Volume 26, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Within cognitive and developmental psychology, it is commonly argued that perception is the basis for object concepts. According to this view, sensory experiences would translate into concepts thanks to the recognition, correlation and integration of physical attributes. Once attributes are integrated into general patterns, subjects would become able to parse objects into categories. In this article, we critically review the three epistemological perspectives according to which it can be claimed that object concepts depend on perception: , and . We show that the three perspectives have problems that make perception inadequate as a conceptual basis. We suggest that the inquiry about the origin and development of object concepts can benefit from a pragmatic perspective that considers objects’ as a conceptual foundation. We address this possibility from the theoretical framework of the , considering the importance of objects’ .


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alessandroni, Nicolás
    2017 Development of metaphorical thought before language: The pragmatic construction of metaphors in action. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science51(4). 618–642. doi:  10.1007/s12124‑016‑9373‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9373-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2018 Varieties of embodiment in cognitive science. Theory & Psychology28(2). 227–248. doi:  10.1177/0959354317745589
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317745589 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alessandroni, Nicolás & Cintia Rodríguez
    2017 Is CONTAINER a natural and embodied image schema? A developmental, pragmatic, and cultural proposal. Human Development60(4). 144–178. doi:  10.1159/000478841
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000478841 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alessandroni, Nicolás, Ana Moreno-Núñez, Cintia Rodríguez & María Jesús Del Olmo
    2019 Musical dynamics in early triadic interactions: A case study84. 1555–1571. Psychological Research. doi:  10.1007/s00426‑019‑01168‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01168-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvarez, George A. & Steven L. Franconeri
    2007 How many objects can you track?: Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision7(13). 14. doi:  10.1167/7.13.14
    https://doi.org/10.1167/7.13.14 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anglin, Jeremy M.
    1977Word, object and conceptual development. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Archer, James
    1966 The psychological nature of concepts. InHerbert J. Klausmeier & Chester W. Harris (eds.), Analyses of concept learning, 37–49. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑1‑4832‑3127‑3.50008‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3127-3.50008-0 [Google Scholar]
  8. Aristotle. trans
    Aristotle. trans 2016De anima [On the soul]. Transl. byChristopher Shields, edited byLindsay Judson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Arnold, Jeanne E., Anthony P. Graesch, Enzo Ragazzini & Elinor Ochs
    2012Life at home in the twenty-first century. California: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press. 10.2307/j.ctvdjrr2c
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvdjrr2c [Google Scholar]
  10. Austin, John L.
    1962Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Babska, Zofia
    1965 The formation of the conception of identity of visual characteristics of objects seen successively. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development30(2). 112–124. 10.2307/1165780
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1165780 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bambach, Sven, Linda B. Smith, David J. Crandall & Chen Yu
    2016Objects in the center: How the infant’s body constrains infant scenes. 2016 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob), Cergy-Pontoise, 132–137. France: IEEE. doi:  10.1109/DEVLRN.2016.7846804
    https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2016.7846804 [Google Scholar]
  13. Barsalou, Lawrence W., Léo Dutriaux & Christoph Scheepers
    2018 Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences373(1752). Article 20170144. doi:  10.1098/rstb.2017.0144
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144 [Google Scholar]
  14. Barsalou, Lawrence W., Steven Sloman & Sergio Chaigneau
    2005 The HIPE theory of function. InLaura Carlson & Emile van der Zee (eds.), Functional features for language and space: Insights from perception, categorization, and development, 131–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bomba, Paul C. & Einar R. Siqueland
    1983 The nature and structure of infant form categories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology35(2). 294–328. doi:  10.1016/0022‑0965(83)90085‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(83)90085-1 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brewer, Bill
    1999Perception and reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2005 Perceptual experience has conceptual content. InMatthias Steup & Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology, 217–230. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bruner, Jerome S., Jacqueline J. Goodnow & George A. Austin
    1956/2009A study of thinking. New Brunswick: Transaction.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Burns, Barbara
    1986 Perceptual development and categorization: I. An investigation of task demands, stimulus set similarity, and age. The Journal of Genetic Psychology147(3). 359–370. doi:  10.1080/00221325.1986.9914510
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1986.9914510 [Google Scholar]
  20. Byers, Patrick
    2016 Knowledge claims in cognitive development research: Problems and alternatives. New Ideas in Psychology43(1). 16–27. doi:  10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Byrne, Alex
    2005 Perception and conceptual content. InMatthias Steup & Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology, 231–250. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cabell, Kenneth R. & Jaan Valsiner
    (eds.) 2014The catalyzing mind: Beyond models of causality. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑8821‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8821-7 [Google Scholar]
  23. Cahen, Arnon & Michela C. Tacca
    2013 Linking perception and cognition. Frontiers in Psychology4(MAR). 1–2. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00144
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00144 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carey, Susan
    2009The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367638.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367638.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Casasola, Marianella & Yeojin A. Ahn
    2018 What develops in infants’ spatial categorization? Korean infants’ categorization of containment and tight-fit relations. Child Development89(4). e382–e396. doi:  10.1111/cdev.12903
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12903 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chaigneau, Sergio & Lawrence W. Barsalou
    2008 The role of function in categories. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum8(1). 33–49. 10.12775/ths.2008.003
    https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2008.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen, Quanjing, Frank E. Garcea & Bradford Z. Mahon
    2016 The representation of object-directed action and function knowledge in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex26(4). 1609–1618. doi:  10.1093/cercor/bhu328
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu328 [Google Scholar]
  28. Chiou, Rocco, Paul F. Sowman, Andrew C. Etchell & Anina N. Rich
    2013 A conceptual lemon: Theta burst stimulation to the left anterior temporal lobe untangles object representation and its canonical color. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience26(5). 1066–1074. doi:  10.1162/jocn_a_00536
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00536 [Google Scholar]
  29. Chuard, Philippe
    2007 Indiscriminable shades and demonstrative concepts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy85(2). 277–306. doi:  10.1080/00048400701343143
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400701343143 [Google Scholar]
  30. Clark, Eve V.
    1973 What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. InTimothy E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 65–110. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑505850‑6.50009‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50009-8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cohen, Jonathan
    2015 Perceptual constancy. InMohan Matthen (ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception, 621–639. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Cohen, Leslie B. & Mark S. Strauss
    1979 Concept acquisition in the human infant. Child Development50(2). 419–424. doi:  10.2307/1129417
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1129417 [Google Scholar]
  33. Cole, Michael
    1996Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Cosmides, Leda & John Tooby
    2013 Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology64(1). 201–229. doi:  10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131628
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131628 [Google Scholar]
  35. Costall, Alan
    2012 Canonical affordances in context. Avant3(2). 85–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Costall, Alan & Ole Dreier
    (eds.) 2006Doing things with things: The design and use of everyday objects. Hampshire: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. D’Alfonso, Simon
    2018McDowell and misperception. Unpublished manuscript. simondalfonso.id.au/documents/philosophy/McDowell.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Dennett, Daniel C.
    1969Content and consciousness. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Efron, Robert
    1969 What is perception?InRobert S. Cohen & Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966/1968. Volume IV, 137–173. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑010‑3378‑7_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3378-7_4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Eimas, Peter D. & Paul C. Quinn
    1994 Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Development65(3). 903–917. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑8624.1994.tb00792.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00792.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Evans, Gareth
    1982The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Fagan, Joseph F.
    1976 Infants’ recognition of invariant features of faces. Child Development47(3). 627–638. doi:  10.2307/1128177
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128177 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fechner, Gustav T.
    1860 Elemente der Psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
  44. Firestone, Chaz & Brian J. Scholl
    2016 Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences39. e229. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X15000965
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000965 [Google Scholar]
  45. Fleming, Roland W.
    2015 Visual development: Learning not to see. Current Biology25(24). R1166–R1168. doi:  10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.012 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gallagher, Shaun
    2017Enactivist interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198794325.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794325.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Galpérine, Piotr
    1966 Essai sur la formation par étapes des actions et des concepts [Essay on the formation of actions and concepts in stages]. InAlekséi N. Leóntiev, Aleksandr R. Luria & Anatoliĭ A. Smirnov (eds.), Recherches Psychologiques en U.R.S.S., 114–132. Moscou: Editions du Progrès.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gärdenfors, Peter
    2007 Representing actions and functional properties in conceptual spaces. InTom Ziemke, Jordan Zlatev & Roslyn M. Frank (eds.), Body, language and mind. Volume 1: Embodiment, 167–195. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2019 From sensations to concepts: A proposal for two learning processes. Review of Philosophy and Psychology10(1). 441–464. doi:  10.1007/s13164‑017‑0379‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0379-7 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gelaes, Sabine & Jean-Pierre Thibaut
    2004 L’apprentissage de concepts chez l’enfant: Facteurs cognilifs, structure des catégories et théories naïves [Learning concepts in children: Cognitive factors, category structure and naive theories]. L’Année Psychologique104(3). 597–636. doi:  10.3406/psy.2004.29681
    https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2004.29681 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gentner, Dedre
    1978 On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development49(1). 988–998. doi:  10.2307/1128738
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128738 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gibson, James J.
    1979/2015The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press / Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Gleason, Tracy R., Kate E. Fiske & Ruth K. Chan
    2004 The verbal nature of representations of the canonical colors of objects. Cognitive Development19(1). 1–14. doi:  10.1016/S0885‑2014(03)00044‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(03)00044-3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Goldstone, Robert L. & Andrew T. Hendrickson
    2010 Categorical perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science1(1). 69–78. doi:  10.1002/wcs.26
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.26 [Google Scholar]
  55. Gori, Monica
    2015 Multisensory integration and calibration in children and adults with and without sensory and motor disabilities. Multisensory Research28(1–2). 71–99. doi:  10.1163/22134808‑00002478
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002478 [Google Scholar]
  56. Gram, Moltke S.
    1983Direct realism: A study of perception. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑6908‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6908-7 [Google Scholar]
  57. Granrud, Carl E.
    2009 Development of size constancy in children: A test of the metacognitive theory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics71(3). 644–654. doi:  10.3758/APP.71.3.644
    https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.3.644 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gruber, Craig W., Matthew G. Clark, Sven Hroar Klempe & Jaan Valsiner
    (eds.) 2015Constraints of agency: Explorations of theory in everyday life. Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑10130‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10130-9 [Google Scholar]
  59. Heck, Richard. G.
    2000 Nonconceptual content and the ‘space of reasons’. The Philosophical Review109(4). 483–523. doi:  10.2307/2693622
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2693622 [Google Scholar]
  60. Helmholtz, Hermann von
    1867Handbuch der physiologischen Optik [Handbook of physiological optics]. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Hering, Ewald
    1878/1964Outlines of a theory of the light sense. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Horst, Jessica S., Lisa M. Oakes & Kelly L. Madole
    2005 What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize. Child Development76(3). 614–631. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2005.00867.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00867.x [Google Scholar]
  63. Hume, David
    1739A treatise of human nature. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Huttenlocher, Janellen, Sean Duffy & Susan Levine
    2002 Infants and toddlers discriminate amount: Are they measuring?Psychological Science13(3). 244–249. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9280.00445
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00445 [Google Scholar]
  65. Jacobson, Hilla & Hilary Putnam
    2016 Against perceptual conceptualism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies24(1). 1–25. doi:  10.1080/09672559.2015.1047164
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2015.1047164 [Google Scholar]
  66. Jahoda, Gustav & Ioan M. Lewis
    (eds.) 2015Acquiring culture: Cross cultural studies in child development. Hove: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. James, William
    1900Psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Kagan, Jerome
    1966 A developmental approach to conceptual growth. InHerbert J. Klausmeier & Chester W. Harris (eds.), Analyses of concept learning, 37–49. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Keil, Frank C.
    1991 The emergence of theoretical beliefs as constraints on concepts. InSusan Carey & Rochel Gelman (eds.), The epigenesis of mind, 237–256. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Kelly, Sean D.
    2001 Demonstrative concepts and experience. The Philosophical Review110(3). 397–420. doi:  10.2307/2693650
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2693650 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kemler Nelson, Deborah G., Rachel Russell, Nell Duke & Kate Jones
    2000 Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. Child Development71(5). 1271–1288. doi:  10.1111/1467‑8624.00228
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00228 [Google Scholar]
  72. Kimura, Atsushi, Yuji Wada, Jiale Yang, Yumiko Otsuka, Ippeita Dan, Tomohiro Masuda, So Kanazawa & Masami K. Yamaguchi
    2010 Infants’ recognition of objects using canonical color. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology105(3). 256–263. doi:  10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  73. Köhler, Wolfgang
    1947Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Koopman, Sarah E., Bradford Z. Mahon & Jessica F. Cantlon
    2017 Evolutionary constraints on human object perception. Cognitive Science41(8). 2126–2148. doi:  10.1111/cogs.12470
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12470 [Google Scholar]
  75. Krnel, Dušan & Darija Skubic
    2015 Concept formation in childhood: Cross-cultural perspectives. InJames D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 531–537. Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.23065‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23065-1 [Google Scholar]
  76. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
    1999Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Lécuyer, Roger & Katia Rovira
    1999 Organisation perceptive, délai inter essais et catégorisation chez les bébés de quatre mois [Perceptive organization, inter-trial delay and categorization in four-month-old babies]. L’Année Psychologique99(2). 209–237. doi:  10.3406/psy.1999.28530
    https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.1999.28530 [Google Scholar]
  78. Leonard, Annie
    2010The story of stuff. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Leóntiev, Alekséi N. & Aleksandr R. Luria
    1972 Some notes concerning Dr. Fodor’s ‘Reflections on L.S. Vygotsky’s Thought and Language’. Cognition1(2–3). 311–316. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0277(72)90024‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90024-8 [Google Scholar]
  80. Luria, Aleksandr R.
    1974Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Edited byMichael Cole. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. MacVean, Mary
    2014, March21. For many people, gathering possessions is just the stuff of life. Los Angeles Times. articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/21/health/la-he-keeping-stuff-20140322
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Maddy, Penelope
    2017What do philosophers do? Skepticism and the practice of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190618698.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190618698.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  83. Malafouris, Lambros
    2013How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  84. 2014 Creative thinging: The feeling of and for clay. Pragmatics & Cognition22(1). 140–158. doi:  10.1075/pc.22.1.08mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.1.08mal [Google Scholar]
  85. 2019 Thinking as “thinging”: Psychology with things. Current Directions in Psychological Science29(1). 3–8. doi:  10.1177/0963721419873349
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419873349 [Google Scholar]
  86. Maloney, J. Christopher
    2017What is it like to perceive?Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Malt, Barbara C., Silvia P. Genari, Mutsumi Imai, Eef Ameel, Noburo Saji & Asifa Majid
    2015 Where are the concepts? What words can and can’t reveal. InEric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), The conceptual mind, 291–326. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Mandler, Jean M.
    2000 Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 3–36. doi:  10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0101N_2 [Google Scholar]
  89. 2004aThe foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. 2004b Two kinds of knowledge acquisition. InJoan M. Lucariello, Judith A. Hudson, Robyn Fivush & Patricia J. Bauer (eds.), The development of the mediated mind: Sociocultural context and cognitive development, 13–32. London: LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 2008a Infant concepts revisited. Philosophical Psychology21(2). 269–280. doi:  10.1080/09515080801980229
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080801980229 [Google Scholar]
  92. 2008b On the birth and growth of concepts. Philosophical Psychology. 21(2), 207–230. doi:  10.1080/09515080801980179
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080801980179 [Google Scholar]
  93. Mandler, Jean M., Patricia J. Bauer & Laraine McDonough
    1991 Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiating global categories. Cognitive Psychology23(2). 263–298. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0285(91)90011‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90011-C [Google Scholar]
  94. Mandler, Jean M., Robyn Fivush & J. Steven Reznick
    1987 The development of contextual categories. Cognitive Development2(4). 339–354. doi:  10.1016/S0885‑2014(87)80012‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(87)80012-6 [Google Scholar]
  95. Mandler, Jean M. & Laraine McDonough
    1996 Drinking and driving don’t mix: Inductive generalization in infancy. Cognition59(3). 307–335. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0277(95)00696‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00696-6 [Google Scholar]
  96. Mandler, Jean M. & Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas
    2014 On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition6(4). 510–532. doi:  10.1017/langcog.2014.14
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.14 [Google Scholar]
  97. Margolis, Eric & Stephen Laurence
    (eds.) 2015The conceptual mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9383.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9383.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  98. Martí, Eduardo
    2017 Body, culture and cognition: Avoiding reductionist temptations. Estudios de Psicología38(1). 140–168. doi:  10.1080/02109395.2016.1268392
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2016.1268392 [Google Scholar]
  99. McDowell, John
    1994/1996Mind and world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1942/1963The structure of behavior. Transl. byAlden L. Fisher. Boston: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. 1945/2005Phenomenology of perception. Transl. byColin Smith. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Mervis, Carolyn B. & Eleanor Rosch
    1981 Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology32(1). 89–115. doi:  10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513 [Google Scholar]
  103. Miceli, Gabriele, Erin Fouch, Rita Capasso, Jennifer R. Shelton, Francesco Tomaiuolo & Alfonso Caramazza
    2001 The dissociation of color from form and function knowledge. Nature Neuroscience4(6). 662–667. doi:  10.1038/88497
    https://doi.org/10.1038/88497 [Google Scholar]
  104. Moro, Christiane & Cintia Rodríguez
    2000 La création des représentations chez l’enfant au travers des processus de sémiosis [The creation of representations in children through semiosis processes]. Enfance53(1). 287–294. doi:  10.3406/enfan.2000.3185
    https://doi.org/10.3406/enfan.2000.3185 [Google Scholar]
  105. Morvan, Pierre le
    2004 Arguments against direct realism and how to counter them. American Philosophical Quarterly41(3). 221–234.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Murphy, Gregory L.
    2002The big book of concepts. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  107. Nelson, Katherine
    1973 Some evidence for the cognitive primacy of categorization and its functional basis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development19(1). 21–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. 1983 Concepts, words, and experiments: Comment on “When is a cup not a cup?” by Anderson and Prawat. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly29(4). 387–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. 1985Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning. New York: Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. 2011 “Concept” is a useful concept in developmental research. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology31(2). 96–101. doi:  10.1037/a0023429
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023429 [Google Scholar]
  111. Nogueira de Carvalho, Felipe
    2016Demonstrative thought. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Nudds, Matthew
    2009 Recent work in perception: Naïve realism and its opponents. Analysis69(2). 334–346. doi:  10.1093/analys/anp039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp039 [Google Scholar]
  113. Oakes, Lisa M.
    2008 Categorization skills and concepts. InMarshall M. Haith & Janette B. Benson (eds.), Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development, 249–259. Cambridge: Academic Press / Elsevier. doi:  10.1016/B978‑012370877‑9.00043‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370877-9.00043-8 [Google Scholar]
  114. Olkkonen, Maria, Thorsten Hansen & Karl R. Gegenfurtner
    2008 Color appearance of familiar objects: Effects of object shape, texture, and illumination changes. Journal of Vision8(5). Article 13. doi:  10.1167/8.5.13
    https://doi.org/10.1167/8.5.13 [Google Scholar]
  115. Olkkonen, Maria, Christoph Witzel, Thorsten Hansen & Karl R. Gegenfurtner
    2010 Categorical color constancy for real surfaces. Journal of Vision10(9). Article 16. doi:  10.1167/10.9.16
    https://doi.org/10.1167/10.9.16 [Google Scholar]
  116. Palacios, Pedro & Cintia Rodríguez
    2015 The development of symbolic uses of objects in infants in a triadic context: A pragmatic and semiotic perspective. Infant and Child Development24(1). 23–43. doi:  10.1002/icd.1873
    https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1873 [Google Scholar]
  117. Palacios, Pedro, Cintia Rodríguez & Cecilia Méndez-Sánchez
    2018 Communicative mediation by adults in the construction of symbolic uses by infants. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science52(2). 209–227. doi:  10.1007/s12124‑018‑9422‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9422-1 [Google Scholar]
  118. Palmer, Stephen E.
    1977 Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology9(4). 441–474. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0285(77)90016‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90016-0 [Google Scholar]
  119. Pauen, Sabina, Träuble Birgit, Stefanie Hoehl & Sabrina Bechtel
    2015 Show me the world: Object categorization and socially guided object learning in infancy. Child Development Perspectives9(2). 111–116. doi:  10.1111/cdep.12119
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12119 [Google Scholar]
  120. Peacocke, Christopher
    2001a Phenomenology and nonconceptual content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research62(3). 609–615. doi:  10.1111/j.1933‑1592.2001.tb00077.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00077.x [Google Scholar]
  121. 2001b Does perception have a nonconceptual content?The Journal of Philosophy98(5). 239–264. doi:  10.2307/2678383
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2678383 [Google Scholar]
  122. Pérez, Diana I., Silvia Español, Liza Skidelsky & Ricardo A. Minervino
    2010 Introducción [Introduction]. InDiana. I. Pérez, Silvia Español, Liza Skidelsky & Ricardo A. Minervino (eds.), Conceptos. Debates contemporáneos en filosofía y psicología [Concepts. Contemporary debates in philosophy and psychology], 7–25. Buenos Aires: Catálogos.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Piaget, Jean
    1937La construction du réel chez l’enfant [The construction of reality in the child]. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
    [Google Scholar]
  124. 1961Les mecanismes perceptifs [Perceptual mechanisms]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Prinz, Jesse J.
    2002Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3169.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3169.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  126. Quine, Willard van O.
    1977 Natural kinds. InStephen P. Schwartz (ed.), Naming, necessity, and natural kinds, 155–177. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Quinn, Paul C. & Mark H. Johnson
    2000 Global-before-basic object categorization in connectionist networks and 2-month-old infants. Infancy1(1). 31–46. doi:  10.1207/S15327078IN0101_04
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0101_04 [Google Scholar]
  128. Quinn, Paul C., Peter D. Eimas & Stacey L. Rosenkrantz
    1993 Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception22(4). 463–475. doi:  10.1068/p220463
    https://doi.org/10.1068/p220463 [Google Scholar]
  129. Rakison, David H. & George E. Butterworth
    1998 Infants’ attention to object structure in early categorization. Developmental Psychology34(6). 1310–1325. doi:  10.1037/0012‑1649.34.6.1310
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1310 [Google Scholar]
  130. Reichard, Suzanne, Marion Schneider & David Rapaport
    1944 The development of concept formation in children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry14(1). 156–161. doi:  10.2307/3624955
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3624955 [Google Scholar]
  131. Rettler, Bradley & Andrew M. Bailey
    2017 Object. InEdward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/object/
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Ribot, Théodule-Armand
    1899The evolution of general ideas. London: Open Court Publishing Company. 10.1037/10850‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10850-000 [Google Scholar]
  133. Rock, Irvin
    1997Indirect perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3727.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3727.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  134. Rodríguez, Cintia
    2006Del ritmo al símbolo: Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia [From rhythm to symbol: Signs at the birth of intelligence]. Barcelona: Horsori.
    [Google Scholar]
  135. 2007 God’s eye does not look at signs: Early development and semiotics. Infancia y Aprendizaje30(3). 343–374. doi:  10.1174/021037007781787471
    https://doi.org/10.1174/021037007781787471 [Google Scholar]
  136. 2012 The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. InEduardo Martí & Cintia Rodríguez (eds.), After Piaget, 123–150. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Rodríguez, Cintia, Marisol Basilio, Karina Cárdenas, Silvia Cavalcante, Ana Moreno-Núñez, Pedro Palacios & Noemi Yuste
    2018 Object pragmatics: Culture and communication, the bases for early cognitive development. InAlberto Rosa & Jaan Valsiner (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology, 2nd ed.223–244. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316662229.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662229.013 [Google Scholar]
  138. Rodríguez, Cintia, Julia Benassi, Luisa Estrada & Nicolás Alessandroni
    2017 Early social interactions with people and objects. InAlan Slater & Gavin Bremner (eds.), An introduction to developmental psychology, 3rd ed.213–258. Hoboken: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Rodríguez, Cintia & Christiane Moro
    1998 Objects are made permanent also by their conventional use. Infancia y Aprendizaje84(1). 67–83. doi:  10.1174/021037098760378793
    https://doi.org/10.1174/021037098760378793 [Google Scholar]
  140. 1999El mágico número tres: Cuando los niños aún no hablan [The magic number three: When children still do not speak]. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.
    [Google Scholar]
  141. 2008 Coming to agreement: Object use by infants and adults. InJordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind, 89–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.12.07rod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.07rod [Google Scholar]
  142. Rodríguez, Cintia & Nora Scheuer
    2015 The paradox between the numerically competent baby and the slow learning of two- to four-year-old children. Estudios de Psicología, 36(1), 18–47. doi:  10.1080/02109395.2014.1000009
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2014.1000009 [Google Scholar]
  143. Rodríguez, Cintia, Pedro Palacios, Karina Cárdenas & Noemi Yuste
    2014 Les symboles: Des formes de second ou de troisiéme sens?InChristiane Moro and Nathalie Müller-Mirza (eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique, 99–116. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Ross, Brian H.
    2000 The effects of category use on learned categories. Memory & Cognition28(1). 51–63. doi:  10.3758/BF03211576
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211576 [Google Scholar]
  145. Rossmanith, Nicole & Vasudevi Reddy
    2016 Structure and openness in the development of self in infancy. Journal of Consciousness Studies23(1–2). 237–257.
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Ruff, Holly A.
    1978 Infant recognition of the invariant form of objects. Child Development, 49(2). 293–306. doi:  10.2307/1128690
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128690 [Google Scholar]
  147. Russell, Bertrand
    1959The problems of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Russell, Terry, Ken Longden & Linda McGuigan
    1991SPACE-Materials. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Sakharov, Leonid. S.
    1990 Methods for investigating concepts. Soviet Psychology28(4). 35–66. 10.2753/RPO1061‑0405280435
    https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405280435 [Google Scholar]
  150. Säljö, Roger
    2018 Conceptual change, materiality and hybrid minds. InTamer G. Amin & Olivia Levrini (eds.), Converging perspectives on conceptual change, 113–120. Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1916/1971Cours de linguistique générale [Course in general linguistics]. Paris: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Schmidt, Eva
    2015Modest nonconceptualism. Epistemology, phenomenology, and content. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑18902‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18902-4 [Google Scholar]
  153. Schyns, Philippe G., Robert L. Goldstone & Jean-Pierre Thibaut
    1998 The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences21(1). 1–54. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X98000107
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98000107 [Google Scholar]
  154. Sedivy, Sonia
    1996 Must conceptually informed perceptual experience involve non-conceptual content?Canadian Journal of Philosophy26(3). 413–431. doi:  10.1080/00455091.1996.10717460
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1996.10717460 [Google Scholar]
  155. Shakespeare, William
    1609/2002Complete sonnets and poems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Shams, Ladan, Yukiyasu Kamitani & Shinsuke Shimojo
    2000 Illusions: What you see is what you hear. Nature408(6814). Article 788. doi:  10.1038/35048669
    https://doi.org/10.1038/35048669 [Google Scholar]
  157. Shanks, David R.
    2015 Concept learning and representation: Models. InJames D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 538–541. Elsevier. doi:  10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.43020‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.43020-5 [Google Scholar]
  158. Sloutsky, Vladimir M.
    2003 The role of similarity in the development of categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(6). 246–251. doi:  10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00109‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00109-8 [Google Scholar]
  159. 2018 Category learning and conceptual development. InSimona Ghetti & John T. Wixted (eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Volume4, 4th ed.37–82. New York: Wiley. 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn402
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn402 [Google Scholar]
  160. Smith, Linda B.
    2005 Action alters shape categories. Cognitive Science29(4). 665–679. doi:  10.1207/s15516709cog0000_13
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_13 [Google Scholar]
  161. Smith, Linda B., Sandra Street, Susan S. Jones & Karin H. James
    2014 Using the axis of elongation to align shapes: Developmental changes between 18 and 24 months of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology123(1). 15–35. doi:  10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  162. Spelke, Elizabeth S.
    2000 Core knowledge. American Psychologist55(11). 1233–1243. doi:  10.1037/0003‑066X.55.11.1233
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1233 [Google Scholar]
  163. Spitz, René A.
    1965The first year of life: A psychoanalytic study of normal and deviant developments of object relations. New York: International Universities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. Stavans, Maayan & Renée Baillargeon
    2018 Four-month-old infants individuate and track simple tools following functional demonstrations. Developmental Science21(1). Article e12500. doi:  10.1111/desc.12500
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12500 [Google Scholar]
  165. Susi, Tarja & Tom Ziemke
    2005 On the subject of objects: Four views on object perception and tool use. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique3(2). 6–19. doi:  10.31269/triplec.v3i2.19
    https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v3i2.19 [Google Scholar]
  166. Thill, Serge & Katherine E. Twomey
    2016 What’s on the inside counts: A grounded account of concept acquisition and development. Frontiers in Psychology7(1). Article 402. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00402
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00402 [Google Scholar]
  167. Tomikawa, Sandra A. & David H. Dodd
    1980 Early word meanings: Perceptually or functionally based?Child Development51(4). 1103–1109. doi:  10.2307/1129550
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1129550 [Google Scholar]
  168. Toribio, Josefa
    2008 State versus content: The unfair trial of perceptual nonconceptualism. Erkenntnis69(3). 351–361. doi:  10.1007/s10670‑008‑9120‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9120-3 [Google Scholar]
  169. Uexküll, Jakob J. von
    1928Theoretische Biologie [Theoretical biology]. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑36634‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-36634-9 [Google Scholar]
  170. Van Gulick, Ana & Michael Tarr
    2010 Is object color memory categorical?Journal of Vision10(7). 407–407. doi:  10.1167/10.7.407
    https://doi.org/10.1167/10.7.407 [Google Scholar]
  171. Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson & Eleanor Rosch
    1991The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  172. Vetter, Petra & Albert Newen
    2014 Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception. Consciousness and Cognition27(1). 62–75. doi:  10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  173. Vygotsky, Lev S.
    1931/1966 Development of the higher mental functions. InAlekséi N. Leóntiev, Aleksandr R. Luria & Anatoliĭ A. Smirnov (eds.), Psychological research in the U.S.S.R., vol.1, 11–45. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. 2018 From sign to meaning and sense. InЕkaterina Zavershneva & René van der Veer (eds.), Vygotsky’s notebooks, 251–270. Singapore: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  175. Wallman, James
    2013Stuffocation. London: Crux.
    [Google Scholar]
  176. Wallon, Henri & Gaby Ascoli
    1950 Comment l’enfant sait classer les objets [How the child classifies objects]. Enfance3(1). 411–433. doi:  10.3406/enfan.1950.2196
    https://doi.org/10.3406/enfan.1950.2196 [Google Scholar]
  177. Welch, Livingston
    1947 A behaviorist explanation of concept formation. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology71(2). 201–222. doi:  10.1080/08856559.1947.10533425
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08856559.1947.10533425 [Google Scholar]
  178. Wilcox, Teresa & Marisa Biondi
    2015 Object processing in the infant: Lessons from neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences19(7). 406–413. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  179. Wisniewski, Edward J. & Douglas L. Medin
    1994 On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science18(2). 221–281. doi:  10.1016/0364‑0213(94)90002‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(94)90002-7 [Google Scholar]
  180. Witzel, Christoph & Karl R. Gegenfurtner
    2013 Memory color. InRonnier Luo (ed.), Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology, 1–7. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑27851‑8_58‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27851-8_58-8 [Google Scholar]
  181. Witzel, Christoph, Maria Olkkonen & Karl R. Gegenfurtner
    2016 Memory colours affect colour appearance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences39(1). Article e262. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X15002587
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002587 [Google Scholar]
  182. Wright, William K.
    1913 The genesis of the categories. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods10(24). 645–657. doi:  10.2307/2012373
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2012373 [Google Scholar]
  183. Yang, Jiale, So Kanazawa, Masami K. Yamaguchi & Ichiro Kuriki
    2013 Investigation of color constancy in 4.5-month-old infants under a strict control of luminance contrast for individual participants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology115(1). 126–136. doi:  10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.013 [Google Scholar]
  184. Yang, Jiale, So Kanazawa, Masami K. Yamaguchi & Isamu Motoyoshi
    2015 Pre-constancy vision in infants. Current Biology25(24). 3209–3212. doi:  10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.053
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.053 [Google Scholar]
  185. Yang, Jiale, Yumiko Otsuka, So Kanazawa, Masami K. Yamaguchi & Isamu Motoyoshi
    2011 Perception of surface glossiness by infants aged 5 to 8 months. Perception40(12). 1491–1502. doi:  10.1068/p6893
    https://doi.org/10.1068/p6893 [Google Scholar]
  186. Young, Thomas
    1807A course of lectures on natural philosophy and the mechanical arts. London: Joseph Johnson.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. Younger, Barbara A.
    2003 Parsing objects into categories. Infants’ perception and use of correlated attributes. InDavid H. Rakison & Lisa M. Oakes (eds.), Early category and concept development, 77–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  188. Younger, Barbara A. & Dru D. Fearing
    2000 A global-to-basic trend in early categorization: Evidence from a dual-category habituation task. Infancy1(1). 47–58. doi:  10.1207/S15327078IN0101_05
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0101_05 [Google Scholar]
  189. Zamudio, Alicia M. & José A. Castorina
    2016 La cuestión del a priori: de Kant a Piaget [The question of the a priori: from Kant to Piaget]. Schème – Revista Eletrônica de Psicologia e Epistemologia Genéticas8(2). 4–27. 10.36311/1984‑1655.2016.v8n2.02.p4
    https://doi.org/10.36311/1984-1655.2016.v8n2.02.p4 [Google Scholar]
  190. Zaporozhets, Alexander V.
    2002 The development of sensations and perceptions in early and preschool childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology40(3). 22–34. doi:  10.2753/RPO1061‑0405400322
    https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405400322 [Google Scholar]
  191. Zentall, Thomas R., Danielle M. Andrews & Jacob P. Case
    2018 Sameness may be a natural concept that does not require learning. Psychological Science29(7). 1185–1189. doi:  10.1177/0956797618758669
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618758669 [Google Scholar]
  192. Zuccotti, Paula
    2015Everything we touch: A 24-hour inventory of our lives. London: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): categorisation; concepts; functional permanence; object; pragmatics of the object
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error