1887
Volume 22, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examined the interrelationships among selected cognitive characteristics of Iranian EFL learners including English self-efficacy, metacognitive awareness, and their test performance. For this purpose, a model was proposed based on empirical studies and was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). Following this, two questionnaires were administrated to 200 Iranian EFL learners of two language institutes in Mashhad, Iran. Results of this study indicated that Iranian EFL learners perceived themselves self-efficacious. They were also metacognitively aware of their learning process. Correlation analysis results showed that metacognitive awareness statistically correlated with English self-efficacy and foreign language test performance. It was found that English self-efficacy significantly correlated with foreign language test performance as well. The proposed SEM model adequately fitted the data. Results of the SEM indicated that self-efficacy was the strongest direct predictor of learners’ test performance. Metacognitive awareness directly affected learners’ English self-efficacy. It also indirectly affected test performance through affecting English self-efficacy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.22.3.03gou
2016-09-26
2019-09-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bandura, A
    (1997) Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1998) Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health, 13(4), 623–649. doi: 10.1080/08870449808407422
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407422 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouffard-Bouchard, T. , Parent, S. , & Larivee, S
    (1991) Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14(2), 153–164. doi: 10.1177/016502549101400203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016502549101400203 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradford, S.B. , & Kozlowski, S.W.J
    (2002) Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Faculty Publications – Human Resource Studies. digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/hrpubs/9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao, L. , & Nietfeld, J.L
    (2007) College students’ metacognitive awareness of difficulties in learning the class content does not automatically lead to adjustment of study strategies. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 7, 31–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carr, A
    (2004) Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cihanoglu, M.O
    (2012) Metacognitive awareness of teacher candidates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4529–4533. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.290
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.290 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, A.D
    (1998) Strategies and processes in test taking and SLA. In L.F. Bachman & A.D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp.90–111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coutinho, S
    (2007) The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate Journal, 7, 39–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Coronado-Aliegro, J
    (2007) The effect of self-assessment on the self-efficacy of students studying Spanish as a foreign language (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved fromd-scholarship.pitt.edu/9914/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Devine, J
    (1993) The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing. In J.G. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp.105–127). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dörnyei, Z
    (2007) Research method in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Flavell, J.H
    (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive—developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.34.10.906
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghanizadeh, A. , & Moafian, F
    (2011) The relationship between Iranian EFL teachers’ sense of self-efficacy and their pedagogical success in language institutes. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 249–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghonsooly, B. , & Ghanizadeh, A
    (2013) Self-efficacy and self-regulation and their relationship: A study of Iranian EFL teachers. The Language Learning Journal, 41(1), 68–84. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2011.625096
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2011.625096 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghonsooly, B. , Elahi, M. , & Golparvar, S.E
    (2012) General English university students’ self-efficacy and their achievement. The Iranian EFL Journal, 8(3), 153–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hambleton, R.K. , Swaminathan, H. , & Rogers, H.J
    (1991) Fundamentals of item response theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Isaacson, R.M. , & Fujita, F
    (2006) Metacognitive knowledge monitoring and self-regulated learning: Academic success and reflections on learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 39–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Iskandar, T.M. , & Sanusi, Z.M
    (2011) Assessing the effect of self-efficacy and task complexity on international control audit judgment. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 29–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jackson, J.W
    (2002) Enhancing self-efficacy and learning performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 243–255. doi: 10.1080/00220970209599508
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970209599508 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuhn, D. , Schauble, L. , & Garcia-Mila, M
    (1992) Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285–327. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0904_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0904_1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pajares, F
    (2001) Toward a positive psychology of academic motivation: The role of self-efficacy beliefs. In R. Gilman , E.S. Huebner , & M.J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp.149–160). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pajares, F. , & Schunk, D.H
    (2001) Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp.239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pishghadam, R. , & Khajavi, Gh. H
    (2013).Intelligence and metacognition as predictors of foreign language achievement: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 176–181. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pour-Mohammadi, M. , & Abidin, M.J.Z
    (2011) Test-taking strategies, schema theory and reading comprehension test performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(18), 237–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pour-Mohammadi, M. , & Abidin, M.J.Z
    (2012) Does instructing test-taking strategies significantly enhance reading comprehension test performance? The case of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 293–311. doi: 10.5296/ijl.v4i3.1964
    https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i3.1964 [Google Scholar]
  27. Rahemi, J
    (2007) Self-efficacy in English and Iranian senior high school students majoring in humanities.Novitas-ROYAL, 1(2), 98–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schraw, G
    (1994) The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 143–154. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1013
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1013 [Google Scholar]
  29. (1998) Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113–125. doi: 10.1023/A:1003044231033
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schraw, G. , & Dennison, R.S
    (1994).Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schreiber, J.B. , Amaury, N. , Stage, F.K. , Barlow, E.A. , & King, J
    (2006).Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337. doi: 10.3200/JOER.99.6.323‑338
    https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338 [Google Scholar]
  32. Siam, E.N. , & Soozandehfar, M.A
    (2011) Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and reading comprehension. California Linguistic Notes, 36(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Siegler, R.S. and Jenkins, E
    (1989).How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tseng, W.T. , Dörnyei, Z. , & Schmitt, N
    (2006) A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78–102. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami046
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami046 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wenden, A
    1998Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. Great Britain: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Williams, M. , & Burden, R.L
    (1997) Psychology of language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, L.J. , & Wu, A
    (2009) Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 2(1), 37–59.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.22.3.03gou
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error