Argumentation as a dimension of discourse

References

1. Amossy, Ruth
   2005 The argumentative dimension of discourse. InFrans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (eds.), Practices of argumentation, 87–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cvs.2.08amo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.2.08amo [Google Scholar]
2. Amossy, Ruth
   2009 Argumentation in discourse: A socio-discursive approach to arguments. Informal Logic29(3). 252–267. 10.22329/il.v29i3.2843
   https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i3.2843 [Google Scholar]
3. Antelmi, Donatella & Francesca Santulli
   2012 Arbitration awards in Italy: Some argumentative features in the discourse analytical perspective. InVijay Bhatia, Giulia Garzone & Chiara Degano (eds.), Arbitration awards: Generic features and textual realisations, 91–108. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beaugrande, Robert de & Wolfgang U. Dressler
   1981 Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. 10.4324/9781315835839
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839 [Google Scholar]
5. Bhatia, Vijay
   1987 Textual-mapping in British legislative writing. World Englishes. 6(1). 1–10. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1987.tb00172.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1987.tb00172.x [Google Scholar]
6. Bhatia, Vijay
   1993 Analysing genre-language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bhatia, Vijay
   2004 Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bhatia, Vijay, Giulia Garzone & Chiara Degano
   (eds.) 2012 Arbitration awards: Generic features and textual realisations. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Biber, Douglas
   1989 A typology of English texts. Linguistics. 27(1). 3–43. 10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3 [Google Scholar]
10. Eemeren, Frans H. van & Robert Grootendorst
    1984 Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110846089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
11. Eemeren, Frans H. van & Robert Grootendorst
    2004 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Eric C. W. Krabbe, Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. Wagemans
    2014 Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [Google Scholar]
13. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Robert Grootendorst & Tjark Kruiger
    1984 The study of argumentation. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Freeman, James B.
    2001 Argument structure and disciplinary perspective. Argumentation. 15(14). 397–423. 10.1023/A:1012022330148
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012022330148 [Google Scholar]
15. Freeman, James B.
    2011 Argument structure: Representation and theory. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑0357‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0357-5 [Google Scholar]
16. Greimas, Algirdas & Joseph Courtés
    1979 Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la theorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Grice, Paul H.
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter J. Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol.3, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted inP. Grice 1989 Studies in the ways of words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Grice, Paul H.
    1991 The conception of value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hatim, Basil & Ian Mason
    1990 Discourse and the translator. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hitchcock, David
    2017 On reasoning and argument: Essays in informal logic and critical thinking. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑53562‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3 [Google Scholar]
21. Johnson, Ralph H.
    2000 Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
23. Mercier, Hugo & Dan Sperber
    2011 Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 34(22). 57–74. 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968 [Google Scholar]
24. Miller, Carolyn
    1984 Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 70(2). 151–167. 10.1080/00335638409383686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686 [Google Scholar]
25. Santulli, Francesca
    2008 La sentenza come genere testuale: Narrazione, argomentazione, performatività. InGiuliana Garzone & Francesca Santulli (eds.), Il linguaggio giuridico: prospettive interdisciplinari, 207–238. Milano: Giuffrè.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sbisà, Marina
    1989 Linguaggio, ragione, interazione: Per una pragmatica degli atti linguistici. Bologna: Il Mulino; second digital edition by Edizioni Università di Trieste 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sbisà, Marina
    2002 Cognition and narrativity in speech act sequences. InAnita Fetzer & Christiane Meierkord (eds.), Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.103.04sbi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.103.04sbi [Google Scholar]
28. Sbisà, Marina
    2006 Two conceptions of rationality in Grice’s theory of implicature. InElvio Baccarini & Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (eds.), Rationality of belief and action, 233–247. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sbisà, Marina
    2007a On argumentative rationality. Anthropology & Philosophy. 8(1/2). 89–99.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sbisà, Marina
    2007b Detto non detto: Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sbisà, Marina
    2018 Philosophical pragmatics. InAndreas H. Jucker, ‎Klaus P. Schneider & ‎Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Methods in pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics 10), 133–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110424928‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-005 [Google Scholar]
32. Toulmin, Stephen
    2003 The uses of argument. Updated edition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First edition 1958 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005 [Google Scholar]
33. Trosborg, Anna
    (ed.) 1997 Text typology: Register, genre and text type. InAnna Trosborg (ed.), Text Typology and Translation, 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.26.03tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.26.03tro [Google Scholar]
34. Walton, Douglas
    1998 The New Dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781442681859
    https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442681859 [Google Scholar]
35. Werlich, Egon
    1983 A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
    [Google Scholar]