1887
Volume 24, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the use of deliberately misleading or unintentionally misinformative phrases related to the so called “Polish concentration camp” issue. This problem has been gaining increasing attention in the Polish media and political sphere. In the article I present the background of the problem including the current legal situation, as well as a linguistic analysis of a selection of problematic collocations. I attempt to maintain an objective stance and refrain from passing any emotional judgement on the issue, providing, at the same time, an in-depth analysis of the linguistic data. I frame the present paper within the cognitive linguistics methodology. I combine Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner’s (2002) with Kerstin Norén and Per Linell’s (2007) concept of in order to account for the emergent and modifiable nature of meanings of complex expressions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.18014.pra
2019-02-28
2019-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benczes, Réka
    2006Creative compounding in English: The semantics of metaphorical and metonymical noun-noun combinations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.19
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.19 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benyon, David
    2012 Presence in blended spaces. Interacting with Computers24(4). 219–226. 10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bibó, István
    2015The art of peacemaking: Political essays by István Bibó. Yale: Yale University Press. 10.12987/yale/9780300203783.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300203783.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blank, Andreas
    1999 Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. InAndreas Blank & Peter Koch (eds.), Historical semantics and cognition, 60–91. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110804195.61
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804195.61 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandt, Line & Per Aage Brandt
    2005 Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics3. 216–249. 10.1075/arcl.3.12bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.12bra [Google Scholar]
  6. British National Corpus (BYU-BNC)
    British National Corpus (BYU-BNC)accessed onhttps://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/
  7. Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)
    Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)accessed onhttps://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
  8. Cymet, David
    2010History vs. apologetics. The Holocaust, the Third Reich, and the Catholic Church. New York: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fauconnier, Gilles
    1985Mental Spaces. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
    1998 Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science22(2). 133–187. 10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2002The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2003 Conceptual blending, form, and meaning. Recherches en Communication19 (Special issueSémiotique cognitive – Cognitive Semiotics, Ed.Pierre Fastrez). 57–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Grice, Paul H.
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol.3, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hellinger, Bert
    2001Love’s own truths: Bonding and balancing in close relationships. Phoenix: Zeig, Tucker & Theisen, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kemmer, Suzanne
    2003 Schemas and lexical blends. InHerbert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, René Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 69–95. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.243.08kem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.243.08kem [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, George
    1991 Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research23(2). 25–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Langacker, Ronald
    2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. McCarthy Wallburg, Lore
    2009In search of new horizons: A young girl’s journey from Nazi Germany to America. Philadelphia: Xlibris Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Melnyk, Andrew
    2008My grandfather’s mill: Journey to freedom. Philadelphia: Xlibris Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mierzwińska-Hajnos, Agnieszka
    2017 Lexical vs. conceptual blends: How to reconcile the two?Acta Neophilologica19(1). 55–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Musolff, Andreas
    2007 What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of antisemitic imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Patterns of Prejudice41(1). 21–43. 10.1080/00313220601118744
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220601118744 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2014 Metaphorical parasites and “parasitic” metaphors: Semantic exchanges between political and scientific vocabularies. Journal of Language and Politics13(2). 218–233. 10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.2.02mus [Google Scholar]
  24. 2015 Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict3(1). 41–56. 10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus [Google Scholar]
  25. 2016 Instrumentalization of Holocaust memory and false historical analogies. InDavid M. Seymour & Mercedes Camino (eds.), The Holocaust in the twenty-first century: Contesting/contested memories, 57–69. New York: Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Norén, Kerstin & Per Linell
    2007 Meaning potentials and the interaction between lexis and contexts: An empirical substantiation. Pragmatics17(3). 387–416. 10.1075/prag.17.3.03nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.3.03nor [Google Scholar]
  27. Nowak-Far, Artur
    2015 Defective codes of memory about genocide crimes: Fundamental problems of axiological and legal assessment. InArtur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.)., Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 83–104. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rakiewicz, Filip
    2015 References to the so-called “Polish concentration camps” as an infringement of personal interests: A civil-law perspective. InArtur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.), Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 105–140. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Renfrew, Colin, Iain Morley & Michael Boyd
    2018Ritual, play and belief, in evolution and early human societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rosiak-Zięba, Ewa
    2015 On the so-called “Polish concentration camps”: A logical pragmatic perspective”. InArtur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.), Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 177–190. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Statiev, Alexander
    2010The Soviet counterinsurgency in the Western borderlands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511730399
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730399 [Google Scholar]
  32. Steen, Gerard
    2011 From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de21. 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2014 Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Cognitive Semiotics5(1/2). 179–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2015 Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics90. 67–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  35. Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier
    1995 Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity10(3). 183–203. 10.1207/s15327868ms1003_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1003_3 [Google Scholar]
  36. ukWac corpus
  37. Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid
    2006An introduction to cognitive linguistics, 2nd edn.London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.18014.pra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.18014.pra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error