1887
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-0907
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9943
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Understanding irony requires epistemic vigilance towards both the content and source of communication. We conducted two experiments to investigate whether children’s early epistemic vigilance abilities aid in detecting verbal irony. The first experiment focused on children’s vigilance towards utterance content, hypothesizing that utterances whose explicit (or literal) content is more inappropriate in the context would be easier to recognize as ironic. The second experiment examined children’s vigilance towards the source of the utterances, hypothesizing that children would find ironic (but accurate) informants more trustworthy than inaccurate ones. Both tasks proved challenging for 3- to 7-year-olds, providing no direct evidence of irony understanding. While adults performed as predicted in the first experiment, they did not trust ironic (but accurate) informants, suggesting that the trustworthiness paradigm may not suit the complexity of verbal irony, where the speaker is both dismissive and correct. Our results contribute to a better understanding of the role of epistemic vigilance in irony development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24045.fal
2026-04-16
2026-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Attardo, Salvatore
    2000 Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics32(6). 793–826. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00070‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia & Barbara Bokus
    2019 Children’s comprehension of irony: Studies on Polish-speaking preschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research48(5). 1217–1240. 10.1007/s10936‑019‑09654‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09654-x [Google Scholar]
  3. Call, Josep & Michael Tomasello
    1999 A nonverbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes. Child Development70(2). 381–395. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00028
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00028 [Google Scholar]
  4. Castelain, Thomas, Stéphane Bernard, Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst & Hugo Mercier
    2016 The influence of power and reason on young Maya children’s endorsement of testimony. Developmental Science19(6). 957–966. 10.1111/desc.12336
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12336 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clément, Fabrice
    2010 To trust or not to trust? Children’s social epistemology. Review of Philosophy and Psychology1(4). 531–549. 10.1007/s13164‑010‑0022‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0022-3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Corriveau, Kathleen & Paul Harris
    2009 Preschoolers continue to trust a more accurate informant 1 week after exposure to accuracy information. Developmental Science12(1). 188–193. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00763.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00763.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Creusere, Marlena A.
    1999 Theories of adults’ understanding and use of irony and sarcasm: Applications and evidence from research with children. Developmental Review191. 213–262. 10.1006/drev.1998.0474
    https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0474 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dews, Shelly, Ellen Winner, Joan Kaplan, Elizabeth Rosenblatt, Malia Hunt, Karen Lim, Angela McGovern, Alison Qualter & Bonnie Smarsh
    1996 Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development671. 3071–3085. 10.2307/1131767
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1131767 [Google Scholar]
  9. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius.
    2019 Pragmatic development: Learning to use language to communicate. InJessica S. Horst & Janne Von Koss Torkildsen (eds.), International handbook of language acquisition, 234–260. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315110622‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110622-13 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2022 The development of non-literal uses of language: Sense conventions and pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics1881. 97–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius & Franziska Köder
    2024 Investigating irony comprehension in children: Methods, challenges, and ways forward. InNatalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Piotr Kałowski & Maria Zajączkowska (eds.), Studying verbal irony and sarcasm: Methodological perspectives from communication studies and beyond, 145–173. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑57172‑5_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57172-5_7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius, Marta Recasens & Eve V. Clark
    2017 “The moustache sits down first”: On the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language44(1). 87–119. 10.1017/S0305000915000720
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000720 [Google Scholar]
  13. Filippova, Eva & Janet Wilde Astington
    2008 Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development79(1). 126–138. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2007.01115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01115.x [Google Scholar]
  14. 2010 Children’s understanding of social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of discourse irony. Child Development81(3). 913–928. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2010.01442.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01442.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Flobbe, Liesbeth
    2006 Children’s development of reasoning about other people’s minds. Groningen: University of Groningen, PhD dissertation.
  16. Gerstadt, Cherie L., Yoon Joo Hong & Adele Diamond
    1994 The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 312–7 years old on a stroop- like day-night test. Cognition53(2). 129–153. 10.1016/0010‑0277(94)90068‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-X [Google Scholar]
  17. Glenwright, Melanie & Penny M. Pexman
    2010 Development of children’s ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony. Journal of Child Language371. 429–451. 10.1017/S0305000909009520
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000909009520 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gliga, Teodora & Gergely Csibra
    2009 One-year-old infants appreciate the referential nature of deictic gestures. Psychological Science201. 347–353. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02295.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02295.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Hancock, Jeffrey T., Philip J. Dunham & Kelly Purdy
    2000 Children’s comprehension of critical and complimentary forms of verbal irony. Journal of Cognition and Development1(2). 227–248. 10.1207/S15327647JCD010204
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD010204 [Google Scholar]
  20. Happé, Francesca G. E.
    1993 Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of Relevance theory. Cognition481. 101–119. 10.1016/0010‑0277(93)90026‑R
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-R [Google Scholar]
  21. Harris, Paul L.
    2012Trusting what you are told: How children learn from others. Boston: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Harris, Melanie & Penny M. Pexman
    2003 Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes36(3). 147–165. 10.1207/S15326950DP3603_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3603_1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Irving, Elizabeth L., Martin J. Steinbach, Linda Lillakas, Raiju J.Babu & Natalie Hutchings
    2006 Horizontal saccade dynamics across the human life span. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science47(6). 2478–2484. 10.1167/iovs.05‑1311
    https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1311 [Google Scholar]
  24. Koenig, Melissa A. & Paul L. Harris
    2005 Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development761. 1261–1277. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2005.00849.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Koenig, Melissa A. & Amanda L. Woodward
    2010 24-month-olds’ sensitivity to the prior inaccuracy of the source: Possible mechanisms. Developmental Psychology46(4). 815–826. 10.1037/a0019664
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019664 [Google Scholar]
  26. Köder, Franziska & Ingrid Lossius Falkum
    2020 Children’s metonymy comprehension: Evidence from eye-tracking and picture selection. Journal of Pragmatics1561. 191–205. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2021 Irony and perspective-taking in children: The roles of norm violations and tone of voice. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kristoffersen, Kristian E. & Hanne G. Simonsen
    2012Tidlig språkutvikling hos norske barn. MacArthur-Bates foreldrerapport for kommunikativ utvikling. Novus forlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Loukusa, Solie & Eeva Leinonen
    2008 Development of comprehension of ironic utterances in 3- to 9-year-old Finnish-speaking children. Psychology of Language and Communication12(1). 55–69. 10.2478/v10057‑008‑0003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-008-0003-0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mascaro, Olivier & Dan Sperber
    2009 The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition1121. 367–380. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mascaro, Olivier, Olivier Morin & Dan Sperber
    2017 Optimistic expectations about communication explain children’s difficulties in hiding, lying, and mistrusting liars. Journal of Child Language44(5). 1041–1064. 10.1017/S0305000916000350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000350 [Google Scholar]
  32. Matthews, Danielle
    (ed.) 2014Pragmatic development in first language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.10 [Google Scholar]
  33. Matthews, Danielle, Elena Lieven, Anna Theakston & Michael Tomasello
    2006 The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children’s use of referring expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics271. 403–422. 10.1017/S0142716406060334
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060334 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mazzarella, Diana & Nausicaa Pouscoulous
    2021 Pragmatics and epistemic vigilance: A developmental perspective. Mind & Language361. 355–376. 10.1111/mila.12287
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12287 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2023 Ironic speakers, vigilant hearers. Intercultural Pragmatics20(2). 111–132. 10.1515/ip‑2023‑2001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-2001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakassis, Constantine & Jesse Snedeker
    2002 Beyond sarcasm: Intonation and context as relational cues in children’s recognition of irony. InBarbora Skarabela, Sara Fish & Anna H. J. Do (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Boston University conference on language development, 429–440. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Neff, Mary Beth & Ingrid Lossius Falkum
    2025 Decoupling literalist behavior from children’s early metaphor comprehension abilities. Language Development Research. 5(2). 130–171. 10.34842/ldr2025‑819
    https://doi.org/10.34842/ldr2025-819 [Google Scholar]
  38. Neff, Mary Beth
    2025 Challenging the metaphor deficit: Unpacking children’s ‘literally biased’ communicative development. Oslo: PhD thesis, University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Michael Tomasello
    2020 Early birds: Metaphor understanding in 3-year-olds. Journal of Pragmatics1561. 160–167. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021 [Google Scholar]
  40. Reccia, Holly, Nina Howe, Hildy Ross & Stephanie Alexander
    2010 Children’s understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology281. 255–274. 10.1348/026151008X401903
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X401903 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi & Deirdre Wilson
    2010 Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language25(4). 359–393. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Sullivan, Kate, Ellen Winner & Natalie Hopfield
    1995 How children tell lies from a joke: The role of second-order mental state attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology13(2). 191–204. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1995.tb00673.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00673.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Vanderbilt, Kimberley E., Gail D. Heyman & David Liu
    2014 In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants. Developmental Science17(3). 443–451. 10.1111/desc.12134
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12134 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wilson, Deirdre
    2009 Irony and metarepresentation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics211. 183–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2013 Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics591. 40–56. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    2012Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]
  47. Winner, Ellen
    1988/1997The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Winner, Ellen & Sue Leekam
    1991 Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker’s second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology91. 257–270. 10.1111/j.2044‑835X.1991.tb00875.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00875.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Zufferey, Sandrine
    2015Acquiring pragmatics: Social and cognitive perspectives. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24045.fal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.24045.fal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): epistemic vigilance; irony; non-literal language; pragmatic development
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error