Mathematics, relevance theory and the situated cognition paradigm

References

1. Barany, Michael J.
   2010 Mathematical research in context. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. MSc dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bringsjord, Selmer
   1998 Computationalism is dead; now what?Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence10(4). 393–402. 10.1080/095281398146662
   https://doi.org/10.1080/095281398146662 [Google Scholar]
3. Carston, Robyn
   2002 Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470754603
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
4. Cave, Terence & Deirdre Wilson
   2018 Reading beyond the code: Literature and relevance theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198794776.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794776.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
5. Clark, Andy
   2010 Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clark, Andy & David Chalmers
   1998 The extended mind. Analysis58(1). 7–19. 10.1093/analys/58.1.7
   https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7 [Google Scholar]
7. Clark, Billy
   2013 Relevance theory (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139034104
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034104 [Google Scholar]
8. de Saussure, Louis & Tim Wharton
   2020 Relevance, effects and affect. International Review of Pragmatics12(2). 183–205. 10.1163/18773109‑01202001
   https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01202001 [Google Scholar]
9. Dreyfus, Hubert L.
   1978 What computers can’t do: The limits of artificial intelligence. New York: Harper Collins.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Forceville, Charles
    2014 Relevance theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. InDavid Machin (ed.), Visual communication, 51–70. Belrin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110255492.51
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255492.51 [Google Scholar]
11. Greiffenhagen, Christian
    2014 The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. The British Journal of Sociology65(3). 502–528. 10.1111/1468‑4446.12037
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12037 [Google Scholar]
12. Grice, H. Paul
    1989 Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hutchins, Edwin
    1995 Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hutchins, Edwin
    2010 Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science2(4). 705–715. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2010.01089.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01089.x [Google Scholar]
15. Kolaiti, Patricia
    2019 The limits of expression: Language, literature, mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290746
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290746 [Google Scholar]
16. Kolaiti, Patricia
    2020 Perceptual relevance and art: Some tentative suggestions. Journal of Literary Semantics49(2). 99–117. 10.1515/jls‑2020‑2022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2020-2022 [Google Scholar]
17. Lakatos, Imre
    1976 Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139171472
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171472 [Google Scholar]
18. Lane, Lorenzo
    2016 The bridge between worlds: Relating position and disposition in the mathematical field. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
19. McCallum, Kate
    2020 Situating mathematical communication: The settings, interactions and material practices of contemporary mathematical research. Brighton: University of Brighton PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Noë, Alva
    2009 Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Pignocchi, Alessandro
    2018 The continuity between art and everyday communication. InFlorian Cova & Sébastien Réhault (eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of aesthetics, 241–264. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Putnam, Hilary
    1991 Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5891.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5891.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Searle, John R.
    1980 Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences3(3). 417–424. 10.1017/S0140525X00005756
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756 [Google Scholar]
24. Searle, John R.
    1992 The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5834.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5834.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
25. Shannon, Claude E. & Warren Weaver
    1949 The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sperber, Dan
    1982 Apparently irrational beliefs. InMartin Hollis & Steven Lukes (eds.), Rationality and relativism, 149–180. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sperber, Dan
    1997 Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language12(1). 67–83. 10.1111/1468‑0017.00036
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00036 [Google Scholar]
28. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    2015 Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy15(2). 117–149.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Wharton, Tim
    2008 “MeaningNN” and “showing”: Gricean intentions and relevance-theoretic intentions. Intercultural Pragmatics5(2). 131–152. 10.1515/IP.2008.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2008.008 [Google Scholar]
31. Wharton, Tim & Claudia Strey
    2019 Slave to the passions: Making emotions relevant. InKate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston (eds.), Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation, 253–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290593.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.022 [Google Scholar]
32. Wilson, Deirdre
    2017 Communication, comprehension and ‘non-propositional effects’. Paper presented at theBeyond meaning conference, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Wilson, Deirdre
    2018 Relevance theory and literary interpretation. InTerence Cave & Deirdre Wilson (eds.), Reading beyond the code: Literature and relevance theory, 185–204. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
    2019 Pragmatics and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of Pragmatics1451. 31–38. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005 [Google Scholar]
35. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    2004 Relevance theory. InLaurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]