1887
Volume 25, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Children and adults with autism do worse on tests of inferences than controls. This fact has been attributed to poor language skills, a tendency to focus on detail, and poor social understanding. This study examines whether children with autism with age-appropriate language and cognitive skills have difficulties drawing inferences from academic, expository texts. Sixteen children with autism and a control group of twenty-four children were matched on language skills, nonverbal cognitive ability, and auditory and nonverbal working memory and compared on their responses to questions that require inferences. The children with autism scored significantly lower on inference questions than the controls. Although language skills explain much of the variance in inference scores, diagnostic background also made a contribution. The results are discussed in the light of theories of suppression of irrelevant information and recognition of text writers’ communicative intention.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.18011.eng
2019-11-25
2024-10-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association APA
    American Psychiatric Association APA 2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn.DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
    https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 [Google Scholar]
  2. Åsberg, Jakob
    2010 Patterns of language and discourse comprehension skills in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology51(6). 534–539. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9450.2010.00822.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00822.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Åsberg, Jakob, Svenny Kopp, Kristina Berg-Kelly & Christopher Gillberg
    2010 Reading comprehension, word decoding and spelling in girls with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD): Performance and predictors. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders45(1). 61–71. doi:  10.3109/13682820902745438
    https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820902745438 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron-Cohen, Simon
    1989 The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry30(2). 285–297. 10.1111/j.1469‑7610.1989.tb00241.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00241.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Bishop, Dorothy
    2010Test for Reception of Grammar, 2nd edn.Danish version developed byKirstine Jensen de Lopez, Ane Knüppel & Lone Sundahl Olsen. Bromma, Sweden: Pearson Assessment.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2012CCC-2: Children’s Communication Checklist, 2nd edn.Bromma, Sweden: Pearson Assessment.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brock, Jon, Courtenay Norbury, Shiri Einav & Kate Nation
    2008 Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-movements. Cognition108. 896–904. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Heather M., Janis Oram-Cardy & Andrew Johnson
    2013 A meta-analysis of the reading comprehension skills of individuals with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders43(4). 932–955. doi:  10.1007/s10803‑012‑1638‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1638-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cain, Kate & Jane Oakhill
    1999 Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal11. 489–503. 10.1023/A:1008084120205
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cain, Kate, Jane Oakhill & Peter E. Bryant
    2004 Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology96(1). 31–42. doi:  10.1037/0022‑0663.96.1.31
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chevallier, Coralie, Deidre Wilson, Francesca Happé & Ira Noveck
    2010 Scalar inferences in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders40(9). 1104–1117. doi:  10.1007/s10803‑010‑0960‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0960-8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Christensen, Rikke V., Stine T. Jensen & Iben I. Nielsen
    2012Sætningsgentagelsestesten [‘The sentence repetition test’]. Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Crumpler, Mary & Colin McCarty
    2004Diagnostic Reading Analysis: Reading booklet. London, UK: Hodder Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Daugaard, Hanne Trebbien
    2015 Hvordan hænger det sammen? Om specifikke vanskeligheder med sprogforståelse i læsning og inferensfærdigheders betydning for læseforståelse [’How does it hang together? On specific difficulties with language comprehension in reading and the role of inference skills for reading comprehension’]. Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen PhD thesis.
  15. Daugaard, Hanne Trebbien & Carsten Elbro
    2013Inferensundervisning med grafiske modeller: En effektundersøgelse i specialundervisningen og på skolens 7. klassetrin [‘Inference teaching with graphic models: An effect study in special education and in grade 7’]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Center for Læseforskning og Undervisningsministeriet (Ministeriet for Børn og Undervisning).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dik, Simon C.
    1997The theory of Funtional Grammar – Part I: The structure of the clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dunn, Loyd M. & Douglas M. Dunn
    1981Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. Danish version: Bremer Nielsen, J. 2008 Det mentale leksikon og testning af receptivt ordforråd: Ændring af Peabody-testen [‘The mental lexicon and testing of receptive vocabulary: Changes to the Peabody test’]. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Eberhardt, Melanie & Aparna Nadig
    2016 Reduced sensitivity to context in language comprehension: A characteristic of Autism Spectrum Disorders or of poor structural language ability?Research in Developmental Disabilities72. 284–296. doi:  10.1016/j.ridd.2016.01.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.01.017 [Google Scholar]
  19. Frith, Uta & Maggie Snowling
    1983 Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology1(4). 329–342. doi:  10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1983.tb00903.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1983.tb00903.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Gellert, Anna & Rikke Vang Christensen
    2012Produktivt ordforråd [‘Productive vocabulary’]. Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & Mark E. Faust
    1991 The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17(2). 245–262. doi:  10.1037/0278‑7393.17.2.245
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.245 [Google Scholar]
  22. Happé, Francesca
    1993 Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition48. 101–119. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0277(93)90026‑R
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-R [Google Scholar]
  23. 1999 Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style?Trends in Cognitive Science3(6). 216–222. PII: S1364-6613(99)01318-2. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(99)01318‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01318-2 [Google Scholar]
  24. Happé, Francesca & Uta Frith
    2006 The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders36(1). 5–25. doi:  10.1007/s10803‑005‑0039‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hogrefe, G.-Juergen, Heinz Wimmer & Josef Perner
    1986 Ignorance versus false belief: A developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development57(3). 567–582. doi: 10.1111/1467‑8624.ep7248787
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.ep7248787 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jolliffe, Therese & Simon Baron-Cohen
    1999 A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired?Cognition71. 149–185. doi:  10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00022‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00022-0 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2000 Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger’s syndrome: Is global coherence impaired?Psychological Medicine30(5). 1169–1187. 10.1017/S003329179900241X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329179900241X [Google Scholar]
  28. Kintsch, Walter & Katherine A. Rawson
    2005 Chapter 12: Comprehension. InMargaret J. Snowling & Charles Humle (eds.), The science of reading: A handbook, 209–226. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi:  10.1002/9780470757642
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lucas, Rebecca & Courtenay Frazier Norbury
    2014 Levels of text comprehension in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): The influence of language phenotype. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders44(11). 2756–2768. doi:  10.1007/s10803‑014‑2133‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2133-7 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2015 Making inferences from text: It’s vocabulary that matters. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research58(4). 1224–1232. doi:  10.1044/2015_JSLHR‑L‑14‑0330
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0330 [Google Scholar]
  31. Minshew, Nancy J., John Sweeney & Beatriz Luna
    2002 Autism as a selective disorder of complex information processing and underdevelopment of neocortical systems. Molecular Psychiatry7. S14–S15. doi:  10.1038/sj.mp.4001166
    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001166 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nielsen, Ina & Dorthe Klint Petersen
    1993Diavok: En diagnostisk læse- og stavetest [‘Diavok: A diagnostic reading and spelling test’]. Copenhagen, Denmark: AOF’s Landsforbund.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Norbury, Courtenay Frazier
    2005 Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology90(2). 142–171. doi:  10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  34. Norbury, Courtenay Frazier & Dorothy V. M. Bishop
    2002 Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: A comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high-functioning autism. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders37(3). 227–251. doi:  10.1080/13682820210136269
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820210136269 [Google Scholar]
  35. Norbury, Courtenay & Kate Nation
    2011 Understanding variability in reading comprehension in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Interactions with language status and decoding skill. Scientific Studies of Reading13(3). 191–210. 10.1080/10888431003623553
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888431003623553 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ochs, Elinor, Tamar Kremer-Sadlik, Karen Gainer Sirota & Olga Solomon
    2004 Autism and the social world: An anthropological perspective. Discourse Studies6(2). 147–183. 10.1177/1461445604041766
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041766 [Google Scholar]
  37. O’Connor, Irene M. & Perry D. Klein
    2004 Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders34(2). 115–127. 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022603.44077.6b
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022603.44077.6b [Google Scholar]
  38. Perfetti, Charles A. & Lesley Hart
    2001 The lexical basis of comprehension skill. InDavid S. Gorfien (ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity, 67–86. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10459‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10459-004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pijnacker, Judith, Peter Hagoort, Jan Buitelaar, Jan-Pieter Teunisse & Bart Geurts
    2009 Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and Asperger syndrom. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders39(4). 607–618. doi:  10.1007/s10803‑008‑0661‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0661-8 [Google Scholar]
  40. Randi, Judy, Tina Newman & Elena L. Grigorenko
    2010 Teaching children with autism to read for meaning: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders40(7). 890–902. doi:  10.1007/s10803‑010‑0938‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0938-6 [Google Scholar]
  41. Roux, Catherine, Eric Dion, Anne Barrette, Véronique Dupéré & Douglas Fuchs
    2015 Efficacy of an intervention to enhance reading comprehension of students with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education36(3). 131–142. doi:  10.1177/0741932514533998
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514533998 [Google Scholar]
  42. Saldaña, David & Uta Frith
    2007 Do readers with autism make bridging inferences from world knowledge?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology96(4). 310–319. doi:  10.1016/j.jecp.2006.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  43. Semel, Eleanor, Elisabeth H. Wiig & Wayne A. Secord
    2003CELF-4: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 4th edn.Bromma, Sweden: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Shah, Amitta & Uta Frith
    1983 An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry24(4). 613–619. doi: 10.1111/1469‑7610.ep11422546
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.ep11422546 [Google Scholar]
  45. Villiers, Jessica de, Brooke Myers & Robert J. Stainton
    2013 Revisiting pragmatic abilities in autism spectrum disorders: A follow-up study with controls. Pragmatics & Cognition21(2). 253–269. doi:  10.1075/pc.21.2.01vil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21.2.01vil [Google Scholar]
  46. Wahlberg, Timothy & Joseph P. Magliano
    2004 The ability of high function individuals with autism to comprehend written discourse. Discourse Processes38(1). 119–144. doi:  10.1207/s15326950dp3801_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3801_5 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wechsler, David & Jack A. Naglieri
    2009Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability. Danish version. Bromma, Sweden: Pearson Assessment.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. White, Sarah J. & David Saldaña
    2011 Performance of children with autism on the Embedded Figures Test: A closer look at a popular task. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders41(11). 1565–1572. doi:  10.1007/s10803‑011‑1182‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1182-4 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wimmer, Heinz & Josef Perner
    1983 Beliefs about beliefs: Representations and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition13(1). 103–128. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0277(83)90004‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 [Google Scholar]
  50. Witkin, Herman A., C. A. Moore, Donald R. Goodenough & Patricia W. Cox
    1977 Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research47(1). 1–64. doi:  10.2307/1169967
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1169967 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.18011.eng
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.18011.eng
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error