How linguistic meaning harmonizes with information through meaning conservation

References

1. Barwise, Jon & Jerry Seligman
   1997 Information flow: The logic of distributed systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511895968
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895968 [Google Scholar]
2. Benthem, Johan van & Maricarmen Martinez
   2008 The stories of logic and information. InPieter Adriaans & Johan van Benthem (eds.), Philosophy of information, vol.8, 217–280. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑444‑51726‑5.50012‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51726-5.50012-1 [Google Scholar]
3. Bloomfield, Leonard
   1933 Language. New York: Henry Holt.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boland, Richard J. Jr. & Kalle Lyytinen
   2017 The limits to language in doing system design. European Journal of Information Systems26(3). 248–259. 10.1057/s41303‑017‑0043‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0043-4 [Google Scholar]
5. Bowerman, Melissa
   1988 The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar?InJohn Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 73–101. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bremer, Manuel E.
   2003 Do logical truths carry information?Minds and Machines13(4). 567–575. 10.1023/A:1026256918837
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026256918837 [Google Scholar]
7. Bresnan, Joan
   2001 Lexical functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carnap, Rudolf & Yehoshua Bar-Hillel
   1952 An outline of a theory of semantic information. Technical Report 247. Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Clark, Stephen
   2015 Vector space models of lexical meaning. InShalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds.), Handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 493–522. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118882139.ch16
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118882139.ch16 [Google Scholar]
10. Dascal, Marcelo
    2003 Interpretation and understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.120
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.120 [Google Scholar]
11. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
    2007 Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fillmore, Charles
    1976 Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech280(1). 20–32. 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1976.tb25467.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x [Google Scholar]
13. Francez, Nissim & Shuly Wintner
    2011 Unification grammars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013574
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013574 [Google Scholar]
14. Goldberg, Adele
    2006 Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Goldberg, Adele
    2019 Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gregory, Howard
    2015 Language and logics: An introduction to the logical foundations of language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hampton, James A.
    2017 Compositionality and concepts. InJames A. Hampton & Yoad Winter (eds.), Language, cognition, and mind: Vol. 3. Compositionality and concepts in linguistics and psychology, 95–122. New York: Springer Nature.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Harris, Zellig
    1991 A theory of language and information: A mathematical approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hintikka, Jaakko
    1973 Logic, language-games and information. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jackendoff, Ray
    2002 Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Kamp, Hans & Martin Stokhof
    2008 Information in natural language. InPieter Adriaans & Johan van Benthem (eds.), Philosophy of information, vol.8, 49–111. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑444‑51726‑5.50008‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51726-5.50008-X [Google Scholar]
22. Lambrecht, Knud
    1996 Information structure and sentence form: A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lyytinen, Kalle
    1985 Implications of theories of language for information systems. MIS Quarterly9(1). 61–74. 10.2307/249274
    https://doi.org/10.2307/249274 [Google Scholar]
24. Menzel, Christopher
    1999 The objective conception of contexts and its logic. Minds and Machines9(1). 29–56. 10.1023/A:1008390129138
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008390129138 [Google Scholar]
25. Mondal, Prakash
    2012 Can internalism and externalism be reconciled in a biological epistemology of language?Biosemiotics5(1). 61–82. 10.1007/s12304‑011‑9120‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9120-6 [Google Scholar]
26. Mondal, Prakash
    2018 Lexicon, meaning relations and semantic networks. The 2nd Workshop on Natural Language for Artificial Intelligence (NL4AI 2018) 2. 40–52.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Newport, Elissa L., Daphne Bavelier & Helen J. Neville
    2002 Critical thinking about critical periods: Perspectives on a critical period for language acquisition. InEmmanuel Dupoux (ed.), Language, brain and cognitive development, 481–502. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pelletier, Francis J.
    2017 Compositionality and concepts – A perspective from formal semantics and philosophy of language. InJames A. Hampton & Yoad Winter (eds.), Language, cognition, and mind, vol. 3: Compositionality and concepts in linguistics and psychology, 31–94. New York: Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑45977‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45977-6_3 [Google Scholar]
29. Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan
    1994 Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    2013 The central question in comparative syntactic metatheory. Mind and Language28(4). 492–521. 10.1111/mila.12029
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12029 [Google Scholar]
31. Pustejovsky, James
    1995 The generative lexicon. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pustejovsky, James
    2012 Type theory and lexical decomposition. InJames Pustejovsky, Pierrette Bouillon, Hitoshi Isahara, Kyoko Kanzaki & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory, 9–38. Heidelberg: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Seuren, Pieter A. M.
    2013 From Whorf to Montague: Explorations in the theory of language. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682195.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682195.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
34. Shannon, Claude E. & Warren Weaver
    1949 The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Shieber, Stuart M.
    1992 Constraint-based grammar formalisms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tesnière, Lucien
    1959 Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Turney, Peter D. & Patrick Pantel
    2010 From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research37. 141–188. 10.1613/jair.2934
    https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2934 [Google Scholar]