1887
Volume 30, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Children who grow up exposed to more than one language face a range of challenges and developmental environments which differ from those of monolinguals. Recently, studies have suggested that this may lead to differences in the development of pragmatic skills and sensitivity to socio-pragmatic cues. We investigate whether bilingually exposed children are able to make further use of these cues in an ostensive teaching setting for word learning in a sample of 110 children aged 4 to 6 years old and find evidence that bilingual children do perform significantly better in ostensive teaching settings when asked to use pragmatic cues to derive the meaning of a novel word. We discuss implications for theories of pragmatics and bilingual development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.22018.lor
2023-11-09
2025-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akhtar, Nameera, Jennifer Menjivar, Elena Hoicka & Mark A. Sabbagh
    2012 Learning foreign labels from a foreign speaker: The role of (limited) exposure to a second language. Journal of child language39(5). 1135–1149. 10.1017/S0305000911000481
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000481 [Google Scholar]
  2. Antoniou, Kyriakos, Alma Veenstra, Mikhail Kissine & Napoleon Katsos
    2020 How does childhood bilingualism and bi-dialectalism affect the interpretation and processing of pragmatic meanings?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition23(1). 186–203. 10.1017/S1366728918001189
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001189 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barac, Raluca & Ellen Bialystok
    2011 Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching44(1). 36–54. 10.1017/S0261444810000339
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000339 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2014 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bialystok, Ellen
    1988 Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental psychology24(4). 560. 10.1037/0012‑1649.24.4.560
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.560 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bialystok, Ellen & Fergus I. M. Craik
    2010 Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind. Current directions in psychological science19(1). 19–23. 10.1177/0963721409358571
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409358571 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bialystok, Ellen, Raluca Barac, Agnes Blaye & Diane Poulin-Dubois
    2010 Word mapping and executive functioning in young monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Cognition and Development11(4). 485–508. 10.1080/15248372.2010.516420
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.516420 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bialystok, Ellen, Gigi Luk, Kathleen F. Peets & Yang Sujin
    2010 Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition13(4). 525–531. 10.1017/S1366728909990423
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990423 [Google Scholar]
  9. Byers-Heinlein, Krista
    2017 Bilingualism affects 9-month-old infants’ expectations about how words refer to kinds. Developmental Science20(1). e12486. 10.1111/desc.12486
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12486 [Google Scholar]
  10. Byers-Heinlein, Krista & Janet F. Werker
    2009 Monolingual, bilingual, trilingual: Infants’ language experience influences the development of a word-learning heuristic. Developmental Science12(5). 815–823. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2009.00902.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00902.x [Google Scholar]
  11. 2013 Lexicon structure and the disambiguation of novel words: Evidence from bilingual infants. Cognition128(3). 407–416. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cane, James E., Heather J. Ferguson & Ian A. Apperly
    2017 Using perspective to resolve reference: The impact of cognitive load and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition43(4). 591.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, Eve. V.
    2009First language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511806698
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806698 [Google Scholar]
  14. Csibra, Gergely & György Gergely
    2009 Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences13(4). 148–153. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dash, Tanya & Bhoomika R. Kar
    2020 Behavioural and ERP correlates of bilingual language control and general-purpose inhibitory control predicted by L1 and L2 proficiency. Journal of Neurolinguistics561. 100914. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100914
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100914 [Google Scholar]
  16. Davidson, Denise & Dina Tell
    2005 Monolingual and bilingual children’s use of mutual exclusivity in the naming of whole objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology92(1). 25–45. 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dunn, Lloyd M. & Douglas M. Dunn
    2009The British picture vocabulary scale. GL Assessment Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Durang López, Ezequiel M.
    2021 A bilingual advantage in memory capacity: Assessing the roles of proficiency, number of languages acquired and age of acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism25(3). 606–621. 10.1177/1367006920965714
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920965714 [Google Scholar]
  19. Engel de Abreu, Pascale M. J.
    2011 Working memory in multilingual children: Is there a bilingual effect?Memory19(5). 529–537. 10.1080/09658211.2011.590504
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.590504 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fan, Samantha P., Zoe Liberman, Boaz Keysar & Katherine D. Kinzler
    2015 The exposure advantage: Early exposure to a multilingual environment promotes effective communication. Psychological Science26(7). 1090–1097. 10.1177/0956797615574699
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615574699 [Google Scholar]
  21. Festman, Julia, Sophia Czapka & Adam Winsler
    2022 How many moderators does it take till we know… that too many bilingual advantage effects have died?InKristin Kersten & Adam Winsler (eds.), Understanding variability in second language acquisition, bilingualism, and cognition, 80–127. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003155683‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003155683-4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gentner, Dedre
    1982 Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. InStan Kuczaj (ed.), Language development: Language, thought and culture, 301–334. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Goetz, Peggy. J.
    2003 The effects of bilingualism on Theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition6(1). 1–15. 10.1017/S1366728903001007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001007 [Google Scholar]
  24. Green, David W.
    1998 Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition1(2). 67–81. 10.1017/S1366728998000133
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133 [Google Scholar]
  25. Greenberg, Anastasia, Buddhika Bellana & Ellen Bialystok
    2013 Perspective-taking ability in bilingual children: Extending advantages in executive control to spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development28(1). 41–50. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hartanto, Andree & Hwajin Yang
    2019 Does early active bilingualism enhance inhibitory control and monitoring? A propensity-matching analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition45(2). 360.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Healey, Emma & Barbora Skarabela
    2008 Are children willing to accept two labels for a single object? A comparative study of mutual exclusivity in monolingual and bilingual children. InProceedings of the Child Language Seminar 2007, 49–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Horowitz, Alexandra C., Rose M. Schneider & Michael C. Frank
    2018 The trouble with quantifiers: Exploring children’s deficits in scalar implicature. Child Development89(6). e572–e593. 10.1111/cdev.13014
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13014 [Google Scholar]
  29. Imai, Mutsumi, Lianjing Li, Etsuko Haryu, Hiroyuki Okada, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff & Jun Shigematsu
    2008 Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese-, English-, and Japanese speaking children. Child Development79(4). 979–1000. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2008.01171.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01171.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Katerelos, Marina, Diane Poulin-Dubois & Yuriko Oshima-Takane
    2011 A cross-linguistic study of word-mapping in 18-to 20-month-old infants. Infancy16(5). 508–534. 10.1111/j.1532‑7078.2010.00064.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00064.x [Google Scholar]
  31. King, Barbara. J.
    1994The information continuum: Evolution of social information transfer in monkeys, apes, and hominids. School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kuhl, Patricia. K.
    2007 Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain?Developmental Science10(1). 110–120. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00572.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00572.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Lewis, Molly L. & Michael C. Frank
    2016 Understanding the effect of social context on learning: A replication of Xu and Tenenbaum 2007b. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General145(9). e72. 10.1037/xge0000203
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000203 [Google Scholar]
  34. Liberman, Zoe, Amanda L. Woodward, Boaz Keysar & Katherine D. Kinzler
    2017 Exposure to multiple languages enhances communication skills in infancy. Developmental Science20(1). e12420. 10.1111/desc.12420
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12420 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lorge, Isabelle & Katsos, Napoleon
    2019 Listener-adapted speech: Bilinguals adapt in a more sensitive way. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism9(3). 376–397. 10.1075/lab.16054.lor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16054.lor [Google Scholar]
  36. Luk, Gigi, E. R. I. C. De Sa & Ellen Bialystok
    2011 Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition14(4). 588–595. 10.1017/S1366728911000010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000010 [Google Scholar]
  37. Markman, Ellen M. & Gwyn F. Wachtel
    1988 Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology20(2). 121–157. 10.1016/0010‑0285(88)90017‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90017-5 [Google Scholar]
  38. Menjivar, Jennifer & Nameera Akhtar
    2017 Language experience and preschoolers’ foreign word learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition20(3). 642–648. 10.1017/S1366728916001103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001103 [Google Scholar]
  39. Morales, Julia, Alejandra Calvo & Ellen Bialystok
    2013 Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology114(2). 187–202. 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nicolay, Anne-Catherine & Martine Poncelet
    2013 Cognitive advantage in children enrolled in a second-language immersion elementary school program for three years. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition16(3). 597–607. 10.1017/S1366728912000375
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000375 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pearson, Barbara Zurer, Sylvia C. Fernández & D. Kimbrough Oller
    1993 Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning43(1). 93–120. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1993.tb00174.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Pearson, Barbara Z., Sylvia C. Fernández, Vanessa Lewedeg & D. Kimbrough Oller
    1997 The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics18(1). 41–58. 10.1017/S0142716400009863
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009863 [Google Scholar]
  43. Purić, Danka, Jasmina Vuksanović & Vasiliki Chondrogianni
    2017 Cognitive advantages of immersion education after 1 year: Effects of amount of exposure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology1591. 296–309. 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosch, Eleanor, Carolyn B. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray, David M. Johnson & Penny Boyes-Braem
    1976 Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology8(3). 382–439. 10.1016/0010‑0285(76)90013‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X [Google Scholar]
  45. Roseberry, Sarah, Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Parish-Morris, Julia & Golinkoff, Roberta M.
    2009 Live action: Can young children learn verbs from video?Child Development80(5). 1360–1375. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2009.01338.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01338.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Rubio-Fernández, Paula & Sam Glucksberg
    2012 Reasoning about other people’s beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition38(1). 211.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Scofield, Jason & Douglas A. Behrend
    2011 Clarifying the role of joint attention in early word learning. First Language31(3). 326–341. 10.1177/0142723710395423
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710395423 [Google Scholar]
  48. Siegal, Michael, Laura Iozzi & Luca Surian
    2009 Bilingualism and conversational understanding in young children. Cognition110(1). 115–122. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  49. Siegal, Michael, Ayumi Matsuo, Clair Pond & Y. Otsu
    2007 Bilingualism and cognitive development: Evidence from scalar implicatures. InProceedings of the 8th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 265–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Siegal, Michael, Luca Surian, Ayumi Matsuo, Alessandra Geraci, Laura Iozzi, Yuko Okumura & Shoji Itakura
    2010 Bilingualism accentuates children’s conversational understanding. PloS One5(2). e9004. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009004
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1986Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Thomas L. Griffiths
    2001 Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences24(4). 629–640. 10.1017/S0140525X01000061
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000061 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tomasello, Michael
    1995Joint attention as social cognition. InChris Moore & Philip J. Dunham (eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development, 103–130. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2000 The social-pragmatic theory of word learning. Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association10(4). 401–413.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Tomasello, Michael & Nameera Akhtar
    1995 Two-year-olds use pragmatic cues to differentiate reference to objects and actions. Cognitive Development10(2). 201–224. 10.1016/0885‑2014(95)90009‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(95)90009-8 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria
    2014 Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism4(3). 283–313. 10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi [Google Scholar]
  57. Waxman, Sandra R. & Toby D. Kosowski
    1990 Nouns mark category relations: Toddlers’ and preschoolers’ word-learning biases. Child Development61(5). 1461–1473. 10.2307/1130756
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1130756 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wermelinger, Stephanie, Anja Gampe & Moritz M. Daum
    2017 Bilingual toddlers have advanced abilities to repair communication failure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology1551. 84–94. 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  59. Woodward, Amanda
    1993 The effect of labeling on children’s attention to objects. InProceedings of the 24th Annual Child Language Research Forum, 35–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Xu, Fei & Joshua B. Tenenbaum
    2007a Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review114(2). 245. 10.1037/0033‑295X.114.2.245
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2007b Sensitivity to sampling in Bayesian word learning. Developmental Science10(3). 288–297. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00590.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00590.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Yow, W. Quin
    2015 Monolingual and bilingual preschoolers’ use of gestures to interpret ambiguous pronouns. Journal of Child Language42(6). 1394–1407. 10.1017/S0305000914000737
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000737 [Google Scholar]
  63. Yow, W. Quin & Ellen. M. Markman
    2011a Bilingualism and children’s use of paralinguistic cues to interpret emotion in speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition14(4). 562–569. 10.1017/S1366728910000404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000404 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2011b Young bilingual children’s heightened sensitivity to referential cues. Journal of Cognition and Development12(1). 12–31. 10.1080/15248372.2011.539524
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.539524 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2015 A bilingual advantage in how children integrate multiple cues to understand a speaker’s referential intent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition18(3). 391–399. 10.1017/S1366728914000133
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000133 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2016 Children increase their sensitivity to a speaker’s nonlinguistic cues following a communicative breakdown. Child Development87(2). 385–394. 10.1111/cdev.12479
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12479 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.22018.lor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.22018.lor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bilingualism; inference; ostension; pragmatic development; word learning
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error