1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics & Cognition
  4. Volume 28, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Swear words of English and French, both real and fictional ones, significantly tend to contain the least sonorous consonants, compared to the rest of the lexicon. What can explain the overrepresentation of such sounds among swear words? This might be a case of sound symbolism, when sounds are unconsciously associated with a meaning. We examine the pragmatic vs. semantic nature of the meaning involved, as well as two explanations in terms of iconicity (plosives may be associated with “violation of hearer’s space”, or unsonorous consonants may be associated with “aggression”). This unusual sound-meaning pairing would involve an emotional-contextual, non-truth-conditional meaning, and be powerful enough that it influences a strong sociolinguistic convention – which words are swear words and which ones are not – suggesting that sounds convey meaning in yet unsuspected ways.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20021.val
2022-03-16
2024-12-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pc.20021.val
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Larousse
    Larousse 2020 Dictionnaire français-anglais. https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais-anglais/. (28January 2020)
     [Google Scholar]
  2. New, Boris & Christophe Pallier
    2019 Lexique. www.lexique.org/. (19June 2019.)
     [Google Scholar]
  3. University of Western Australia, School of Psychological Science
    University of Western Australia, School of Psychological Science 1997 MRC Psycholinguistic Database. websites.psychology.uwa.edu.au/school/MRCDatabase/uwa_mrc.htm. (19June 2019.)
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Oxford University Press
    Oxford University Press 2020 OED Online. www.oed.com/. (28January 2020.)
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine
    ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine 2002 TLFi : Trésor de la Langue Française informatisé. www.atilf.fr/tlfi. (19June 2019.)
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Wikipedia
    Wikipedia 2004 Vocabulaire du Capitaine Haddock. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocabulaire_du_capitaine_Haddock. (31May 2019.)
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Wiktionary
    Wiktionary 2009 Appendix: Fictional English swear words. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Fictional_English_curse_words. (31May 2019.)
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bergen, Benjamin K.
    2004 The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language80(2). 290–311. 10.1353/lan.2004.0056
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0056 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2016 What the F: What swearing reveals about our language, our brains, and ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Broadcasting Standards Authority
    Broadcasting Standards Authority 2010 What not to swear: The acceptability of words in broadcasting. https://www.bsa.govt.nz/oldsite/assets/Research/What-Not-to-Swear-Full-BSA2010.pdf. (28January 2020.)
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Childs, G. Tucker
    2001 Research on ideophones, whither hence? The need for a social theory of ideophones. InF. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 63–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/tsl.44.06chi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44.06chi [Google Scholar]
  12. Egbokhare, Francis O.
    2001 Phonosemantic correspondences in Emai attributive ideophones. InF. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 87–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/tsl.44.08egb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44.08egb [Google Scholar]
  13. Finkelstein, Shlomit Ritz
    2018 Swearing as emotion acts. InAndrea Pizarro Pedraza (ed.), Linguistic taboo revisited: Novel insights from cognitive perspectives, 108–139. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110582758‑016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110582758-016 [Google Scholar]
  14. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1987 Languages in the Americas. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gutiérrez, Elkin Darío, Roger Levy & Benjamin K. Bergen
    2016 Finding non-arbitrary form-meaning systematicity using string-metric learning for kernel regression. InKatrin Erk & Noah A. Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics1. 2379–2388. 10.18653/v1/P16‑1225
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1225 [Google Scholar]
  16. Haiman, John
    2018 Ideophones and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107706897
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107706897 [Google Scholar]
  17. Institut National de l’Audiovisuel
    Institut National de l’Audiovisuel. N.d.Hergé à propos du capitaine Haddock. [Hergé on Captain Haddock] https://fresques.ina.fr/europe-des-cultures-fr/fiche-media/Europe00025/herge-a-propos-du-capitaine-haddock.html. (6June 2019.)
  18. Janschewitz, Kristin
    2008 Taboo, emotionally valenced, and emotionally neutral word norms. Behavior Research Methods40(4). 1065–1074. 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1065
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1065 [Google Scholar]
  19. Millwood-Hargrave, Andrea
    2000 Delete expletives?Ofcom. jastoy.plus.com/pdf/delete_expletives.pdf. (28January 2020.)
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Parker, Steve
    2008 Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority. Journal of Phonetics36(1). 55–90. 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Reilly, Jamie, David Biun, H. Wind Cowles & Jonathan Peelle
    2008 Where did words come from? A linking theory of sound symbolism and natural language evolution. Nature Precedings. precedings.nature.com/documents/2369/version/1. (4June 2019.) 10.1038/npre.2008.2369.1
     https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.2369.1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Rouayrenc, Catherine
    1996 Les gros mots. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Sidhu, David M., Kristen Deschamps, Joshua S. Bourdage & Penny M. Pexman
    2019 Does the name say it all? Investigating phoneme-personality sound symbolism in first names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General148(9). 1595–1614. 10.1037/xge0000662 (7October 2019.)
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000662 [Google Scholar]
  24. Vallery, Robin
    2019 The sound of taboo: Exploring phonopragmatic associations of swear words in English and in French. Unpublished MA thesis, University de Lille, France
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz
    2001 Introduction. InF. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones, 1–8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/tsl.44.02voe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44.02voe [Google Scholar]
  26. Whissell, Cynthia
    1999 Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Perception and Motor Skills89(1). 19–48. 10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.19
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.89.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  27. Yardy, Brandon John
    2010 Sound symbolism, sonority, and swearing: An affect induction perspective. Lethbridge: The University of Lethbridge dissertation. https://opus.uleth.ca/handle/10133/2556. (4June 2019.)
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20021.val
Loading
The sound of taboo
Pragmatics & Cognition 28, 87 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.20021.val
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20021.val
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.20021.val
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): iconicity; sound symbolism; swear words; swearing; systematicity; taboo; taboo words

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error