1887
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943

Abstract

Young children are notoriously bad at understanding ironical statements, with irony comprehension emerging around the age of 6 and appearing resistant to task manipulation. What can explain this late emergence? We propose that children’s epistemic vigilance is a pivotal component of the constellation of socio-cognitive abilities underpinning irony comprehension. Epistemic vigilance enables children to detect the contextual incongruity of an ironical statement, discern that the ironical speaker is neither mistaken nor deceptive, and infer the critical, dissociative attitude expressed through verbal irony. By highlighting the role of epistemic vigilance, this account provides insight into the developmental puzzle of irony comprehension. It elucidates why its developmental trajectory diverges from that of other forms of figurative or humorous language and why it is closely linked to lie understanding and second-order false belief reasoning.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24042.maz
2026-04-16
2026-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pc.24042.maz.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24042.maz&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ackerman, Brian P.
    1981 Young children’s understanding of a speaker’s intentional use of a false utterance. Developmental Psychology171. 472–480. 10.1037/0012‑1649.17.4.472
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.17.4.472 [Google Scholar]
  2. Angeleri, Romina & Gabriella Airenti
    2014 The development of joke and irony understanding: A study with 3- to 6-year-old children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology68(2). 133–46. 10.1037/cep0000011
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000011 [Google Scholar]
  3. Antoniou, Kyriakos, Alma Veenstra, Mikhail Kissine & Napoleon Katsos
    2020 How does childhood bilingualism and bi-dialectalism affect the interpretation and processing of pragmatic meanings?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition23(1). 186–203. 10.1017/S1366728918001189
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001189 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan M. Leslie & Utah Frith
    1985 Does the autistic child have a Theory of mind?Cognition211. 37–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosco, Francesca M., Romina Angeleri, Livia Colle, Katiuscia Sacco & Bruno G. Bara, B.
    2013 Communicative abilities in children: An assessment through different phenomena and expressive means. Journal of Child Language40(4). 741–778. 10.1017/S0305000913000081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000081 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosco, Francesca M. & Monica Bucciarelli
    2008 Simple and complex deceits and ironies, Journal of Pragmatics40(4). 583–607. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bosco, Francesca M. & Ilaria Gabbatore
    2017 Sincere, deceitful, and ironic communicative acts and the role of Theory of mind in childhood. Frontiers in Psychology81. 21. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00021
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00021 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bosco, Francesca M., Ilaria Gabbatore, Romina Angeleri, Martina Zettin & Alberta Parola
    2018 Do executive function and Theory of mind predict pragmatic abilities following traumatic brain injury? An analysis of sincere, deceitful and ironic communicative acts. Journal of Communication Disorders751. 102–117. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bosco, Francesca M., Alberta Parola, Katiuscia Sacco, Martina Zettin & Romina Angeleri
    2017 Communicative- pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: The role of Theory of mind and executive functions. Brain and language1681. 73–83. 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brosseau-Liard, Patricia, Danielle Penney & Diane Poulin-Dubois
    2015 Theory of mind selectively predicts preschoolers’ knowledge-based selective word learning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology33(4). 464–475. 10.1111/bjdp.12107
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12107 [Google Scholar]
  11. Caillies, Stéphanie, Vicine Bertot, Jacquess Motte, Christine Raynaud & Michel Abely
    2014 Social cognition in ADHD: Irony understanding and recursive Theory of mind. Research in Developmental Disabilities35(11). 3191–3198. 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carlson, Stephanie M., Louis J. Moses & Laura Claxton J.
    2004 Individual differences in Executive functioning and Theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology871. 299–319. 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Crivello, Cristina, Sara Phillips & Diane Poulin-Dubois
    2018 Selective social learning in infancy: Looking for mechanisms. Developmental science21(3). E12592. 10.1111/desc.12592
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12592 [Google Scholar]
  14. Crivello, Cristina, Shawna Grossman & Diane Poulin-Dubois
    2021 Specifying links between infants’ Theory of mind, associative learning, and selective trust. Infancy26(5). 664–685. 10.1111/infa.12407
    https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12407 [Google Scholar]
  15. Deliens, Gaétan, Kyriakos Antoniou, Elise Clin, Ekaterina Ostashchenko & Mikhail Kissine
    2018 Context, facial expression and prosody in irony processing. Journal of Memory and Language991. 35–48. 10.1016/j.jml.2017.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Demorest, Amy, Christine Meyer, Erin Phelps, Howard Gardner & Ellen Winner
    1984 Words speak louder than actions: Understanding deliberately false remarks. Child Development55(4). 1527–1534. 10.2307/1130022
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1130022 [Google Scholar]
  17. Diamond, Adele
    2006 The early development of executive functions. InEllen Bialystok & Fergus I. M. Craik (eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change, 70–95. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2013 Executive functions. Annual Reviews of Psychology641. 135–168. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑113011‑143750
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 [Google Scholar]
  19. DiYanni, Cara, Deniela Nini, Whitney Rheel & Alicia Livelli
    2012 “I won’t trust you if I think you’re trying to deceive me”: Relations between selective trust, Theory of mind, and imitation in early childhood. Journal of Cognition and Development13(3). 354–371. 10.1080/15248372.2011.590462
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.590462 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ebert, Susanne
    2020 Theory of mind, language, and reading: Developmental relations from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology1911. 104739. 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104739
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104739 [Google Scholar]
  21. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius & Franziska Köder
    2024 Investigating irony comprehension in children: Methods, challenges, and ways forward. InNatalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Piotr Kałowski & Maria Zajączkowska (eds.), Studying verbal irony and sarcasm: Methodological perspectives from communication studies and beyond, 145–173. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑57172‑5_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57172-5_7 [Google Scholar]
  22. Filippova, Eva & Janet Wilde Astington
    2008 Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development79(1). 126–138. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01115.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Fuchs, Julia
    2023 40 years of research into children’s irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition30 (1). 1–30. 10.1075/pc.22015.fuc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22015.fuc [Google Scholar]
  24. Fusaro, Maria & Paul L. Harris
    2008 Children assess informant reliability using bystanders’ non-verbal cues. Developmental Science11(5). 771–777. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00728.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00728.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Garmendia, Joanna
    2018Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316136218
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316136218 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerardi-Caulton, Gina
    2000 Sensitivity to spatial conflict and the development of self-regulation in children 24–36 months of age. Developmental Science3(4). 397–404. 10.1111/1467‑7687.00134
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00134 [Google Scholar]
  27. Godbee, Kali & Melanie Porter
    2013 Comprehension of sarcasm, metaphor and simile in Williams syndrome. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders481. 651–665. 10.1111/1460‑6984.12037
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12037 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hala, Suzanne
    2004 The role of executive function in constructing an understanding of mind [commentary on Carpendale]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27(1). 108–109. 10.1017/S0140525X0435003X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0435003X [Google Scholar]
  29. Happé, Francesca
    1993 Communicative competence and Theory of mind in autism: A test of Relevance theory. Cognition48(2). 101–119. 10.1016/0010‑0277(93)90026‑R
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-R [Google Scholar]
  30. Hayashi, Hajimu & Yoshimi Ban
    2020 Children’s understanding of unintended irony and unsuccessful irony. European Journal of Developmental Psychology18(2). 230–256. 10.1080/17405629.2020.1783528
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1783528 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hermes, Jonas, Tanya Behne, Anna Elisa Bich, Christa Thielert & Hannes Rakoczy
    2018 Children’s selective trust decisions: Rational competence and limiting performance factors. Developmental science21(2). E12527. 10.1111/desc.12527
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12527 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoicka, Elena
    2014 The development of humour and pretending from infancy to three-years. Working Paper. TACTYC: Association for Professional Development in Early Years.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoicka, Elena & Merideth Gattis
    2008 Do the wrong thing: How toddlers tell a joke from a mistake. Cognitive Development23(1). 180–190. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hsu, Yik Kwan & Him Cheung
    2013 Two mentalizing capacities and the understanding of two types of lie telling in children. Developmental Psychology49(9). 1650–1659. 10.1037/a0031128
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031128 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jaswal, Vikram K., Koraly Pérez-Edgar, Robyn L. Kondrad, Carolyn M. Palmquist, Caitlin A. Cole & Claire E. Cole
    2014 Can’t stop believing: Inhibitory control and resistance to misleading testimony. Developmental science17(6). 965–976. 10.1111/desc.12187
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12187 [Google Scholar]
  36. Köder, Franziska & Ingrid Lossius Falkum
    2020 Children’s metonymy comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking and picture selection. Journal of Pragmatics1561. 191–205. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  37. Köder, Franziska & Emar Maier
    2016 Children mix direct and indirect speech: Evidence from pronoun comprehension. Journal of Child Language43(4). 843–866. 10.1017/S0305000915000318
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000318 [Google Scholar]
  38. McClelland, Megan M., Claire E. Cameron, Robert Duncan, Ryan P. Bowles, Alan C. Acock, Alicia Miao & Megan E. Pratt
    2014 Predictors of early growth in academic achievement: The head-toes-knees-shoulders task. Frontiers in Psychology51. 599. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00599
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00599 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mahr, Johannes B., Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier & Gergely Csibra
    2021 The effect of disagreement on children’s source memory performance. PLoS One16(4). E0249958. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249958
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249958 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mascaro, Oliver & Dan Sperber
    2009 The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition1121. 367–380. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mascaro, Olivier & Olivier Morin
    2014 Gullible’s travel: How honest and trustful children become vigilant communicators. InRobinson, Elisabeth & Einav, Shiri (eds.), Trust and testimony: Children’s selective learning from testimony, 69–82. New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2015 Epistemology for beginners: Two-to five-year-old children’s representation of falsity. PloS One10.10. E0140658. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140658
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140658 [Google Scholar]
  43. Massaro, Davide, Annalisa Valle & Antonella Marchetti
    2012 Irony and second-order false belief in children: What changes when mothers rather than siblings speak?European Journal of Developmental Psychology10(3). 301–317. 10.1080/17405629.2012.672272
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.672272 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2013 Do social norms, false belief understanding, and metacognitive vocabulary influence irony comprehension? A study of five- and seven-year-old children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology11(3). 292–304. 10.1080/17405629.2013.821407
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.821407 [Google Scholar]
  45. Matthews, Danielle, Hannah Biney & Kirsten Abbot-Smith
    2018 Individual differences in children’s pragmatic ability: A review of associations with formal language, social cognition, and executive functions. Language Learning and Development14(3). 186–223. 10.1080/15475441.2018.1455584
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2018.1455584 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mazzarella, Diana & Ira Noveck
    2021 Pragmatics and mind reading: The puzzle of autism (Response to Kissine). Language97(3). e198–e210. 10.1353/lan.2021.0037
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0037 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mazzarella, Diana & Nausicaa Pouscoulous
    2021 Pragmatics and epistemic vigilance: A developmental perspective. Mind & Language36(3). 355–376. 10.1111/mila.12287
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12287 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2023 Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers. Intercultural Pragmatics20(2). 111–132. 10.1515/ip‑2023‑2001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-2001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mazzarella, Diana & Edoardo Vaccargiu
    2024 Communication: Inferring speaker intentions or perceiving the world? Insights from developmental research. Journal of Pragmatics2211. 123–136. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.014 [Google Scholar]
  50. Milligan, Karen, Janet Wilde Astington & Lisa Ain Dack
    2007 Language and Theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development781. 622–646. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Milosavljevic, Ana
    2024 Experiments on the development of irony: Walking through a methodological maze. InNatalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Piotr Kałowski & Maria Zajączkowska (eds.), Studying verbal irony and sarcasm: Methodological perspectives from communication studies and beyond, 79–106. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑57172‑5_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57172-5_5 [Google Scholar]
  52. Milosavljevic, Ana, Thomas Castelain, Nausicaa Pouscoulous & Diana Mazzarella
    2025a The developmental puzzle of irony understanding: Is epistemic vigilance the missing link?Journal of Child Language. 1–22. 10.1017/S0305000925000091
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000925000091 [Google Scholar]
  53. Milosavljevic, Ana, Nausicaa Pouscoulous & Diana Mazzarella
    2025b Irony comprehension: Pragmatics meets epistemic vigilance. First Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Nilsen, Elizabeth S., Melanie Glenwright & Vanessa Huyder
    2011 Children and adults understand that verbal irony interpretation depends on listener knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development121. 374–409. 10.1080/15248372.2010.544693
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.544693 [Google Scholar]
  55. Olkoniemi, Henri & Johanna K. Kaakinen
    2021 Processing of irony in text: A systematic review of eye tracking studies. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology75(2). 99–106. 10.1037/cep0000216
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000216 [Google Scholar]
  56. Perner, Josef, & Heinz Wimmer
    1985 “John thinks that Mary thinks that...”: Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology391. 437–471. 10.1016/0022‑0965(85)90051‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(85)90051-7 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pexman, Penny M.
    2023 Irony and thought: Developmental insights. InRaymond W. Jr Gibbs & Herbert L. Colston (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of irony and thought, 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108974004.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974004.015 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pexman, Penny M., Lorraine Reggin & Kate Lee
    2019 Addressing the challenge of verbal irony: Getting serious about sarcasm training. Languages4(2). 23. 10.3390/languages4020023
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020023 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pexman, Penny M., Lenka Zdrazilova, Devon McConnachie, Kirby Deater-Deckard & Stephen A. Petrill
    2009 “That was smooth, mom”: Children’s production of verbal and gestural irony. Metaphor & Symbol24(4). 237–248. 10.1080/10926480903310286
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480903310286 [Google Scholar]
  60. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa
    2023 More than one path to pragmatics? Insights from children’s grasp of implicit, figurative and ironical meaning. Cognition2401. 105531. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105531
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105531 [Google Scholar]
  61. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa, Ira Noveck, Guy Politzer & Anne Bastide
    2007 A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition14(4). 347–375.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Michael Tomasello
    2020 Early birds: Metaphor understanding in 3-year- olds. Journal of Pragmatics1561. 160–167. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021 [Google Scholar]
  63. Rakoczy, Hannes & Michael Tomasello
    2006 Two-year-olds grasp the intentional structure of pretense acts. Developmental Science9(6). 557–564. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2006.00533.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00533.x [Google Scholar]
  64. Rakoczy, Hannes, Michael Tomasello & Tricia Striano
    2004 Young children know that trying is not pretending: A test of the “behaving-as-if” construal in children’s early concept of pretense. Developmental Psychology40(3). 388–399. 10.1037/0012‑1649.40.3.388
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.388 [Google Scholar]
  65. Schulze, Cornelia, Susanne Grassman & Michael Tomasello
    2013 3-year-old children make relevance inferences in indirect verbal communication. Child Development84(6). 2079–2093. 10.1111/cdev.12093
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12093 [Google Scholar]
  66. Schmidt, Benjamin
    2018 Learning from reliable and unreliable Speakers: Early development and underlying mechanisms. Groningen: PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
  67. Sperber, Dan
    1984 Verbal irony: Pretence or echoic mention?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General1131. 130–136. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.130
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.130 [Google Scholar]
  68. Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi & Deirdre Wilson
    2010 Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language25(4). 359–393. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
  69. Sullivan, Kate, Ellen Winner & Natalie Hopfield
    1995 How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology131.191–204. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1995.tb00673.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00673.x [Google Scholar]
  70. Wellman, Henry M.
    2014Making minds: How Theory of mind develops. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199334919.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199334919.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wilson, Elspeth, Kate Cain, Catherine Davies, Jenny Gibson, Holly Joseph, Ludovica Serratrice & Margreet Vogelzang
    2024 Children’s development of conversational and reading skills: A call for a collaborative approach. Language Development Research4(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Wimmer, Heinz, & Josef Perner
    1983 Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition131. 103–128. 10.1016/0010‑0277(83)90004‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 [Google Scholar]
  73. Winner, Ellen
    1988/97The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Winner, Ellen, Hiram Brownell, Francesca Happé, Ari Blum, Ari & Donna Pincus
    1998 Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right-hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language62(1). 89–106. 10.1006/brln.1997.1889
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1889 [Google Scholar]
  75. Winner, Ellen, & Sue Leekam
    1991 Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker’s second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology91. 257–270. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1991.tb00875.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00875.x [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilson, Deirdre
    2006 The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?Lingua116(10). 1722–1743. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  77. 2009 Irony and metarepresentation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics211. 183–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 2013 Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics591. 40–56. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  79. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    2012 Explaining irony. InMeaning and relevance, 1231–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008 [Google Scholar]
  80. Zajaczkowska, Maria & Kirsten Abbot-Smith
    2020 “Sure I’ll help — I’ve just been sitting around doing nothing at school all day”: Cognitive flexibility and child irony comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology1991. 104942. 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104942
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104942 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24042.maz
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attitude; epistemic vigilance; irony; pragmatic development; theory of mind
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error