1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics & Cognition
  4. Volume 33, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Humans are endowed with a suite of cognitive mechanisms that enable them to mitigate the risk of misinformation and underlie their epistemic vigilance. When direct access to the initial source of information is unavailable, individuals often rely on the vigilance of others to acquire beliefs. Moreover, monitoring the critical alertness of one’s interlocutors is essential for interpreting their communicative intentions, particularly in cases of deliberately conveying false information, such as lies or verbal irony. However, little is known about the human capacity to track others’ epistemic vigilance and use this information to guide belief formation and pragmatic interpretation. This study investigates whether children aged from 4 to 8 selectively trust vigilant over gullible informants. Our findings suggest that selective trust based on informant vigilance towards inaccuracy begins to emerge around the age of 6.

© 2026 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24044.agu
2026-04-16
2026-05-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pc.24044.agu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pc.24044.agu.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24044.agu&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aboody, Rosie, Sami R. Yousif, Mark Sheskin & Frank C. Keil
    2022 Says who? Children consider informants’ sources when deciding whom to believe. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. US: American Psychological Association151(10). 2481–2493. 10.1037/xge0001198
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001198 [Google Scholar]
  2. Babineau, Mireille, Alex de Carvalho, John Trueswell & Anne Christophe
    2021 Familiar words can serve as a semantic seed for syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Science24(1). e13010. 10.1111/desc.13010
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13010 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software67(1). 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bazhydai, Marina, Gert Westermann & Eugenio Parise
    2020 “I don’t know but I know who to ask”: 12-month-olds actively seek information from knowledgeable adults. Developmental Science23(5). e12938. 10.1111/desc.12938
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12938 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernard, Stéphane, Joëlle Proust & Fabrice Clément
    2015 Four- to six-year-old children’s sensitivity to reliability versus consensus in the endorsement of object labels. Child Development86(4). 1112–1124. 10.1111/cdev.12366
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12366 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boseovski, Janet J.
    2012 Trust in testimony about strangers: Young children prefer reliable informants who make positive attributions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology111(3). 543–551. 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brosseau-Liard, Patricia, Danielle Penney & Diane Poulin-Dubois
    2015 Theory of mind selectively predicts preschoolers’ knowledge-based selective word learning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology33(4). 464–475. 10.1111/bjdp.12107
     https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12107 [Google Scholar]
  8. Crivello, Cristina, Sara Phillips & Diane Poulin-Dubois
    2018 Selective social learning in infancy: Looking for mechanisms. Developmental Science21(3). e12592. 10.1111/desc.12592
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12592 [Google Scholar]
  9. Croce, Rachel C. & Janet J. Boseovski
    2020 Trait or testimony? Children’s preferences for positive informants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology1901. 104726. 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104726
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104726 [Google Scholar]
  10. Einav, Shiri & Elizabeth J. Robinson
    2011 When being right is not enough: Four-year-olds distinguish knowledgeable informants from merely accurate informants. Psychological Science22(10). 1250–1253. 10.1177/0956797611416998
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416998 [Google Scholar]
  11. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius & Franziska Köder
    2020 The acquisition of figurative meanings. Journal of Pragmatics1641. 18–24. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  12. Faul, Franz, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang & Axel Buchner
    2007 G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods39(2). 175–191. 10.3758/BF03193146
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg
    2019 An R companion to applied regression (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion/
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gathercole, Susan E., Catherine S. Willis, Alan D. Baddeley & Hazel Emslie
    1994 The children’s test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory2(2). 103–127. 10.1080/09658219408258940
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658219408258940 [Google Scholar]
  15. Harris, Paul L., Melissa A. Koenig, Kathleen H. Corriveau & Vikram K. Jaswal
    2018 Cognitive foundations of learning from testimony. Annual Review of Psychology69(1). 251–273. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑122216‑011710
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011710 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hartig, Florian
    2024 DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level / mixed) regression models. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa
  17. Hennefield, Laura, Laura M. Talpey & Lori Markson
    2021 When positive outcomes and reality collide: Children prefer optimists as social partners. Cognitive Development591. 101070. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101070
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101070 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hermes, Jonas, Tanya Behne & Hannes Rakoczy
    2018 The development of selective trust: Prospects for a dual-process account. Child Development Perspectives12(2). 134–138. 10.1111/cdep.12274
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12274 [Google Scholar]
  19. JASP Team
    JASP Team 2024 JASP (Version 0.19.0)[Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/
  20. Kassambara, Alboukadel
    2023 ggpubr: “ggplot2” Based publication ready plots. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr
  21. Keuleers, Emmanuel & Marc Brysbaert
    2010 Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods42(3). 627–633. 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.627 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, Young-IL, Tyler VanderWeele & Byron Johnson
    2024 Childhood predictors of perceptions of social trust: A cross-national analysis in the global flourishing study. Research Square. 10.21203/rs.3.rs‑4927296/v1
     https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4927296/v1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Köder, Franziska & Ingrid Lossius Falkum
    2021 Irony and perspective-taking in children: The roles of norm violations and tone of voice. Frontiers in Psychology121. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604 [Google Scholar]
  24. Koenig, Melissa A. & Catharine H. Echols
    2003 Infants’ understanding of false labeling events: The referential roles of words and the speakers who use them. Cognition87(3). 179–208. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(03)00002‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00002-7 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
    2017 lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software82(13). 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  26. Landrum, Asheley R., Candice M. Mills & Angie M. Johnston
    2013 When do children trust the expert? Benevolence information influences children’s trust more than expertise. Developmental Science16(4). 622–638. 10.1111/desc.12059
     https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12059 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mazzarella, Diana, Marie Aguirre, Thomas Castelain & Nauiscaa Pouscoulous
    2026 Trusting the vigilant: How children value others’ vigilance towards deception. Acta Psychologica2651. 106497. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106497
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106497 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mazzarella, Diana & Nausicaa Pouscoulous
    2021 Pragmatics and epistemic vigilance: A developmental perspective. Mind & Language36(3). 355–376. 10.1111/mila.12287
     https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12287 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2023 Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers. Intercultural Pragmatics20(2). 111–132. 10.1515/ip‑2023‑2001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-2001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mell, Hugo, Lou Safra, Perline Demange, Yann Algan, Nicolas Baumard & Coralie Chevallier
    2022 Early life adversity as associated with diminished social trust in adults. Political Psychology43(2). 317–335. 10.1111/pops.12756
     https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12756 [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller, Scott A.
    2009 Children’s understanding of second-order mental states. Psychological Bulletin135(5). 749–773. 10.1037/a0016854
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016854 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nurmsoo, Erika & Elizabeth J. Robinson
    2009 Children’s trust in previously inaccurate informants who were well or poorly informed: When past errors can be excused. Child Development80(1). 23–27. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2008.01243.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01243.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Pasquini, Elisabeth S., Kathleen H. Corriveau, Melissa A. Koenig & Paul L. Harris
    2007 Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants. Developmental Psychology43(5). 1216–1226. 10.1037/0012‑1649.43.5.1216
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.5.1216 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pexman, Penny M.
    2023 Irony and thought: Developmental insights. InRaymond W. Gibbs, Jr & Herbert L. Colston (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of irony and thought, 181–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108974004.015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108974004.015 [Google Scholar]
  35. Poncelet, Martine & Martial Van der Linden
    2003 L’évaluation du stock phonologique de la mémoire de travail: élaboration d’une épreuve de répétition de non-mots pour population francophone. Revue de neuropsychologie13(3). 377–407.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Posit Team
    Posit Team 2024 RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA: Posit Software, PBC. www.posit.co/
  37. Poulin-Dubois, Diane & Patricia Brosseau-Liard
    2016 The developmental origins of selective social learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science25(1). 60–64. 10.1177/0963721415613962
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415613962 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa
    2023 More than one path to pragmatics? Insights from children’s grasp of implicit, figurative and ironical meaning. Cognition2401. 105531. 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105531
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105531 [Google Scholar]
  39. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2024 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  40. Sobel, David M. & Zoe Finiasz
    2020 How children learn from others: An analysis of selective word learning. Child Development91(6). e1134–e1161. 10.1111/cdev.13415
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13415 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi & Deirdre Wilson
    2010 Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language25(4). 359–393. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, Haoran & Dongmei Huang
    2024 How childhood socioeconomic status (childhood SES) could influence scope of trust: The mediating role of neuroticism and uncertainty aversion. Personality and Individual Differences2231. 112622. 10.1016/j.paid.2024.112622
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112622 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wickham, Hadley, Romain François, Lionel Henry, Kirill Müller & Davis Vaughan
    2023 Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
  44. Wilson, Deirdre
    2009 Irony and metarepresentation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics211. 183–226.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    2012 Explaining irony. InDan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson (eds.), Meaning and relevance, 123–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wimmer, Heinz & Josef Perner
    1983 Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition13(1). 103–128. 10.1016/0010‑0277(83)90004‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24044.agu
Loading
Children’s vigilance towards others’ gullibility
Pragmatics & Cognition 33, 208 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24044.agu
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24044.agu
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24044.agu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognitive development; epistemic vigilance; irony; misinformation; pragmatic development; selective trust

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error