Being ambivalent by exploiting indeterminacy in the explicit import of an utterance

References

1. Ahern, Aoife
   2010 Speaker attitude in relevance theory: An overview. InMarta Kisielewska-Krysiuk, Agnieszka Piskorska and Ewa Wałaszewska (eds.), In the mind and across minds: A relevance-theoretic perspective on communication and translation, 147–166. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blakemore, Diane
   1991 Performatives and parentheticals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society91. 197–214. 10.1093/aristotelian/91.1.197
   https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/91.1.197 [Google Scholar]
3. Carston, Robyn
   2002 Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470754603
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
4. Carston, Robyn
   2013 Word meaning, what is said and explicature. InCarlo Penco & Filippo Domaneschi (eds.), What is said and what is not, 175–204. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carston, Robyn & Catherine Wearing
   2015 Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics79. 79–92. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011 [Google Scholar]
6. Forabosco, Giovannantonio
   2008 Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research?Lodz Papers in Pragmatics4.1. 45–62. 10.2478/v10016‑008‑0003‑5
   https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5 [Google Scholar]
7. Grice, H. Paul
   1989 Logic and conversation. InH. Paul GriceStudies in the way of words, 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ifantidou, Elly
   2021 Non-propositional effects in verbal communication: The case of metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics181, 6–16. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.009 [Google Scholar]
9. Jaszczołt, Kasia. M.
   2021 Functional proposition: A new concept for representing discourse meaning?Journal of Pragmatics171. 200–214. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.010
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.010 [Google Scholar]
10. Jodłowiec, Maria
    2015 The challenges of explicit and implicit communication. A relevance-theoretic approach. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑05190‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05190-2 [Google Scholar]
11. Padilla Cruz, Manuel
    2007 Can irony be phatic? A relevance-theoretic proposal. InM. Losada Friend, P. Ron Vaz, S. Hernández Santano and J. Casanova (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th International AEDEAN Conference. Huelva: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Huelva.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Padilla Cruz, Manuel
    2012 Metarepresentation, attitudinal utterances and attitude combination: A relevance-theoretic approach. InAgnieszka Piskorska (ed.) Relevance studies in Poland, Vol. 4. Essays on language and communication, 75–88. Warsaw: WUW.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Piskorska, Agnieszka
    2016 Perlocutionary effects and relevance theory. InManuel Padilla Cruz (ed.), Relevance Theory: Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions, 287–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.268.11pis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.268.11pis [Google Scholar]
14. Piskorska, Agnieszka
    2020 Introduction: The literal-figurative language continuum and optimally relevant interpretations. InAgnieszka Piskorska (ed.), Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.8.00pis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.8.00pis [Google Scholar]
15. Rosch, Eleanor. H.
    1973 Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3). 328–350. 10.1016/0010‑0285(73)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
16. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1998 The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. InPeter Carruthers and Jill Boucher (eds.), Thought and language, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597909.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597909.012 [Google Scholar]
18. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    2008 A deflationary account of metaphors. InRaymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 84–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007 [Google Scholar]
19. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    2015 Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of PhilosophyXV(44). 117–149.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Wałaszewska, Ewa
    2020 Category extension as a variety of loose use. InAgnieszka Piskorska (ed.), Relevance theory, figuration, and continuity in pragmatics, 25–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.8.01wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.8.01wal [Google Scholar]
21. Wharton, Tim & Claudia Strey
    2019 Slave of the passions. Making emotions relevant. InKate Scott, Robyn Carston & Billy Clark, Relevance: Pragmatics and interpretation, 253–266. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290593.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.022 [Google Scholar]
22. Wilson, Deirdre
    2000 Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. InDan Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Wilson, Deirdre
    2003 Relevance and lexical pragmatics. Rivista di Linguistica15(2). 273–291.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wilson, Deirdre
    2006 The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?Lingua116. 1722–1743. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
25. Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
    2007 A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. InNoel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/978‑1‑349‑73908‑0_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-73908-0_12 [Google Scholar]
26. Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
    2019 Pragmatics and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of Pragmatics57. 125–148. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005 [Google Scholar]
27. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    1993 Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua90. 1–25. 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]
28. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1953 Philosophical invesigations. Macmillan Publishing Company
    [Google Scholar]
29. Yus, Francisco
    2016 Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition23(1). 92–116. 10.1075/pc.23.1.05yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.05yus [Google Scholar]