1887
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943

Abstract

Unlike other figurative language abilities, irony emerges rather late, and its mastering takes place over a protracted window of development. Whilst its late emergence reflects the later development of prerequisite skills, its protracted development is likely to reflect the fact that some ironies are easier to grasp than others. In this paper, we discuss how conventionality is one factor which is likely to contribute to how easily ironies are mastered, yet despite this the nature of conventionality in irony and its effects on irony development are mostly unexplored. We argue for the existence of multiple sources of conventionality for irony likely to play a crucial role in its development. Since some of these sources facilitate adult irony processing, we investigate whether conventionality is likely to be a help to achieve proficient irony comprehension or rather a hinderance, as it has been found to be elsewhere in pragmatic development.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24040.gou
2026-04-16
2026-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pc.24040.gou.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24040.gou&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aguert, Marc, Virginie Laval, Nadia Gauducheau, Hassan Atifi & Michel Marcoccia
    2016 Producing irony in adolescence: A comparison between face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Psychology of Language and Communication20(3). 199–218. 10.1515/plc‑2016‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-0013 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguert, Marc, Coralie Le Vallois, Karine Martel & Virginie Laval
    2018 “That’s really clever!” Ironic hyperbole understanding in children. Journal of Child Language45(1). 260–272. 10.1017/S0305000917000113
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000113 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alba-Juez, Laura
    1998 On the conventionalization of verbal irony in English: A corpus-based study. InIgnacio Vázquez Orta & Ignacio Guillén Galve (eds.), Perspectivas pragmáticas en lingüística aplicada, 11–18. Zaragoza: Anubar.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2014 Irony as inferred contradiction. Russian Journal of Linguistics41. 140–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrés-Roqueta, Clara & Napoleon Katsos
    2020 A distinction between linguistic and social pragmatics helps the precise characterization of pragmatic challenges in children with autism spectrum disorders and developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research63(5). 1494–1508. 10.1044/2020_JSLHR‑19‑00263
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00263 [Google Scholar]
  6. Angeleri, Romina & Gabriella Airenti
    2014 The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3- to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology68(2). 133–146. 10.1037/cep0000011
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Attardo, Salvatore
    2013 Intentionality and irony. InLeonor Ruiz-Gurillo & M. Belén Alvarado Ortega (eds.), Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse, 39–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.231.04att
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.231.04att [Google Scholar]
  8. Banasik, Natalia
    2013 Non-literal speech comprehension in preschool children: An example from a study on verbal irony. Psychology of Language and Communication17(3). 309–324. 10.2478/plc‑2013‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0020 [Google Scholar]
  9. Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia & Barbara Bokus
    2019 Children’s comprehension of irony: Studies on Polish-speaking preschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research48(5). 1217–1240. 10.1007/s10936‑019‑09654‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x [Google Scholar]
  10. Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia, Sandra Bosacki, Anna Mitrowska, Diana Wyrębek Walters, Katarzyna Wisiecka, Natalia Ewelina Copeland, Lara Wieland, Ljiljana Popovic, Jovana Piper & Aleksandra Siemieniuk
    2020 “Wonderful! We’ve just missed the bus”: Parental use of irony and children’s irony comprehension. PLOS ONE15(2). e0228538. 10.1371/journal.pone.0228538
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228538 [Google Scholar]
  11. Blasko, Dawn G. & Deborah S. Briihl
    1997 Reading and recall of metaphorical sentences: Effects of familiarity and context. Metaphor and Symbol12(4). 261–285. 10.1207/s15327868ms1204_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1204_4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bosco, Francesca M. & Monica Bucciarelli
    2008 Simple and complex deceits and ironies. Journal of Pragmatics40(4). 583–607. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bowdle, Brian F. & Dedre Gentner
    2005 The career of metaphor. Psychological Review112(1). 193–216. 10.1037/0033‑295X.112.1.193
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193 [Google Scholar]
  14. Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken & Peter Jan Schellens
    2012 Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics44(3). 231–242. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Burgers, Christian, Kiki Y. Renardel de Lavalette & Gerard J. Steen
    2018 Metaphor, hyperbole, and irony: Uses in isolation and in combination in written discourse. Journal of Pragmatics1271. 71–83. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  16. Burnett, Debra L.
    2015 Exploring the role of conventionality in children’s interpretation of ironic remarks. Journal of Child Language42(6). 1267–1288. 10.1017/S0305000914000798
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000798 [Google Scholar]
  17. Capelli, Carol A., Noreen Nakagawa & Cary M. Madden
    1990 How children understand sarcasm: The role of context and intonation. Child Development61(6). 1824–1841. 10.2307/1130840
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1130840 [Google Scholar]
  18. Clark, Eve V.
    1993The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554377
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554377 [Google Scholar]
  19. Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
    1984 On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113(1). 121–126. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121 [Google Scholar]
  20. Csibra, Gergely & György Gergely
    2009 Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences13(4). 148–153. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2011 Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences366(1567). 1149–1157. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0319
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0319 [Google Scholar]
  22. Deliens, Gaétane, Kyriakos Antoniou, Elise Clin, Ekaterina Ostashchenko & Mikhail Kissine
    2018 Context, facial expression and prosody in irony processing. Journal of Memory and Language991. 35–48. 10.1016/j.jml.2017.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Demorest, Amy, Lisa Silberstein, Howard Gardner & Ellen Winner
    1983 Telling it as it isn’t: Children’s understanding of figurative language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology1(2). 121–134. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1983.tb00550.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1983.tb00550.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Dews, Shelly, Ellen Winner, Joan Kaplan, Elizabeth Rosenblatt, Malia Hunt, Karen Lim, Angela McGovern, Alison Qualter & Bonnie Smarsh
    1996 Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development67(6). 3071–3085. 10.2307/1131767
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131767 [Google Scholar]
  25. Falkum, Ingrid L., Marta Recasens & Eve V. Clark
    2017 “The moustache sits down first”: On the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language44(1). 87–119. 10.1017/S0305000915000720
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000720 [Google Scholar]
  26. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius
    2022 The development of non-literal uses of language: Sense conventions and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics1881. 97–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Filik, Ruth, Hartmut Leuthold, Katie Wallington & Jemma Page
    2014 Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition40(3). 811–828. 10.1037/a0035658
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035658 [Google Scholar]
  28. Filippova, Eva
    2014 Irony production and comprehension. InDanielle Matthews (ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition, 261–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.10.15fil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10.15fil [Google Scholar]
  29. Filippova, Eva & Janet Wilde Astington
    2008 Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development79(1). 126–138. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01115.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Garfinkel, Sarah, Meredith L. Rowe, Sandra Bosacki & Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak
    2024 “Mom said it in quotation marks!” Irony comprehension and metapragmatic awareness in 8-year-olds. Journal of Child Language51(3). 485–508. 10.1017/S0305000923000399
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000923000399 [Google Scholar]
  31. Giora, Rachel
    1997 Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics8(3). 183–206. 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2003On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Glenwright, Melanie, Brent Tapley, Jacqueline K. S. Rano & Penny M. Pexman
    2017 Developing appreciation for sarcasm and sarcastic gossip: It depends on perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research60(11). 3295–3309. 10.1044/2017_JSLHR‑L‑17‑0058
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0058 [Google Scholar]
  34. Grice, H. P.
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. London: Brill. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hancock, Jeffrey T., Philip J. Dunham & Kelly Purdy
    2000 Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development1(2). 227–248. 10.1207/S15327647JCD010204
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD010204 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kao, Justine T., Jean Y. Wu, Leon Bergen & Noah D. Goodman
    2014 Non-literal understanding of number words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(33). 12002–12007. 10.1073/pnas.1407479111
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407479111 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kapogianni, Eleni
    2016 The ironist’s intentions. Pragmatics & Cognition23(1). 150–173. 10.1075/pc.23.1.07kap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.07kap [Google Scholar]
  38. Köder, Franziska & Ingrid Lossius Falkum
    2020 Children’s metonymy comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking and picture selection. Journal of Pragmatics1561. 191–205. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kreuz, Roger J. & Gina M. Caucci
    2007 Lexical influences on the perception of sarcasm. InProceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language — FigLanguages ’07, 1–4. Morristown, New Jersey: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1611528.1611529
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1611528.1611529 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kreuz, Roger J., Max A. Kassler, Lori Coppenrath & Bonnie McLain Allen
    1999 Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics31(12). 1685–1700. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00010‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00010-7 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kreuz, Roger J. & Richard M. Roberts
    1995 Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity10(1). 21–31. 10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lai, Vicky Tzuyin, Tim Curran & Lise Menn
    2009 Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research12841. 145–155. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088 [Google Scholar]
  43. Leinonen, Eeva, Nuala Ryder, Margaret Ellis & Clair Hammond
    2003 The use of context in pragmatic comprehension by specifically language-impaired and control children. Linguistics41(2). 10.1515/ling.2003.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.014 [Google Scholar]
  44. Massaro, Davide, Annalisa Valle & Antonella Marchetti
    2013 Irony and second-order false belief in children: What changes when mothers rather than siblings speak?European Journal of Developmental Psychology10(3). 301–317. 10.1080/17405629.2012.672272
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.672272 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mazzaggio, Greta, Alessandra Zappoli & Diana Mazzarella
    2023 Verbal irony and the implicitness of the echo. Pragmatics & Cognition30(2). 412–443. 10.1075/pc.00036.maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00036.maz [Google Scholar]
  46. Neys, Wim De & Walter Schaeken
    2007 When people are more logical under cognitive load. Experimental Psychology54(2). 128–133. 10.1027/1618‑3169.54.2.128
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.128 [Google Scholar]
  47. Nilsen, Elizabeth S., Melanie Glenwright & Vanessa Huyder
    2011 Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development12(3). 374–409. 10.1080/15248372.2010.544693
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.544693 [Google Scholar]
  48. Noveck, Ira A. & Andres Posada
    2003 Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language85(2). 203–210. 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00053‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00053-1 [Google Scholar]
  49. Olkoniemi, Henri, Sohvi Halonen, Penny M. Pexman & Tuomo Häikiö
    2023 Children’s processing of written irony: An eye-tracking study. Cognition2381. 105508. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105508
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105508 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pexman, Penny M. & Melanie Glenwright
    2007 How do typically developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony?Journal of Neurolinguistics20(2). 178–196. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pexman, Penny M., Lenka Zdrazilova, Devon McConnachie, Kirby Deater-Deckard & Stephen A. Petrill
    2009 “That was smooth, mom”: Children’s production of verbal and gestural irony. Metaphor and Symbol24(4). 237–248. 10.1080/10926480903310286
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480903310286 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa, Ira A. Noveck, Guy Politzer & Anne Bastide
    2007 A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition14(4). 347–375. 10.1080/10489220701600457
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701600457 [Google Scholar]
  53. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Alexandra Perovic
    2023 Linguistic skills and socioeconomic status: Two oft forgotten factors in child metaphor comprehension. Children10(12). 847. 10.3390/children10121847
    https://doi.org/10.3390/children10121847 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Michael Tomasello
    2020 Early birds: Metaphor understanding in 3-year-olds. Journal of Pragmatics1561. 160–167. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021 [Google Scholar]
  55. Quintilian
    Quintilian. 95AD. Institutio Oratoria. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ronderos, Camilo R.
    2024 Teasing apart the effects of aptness and familiarity on the development of metaphor comprehension. Talk given at the “Meaning and Grammar Seminar” of the University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1981 Irony and the use-mention distinction. InPeter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 1986Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Szücs, Márta & Anna Babarczy
    2017 The role of Theory of Mind, grammatical competence and metapragmatic awareness in irony comprehension. InStavros Assimakopoulos (ed.), Pragmatics at its interfaces, 129–148. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501505089‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505089-008 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ţurcan, Alexandra & Ruth Filik
    2016 An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition42(12). 1867–1893. 10.1037/xlm0000285
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000285 [Google Scholar]
  61. Whalen, Juanita M. & Penny M. Pexman
    2010 How do children respond to verbal irony in face-to-face communication? The development of mode adoption across middle childhood. Discourse Processes47(5). 363–387. 10.1080/01638530903347635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903347635 [Google Scholar]
  62. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    1992 On verbal irony. Lingua87(1–2). 53–76. 10.1016/0024‑3841(92)90025‑E
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E [Google Scholar]
  63. Zajączkowska, Maria & Kirsten Abbot-Smith
    2020 “Sure I’ll help — I’ve just been sitting around doing nothing at school all day”: Cognitive flexibility and child irony interpretation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology1991. 104942. 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104942
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104942 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24040.gou
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error