1887
Volume 26, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The current paper aims to explore the meaning of one of the most elusive discourse markers in Modern Greek rhetorical discourse: . To address the challenge of a thorough and parsimonious account, the relevance-theoretic model of meaning analysis is deployed. The analysis undertaken ultimately reveals that the marker at hand encodes procedural meaning in standard relevance-theoretic terms. However, unlike traditional relevance-theoretic approaches linking a marker to a single procedural function, the current one proposes that encodes a poly-procedural constraint on the implicated content of the utterance containing the marker. Moreover, it is argued that this poly-procedural constraint is rhetorically exploited by the speaker in the interest of convincing argumentation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.19021.bar
2021-02-12
2021-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Babiniotis, Georgios
    1998Λεξικό της Νέας Ελληνικής Γλώσσας [Dictionary of Modern Greek]. Athens: Center of Lexicology.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach, Kent
    1999 The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy22(4). 262–283. 10.1023/A:1005466020243
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005466020243 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardzokas, Valandis
    2012Causality and connectives: From Grice to relevance. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.216
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.216 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2013 The semantics and pragmatics of causal connectives: Conceptual and procedural aspects of Modern Greek γiati and epeiδi. InIstvan Kecskes & Jesús Romero-Trillo (eds.), Research Trends of Intercultural Pragmatics, 29–54. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614513735.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513735.29 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2014 Linguistic constraints on causal content: The case of Modern Greek markers. Journal of Pragmatics60. 160–174. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2015 Correction-but: A relevance-theoretic reappraisal. Language & Communication45. 27–45. 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017 Conceptual and procedural aspects of causal meaning: Corpus-analytic evidence from modern Greek. Corpus Pragmatics1(3). 257–279. 10.1007/s41701‑017‑0011‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0011-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2019 Distinctions in procedural meaning: Evidence from Modern Greek contrast. International Review of Pragmatics11(1). 79–108. 10.1163/18773109‑201810014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-201810014 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blakemore, Diane
    1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2002Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486456
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486456 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2010 Communication and the representation of thought: The use of audience-directed expressions in free indirect thought representations. Journal of Linguistics46(3). 575–599. 10.1017/S0022226709990375
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990375 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carston, Robyn
    2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470754603
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2004 Explicature and semantics. InSteven Davis & Brendan S. Gillon (eds.), Semantics: A Reader, 1–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016 The heterogeneity of procedural meaning. Lingua175–176. 154–166. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.010 [Google Scholar]
  15. Comrie, Bernard
    1986 Conditionals: A typology. InElisabeth Closs Traugott, Alice Ter Meulen, Judy Smitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), On conditionals, 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dancygier, Barbara
    1998Conditionals and Prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fraser, Bruce
    2006 On the conceptual-procedural distinction. Style40(1–2). 24–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Goutsos, Dionysis
    2010 The Corpus of Greek Texts: A Reference Corpus for Modern Greek. Corpora5 (1): 29–44. 10.3366/cor.2010.0002
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grice, Paul
    1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall, Alison
    2007 Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures?Lingua117(1). 149–174. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoidas, Spyros
    1997From time to cause: The case of since/afu. Athens 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ifantidou, Elly
    2001Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.86
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.86 [Google Scholar]
  23. Iten, Corinne
    2005Linguistic meaning, truth conditions and relevance: The case of concessives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230503236
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503236 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kalokerinos, Alexis
    2001Αφού [αfu]. InYioryia Angouraki, Amalia Arvaniti, Dionysis Goutsos (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2004 The justifying connection, mostly in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics5(1). 27–80. 10.1075/jgl.5.04kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.5.04kal [Google Scholar]
  26. Kitis, Eliza
    1982 Problems connected to the notion of implicature. PhD Thesis, University of Warrick.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2001 The case of some temporal subordinative connectives: Existential and universal quantifiers. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Greek Linguistics, 268–276. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2002 Connectives and subjectivity: Comparison of connectives an [if] and ama [if/when]. Studies in Greek Linguistics22, 365–376. Institute of Modern Greek Studies: Manolis Triantaphyllidis.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2004 Conditional constructions as rhetorical structures. Working Papers in Linguistics 2004, 30–51. Altintzis, Thessaloniki.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2006 Causality and subjectivity: The causal connectives of Modern Greek. InHanna Pishwa (ed.), Language and Memory: Aspects of Knowledge Representation (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 173), 223–267. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895087.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895087.223 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012Semantics: Meaning in Language. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kriaras, Emmanuel
    1995Νέο Ελληνικό Λεξικό της Σύγχρονης Ελληνικής Δημοτικής Γλώσσας [Modern Greek Dictionary]. Athens: Athens Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lakoff, Robyn
    1971 If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunction. InCharles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 115–150. New York: Holt, Rinchart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stavropoulos, Dimitrios
    1988Oxford Greek English Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sweetser, Eve
    1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  37. Tzartzanos, Achilleas
    1996Syntax of Modern Greek [Νεοελληνική Σύνταξις], vol2. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis Bros.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilson, Deirdre
    2011 The conceptual-procedural distinction: Past, present and future. InVictoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface), 3–31. Wagon Lane Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. 10.1108/S1472‑7870(2011)0000025005
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S1472-7870(2011)0000025005 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2016 Reassessing the conceptual-procedural distinction. Lingua175–176. 5–19. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    1993 Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua90(1). 1–25. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2012Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.19021.bar
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error