Deliberately misleading or unintentionally ambiguous?

References

1. Benczes, Réka
   2006 Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.19
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.19 [Google Scholar]
2. Benyon, David
   2012 Presence in blended spaces. Interacting with Computers24(4). 219–226. 10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.005 [Google Scholar]
3. Bibó, István
   2015 The art of peacemaking: Political essays by István Bibó. Yale: Yale University Press. 10.12987/yale/9780300203783.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300203783.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Blank, Andreas
   1999 Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. InAndreas Blank & Peter Koch (eds.), Historical semantics and cognition, 60–91. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110804195.61
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804195.61 [Google Scholar]
5. Brandt, Line & Per Aage Brandt
   2005 Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics3. 216–249. 10.1075/arcl.3.12bra
   https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.12bra [Google Scholar]
6. British National Corpus (BYU-BNC)
   British National Corpus (BYU-BNC)accessed onhttps://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/
7. Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)
   Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)accessed onhttps://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
8. Cymet, David
   2010 History vs. apologetics. The Holocaust, the Third Reich, and the Catholic Church. New York: Lexington Books.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fauconnier, Gilles
   1985 Mental Spaces. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
    1998 Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science22(2). 133–187. 10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1 [Google Scholar]
11. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
    2002 The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
    2003 Conceptual blending, form, and meaning. Recherches en Communication19 (Special issueSémiotique cognitive – Cognitive Semiotics, Ed.Pierre Fastrez). 57–86.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grice, Paul H.
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol.3, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hellinger, Bert
    2001 Love’s own truths: Bonding and balancing in close relationships. Phoenix: Zeig, Tucker & Theisen, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kemmer, Suzanne
    2003 Schemas and lexical blends. InHerbert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, René Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 69–95. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.243.08kem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.243.08kem [Google Scholar]
16. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lakoff, George
    1991 Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research23(2). 25–32.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Langacker, Ronald
    2008 Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. McCarthy Wallburg, Lore
    2009 In search of new horizons: A young girl’s journey from Nazi Germany to America. Philadelphia: Xlibris Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Melnyk, Andrew
    2008 My grandfather’s mill: Journey to freedom. Philadelphia: Xlibris Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mierzwińska-Hajnos, Agnieszka
    2017 Lexical vs. conceptual blends: How to reconcile the two?Acta Neophilologica19(1). 55–68.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Musolff, Andreas
    2007 What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of antisemitic imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Patterns of Prejudice41(1). 21–43. 10.1080/00313220601118744
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220601118744 [Google Scholar]
23. Musolff, Andreas
    2014 Metaphorical parasites and “parasitic” metaphors: Semantic exchanges between political and scientific vocabularies. Journal of Language and Politics13(2). 218–233. 10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus [Google Scholar]
24. Musolff, Andreas
    2015 Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict3(1). 41–56. 10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus [Google Scholar]
25. Musolff, Andreas
    2016 Instrumentalization of Holocaust memory and false historical analogies. InDavid M. Seymour & Mercedes Camino (eds.), The Holocaust in the twenty-first century: Contesting/contested memories, 57–69. New York: Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Norén, Kerstin & Per Linell
    2007 Meaning potentials and the interaction between lexis and contexts: An empirical substantiation. Pragmatics17(3). 387–416. 10.1075/prag.17.3.03nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.3.03nor [Google Scholar]
27. Nowak-Far, Artur
    2015 Defective codes of memory about genocide crimes: Fundamental problems of axiological and legal assessment. InArtur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.)., Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 83–104. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rakiewicz, Filip
    2015 References to the so-called “Polish concentration camps” as an infringement of personal interests: A civil-law perspective. InArtur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.), Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 105–140. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Renfrew, Colin, Iain Morley & Michael Boyd
    2018 Ritual, play and belief, in evolution and early human societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rosiak-Zięba, Ewa
    2015 On the so-called “Polish concentration camps”: A logical pragmatic perspective”. InArtur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.), Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 177–190. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Statiev, Alexander
    2010 The Soviet counterinsurgency in the Western borderlands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511730399
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730399 [Google Scholar]
32. Steen, Gerard
    2011 From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de21. 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Steen, Gerard
    2014 Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Cognitive Semiotics5(1/2). 179–197.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Steen, Gerard
    2015 Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics90. 67–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar]
35. Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier
    1995 Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity10(3). 183–203. 10.1207/s15327868ms1003_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1003_3 [Google Scholar]
36. ukWac corpus
    ukWac corpusaccessed oncorpus.leeds.ac.uk/protected/query.html
37. Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid
    2006 An introduction to cognitive linguistics, 2nd edn.London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]