Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Many neologies receive a large amount of metalinguistic focus during their conventionalization. This includes explicit metalinguistic comments, as well as several ways of emphasizing a new word qua word in running texts, so-called (e.g., quotation marks). This article reports from a large quantitative study of 360 Swedish neologies. It investigates the nature and the amount of metafocus during conventionalization. More than 96% of the neologies received metafocus at least once, but the mean proportion of metafocused citations was low, just under 3.5%. Metafocusing is likely to be more intense in early phases and is likely to decline over time. No long-term effects of metafocusing on the conventionalization process itself were found in corpus data.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baayen, R. Harald
    2009 Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 900–919. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer, Laurie
    1983English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165846
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165846 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2001Morphological productivity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
  4. Benczes, Réka
    2006Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations (Human Cognitive Processing 19). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.19
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.19 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2010 Setting limits on creativity in the production and use of metaphorical and metonymical compounds. In Sascha Michel & Alexander Onysko (eds.), Cognitive approaches to word formation, 221–245. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110223606.217
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223606.217 [Google Scholar]
  6. Berry, Roger
    2005 Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness14(1). 3–20. 10.1080/09658410508668817
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668817 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bower, Jack & Satomi Kawaguchi
    2011 Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem. Language Learning & Technology15(1). 41–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bybee, Joan
    1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Typological Studies in Language 9). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fischer, Roswitha
    1998Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kerremans, Daphné
    2015A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04788‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04788-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Metcalf, Allan
    2002Predicting new words. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Morzycki, Marcin
    2011 Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. Natural Language Semantics19. 39–86. 10.1007/s11050‑010‑9063‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-010-9063-5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Predelli, Stefano
    2003 Scare quotes and their relation to other semantic issues. Linguistics and Philosophy26. 1–28. 10.1023/A:1022278209949
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022278209949 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2008 New words in the mind: Concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms. Anglia126 (1). 1–36. 10.1515/angl.2008.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2008.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2016English morphology and word-formation: An introduction. 3rd edn.Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Semino, Elena
    2016 A corpus-based study of ‘mixed metaphor’ as a metalinguistic comment. In Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. (ed.), Mixing metaphor (Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 6), 203–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Svanlund, Jan
    2006 Hur man etablerar sig som curlingförälder och stafettläkare. Svenskans beskrivning28. Örebro universitet. 359–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2009Lexikal etablering: En korpusundersökning av hur nya sammansättningar konventionaliseras och får sin betydelse (Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology, n.s., 52). Vällingby: Elanders.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conventionalization; corpus data; metafocus; metalinguistic comments; metasignals; neologies
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error