1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics & Cognition
  4. Volume 32, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

A lie commits the speaker to the truth of an assertion they believe false. But a speaker uttering a falsehood in jest or sarcasm arguably neither asserts that falsehood nor lies. The insincere speaker essentially “uncommits” to the truth of their remark. Social media posters, criminal defendants, and politicians facing pushback regularly appeal to the sarcasm defense as a get-out-of-accountability-free card, often supporting this move by citing a purported insincerity marker accompanying the critical utterance. But proffered plausible deniability may be implausible, resulting in legal or public disputes. How credible is the sarcasm or “only joking” defense, particularly when retroactively invoked? In Grice’s terms, how do we distinguish what a speaker says from what a speaker makes as if to say? This study surveys modes of “uncommitment” and the interactional and grammatical properties of devices associated with signals of insincerity that have been employed from twenty-two centuries ago to today.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24020.hor
2025-09-26
2026-03-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pc.24020.hor
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adler, Jerry
    2019 The many, many times Trump has said he was only joking. Yahoo! News online story. https://www.yahoo.com/video/trump-jokes-150223195.html
  2. Aiken, Scott
    2009 Poe’s Law, group polarization, and the epistemology of online religious discourse. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1332169
  3. Anderson, Luvell
    2018 Calling, addressing, and appropriation. InDavid Sosa (ed.), Bad words: Philosophical perspectives on slurs, 6–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay & Isabella Poggi
    2003 Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor161. 243–260. 10.1515/humr.2003.012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.012 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bender, Emily & Andreas Kathol
    2001 Constructional effects of just because…doesn’t mean. BLS271, 13–25. https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/BLS/article/view/1089. 10.3765/bls.v27i1.1089
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v27i1.1089 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bettelli, Giulia & Francesca Panzeri
    2023 “Irony is easy to understand”: The role of emoji in irony detection. Intercultural Pragmatics201. 467–493. 10.1515/ip‑2023‑5001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-5001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bledin, Justin & Sadhwi Srinivas
    2023 Descriptive as ifs. Linguistics and Philosophy461. 87–134. 10.1007/s10988‑022‑09352‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09352-3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen & Maarten van Leeuwen
    2021 “Those are your words, not mine!”: Defence strategies for denying speaker commitment. Argumentation351. 209–235. 10.1007/s10503‑020‑09521‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09521-3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brinton, Laurel
    2014 The extremes of insubordination: Exclamatory as if!Journal of English Linguistics421. 93–113. 10.1177/0075424214521425
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214521425 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bryant, Gregory & Jean Fox Tree
    2002 Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol171. 99–117. 10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Camp, Elisabeth
    2012 Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Noûs461. 587–634. 10.1111/j.1468‑0068.2010.00822.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00822.x [Google Scholar]
  12. 2022 Just saying, just kidding: Liability for accountability-avoiding speech in ordinary language, politics, and law. InLaurence Horn (ed.), From lying to perjury: Linguistic and legal perspectives on lies and other falsehoods, 227–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110733730‑010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733730-010 [Google Scholar]
  13. Camp, Elisabeth & John Hawthorne
    2008 Sarcastic “like”: A case study in the interface of syntax and semantics. Philosophical Perspectives (Philosophy of Language)221. 1–21. www.jstor.org/stable/2517722010.1111/j.1520‑8583.2008.00140.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00140.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Carson, Thomas
    2010 Lying and deception. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577415.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577415.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cavaillé, Jean-Pierre
    2004 Non est hic: Le cas exemplaire de la protection du fugitif. Les dossiers du Grihl, Hors série No 5: secrets et mensonges. https://journals.openedition.org/dossiersgrihl/300?lang=en
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Cohen, David
    . Reaction to Trump’s speech: When is ‘a bloodbath’ not a bloodbath?Politico, 17 March 2024. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/17/trump-bloodbath-turner-cassidy-rounds-00147465
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Clark, Herbert
    1996 Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Clark, Herbert & Richard Gerrig
    1984 On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General1131. 121–126. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121 [Google Scholar]
  19. Coleman, Linda & Paul Kay
    1981 Prototype semantics: The English word lie. Language571. 26–44. 10.1353/lan.1981.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1981.0002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cutler, Anne
    1974 On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. CLS101. 117–127.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dale, Daniel
    2020 Fact check: Trump lies that he was being ‘sarcastic’ when he talked about injecting disinfectant. https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/24/politics/fact-check-trump-disinfectant-sarcastic/index.html
  22. Dénigot, Quentin & Heather Burnett
    2020 Proceedings of the Probability and Meaning Conference (PaM 2020), 17–25. https://aclanthology.org/2020.pam-1.3.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Dorning, Mike
    2016 Trump has pattern of using ‘sarcasm’ defense. Portland Press Herald, 12 Aug. 2016. https://www.pressherald.com/2016/08/12/trump-has-pattern-of-using-sarcasm-defense/
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Duns Scotus
    Duns Scotus 1986 Duns Scotus on the will and morality. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Foltz, Kristen & Juliana Fray
    2020 Emoji goes to court: An analysis of emoji in court proceedings and implications for legal practice. Communication Law Review201: 109–125.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fowler, H. W.
    1965 A dictionary of Modern English (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Frankfurt, Harry
    2005 On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt7t4wr
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t4wr [Google Scholar]
  28. Garcia, Charlotte, Alexandra Turcan, Hannah Howman & Ruth Filik
    2022 Emoji as a tool to aid the comprehension of written sarcasm. Computers in Human Behavior1261. 106971. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106971
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106971 [Google Scholar]
  29. Garmendia, Joana
    2018 Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316136218
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316136218 [Google Scholar]
  30. Garfield Tenzer, Leslie & Ashley Cangro
    2022 An emoji legal dictionary. University of Pittsburgh Law Review Online831. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/1250/. 10.5195/lawreview.2022.834
     https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2022.834 [Google Scholar]
  31. Geurts, Bart
    2019 Communication as commitment sharing. Theoretical Linguistics451. 1–30. 10.1515/tl‑2019‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Grice, H. P.
    1989 Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Grotius, Hugo
    2005 [1625] The rights of war and peace. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Haiman, John
    1998 Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1017/S0047404500211032
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500211032 [Google Scholar]
  35. Haugh, Michael
    2013 Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics481. 41–56. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  36. Horn, Laurence
    1989 A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reissue edition, Stanford: CSLI 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 1992 The said and the unsaid. SALT II, 163–92. Columbus: The Ohio State University. 10.3765/salt.v2i0.3039
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v2i0.3039 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2001 Flaubert triggers, squatitive negation and other quirks of grammar. InJack Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann, Victor Sánchez Valencia & Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items, 173–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.40.08hor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.40.08hor [Google Scholar]
  39. 2016 Licensing NPIs: Some negative (and positive) results. InPierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives, 281–306. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17464‑8_12
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17464-8_12 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2017 Telling it slant: Toward a taxonomy of deception. InDieter Stein & Janet Giltrow (eds.), The pragmatic turn in law, 23–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501504723‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504723-002 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2022 Practice to deceive: A natural history of the legal bluff. InLaurence Horn (ed.), 195–225. 10.1515/9783110733730‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733730-009 [Google Scholar]
  42. Houston, Keith
    2010 Irony and sarcasm. Chapter 10 in Shady characters: The secret life of punctuation, symbols & other typographical marks. New York: W. W. Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Howley, Kerry
    2023 Bottoms up and the Devil laughs: A journey through the Deep State. New York: Knopf.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kenyon, Tim & Jennifer Saul
    2022 Bald-faced bullshit and authoritarian political speech: Making sense of Johnson and Trump. InLaurence Horn (ed.), From lying to perjury: Linguistic and legal perspectives on lies and other falsehoods, 165–193. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110733730‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733730-008 [Google Scholar]
  46. Krifka, Manfred
    2019 Commitments and beyond. Theoretical Linguistics451: 73–91. 10.1515/tl‑2019‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0006 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lewis, David
    1969 Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Linebarger, Marcia
    1987 Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy101: 325–87. 10.1007/BF00584131
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00584131 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lo Guercio, Nicolás & Ramiro Caso
    2022 An account of overt intentional dogwhistling. Synthese2001. 203. 10.1007/s11229‑022‑03511‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03511-6 [Google Scholar]
  50. MacFarlane, John
    2011 What is assertion?InJessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New philosophical essays, 79–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573004.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573004.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mahon, James
    2015 The definition of lying and deception. InEd Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition/
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Marsili, Neri
    2021 Lying, speech acts, and commitment. Synthese1991. 3245–3269. 10.1007/s11229‑020‑02933‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02933-4 [Google Scholar]
  53. McCulloch, Gretchen
    2019 Because internet: Understanding the new rules of language. New York: Riverhead Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Meibauer, Jörg
    2014 Lying at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614510840
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510840 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2019 Bald-faced lies. InJörg Meibauer (ed.), Oxford handbook of lying, 252–263. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Nunberg, Geoffrey
    2018 The social life of slurs. InDaniel Fogal, Daniel Harris & Matt Moss (eds.), New work on speech acts, 237–295. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  57. O’Bryan, Alara
    2023 Unambiguously ambiguous: A brief examination of tone indicators. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Onion
    Onion 2022 Anthony Novak v. City of Parma, Ohio; Kevin Riley and Thomas Connor. On petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Brief submitted by The Onion as Amicus Curiae in support of petitioner. No. 22–293. https://tinyurl.com/yc2p92dv
  59. Pascal, Blaise
    [1656] Les lettres provinciales. Published pseudonymously in various editions. Available athttps://ccel.org/ccel/pascal/provincial/provincial.xi.html
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Pei, Jiamin & Le Ching
    2022 Deciphering emoji variation in courts: A social semiotic perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications91. 445. 10.1057/s41599‑022‑01453‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01453-5 [Google Scholar]
  61. Peirce, C. S.
    1932 The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Priego-Valverde, Béatrice
    2009 Failed humor in conversation: A double voicing analysis. InNeal Norrick & Delia Chiaro (eds.), Humor in interaction, 165–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.182.08pri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182.08pri [Google Scholar]
  63. Schonfeld, Zach
    2022 Greene says Jan. 6 remarks were ‘sarcasm’. The Hill, 12 Dec. 2022. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3772006-greene-says-jan-6-remarks-were-sarcasm/
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Simpson, Paul
    2003 On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.2 [Google Scholar]
  65. Skalicky, Stephen, Cynthia Berger & Nancy Bell
    2015 The functions of “just kidding” in American English. Journal of Pragmatics851. 18–31. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.024
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.024 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sorensen, Roy
    2007 Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly881. 251–264. 10.1111/j.1468‑0114.2007.00290.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00290.x [Google Scholar]
  67. Sorensen, Roy & Ian Proops
    2024 Kant and the king: Lying promises, conventional implicature, and hypocrisy. Ratio371. 51–63. 10.1111/rati.12389
     https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12389 [Google Scholar]
  68. Stokke, Andreas
    2018 Lying and insincerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198825968.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198825968.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tepperman, Joseph, David Traum & Shrikanth Narayanan
    2006 “Yeah, right”: Sarcasm recognition for spoken dialogue systems. Interspeech, 2006–507. https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2006/tepperman06b_interspeech.html#
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Timm, Jane
    2020 Trump says he was being sarcastic with comments about injecting disinfectants. NBC News report. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-he-was-being-sarcastic-comments-about-injecting-disinfectants-n1191991
  71. Weissman, Benjamin
    2022 Emoji semantics/pragmatics: Investigating commitment and lying. InProceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media, 21–28, Seattle. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2022.emoji-1.3/. 10.18653/v1/2022.emoji‑1.3
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emoji-1.3 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2024 Can an emoji be a lie? The links between emoji meaning, commitment, and lying. Journal of Pragmatics2191. 12–29. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.11.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  73. Weissman, Benjamin & Marina Terkourafi
    2019 Are false implicatures lies? An experimental investigation. Mind & Language341. 221–246. 10.1111/mila.12212
     https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12212 [Google Scholar]
  74. Wiegmann, Alex, Pascale Willemsen & Jörg Meibauer
    2021 Lying, deceptive implicatures, and commitment. Ergo81. 709–740. 10.3998/ergo.2251
     https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.2251 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wiese, Heike & Nilgin Tanış Polat
    2016 Pejoration in context: m-reduplication and other examples from urban German. InRita Finkbeiner, Jorg Meibauer & Heike Wiese (eds.), Pejoration, 243–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.228.11wie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.228.11wie [Google Scholar]
  76. Woodward, Alex
    2020 Six times Trump used ‘sarcasm defence’ to gaslight America. Independent (U.K.), 27 April 2020. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-sarcasm-twitter-jokes-gaslight-inject-disinfectant-a9486966.html
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24020.hor
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bald-faced lies; classical rhetorical status theory; double audience; emojis; insincerity; lying; negative polarity items; Poe’s Law; sarcasm; winking

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error