Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, D.M.L
    2003 “Embodied cognition: A field guide”. Artificial Intelligence149(1): 91–130. doi: 10.1016/S0004‑3702(03)00054‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-7 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsalou, L.W
    2008 “Grounded cognition”. Annual Reviews Psychology59: 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsalou, L.W. , Breazeal, C. and Smith, L.B
    2007 “Cognition as coordinated non-cognition”. Cognitive Processing8(2): 79–91. doi: 10.1007/s10339‑007‑0163‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0163-1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bechtel, W
    1988Philosophy of Mind: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blakemore, S.J. , Rees, G. and Frith, C.D
    1998 “How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study”. Elsevier Science36(6).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blakemore, S.J. , Wolpert, D. and Frith, C.D
    2000 “Why can’t you tickle yourself”. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins11(11).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brentano, F
    1874Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chisholm, R.M
    1984 “The primacy of the intentional”. Synthese61(1): 89–109. doi: 10.1007/BF00485490
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485490 [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, A
    1998 “Embodiment and the philosophy of mind”. Current Issues in Philosophy of Mind43.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Damasio, A
    2010Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Damasio, A. and Damasio, H
    2006 “Minding the body”. ProQuest Agriculture Journals3(135).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dearden, A. and Demiris, Y
    2005 “Learning forward models for robots”. In Int. Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence . Edimburgh, 1440.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dearden, A
    2008Developmental Learning of Internal Models for Robotics. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Demiris, Y. and Khadhouri, B
    2006 “Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition of actions. Robotics and autonomous systems”. The Social Mechanisms of Robot Programming from Demonstration54(5): 361–369.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dewey, J
    1896The Metaphysical Assumptions of Materialism, Chapter the Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. Early Works 5 (EW. 5).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1922The Metaphysical Assumptions of Materialism, chapter Human Nature and Conduct. Middle Works 14 (MW.14).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Di Paolo E.A
    ., Murase, K. and Asakura, T (eds) 2003Organismically-Inspired Robotics: Homeostatic Adaptation and Teleology Beyond the Closed Sensorimotor Loop Dynamical Systems Approach to Embodiment and Sociality. Australia: Advanced Knowledge International, pp.19–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dretske, F
    2000Perception, Knowledge, and Belief: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511625312
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625312 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dreyfus, H.L
    1979What Computers Can’t Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1972. New York: Harper & Row,
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Escobar, E. , Hermosillo, J. and Lara, B
    2012 “Self body mapping in mobile robots using vision and forward models”. Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fodor, J.A
    1975The Language of Thought. Thomas Y. Crowell Co. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Froese, T. and Ziemke, T
    2009 “Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind”. Artificial Intelligence173(3-4): 466–500. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2008.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gaona, W. , Hermosillo, J. and Lara, B
    2012 “Distance perception in mobile robots as an emergent consequence of visual-motor cycles using forward models”. Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gentsch, A. and Schütz-Bosbach, S
    2011 “I did it: Unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature”. Cognitive Neuroscience23(12): 3817–3828. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00012
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00012 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibson, J.J
    1950The Perception of the Visual World. U.S.A: The Riverside Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1986The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Harnad, S
    1990 “The symbol grounding problem”. Physica D42: 335–346. doi: 10.1016/0167‑2789(90)90087‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6 [Google Scholar]
  28. Haruno, M. , Wolpert, D.M. and Kawato, M
    2001 “Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control”. Neural Computation13: 2201–2220. doi: 10.1162/089976601750541778
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089976601750541778 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heidegger, M
    1985History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1996Being and Time (Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy). New York: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoffmann, H. and Moeller, R
    2004 “Action selection and mental transformation based on a chain of forward models”. InProceedings. of the 8th International. Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press, 213–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoffmann, H
    2007 “Perception through visuomotor anticipation in a mobile robot”. Neural Networks20: 22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2006.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Husserl, E
    1983Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Vol. 2. Netherlands: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Husserl, E. , Sheehan, Thomas and Palmer, Richard E
    (eds) 1997Edmund Husserl: Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927-1931). Great Britain: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9923‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9923-5 [Google Scholar]
  35. James, W
    1897The Will to Believe and Other Popular Essays in Popular Philosophy. Longmans Green and Co. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1904A World of Pure Experience. Chapter 2. Longmans Green and Co. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jazé, J-P
    2012 “El rol del saber no-proposicional en la explicación de la acción”. Memorias del I Coloquio Internacional de Ciencias Cognitivas.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jordan, M.I. and Rumelhart, D.E
    1992 “Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher”. Cognitive Science16: 307–354. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1603_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1603_1 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kiverstein, J
    2007 “Could a robot have a subjective point of view?” Journal of Consciousness Studies14(7).
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lara, B. , Rendon, J.M. and Capistran, M.A
    2007 “Prediction of multi-modal sensory situations a for- ward model approach”. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Latin America Robotics Symposium , Vol. 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Metta, G. , Sandini, G. , Natale, L. , Craighero, L. and Fadiga, L
    2006 “Understanding mirror neurons: a bio-robotic approach”. Interaction Studies7: 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Miall, R.C. and Wolpert, D.M
    1996 “Forward models for physiological motor control”. Neural Net-Works9(8): 1265–1279. doi: 10.1016/S0893‑6080(96)00035‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Moeller, R. and Schenk, W
    2008 “Bootstrapping cognition from behavior— a computerized thought experiment”. Cognitive Science32(3): 504–554. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035241
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802035241 [Google Scholar]
  44. Newell, A. and Simon, H.A
    1963Computers and Thought, chapter GPS: A Program that Simulates Human Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. O´Regan, J.K. , Myin, E. and Noë, A
    2005 “Sensory consciousness explained (better) in terms of ‘corporality’ and ‘alerting capacity’”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences4: 369–387. doi: 10.1007/s11097‑005‑9000‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9000-0 [Google Scholar]
  46. Peirce, C.S
    1877 “The fixation of belief”. Popular Science, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 1878 “How to make our ideas clear”. Popular Science, 286–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1998 “What pragmatism is”. In The Peirce Edition Project (ed.), The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2 (1893-1913). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 331–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pezzulo, G. , Barsalou, L.W. , Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M.H., McRae, K. and Spivey, M.J
    2011 “The mechanics of embodiment: A dialog on embodiment and computational modeling”. Frontiers in psychology2(5). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pezzulo, G. , Can- didi, M. , Dindo, H. and Barca, L
    2013 “Action simulation in the human brain: Twelve questions”. New Ideas in Psychology31(3): 270–290. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pfeifer, R. and Scheier, C
    1999Understanding Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Putnam, H
    1975 The meaning of `Meaning´. InMind, language, and reality: Philosophical papers of Hilary Putnam, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511625251
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625251 [Google Scholar]
  53. Richardson, R.C
    1981 “Internal representations: Prologue to a theory of intentionality”. Philosophical Topics12(1). doi: 10.5840/philtopics198112149
    https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics198112149 [Google Scholar]
  54. Rorty, R
    1979Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Searle, J.R
    1980 “Minds, brains, and programs”. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences3: 417–457. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00005756
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756 [Google Scholar]
  56. 1983Intentionality An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173452
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173452 [Google Scholar]
  57. 1984Minds, Brains and Science (Lectures, Reith). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 1992The Rediscovery of the Mind. London: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Shapiro, L.A
    2011Embodied Cognition. (New problems of philosophy). London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Turing, A
    1950 “Computing machinery and intelligence”. Mind59: 433–460. doi: 10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433 [Google Scholar]
  61. Varela, F.J
    1979“Principles of biological autonomy”. New York, North Holland: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wilson, M
    2002 “Six views of embodied cognition”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review9(4): 625–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322 [Google Scholar]
  63. Wilson, M. and Knoblich, G
    2005 “The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics”. Psycho- Logical Bulletin131: 460–473. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.131.3.460
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wolpert, D.M. , Miall, R.C. and Kawato, M
    1998 “Internal models in the cerebellum”. Elsevier Science2(9).
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Wolpert, D.M. and Ghahramani, Z
    2000 “Computational principles of movement neuroscience”. Nature Neuroscience3: 1212–1217. doi: 10.1038/81497
    https://doi.org/10.1038/81497 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wolpert, D.M. , Ghahramani, Z. and Flanagan, J.R
    2001 “Perspectives and problems in motor learning”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences5(11): 487–494. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01773‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01773-3 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wolpert, D.M. , Doya, K. and Kawato, M
    2003 “A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences358(1431): 593–602. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1238
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1238 [Google Scholar]
  68. Ziemke, T
    1999Rethinking Grounding. Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. (Department of Computer Science). University of Skövde, 177–190. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑585‑29605‑0_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_20 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error