1887
Volume 27, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This experimental study sets out to determine whether people detect click sounds in American English. Recent research has documented the use of non-phonemic clicks in a variety of languages to fulfill a range of functions such as sequence management or signaling searches and different types of attitudinal stance. While these clicks are acoustically salient and have been reported to occur with a frequency of up to 14 per minute in British English, they have not been widely investigated until relatively recently. For this experiment, we designed video stimuli consisting of A and B pairs of approximately 10 seconds of speech, one with a click and the other with the click edited out. We gave 118 participants a questionnaire and asked if they could detect a difference between the pairs of videos. The results indicate that the majority of participants, between 79% and 86%, do not detect click sounds.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20009.vig
2021-10-06
2021-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arlington, Jody, Sebastian Brenninkmeyer, Danielle Arn, Rita Grundhauser & Daniel O’Connell
    1992 A usual extreme case: Pause reports of informal spontaneous dialogue. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society30(2). 161–163. 10.3758/BF03330427
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330427 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold, Jennifer, Maria Fagnano & Michael Tanenhaus
    2003 Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research32(1). 25–36. 10.1023/A:1021980931292
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021980931292 [Google Scholar]
  3. Benor, Sarah
    2004 Second style acquisition: The linguistic socialization of newly orthodox Jews. Stanford University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Block, Ned
    2007 Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences30. 481–548. 10.1017/S0140525X07002786
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002786 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brennan, Susan & Maurice Williams
    1995 The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language34. 383–398. 10.1006/jmla.1995.1017
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1017 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, Herbert & Jean Fox Tree
    2002 Using uh and um in spontaneous dialog. Cognition84. 73–111. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00017‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Christentfeld, Nicholas
    1995 Does it hurt to say um?Journal of Nonverbal Behavior19(3). 171–186. 10.1007/BF02175503
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02175503 [Google Scholar]
  8. Duez, Danielle
    1985 Perceptions of silent pauses in continuous speech. Language and Speech28(4). 377–389. 10.1177/002383098502800403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098502800403 [Google Scholar]
  9. Fodor, Jerry & Thomas Bever
    1965 The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior4. 414–420. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(65)80081‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80081-0 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fox Tree, Jean
    2001 Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory and Cognition29(2). 320–326. 10.3758/BF03194926
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194926 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2002 Interpreting pauses and ums at turn exchanges. Discourse Processes34(1). 37–55. 10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3401_2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gold, Erica, Peter French & Philip Harrison
    2013 Clicking behavior as a possible speaker discriminant in English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association43(3). 339–349. 10.1017/S0025100313000248
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100313000248 [Google Scholar]
  13. González Temer, Verónica
    2014 Clicks in Chilean Spanish conversation. InTheodora Lee (ed.), Proceedings of the first postgraduate and academic researchers in linguistics at York, 74–99. York: University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hieke, Adolf, Sabine Kowal & Daniel O’Connell
    1983 The trouble with “articulatory” pauses. Language and Speech26(3). 203–214. 10.1177/002383098302600302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600302 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jokinen, Kristiina
    2010 Hesitation and uncertainty as feedback. DiSS-LPSS 5th workshop on disfluency in spontaneous speech and 2nd international symposium on linguistic patterns in spontaneous speech, 103–106. Tokyo, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kayser, Christoph, Christopher Petkov, Michael Lippert & Nikos Logothetis
    2005Current Biology15(21). 1943–1947. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.040
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.040 [Google Scholar]
  17. Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts
    2005 How children and adults produce and perceive uncertainty in audiovisual speech. Language and Speech48. 29–53. 10.1177/00238309050480010201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480010201 [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, Xiaoting
    2020 Click-initiated self-repair in changing the sequential trajectory of actions-in-progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction53(1). 90–117. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712959
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712959 [Google Scholar]
  19. Martin, James & Winifred Strange
    1968 The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech. Perception & Psychophysics3(6). 427–438. 10.3758/BF03205750
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205750 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mattys, Sven & Jamie Clark
    2002 Lexical activity in speech processing: Evidence from pause detection. Journal of Memory and Language47(3). 343–359. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00037‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00037-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mattys, Sven, Christopher W. Pleydell-Pearce, James Melhorn & Sharron E. Whitecross
    2005 Detecting silent pauses in speech: A new tool for measuring on-line lexical and semantic processing. Psychological Science16(12). 958–964. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2005.01644.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01644.x [Google Scholar]
  22. McGuire, Grant
    2010A brief primer on experimental designs for speech perception research (Unpublished manuscript). Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Moreno, Julia
    2019 [!] What’s the name of it? [!]: Phonetic clicks in word search strategies in Glasgow. InSasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international congress of phonetic sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 1823–1827. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ogden, Richard
    2013 Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association43(3). 299–320. 10.1017/S0025100313000224
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100313000224 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2020 Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction53(1). 66–89. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960 [Google Scholar]
  26. Paschen, Ludger
    2019 On clicks in Russian everyday communication. InNicole Richter & Nadine Thielemann (eds.), Urban voices: The sociolinguistics, grammar and pragmatics of spoken Russian, 237–257. Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pillion, Betsy
    2019 Acoustic properties of para-phonemic sounds: Clicks in American English. InSasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international congress of phonetic sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 2660–2664. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pinto, Derrin & Donny Vigil
    2018 Clicks as discourse markers in Peninsular Spanish. Spanish in Context15(3). 441–464. 10.1075/sic.00022.pin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00022.pin [Google Scholar]
  29. 2019 Searches and clicks in Peninsular Spanish. Pragmatics29(1). 83–105. 10.1075/prag.18020.pin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18020.pin [Google Scholar]
  30. 2020 Spanish clicks in discourse marker combinations. Journal of Pragmatics159. 1–11. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  31. Reber, Elisabeth
    2012Affectivity in interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.215
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.215 [Google Scholar]
  32. Reber, Arthur & John Anderson
    1970 The perception of clicks in linguistic and nonlinguistic messages. Perception and Pyschophysics8(2). 81–89. 10.3758/BF03210179
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210179 [Google Scholar]
  33. Scherer, Klaus, Harvey London & Jared Wolf
    1973 The voice of confidence: Paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation. Journal of Research in Personality7(1). 31–44. 10.1016/0092‑6566(73)90030‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(73)90030-5 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1987Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schleef, Erik
    2019 The evaluation of unfilled pauses: Limits of the prestige, solidarity and dynamism dimensions. Lingua228. 1–16. 10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schneider, Walter & Richard Shiffrin
    1977 Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review84(1). 1–66. 10.1037/0033‑295X.84.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  37. Trouvain, Jürgen
    2014 Laughing, breathing, clicking – The prosody of nonverbal vocalisations. InProceedings of the conference on speech prosody (SP7), 598–602. Dublin, IE. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014‑107
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-107 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2015 On clicks in German. InAdrian Leemann, María-José Kolly, Stephan Schmid & Volker Dellwo (eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Studies from German-speaking Europe, 21–33. Frankfurt/Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Trouvain, Jürgen & Zofia Malisz
    2016 Inter-speech clicks in an Interspeech keynote. InProceedings of Interspeech, 1397–1401. San Francisco, CA. 10.21437/Interspeech.2016‑1064
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2016-1064 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ward, Nigel
    2006 Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English. Pragmatics & Cognition14(1). 129–182. 10.1075/pc.14.1.08war
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.1.08war [Google Scholar]
  41. Watanabe, Michiko
    2003 The constituent complexity and types of fillers in Japanese. InMaria-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens & Joaquin Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, 2473–2476. Adelaide: Causal Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Watanabe, Michiko, Keikichi Hirose, Yasuharu Den & Nobuaki Minematsu
    2008 Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of upcoming phrases for native and non-native listeners. Speech Communication50(2). 81–94. 10.1016/j.specom.2007.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2007.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wright, Melissa
    2005 Studies of the phonetics-interaction interface: Clicks and interactional structures in English conversation. York: University of York dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2007 Clicks as markers of new sequences in English conversation. InJürgen Trouvain & William Barry (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, 1069–1072. Germany: Universität des Saarlandes.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2011a On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association41(2). 207–229. 10.1017/S0025100311000144
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100311000144 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2011b The phonetics–interaction interface in the initiation of closings in everyday English telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics43(4). 1080–1099. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Xiaoming, Jiang & Marc D. Pell
    2017 The sound of confidence and doubt. Speech Communication88. 106–126. 10.1016/j.specom.2017.01.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2017.01.011 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20009.vig
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20009.vig
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): clicks; detection; experimental study; paralinguistics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error