Metaphor and metonymy in Chinese and American political cartoons (2018–2019) about the Sino-US trade conflict

References

1. Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
   2019 Pictorial framing in moral politics: A corpus-based experimental study. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Masri, Hanada
   2016 Jordanian editorial cartoons: A multimodal approach to the cartoons of Emad Hajjaj. Language and Communication50. 45–58. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.09.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.09.005 [Google Scholar]
3. Barcelona, Antonio
   (ed.) 2000 Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barthes, Roland
   1986 [1964] Rhetoric of the image. InRoland Barthes, The responsibility of forms, 21–40. Translated byRichard Howard. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bergen, Benjamin
   2003 To awaken a sleeping giant: Cognition and culture in September 11 political cartoons. InMichel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind, 23–35. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Black, Max
   1979 More about metaphor. InAndrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 19–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bolognesi, Marianna & Paola Vernillo
   2019 How abstract concepts emerge from metaphorical images: The metonymic way. Language and Communication69. 26–41. 10.1016/j.langcom.2019.05.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.05.003 [Google Scholar]
8. Bounegru, Liliana & Charles Forceville
   2011 Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication10(2). 209–229. 10.1177/1470357211398446
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398446 [Google Scholar]
9. Brzezinski, Mika
   2018 (13June). Morning Joe. https://dailycaller.com/2018/06/13/mika-trump-flintstone/, accessed14-12-2019.
10. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2019 Metaphors of Brexit: No cherries on the cake. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28768‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28768-9 [Google Scholar]
11. Cienki, Alan & Cornelia Müller
    2008 Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3 [Google Scholar]
12. Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
    (eds.) 2012 Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727 [Google Scholar]
13. Dirven, René & Ralf Pörings
    (eds.) 2002 Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Đurović, Tatjana & Nadežda Silaški
    2016 Multimodality and the construal of reality in political cartoons: The case of Serbia-EU relationship. Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature14(2). 117–128.
    [Google Scholar]
15. El Refaie, Elisabeth
    2003 Understanding visual metaphors: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication2(1). 75–95. 10.1177/1470357203002001755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755 [Google Scholar]
16. El Refaie, Elisabeth
    2009 Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication8(2). 181–205. 10.1177/1470357209102113
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357209102113 [Google Scholar]
17. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
    2002 The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Forceville, Charles
    1996 Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203064252
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203064252 [Google Scholar]
19. Forceville, Charles
    2004 Review of Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner, The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Metaphor and Symbol19. 83–89.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Forceville, Charles
    2006 The source-path-goal schema in the autobiographical journey documentary: McElwee, Van der Keuken, Cole. New Review of Film and Television Studies4(3). 241–261. 10.1080/17400300600982023
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17400300600982023 [Google Scholar]
21. Forceville, Charles
    2009 Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. InEija Ventola & Arsenio Jésus Moya Guijarro (eds.), The world told and the world shown: Issues in multisemiotics, 56–74. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Forceville, Charles
    2011 Pictorial runes in Tintin and the Picaros. Journal of Pragmatics43. 875–890. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.014 [Google Scholar]
23. Forceville, Charles
    2013a Metaphor and symbol: searching for one’s identity is looking for a home in animation film. Review of Cognitive Linguistics11(2). 250–268. 10.1075/rcl.11.2.03for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.2.03for [Google Scholar]
24. Forceville, Charles
    2013b Creative visual duality in comics balloons. InTony Veale, Kurt Feyaerts & Charles Forceville (eds.), Creativity and the agile mind: A multi-disciplinary exploration of a multi-faceted phenomenon, 253–273. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110295290.253
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295290.253 [Google Scholar]
25. Forceville, Charles
    2017 Visual and multimodal metaphor in advertising: Cultural perspectives. Styles of Communication9(2). 26–41.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Forceville, Charles
    2020 Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190845230.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845230.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
27. Forceville, Charles & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
    (eds.) 2009 Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
28. Forceville, Charles & Marloes Jeulink
    2011 “The flesh and blood of embodied understanding”: The source-path-goal schema in animation film. Pragmatics & Cognition19(1). 37–59. 10.1075/pc.19.1.02for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.1.02for [Google Scholar]
29. Forceville, Charles, Elisabeth El Refaie & Gert Meesters
    2014 Stylistics and comics. InMichael Burke (ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics, 485–499. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Forceville, Charles & Nataša van de Laar
    2019 Metaphors portraying right-wing politician Geert Wilders in Dutch political cartoons. InEncarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio, Miguel Ángel Benítez-Castro & Francesca De Cesare (eds.), Populist discourse: Critical approaches to contemporary politics, 292–307. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429026751‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429026751-18 [Google Scholar]
31. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr.
    (ed.) 2008 The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802 [Google Scholar]
32. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr.
    2015 The allegorical character of political metaphors in discourse. Metaphor and the Social World5(2). 264–282. 10.1075/msw.5.2.05gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.05gib [Google Scholar]
33. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr.
    2016 (ed.). Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6 [Google Scholar]
34. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr.
    2017 Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107762350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350 [Google Scholar]
35. Goossens, Louis
    1995 By word of mouth: Metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.33 [Google Scholar]
36. Guan, Yue & Charles Forceville
    2020 Making cross-cultural meaning in five Chinese promotional clips: Metonymies and metaphors. Intercultural Pragmatics17(2). 123–149. 10.1515/ip‑2020‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-0007 [Google Scholar]
37. Hartmann-Mahmud, Lori
    2002 War as metaphor. Peace Review14(4). 427–432. 10.1080/1040265022000039213
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1040265022000039213 [Google Scholar]
38. Jansen, Sue Curry & Don Sabo
    1994 The sport/war metaphor: Hegemonic masculinity, the Persian Gulf War, and the new world order. Sociology of Sport Journal11(1). 1–17. 10.1123/ssj.11.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.11.1.1 [Google Scholar]
39. Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
    2020 Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy: A study of Iranian and Dutch print advertisements. Cognitive Linguistic Studies7(1). 78–110. 10.1075/cogls.00050.kas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00050.kas [Google Scholar]
40. Kashyap, Usha & Neha Bothra
    2019 Sino-US trade and trade war. Management and Economics Research Journal5. 1–12. 10.18639/MERJ.2019.879180
    https://doi.org/10.18639/MERJ.2019.879180 [Google Scholar]
41. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2010 Metaphor: A practical introduction. 2nd edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2015 Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
43. Kövecses, Zoltán & Günther Radden
    1998 Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics9(1). 37–77. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
44. Kwon, Iksoo
    2019 Conceptual mappings in political cartoons: A comparative study of the case of nuclear crises in US-North Korean relations. Journal of Pragmatics143. 10–27. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.021 [Google Scholar]
45. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lakoff, George
    1991 Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research23(2/3). 25-32.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lan, Chun & Danyu Zuo
    2016 Pictorial-verbal metaphors in Chinese editorial cartoons on food safety. Metaphor and the Social World6(1). 20–51. 10.1075/msw.6.1.02lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.02lan [Google Scholar]
48. Li, Chunding, Chuantian He & Chuangwei Lin
    2018 Economic impacts of the possible China-US trade war. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade54. 1557–1577. 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1446131
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1446131 [Google Scholar]
49. Li, Minghao, Edward J. Balistreri & Wendong Zhang
    2019 The U.S.-China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/19-wp595.html, accessed9-12-20.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Lin, Tiffany Ying-Yu & Wen-Yu Chiang
    2015 Multimodal fusion in analyzing political cartoons: Debates on U.S. beef imports into Taiwan. Metaphor and Symbol30(2). 137–161. 10.1080/10926488.2015.1016859
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1016859 [Google Scholar]
51. Littlemore, Jeannette
    2015 Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
52. Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
    2019 Political cartoon discourse: Creativity, critique and persuasion. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación22. 117–134. 10.6035/CLR.2019.22.7
    https://doi.org/10.6035/CLR.2019.22.7 [Google Scholar]
53. Master Metaphor ListGeorge Lakoff, Jane Espenson & Alan Schwartz
    Master Metaphor List 1991 1st edn compiled by George Lakoff, Jane Espenson & Adele Goldberg; 2nd edncompiled byGeorge Lakoff, Jane Espenson & Alan Schwartz. araw.mede.uic.edu/~alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf (last accessed9-12-20).
54. Mittelberg, Irene & Linda R. Waugh
    2009 Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. InCharles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 329–356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Musolff, Andreas
    2016 Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Negro Alousque, Isabel
    2013 Visual metaphor and metonymy in French political cartoons. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada26. 365–384.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Peirsman, Yves & Geeraerts, Dirk
    2006 Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics17(3). 269–316. 10.1515/COG.2006.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.007 [Google Scholar]
58. Pérez-Sobrino, Paula
    2017 Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.2 [Google Scholar]
59. Prendergast, Muireann
    2019 Political cartoons as carnivalesque: A multimodal discourse analysis of Argentina’s Humor Registrado magazine. Social Semiotics29(1). 45–67. 10.1080/10350330.2017.1406587
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1406587 [Google Scholar]
60. Radden, Günter & Zoltán Kövecses
    1999 Towards a theory of metonymy. InKlaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden (eds.), Metonymy in language and thought, 17–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
61. Rojo López, Ana María & María Ángeles Orts Llopis
    2010 Metaphorical pattern analysis in financial texts: Framing the crisis in positive or negative metaphorical terms. Journal of Pragmatics42. 3300–3313. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.001 [Google Scholar]
62. Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco
    1997 Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction. Atlantis19(1). 281–295.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco
    2000 The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. InAntonio Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads, 109–132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Silaški, Nadežda & Tatjana Đurović
    2019 The journey metaphor in Brexit-related political cartoons. Discourse, Context & Media31. 1–10. 10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100318
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100318 [Google Scholar]
65. Sweetser, Eve
    2017 Metaphor and metonymy in advertising: Building viewpoint in multimodal multi-space blends. Journal of Pragmatics122. 65–76. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.012 [Google Scholar]
66. Wales, Katie
    2001 A dictionary of stylistics, revised edn. London: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Wawra, Daniela
    2018 Multimodal literacy: Meaning negotiations in political cartoons on the refugee crisis. System77. 10–18. 10.1016/j.system.2018.02.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.018 [Google Scholar]
68. Wikipedia
    Wikipedia 2020 George Armstrong Custer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Armstrong_Custer#cite_note-b540-117, accessed9-12-2020.
69. Zhao, Xiufeng & Dezheng Feng
    2017 Multimodal metaphtonymy and the construction of China image: A case of China-related political cartoon discourses in the Economist. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University25(2). 31–36.
    [Google Scholar]