1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics & Cognition
  4. Volume 32, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 32, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Despite the numerous studies on the perception of speech acts, very little is known about how children in middle childhood perceive implicit speech acts (ISA) across different ages. To this end, referring to the research paradigm described by Holtgraves (2005, 2008), this study aimed to examine the identification and classification of utterances with implicit performatives among 621 Chinese children between the age of 9–13. The results indicate that on the identification task, 11- and 12-year-olds significantly outperformed 9-year-olds, and girls identify more implicit speech acts than boys. Most importantly, similar to adults, 13-year-olds categorized implicit speech acts based on the emotional valence of listeners, while 11-year-olds tended to group them according to the psychological states and attitudes of the speakers. However, 9-year-olds were not able to classify implicit speech acts. The above findings offer valuable implications for pragmatic teaching and research.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24014.xia
2025-11-13
2025-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pc.24014.xia
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdulkhay, Koismov
    2022 Why should we teach pragmatics? The importance of pragmatics in language teaching. Involta Scientific Journal1(11). 30–36. Retrieved fromhttps://involta.uz/index.php/iv/article/view/337
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, John L.
    1962 How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Babakr, Zana H., Pakstan Mohamedamin & Karwan Kakamad
    2019 Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory: Critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews2(3). 517–524. 10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.84
     https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.84 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandura, Albert
    1986 Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernicot, Josie & Laval Virginie
    2004 Speech acts in children: The example of promises. InIra A. Noveck & Dan Sperber (eds.), Experimental pragmatics, 207–227. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230524125_10
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125_10 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bornstein, Marc H., Chun-Shin Hahn & O. Maurice Haynes
    2004 Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations. First Language24(3). 267–304. 10.1177/0142723704045681
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723704045681 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bosco, Francesca M., Alberto Parola, Katiuscia Sacco, Marina Zettin & Romina Angeleri
    2017 Communicative-pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: The role of theory of mind and executive functions. Brain and Language1681. 73–83. 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  9. Calero, Cecilia I., Alejo Salles, Mariano Semelman & Mariano Sigman
    2013 Age and gender dependent development of theory of mind in 6-to 8-years old children. Frontiers in human neuroscience71. 281. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00281
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00281 [Google Scholar]
  10. Camaioni, Luigia, Emiddia Longobardi, Paola Venuti & Marc H. Bornstein
    1998 Maternal speech to 1-year-old children in two Italian cultural contexts. Early Development and Parenting: An International Journal of Research and Practice7(1). 9–17. 10.1002/(SICI)1099‑0917(199803)7:1<9::AID‑EDP159>3.0.CO;2‑T
     https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199803)7:1<9::AID-EDP159>3.0.CO;2-T [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang, Yuh-Fang
    2016 Apologizing in Mandarin Chinese: A study on developmental patterns. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics42(1). 73–101. 10.6241/concentric.ling.42.1.04
     https://doi.org/10.6241/concentric.ling.42.1.04 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Youqing & Guo-en Yin
    2002 The empirical research on children’s similarity-based classification ability development and influential factors. Psychological Development and Education. 11. 27–31. 10.3969/j.issn.1001‑4918.2002.01.006
     https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2002.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cortazzi, Martin & Jin Lixian
    1996 Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. InHewel Coleman (ed.), Society and the language classroom, 169–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cummings, Louise
    2017 Cognitive aspects of pragmatic disorders. InLouise Cummings (eds.), Research in clinical pragmatics, 587–616. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑47489‑2_22
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_22 [Google Scholar]
  15. Deák, Gedeon & Patricia J. Bauer
    1995 The effects of task comprehension on preschoolers’ and adults’ categorisation choices. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology60(3). 393–427. 10.1006/jecp.1995.1047
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1047 [Google Scholar]
  16. DeJarnette, Glenda, Kenyatta O. Rivers & Yvette D. Hyter
    2015 Ways of examining speech acts in young African American children. Topics in Language Disorders35(1). 61–75. 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000042
     https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000042 [Google Scholar]
  17. Domaneschi, Filippo, Marcello Passarelli & Carlo Chiorri
    2017 Facial expressions and speech acts: Experimental evidence on the role of the upper face as an illocutionary force indicating device in language comprehension. Cognitive processing18(3). 285–306. 10.1007/s10339‑017‑0809‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0809-6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dumontheil, Iroise, Ian A. Apperly & Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
    2010 Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science13(2). 331–338. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2009.00888.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00888.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Etikawati, Agnes, Indar, Ratri Sunar Astuti & Monica Eviandaru Madyaningrum
    2023 A qualitative study to explore the construct of communication skills in middle childhood. Journal of Educational, Health & Community Psychology12(1). 107–127. 10.12928/jehcp.v1i1.25684
     https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v1i1.25684 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gaszczyk, Grzegorz
    2022 Lying with uninformative speech acts. Canadian Journal of Philosophy52(7). 746–760. 10.1017/can.2023.12
     https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2023.12 [Google Scholar]
  21. Grice, H. P.
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan Jerry (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics14(2). 237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  23. Guan, Wei & Haitao Liu
    2023 Speech representation used by Mandarin Chinese-speaking children aged three to six years. Journal of Child Language501. 338–364. 10.1017/S0305000921000866
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000866 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hofstede, Geert
    2001 Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Holtgraves, Thomas
    1998 Interpreting indirect replies. Cognitive Psychology37(1). 1–27. 10.1006/cogp.1998.0689
     https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0689 [Google Scholar]
  26. 1999 Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated?Journal of Memory and Language41(4). 519–540. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2657
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2657 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2005 The production and perception of implicit performatives. Journal of Pragmatics37(12). 2024–2043. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2007 Second language learners and speech act comprehension. Language Learning57(4). 595–610. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00429.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00429.x [Google Scholar]
  29. 2008 Automatic intention recognition in conversation processing. Journal of Memory and Language58(3). 627–645. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ifantidou, Elly
    2013 Pragmatic competence and explicit instruction. Journal of Pragmatics591. 93–116. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  31. Katz, Mara Hermes
    2015 Politeness theory and the classification of speech acts. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle25(2). 45–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kecskes, Istvan
    2016 Can intercultural pragmatics bring some new insight into pragmatic theories?InAlessandro Capone & Jacob L. Mey (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society (vol.41), 43–69. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12616‑6_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lange, Benjamin P., Harald A. Euler & Eugen Zaretsky
    2016 Sex differences in language competence of 3- to 6-year-old children. Applied Psycholinguistics37(6). 1417–1438. 10.1017/S0142716415000624
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000624 [Google Scholar]
  34. Leaper, Campbell, Anderson, Kristin J. & Sanders Paul
    1998 Moderators of gender effects on parents’ talk to their children: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology34(1). 3–27. 10.1037/0012‑1649.34.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  35. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    1983 Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, David C. S.
    1999 The functions and status of English in Hong Kong: A post-1997 update. English World-Wide20(1). 67–110. 10.1075/eww.20.1.03li
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.20.1.03li [Google Scholar]
  37. Licea-Haquet, Eva P. Velásquez-Upegui, Thomas Holtgraves & Magda Giordano
    2019 Speech act recognition in Spanish speakers. Journal of Pragmatics1411. 44–56. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.013 [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, Ngar-Fun & William Littlewood
    1997 Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse?System25(3). 371–384. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(97)00029‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00029-8 [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, Si
    2011 An experimental study of the classification and recognition of Chinese speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics43(6). 1801–1817. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.031
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.031 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lv, Xiaoxuan, Wei Ren & Lin Li
    2021 Pragmatic competence and willingness to communicate among L2 learners of Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology121. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797419
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797419 [Google Scholar]
  41. Maccoby, Eleanor E.
    1990 Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist45(4). 513–520. 10.1037/0003‑066X.45.4.513
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nandy, Angana, Elizabeth Nixon & Jean Quigley
    2021 Communicative functions of parents’ child-directed speech across dyadic and triadic contexts. Journal of Child Language48(6). 1281–1294. 10.1017/S030500092000080X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500092000080X [Google Scholar]
  43. Nencheva, Mira L., Elise A. Piazza & Casey Lew-Williams
    2021 The moment-to-moment pitch dynamics of child-directed speech shape toddlers’ attention and learning. Developmental Science24(1). e12997. 10.1111/desc.12997
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12997 [Google Scholar]
  44. Nguyen, Hanh Thi & Minh Thi Thuy Nguyen
    2016 “But please can I play with the iPad?”: The development of request negotiation practices by a four-year-old child. Journal of Pragmatics1011. 66–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ninio, Anat & Catherine E. Snow
    1996 Pragmatic development. New York: Westview Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Ninio, Anat & Wheeler Polly
    1986 A manual for classifying verbal communicative acts in mother-infant interaction. Transcript Analysis3(1) 1–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Piaget, Jean
    1952 The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. 10.1037/11494‑000
     https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rahimi, Salah Addin
    2020 Identification of speech acts performed by a 25–26 months old Kholosi-Persian bilingual child. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies8(1). 12–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Rivero, Magda
    2010 Maternal expression of communicative intentions and pragmatic fine tuning in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development33(4). 373–386. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.04.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  50. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  51. 1979 Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  52. Searle, John. R. & Daniel Vanderveken
    1985 Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Snow, Catherine E., Barbara Alexander Pan, Alison Imbens-Bailey & Jane Herman
    1996 Learning how to say what one means: A longitudinal study of children’s speech act use. Social Development5(1). 56–84. 10.1111/j.1467‑9507.1996.tb00072.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00072.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Su, Er-mei
    2015 Lun wenhua chayi dui zhongmei jiating jiaoyu de yingxiang [On the influence of cultural differences on family education between China and the United States]. Asia Pacific Education5(14). 95.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Tomasello, Michael
    2003 Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Boston: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Ullman, Michael T., Miranda A. Robbin & Michelle L. Travers
    2008 Sex differences in the neurocognition of language. InJill B. Becker, Karen J. Berkley & Nori Geary (eds.), Sex on the brain: From genes to behavior, 291–309. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195311587.003.0015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195311587.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, Yalien
    2008 Explorations in the development of young children’s speech act of threatening in Mandarin Chinese. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wellman, Henry M., David Cross & Watson Julanne
    2003 Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development72(3). 655–684. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00304
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wilson, Deirdre
    2013 Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics591. 40–56. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yang, He
    2022 Second language learners’ competence of and beliefs about pragmatic comprehension: Insights from the Chinese EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology121: 801315. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.801315
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.801315 [Google Scholar]
  61. Yip, Po-ching
    2000 The Chinese lexicon: A comprehensive survey. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24014.xia
Loading
Identification and classification of implicit speech acts among Chinese children in middle childhood*
Pragmatics & Cognition 32, 354 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24014.xia
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24014.xia
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24014.xia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): age differences; Chinese children; gender differences; implicit speech acts; middle childhood

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error