1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics & Cognition
  4. Volume 23, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This philosophical-pragmatic paper discusses several forms of irony which rest on other figures of speech contingent on overt untruthfulness, namely the figures arising as a result of flouting the first maxim of Quality. It is argued that an ironic implicature may be piggybacked on another implicature, called “as if implicature”, originating from flouting the first maxim of Quality occasioned by metaphor. Metaphorical irony, which is subject to the irony-after-metaphor order of interpretation, exhibits a number of manifestations depending on the nature and scope of irony, and the scope of the subordinate metaphor. On the other hand, rather than giving rise to an as if implicature distinct from the irony-based one, hyperbole and meiosis, which are inherently evaluative, most typically overlap with ironically evaluative expressions, promoting meiotic and hyperbolic irony, frequently (wrongly, as will be claimed here) considered by researchers to rely on flouting Quantity maxims. However, cases of independent use of hyperbole or meiosis in ironic environment are also possible. Such invite two levels of untruthfulness and two implicatures.

© 2016 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.23.2.03dyn
2017-07-10
2023-10-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pc.23.2.03dyn
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bezuidenhout, A
    2001 “Metaphor and what is said: A defense of a direct expression view of metaphor”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy25: 156–186. doi: 10.1111/1475‑4975.00044
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4975.00044 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blair, H
    1842 Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Halifax: William Milner.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Camp, E
    2006 “Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said”. Mind and Language21(3): 280–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00279.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00279.x [Google Scholar]
  4. 2012 “Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction”. Noûs46: 587–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0068.2010.00822.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00822.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Camp, E. and Hawthorne, J
    2008 “Sarcastic ‘Like’: A case study in the interface of syntax and semantics”. In John Hawthorne (ed), Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Carston, R. and Wearing, C
    2015 “Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony”. Journal of Pragmatics79: 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Carter, R. and McCarthy, M
    1997 Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Claridge, C
    2011 Hyperbole in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Colston, H
    1997 “Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism”. Discourse Processes23: 25–45. doi: 10.1080/01638539709544980
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544980 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2000 “On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension”. Pragmatics and Cognition8(2): 277–324. doi: 10.1075/pc.8.2.02col
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.8.2.02col [Google Scholar]
  11. Colston, H. and O’Brien, J
    2000 “Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishment of irony and hyperbole”. Discourse Processes30(2): 179–199. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3002_05
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3002_05 [Google Scholar]
  12. Creusere, M
    2000 “A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children’s recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity”. Metaphor and Symbol15: 29–45. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2000.9678863
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678863 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dynel, M
    2011 “A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception”. International Review of Pragmatics3(2): 137–165. doi: 10.1163/187731011X610996
     https://doi.org/10.1163/187731011X610996 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2013a “Irony from a neo–Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature”. Intercultural Pragmatics10(3): 403–431. doi: 10.1515/ip‑2013‑0018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0018 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013b “When does irony tickle the hearer? Towards capturing the characteristics of humorous irony”. In M. Dynel (ed), The Pragmatics of Humour Across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 289–320. doi: 10.1075/thr.1.14dyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.14dyn [Google Scholar]
  16. 2016 “Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness: On lying, deception, irony and metaphor”. Pragmatics & Cognition23 (1): 174–208. doi: 10.1075/pc.23.1.08dyn
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.08dyn [Google Scholar]
  17. 2017 “The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness”. Corpus Pragmatics1: 1–34. doi: 10.1007/s41701‑016‑0003‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-016-0003-6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Falk, L
    1990 “Between emphasis and exaggeration: Verbal emphasis in the English of Cape Breton Island”. In J. Black (ed), Papers from the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association. St John’s Memorial: University of Newfoundland, 39–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fogelin, R
    1988 Figuratively Speaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Garmendia, J
    2010 “Irony is critical”. Pragmatics and Cognition18: 397–421. doi: 10.1075/pc.18.2.07gar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18.2.07gar [Google Scholar]
  21. 2011 “She’s (not) a fine friend: ‘Saying’ and criticism in irony”. Intercultural Pragmatics8: 41–65. doi: 10.1515/IPRG.2011.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2011.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2014 “The clash: Humor and critical attitude in verbal irony”. Humor27: 641–659. doi: 10.1515/humor‑2014‑0094
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0094 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibbs, R
    1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibbs, R.W
    1999 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibbs, R
    2000 “Irony in talk among friends”. Metaphor and Symbol15: 5–27. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gibbs, R. and O’Brien, J
    1991 “Psychological aspects of irony understanding”. Journal of Pragmatics16: 523–530. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90101‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90101-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Grice, H.P
    1989a “Logic and conversation”. InStudies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 22–40. [Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58; Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In D. Davison and G. Harman (eds), The Logic of Grammar. Dickenson: Encino, 64–75.]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 1989b “Further notes on logic and conversation”. InStudies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 41–57. [Grice, Herbert Paul. 1978. “Further notes on logic and conversation”. In P. Cole (ed), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 113–127.]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hamamoto, H
    1998 “Irony from a cognitive perspective”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–270. doi: 10.1075/pbns.37.14ham
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.37.14ham [Google Scholar]
  30. Haverkate, H
    1990 “A speech-act analysis of irony”. Journal of Pragmatics14: 77–109. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90065‑L
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90065-L [Google Scholar]
  31. Horn, L
    1989 The Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Israel, M
    2006 “Saying less and meaning less”. In B. Birner and G. Ward (eds), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–162. doi: 10.1075/slcs.80.09isr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.80.09isr [Google Scholar]
  33. Jespersen, O
    1917 Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kapogianni, E
    2011 “Irony via ‘surrealism’”. In M. Dynel (ed), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51–68. doi: 10.1075/pbns.210.05kap
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.05kap [Google Scholar]
  35. 2013 Irony and the Literal Versus Nonliteral Distinction: A Typological Approach with Focus on Ironic Implicature Strength. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 2014 “Differences in use and function of verbal irony between real and fictional discourse: (mis)interpretation and irony blindness”. Humor27: 597–618. doi: 10.1515/humor‑2014‑0093
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0093 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kreuz, R. and Glucksberg, S
    1989 “How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118(4): 374–386. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.118.4.374
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.374 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kreuz, R. and Roberts, R
    1995 “Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity10: 21–31. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kumon-Nakamura, S. , Glucksberg, S. and Brown, M
    1995 “How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General124: 3–21. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.124.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lausberg, H. , Orton, D and Anderson, D
    1998 Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Levinson, S.C
    2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Livnat, Z
    2004 “On verbal irony, meta-linguistic knowledge and echoic interpretation”. Pragmatics & Cognition12(5): 7–70. doi: 10.1075/pc.12.1.05liv
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.12.1.05liv [Google Scholar]
  43. 2011 “Quantity, truthfulness and ironic effect”. Language Sciences33(2): 305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  44. McCarthy, M. and Carter, R
    2004 “‘There’s millions of them’: Hyperbole in everyday conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics36: 149–184. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00116‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00116-4 [Google Scholar]
  45. Nemesi, A
    2010 “Data-gathering methods in research on hyperbole production and interpretation”. In E.T. Nemeth and K. Bibok (eds), The Role of Data at the Semantic-Pragmatic Interface. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 381–417.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Neuhaus, L
    2016 “On the relation of irony, understatement, and litotes”. Pragmatics & Cognition.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Norrick, N.R
    2004 “Hyperbole, extreme case formulations”. Journal of Pragmatics36: 1727–1739. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  48. Partington, A
    2006 The Linguistics of Laughter. A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Oxon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 2007 “Irony and the reversal of evaluation”. Journal of Pragmatics39: 1547–1569. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pexman, P. , Ferretti, T. and Katz, A
    2000 “Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony”. Discourse Processes29: 201–222. doi: 10.1207/S15326950dp2903_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pomerantz, A
    1986 “Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims”. Human Studies9: 219–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00148128
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128 [Google Scholar]
  52. Popa, M
    2009 Figuring the Code: Pragmatic Routes to the Non-literal. PhD Dissertation, University of Geneva.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 2010 “Ironic metaphor interpretation”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics33: 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Preminger, A
    (ed) 1974 Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑15617‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15617-7 [Google Scholar]
  55. Roberts, R. and Kreuz, R
    1994 “Why do people use figurative language?” Psychological Science5: 159–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1994.tb00653.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Seto, K
    1998 “On non-echoic irony”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 240–255. doi: 10.1075/pbns.37.13set
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.37.13set [Google Scholar]
  57. Smith, J
    1657 Mysterie of Rhetorique Unvail’d. Facsimile reprint of 1st ed., London: George Everfden.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D
    1981 “Irony and the use-mention distinction”. In P. Cole (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 295–313.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 1998 “Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto, and Yamanashi”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283–293. doi: 10.1075/pbns.37.16spe
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.37.16spe [Google Scholar]
  60. Spitzbardt, H
    1965 “English adverbs of degree and their semantic fields”. Philologica Pragensia8: 349–359.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Stern, J
    2000 Metaphor in Context. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Utsumi, A
    2000 “Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony”. Journal of Pragmatics32: 1777–1806. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00116‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00116-2 [Google Scholar]
  63. Vincent Marrelli, J
    2003 “Truthfulness”. In J. Verschueren , J.-O. Östman , J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–48. doi: 10.1075/pbns.37.13set
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.37.13set [Google Scholar]
  64. 2004 Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Walton, K
    2015 “Meiosis, hyperbole, irony”. Philosophical Studies, 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Wilson, D
    1995 “Is there a maxim of truthfulness?” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics7: 197–212.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 2006 “The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?” Lingua116: 1722–1743. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D
    1992 “On verbal irony”. Lingua87: 53–76. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(92)90025‑E
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E [Google Scholar]
  69. 2000 [2002, 2012] “Truthfulness and relevance”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 215–254. [Reprinted as Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. “Truthfulness and relevance”. Mind 111: 583–632; “Truthfulness and relevance”. In D. Wilson and D. Sperber. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–83]
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 2012 “Explaining irony”. In D. Wilson and D. Sperber (eds), Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–145. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008 [Google Scholar]
  71. Yamanashi, M
    1998 “Some issues in the treatment of irony and related tropes”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 271–281. doi: 10.1075/pbns.37.15yam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.37.15yam [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pc.23.2.03dyn
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): evaluative implicature; first maxim of Quality; flouting; hyperbolic irony; irony; meiotic irony; metaphorical irony; overt untruthfulness

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error