Managing turns, building common ground, planning discourse

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   2002 English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.10
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.10 [Google Scholar]
2. Andersen, Gisle
   2001 Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevance-theoretic approach to the language of adolescents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.84
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.84 [Google Scholar]
3. Ariel, Mira & Caterina Mauri
   2018 Why use or?Linguistics561. 939–993. 10.1515/ling‑2018‑0020
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0020 [Google Scholar]
4. Bazzanella, Carla
   1995 I segnali discorsivi. InLorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione (vol.31), 225–257. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beeching, Kate
   2016 Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139507110
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507110 [Google Scholar]
6. Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges
   2014 Introduction. InKate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004274822_002
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004274822_002 [Google Scholar]
7. Bernini, Giuliano
   1995 Le profrasi. InLorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione (vol.31), 175–222. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
9. Denis, Derek & Sali A. Tagliamonte
   2016 Innovation, right? Change, you know? Utterance-final tags in Canadian English. InHeike Pichler (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights, 86–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107295476.005
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295476.005 [Google Scholar]
10. Du Bois, John W.
    2014 Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics25(3). 359–410. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
11. Fischer, Kerstin
    2006 Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. InKerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 427–447. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1163/9780080461588_023
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_023 [Google Scholar]
12. Lo Baido, Maria Cristina
    2018 Categorization via exemplification: Evidence from Italian. Folia Linguistica Historica391. 69–95. 10.1515/flih‑2018‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
13. Mauri, Caterina
    2021 Ad hoc categorization in linguistic interaction. InCaterina Mauri, Eugenio Goria & Ilaria Fiorentini (eds.), Building categories in interaction: Linguistic resources at work, 9–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.220.02mau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.220.02mau [Google Scholar]
14. Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò
    2018 Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: Theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation. Folia Linguistica Historica39(1). 1–35.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mauri, Caterina, Ilaria Fiorentini & Eugenio Goria
    2021 Building categories in interaction: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. InCaterina Mauri, Eugenio Goria & Ilaria Fiorentini (eds.), Building categories in interaction: Linguistic resources at work, 1–8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.220.01fio
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.220.01fio [Google Scholar]
16. Mauri, Caterina, Silvia Ballarè, Eugenio Goria, Massimo Cerruti & Francesco Suriano
    2019 KIParla corpus: A new resource for spoken Italian. InRaffaella Bernardi, Roberto Navigli & Giovanni Semeraro (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Molinelli, Piera
    1988 Fenomeni della negazione dal latino all’italiano. Firenze: La Nuova Editrice.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Molinelli, Piera
    2020 Ma anche no! Trent’anni di un’espressione di successo. Lingua Italiana. [https://www.treccani.it/magazine/lingua_italiana/articoli/scritto_e_parlato/Ma_anche.html]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Moretti, Bruno
    1993 False partenze e contraddizioni logiche convenzionalizzate: “Sì o no”?Vox Romanica521. 85–95.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Schwenter, Scott A.
    2000 Viewpoints and polysemy: Linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. InElizabeth Couper-Kuhler & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 257–282. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219043.3.257
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.3.257 [Google Scholar]
21. Stivers, Tanya
    2013 Sequence organization. InJack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 191–209. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Tottie, Gunnel
    2014 On the use of uh and um in American English. Functions of Language21(1). 6–29. 10.1075/fol.21.1.02tot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.02tot [Google Scholar]
23. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2008 “All that he endeavoured to prove was …”: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogual and dialogic contexts. InRobin Cooper & Ruth Kempson (eds.), Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution, 143–177. London: King’s College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]