Gossip as a model of inference to composite hypotheses

References

1. Allemang, D. , Tanner, M.C. , Bylander, T. , & Josephson, J.R
   (1987) Computational complexity of hypothesis assembly. InProceedings of the Lentil International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2), pp.1112–1119.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atran, S
   (2002) In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ayim, M
   (1994) Knowledge through the grapevine: Gossip as inquiry. In R.F. Goodman & A. Ben-Ze’ev (Eds.), Good Gossip (pp.85–99). Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bardone, E. & Magnani, L
   (2010) The appeal of gossiping fallacies and its eco-logical roots. Pragmatics & Cognition, 18(2), 365–396. doi: 10.1075/pc.18.2.06bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18.2.06bar [Google Scholar]
5. Beersma, B. , & Van Kleef, G.A
   (2011) How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 642–649. doi: 10.1177/1948550611405073
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405073 [Google Scholar]
6. Bertolotti, T
   (2012) From mindless modeling to scientific models: The case of emerging models. In L. Magnani & P. Li (Eds.), Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Western & Eastern Studies (pp.75–104). Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑29928‑5_4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29928-5_4 [Google Scholar]
7. Bertolotti, T. , & Magnani, L
   (2014) An epistemological analysis of gossip and gossip based knowledge. Synthese, 191, 4037–4067. doi: 10.1007/s11229‑014‑0514‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0514-2 [Google Scholar]
8. Bertolotti, T. , & Magnani, L
   (2010) The role of agency detection in the invention of supernatural beings: An abductive approach. In L. Magnani , W. Carnielli & C. Pizzi (Eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Abduction, Logic, and Computational Discovery (pp.195–213). Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boyer, P
   (2001) Religion Explained. London: Vintage U.K. Random House.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brunswik, E
    (1952) The Conceptual Framework of Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bylander, T. , & Mittal, S
    (1986) CRSL: A language for classificatory problem solving and uncertainty handling. AI Magazine, 7(3), 66–77.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Clark, A
    (2005) Word, niche and super-niche: How language makes minds matter more. Theoria, 54, 255–268.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dunbar, R
    (2004) Gossip in an evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110. doi: 10.1037/1089‑2680.8.2.100
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100 [Google Scholar]
14. Foster, E.K
    (2004) Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99. doi: 10.1037/1089‑2680.8.2.78
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78 [Google Scholar]
15. Gigerenzer, G. , & Brighton, H
    (2009) Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2008.01006.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x [Google Scholar]
16. Gigerenzer, G. , & Selten, R
    (2002) Bounded Rationality. The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goodman, R.F. , & Ben-Ze’ev, A
    (Eds.) (1994) Good Gossip. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hammond, K.R. & Steward, T.R
    (Eds.) (2001) The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hart, H.L.A. , & Honoré, T
    (1985) Causation in the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254744.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254744.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
20. Josephson, J.R. , Chandrasekharan, S. , Smith, J.W.J. , & Tanner, M.C
    (1987) A mechanism for forming composite explanatory hypotheses. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 17(3), 445–454. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1987.4309060
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1987.4309060 [Google Scholar]
21. Josephson, J.R. , & Josephson, S.G
    (Eds.) (1994) Abductive Inference. Computation, Philosophy, Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511530128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511530128 [Google Scholar]
22. Kelemen, D
    (2005) Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15(5), 295–301. doi: 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00672.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00672.x [Google Scholar]
23. Kelso, J.A.S
    (2009) Synergies: Atoms of brain and behavior. In D. Sternad (Ed.), Progress in Motor Control (pp.83–91). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑77064‑2_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_5 [Google Scholar]
24. Kim, J.H. , & Pearl, J
    (1983) A computational model for causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference systems. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 1, pp.190–194).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kominsky, J.F. , Phillips, J. , Gerstenberg, T. , Lagnado, D. , & Knobe, J
    (2014) Causal supersession. In P. Bello , M. Guarini , M. McShane , & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Magnani, L
    (2015) The eco-cognitive model of abduction. ‘Apagwgh¯ now: Naturalizing the Logic of Abduction. Journal of Applied Logic, 13, 285–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jal.2015.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2015.04.003 [Google Scholar]
27. Magnani, L
    (2013) Is abduction ignorance-preserving? Conventions, models, and fictions in science. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 21(6), 882–914. doi: 10.1093/jigpal/jzt012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzt012 [Google Scholar]
28. Magnani, L
    (2009) Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mithen, S
    (1999) Handaxes and ice age carvings: Hard evidence for the evolution of consciousness. In A. Hameroff , A. Kaszniak , & D. Chalmers (Eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness III: The Third Tucson Discussions and Debates (pp.281–296). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mithen, S
    (1996) The Prehistory of the Mind. A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion, and Science. London: Thames and Hudson.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Peirce, C.S
    (1931–1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (vols. 1-6, C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.); vols. 7-8, A.W. Burks (Ed.)) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Shadish, W.R. , Cook, T.D. , & Campbell, D.T
    (2002) Experimental and QuasiExperimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston / New York: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Simon, H
    (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 99–118.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Thagard, P
    (1997) Collaborative knowledge. Noûs, 31, 242–261. doi: 10.1111/0029‑4624.00044
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00044 [Google Scholar]
35. Vicente, K.J
    (2003) Beyond the lens model and direct perception: Toward a broader ecological psychology. Ecological Psychology, 15(3), 241–267. doi: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1503_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1503_4 [Google Scholar]
36. Yerkovich, S
    (1977) Gossiping as a way of speaking. Journal of Communication, 27, 192–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1977.tb01817.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01817.x [Google Scholar]