1887
Volume 27, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, using the tenets of (SBUs) (Kecskes 20002010) and referring to (PAT) (Mey 2001), the verb (‘to die’ in English), and its different realisations are analysed among Persian speakers. Through the analysis of authentic talk in interaction, this study aims to ponder nonstandard (situation-derived) meanings of the term and its different SBUs. The primary focus of the study is on strings of linguistic events as well as the “conventions of usage” (Morgan 1978) or cultural understanding that may lead to standard and nonstandard meanings considering and its different SBUs. The findings suggest that the SBUs regarding , a neglected sociolinguistic context, not only is affected by its actual situational characteristics but also by prior context encoded in utterances used, which manifests culture-specific ways of thinking (Capone 2018Wong 2010). Overall, 19 SBUs and 7 generic categories were identified with regard to the verb in Persian. This paper exhibits that is a versatile verb, which, when combined with situational/contextual factors, conveys different nonstandard functions that fulfil social needs. This study will also refer to linguistic features underlying SBUs that are influential in assigning various distinct meanings to the verb in Persian.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20004.mog
2021-10-06
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Capone, Alessandro
    2005 Pragmemes: A study with reference to English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics37. 1355–1371. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2010 On pragmemes again: Dealing with death. La linguistique46. 3–21. 10.3917/ling.462.0003
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ling.462.0003 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2018 Pragmemes (again). Lingua209. 89–104. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Crespo Fernández, Eliecer
    2006 The language of death: Euphemism and conceptual metaphorization in Victorian obituaries. SKY Journal of Linguistics19. 101–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hänggi, Philipp & Catherine Diederich
    2017 Accommodating language: A comparative investigation of the use of euphemisms for death and dying in obituaries in English and in German. InVahid Parvaresh & Alessandro Capone (eds.), The pragmeme of accommodation: The case of interaction around the event of death, 277–300. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑55759‑5_15
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_15 [Google Scholar]
  6. Itakura, Hiroko
    2018 Accuracy in reported speech: Evidence from masculine and feminine Japanese language. InAlessandro Capone, Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Alessandra Falzone (eds.), Indirect reports and pragmatics in the world languages, 315–332. Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. James, Kathryn
    2009Death, gender and sexuality in contemporary adolescent literature. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203885154
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885154 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jonker, Gerdien
    1997 The many facets of Islam: Death, dying and disposal between orthodox rule and historical convention. InColin Murray Parkes, Pittu Laungani & Bill Young (eds.), Death and bereavement across cultures, 147–165. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kecskes, Istvan
    2000 A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics32(6). 605–625. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00063‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00063-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2003Situation-bound utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110894035
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894035 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2010 Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics42(11). 2889–2897. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2014Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kecskes, Istvan, Olga Obdalova, Ludmila Minakova & Aleksandra Soboleva
    2018 A study of the perception of situation-bound utterances as culture-specific pragmatic units by Russian learners of English. System76. 219–232. 10.1016/j.system.2018.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001Pragmatics: An introduction, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
    2012 Discourse structures of condolence speech act. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning2. 105–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Morgan, Jerry L.
    1978 Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. InPeter Cole (ed.), Pragmatics [Syntax and Semantics 9], 261–280. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368873_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368873_010 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ortactepe, Deniz
    2012The development of conceptual socialization in international students: A language socialization perspective on conceptual fluency and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Parvaresh, Vahid
    2017 Introduction: Death, dying and the pragmeme. InVahid Parvaresh & Alessandro Capone (eds.), The pragmeme of accommodation: The case of interaction around the event of death, 1–16. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑55759‑5_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Richards, Jack C. & Richard Schmidt
    2010Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics, 4th edition. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sandman, Lars
    2005A good death: On the value of death and dying. Berkshire: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tien, Adrian
    2017 To be headed for the West, riding a crane: Chinese pragmemes in the wake of someone’s passing. InVahid Parvaresh & Alessandro Capone (eds.), The pragmeme of accommodation: The case of interaction around the event of death, 183–202. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑55759‑5_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_11 [Google Scholar]
  22. Wakefield, John C. & Hiroko Itakura
    2017 English vs. Japanese condolences: What people say and why. InVahid Parvaresh & Alessandro Capone (eds.), The pragmeme of accommodation: The case of interaction around the event of death, 203–232. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑55759‑5_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5_12 [Google Scholar]
  23. Wong, Jock
    2010 The “triple articulation” of language. Journal of Pragmatics42(11). 2932–2944. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.013 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2015 A critical look at the description of speech acts. InAlessandro Capone & Jacob L. Mey (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society, 825–855. Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yeh, Shu-Han
    2016 The use of Situation-Bound Utterances in Chinese foreign language textbooks. Chinese as a Second Language Research5(2). 187–212. 10.1515/caslar‑2016‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2016-0008 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20004.mog
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20004.mog
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): die; mordan; Persian; pragmatic acts; situation-bound utterances
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error