1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pragmatics & Cognition
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Worse than bad, better than good
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

This article investigates text-based emotional contagion in online customer feedback, focusing on the role of evaluative language in Twitter (now X) complaints and compliments. Specifically, it examines the impact of evaluative language on readers’ attribution of positive and negative emotions in these messages, as well as the emotions they themselves experience when reading them. The study focuses on Dutch-language Twitter posts in which customers publicly complain about or praise the Belgian national railway company. We report on a questionnaire experiment with a 2 x 2 design in which the valence (positive or negative) of corpus-based Twitter stimuli and the presence/absence of evaluative language were manipulated. Participants were first asked to report their own emotional states while reading the messages and were then asked to assess positive and negative emotions expressed in the same messages. The results show, first, that complaints containing evaluative language led to higher perceived sadness and lower perceived happiness than complaints without evaluative language. Second, while evaluative language did not affect readers’ emotional responses to compliments, self-reported sadness was higher for complaints with evaluative language than for those without. Third, participants reported greater surprise in response to compliments than to complaints overall. Finally, a significant positive correlation was found between the intensity of perceived emotions and that of self-reported emotions. Together, these findings provide novel evidence for emotion attribution and text-based emotional contagion in online customer feedback.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pc.25009.ruy
2026-07-31
2026-08-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pc.25009.ruy
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/pc.25009.ruy/pc.25009.ruy.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pc.25009.ruy&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barsade, Sigal G.
    2002 The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly(). –. 10.2307/3094912
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3094912 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2015 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software(). –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baumeister, Roy F., Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer & Cathleen D. Vohs
    2001 Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology(). –. 10.1037/1089‑2680.5.4.323
     https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, Lance K., Xavier Scruggs & Joy M. Woods
    2020 Surprise, hurt, and anger as emotional responses to expectancy violations following feedback messages. Communication Research Reports(). –. 10.1080/08824096.2020.1737000
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1737000 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berger, Jonah & Katherine L. Milkman
    2012 What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research(). –. 10.1509/jmr.10.0353
     https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cenni, Irene & Camilla Vásquez
    2023 “Jerry was a terrific host!” “You were a brilliant guest!”: Reciprocal compliments on Airbnb. Pragmatics and Society(). –. 10.1075/ps.20059.cen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20059.cen [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis, Mark H.
    1980 A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology. .
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Decock, Sofie & Ilse Depraetere
    2018 (In)directness and complaints: A reassessment. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Depraetere, Ilse, Sofie Decock & Nicolas Ruytenbeek
    2021 Linguistic (in)directness in Twitter complaints: A contrastive analysis of railway complaint interactions. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.026
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.026 [Google Scholar]
  10. Derks, Daantje, Agneta H. Fischer & Arjan E. R. Bos
    2008 The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior(). –. 10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  11. Du Bois, John W. & Elise Kärkkäinen
    2012 Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk(). –. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021 [Google Scholar]
  12. Felbermayr, Armin & Alexandros Nanopoulos
    2016 The role of emotions for the perceived usefulness in online customer reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing. –. 10.1016/j.intmar.2016.05.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferrara, Emilio & Zeyao Yang
    2015 Measuring emotional contagion in social media. PloS one(). –. 10.1371/journal.pone.0142390
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142390 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fox, Alexa K., George D. Deitz, Marla B. Royne & Joseph D. Fox
    2018 The face of contagion: Consumer response to service failure depiction in online reviews. European Journal of Marketing(). –. 10.1108/EJM‑12‑2016‑0887
     https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0887 [Google Scholar]
  15. Franzke, Aline Shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, Charles M. Ess & the Association of Internet Researchers
    2020 Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
  16. Goldenberg, Amit & James J. Gross
    2020 Digital emotion contagion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences(). –. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  17. Guo, Junpeng, Xiaopang Wang & Yi Wu
    2020 Positive emotion bias: Role of emotional content from online customer reviews in purchase decisions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. . 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101891
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101891 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamilton, Antonia, Daniel Wolpert & Uta Frith
    2004 Your own action influences how you perceive another person’s action. Current Biology(). –. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hancock, Jeffrey T., Christopher Landrigan & Courtney Silver
    2007 Expressing emotion in text-based communication. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07), –. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/1240624.1240764
     https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240764 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hatfield, Elaine, John T. Cacioppo & Richard L. Rapson
    1994 Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Havas, David A., Arthur M. Glenberg & Mike Rinck
    2007 Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. –. 10.3758/BF03194085
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194085 [Google Scholar]
  22. Havas, David A. & James Matheson
    2013 The functional role of the periphery in emotional language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00294
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00294 [Google Scholar]
  23. Herrando, Carolina & Efthymios Constantinides
    2021 Emotional contagion: A brief overview and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology. . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712606
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712606 [Google Scholar]
  24. Herrando, Carolina, Julio Jiménez-Martínez, María José Martín-De Hoyos & Efthymios Constantinides
    2022 Emotional contagion triggered by online consumer reviews: Evidence from a neuroscience study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. . 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102973
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102973 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hine, Michael J., Steven A. Murphy & Vinita Ambwani
    2010 Emotional contagion in computer mediated communication. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management Annual Review(). –. 10.18848/1447‑9524/CGP/v10i06/49987
     https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v10i06/49987 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ito, Tiffany A., Jeff T. Larsen, N. Kyle Smith & John T. Cacioppo
    1998 Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology(). –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.75.4.887
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.887 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
    2007 Negativity bias in language: A cognitive-affective model of emotive intensifiers. Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/COG.2007.023
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.023 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kramer, Adam D. I., Jamie E. Guillory & Jeffrey T. Hancock
    2014 Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. –. 10.1073/pnas.1320040111
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lenth, Russell V.
    2023 emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (R package version 1.8.8). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Liebrecht, Christine, Lettica Hustinx & Margot van Mulken
    2019 The relative power of negativity: The influence of language intensity on perceived strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology(). –. 10.1177/0261927X18808562
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18808562 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ludwig, Stephan, Ko de Ruyter, Mike Friedman, Elisabeth C. Brüggen, Martin Wetzels & Gerard Pfann
    2013 More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates. Journal of Marketing(). –. 10.1509/jm.11.0560
     https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0560 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lutzky, Ursula
    2021 The discourse of customer service tweets. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Masciantonio, Alexandra & David Bourguignon
    2024 Too positive to be tweeted? An experimental investigation of emotional expression on Twitter and Instagram. Media Psychology(). –. 10.1080/15213269.2023.2236935
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2023.2236935 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ott, Larissa & Petra Theunissen
    2015 Reputations at risk: Engagement during social media crises. Public Relations Review. –. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  35. Placencia, María Elena & Amanda Lower
    2017 Compliments and compliment responses. InChristian R. Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of social media, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110431070‑023
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-023 [Google Scholar]
  36. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2023 R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Rozin, Paul & Edward B. Royzman
    2001 Bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review(). –. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ruytenbeek, Nicolas, Sofie Decock & Ilse Depraetere
    2023a Experiments into the influence of linguistic (in)directness on perceived face-threat in Twitter complaints. Journal of Politeness Research(). –. 10.1515/pr‑2019‑0042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2019-0042 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2023b The influence of linguistic choices on perceived face-threat in Twitter complaints: An experimental approach. Journal of Politeness Research(). –. 10.1515/pr‑2021‑0031
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2021-0031 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ruytenbeek, Nicolas, Jens Allaert & Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
    2024 Psychophysiological effects of evaluative language use on Twitter complaints and compliments. Internet Pragmatics(). –. 10.1075/ip.00092.ruy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00092.ruy [Google Scholar]
  41. Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
    2026 Acknowledging feedback in French customer service interactions online: Types and perceptions. InCamilla Vásquez & Sylvia Jaworska (eds.), The Feedback Society: Linguistic and Discursive Approaches, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003537489‑10
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003537489-10 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schellekens, Gaby A. C., Peeter W. J. Verlegh & Ale Smidts
    2013 Linguistic biases and persuasion in communication about objects. Journal of Language and Social Psychology(). –. 10.1177/0261927X12466083
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12466083 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schoenewolf, Gerald
    1990 Emotional contagion: Behavioral induction in individuals and groups. Modern Psychoanalysis. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Schwab, Pierre Nicolas & Sandra Rothenberger
    2015 Online complaint handling: The effects of politeness and grammaticality upon perceived professionalism and loyalty. Working Papers CEB15-015. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sigona, Annalise
    2015 Impression management on Facebook and Twitter: Where are people more likely to share positivity or negativity with their audiences?Young Scholars in Writing. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith, Andrew N., Eileen Fischer & Chen Yongjian
    2012 How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?Journal of Interactive Marketing(). –. 10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith, Leah Warfield & Randall L. Rose
    2020 Service with a smiley face: Emotional contagion in digitally mediated relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing. –. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stoet, Gijsbert
    2010 PsyToolkit — A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods(). –. 10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2017 PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology(). –. 10.1177/0098628316677643
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643 [Google Scholar]
  50. Vásquez, Camilla
    2011 Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2014 The discourse of online consumer reviews. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Von Helversen, Bettina, Katarzyna Abramczuk, Wiesław Kopeć & Radoslaw Nielek
    2018 Influence of consumer reviews on online purchasing decisions in older and younger adults. Decision Support Systems. –. 10.1016/j.dss.2018.05.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  53. Waterloo, Sophie F., Susanne E. Baumgartner, Jochen Peter & Patti M. Valkenburg
    2018 Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society(). –. 10.1177/1461444817707349
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707349 [Google Scholar]
  54. Widdershoven, Svenja
    2019 Disentangling a web of emotions. The pervasiveness of emotional contagion on social media in service settings. Nijmegen: Radboud University of Nijmegen PhD dissertation.
  55. Widdershoven, Svenja, Mark Pluymaekers & Josée M. M. Bloemer
    2021 It’s part of the job: How webcare agents regulate their emotions during service interactions on Facebook and Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media. . 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100500
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100500 [Google Scholar]
  56. Widdershoven, Svenja, Pluymaekers, Mark, Haithem Zourrig, Paul Sinclair & Josée M. M. Bloemer
    2024 Calming the storm: How non-negative messages from fellow consumers can dispel negativity in a social media firestorm. International Journal of Business Communication(). –. 10.1177/23294884231200244
     https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884231200244 [Google Scholar]
  57. Webb, Helena, Marina Jirotka, Bernd C. Stahl, William Housley, Adam Edwards, Matthew Williams, Rob Procter, Omer Rana & Pete Burnap
    2017 The ethical challenges of publishing Twitter data for research dissemination. InProceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference (WebSci ’17), –. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/3091478.3091489
     https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091489 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wharton, Tim & Louis de Saussure
    2023 Pragmatics and emotion. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108869867
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108869867 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zwaan, Rolf A.
    1999 Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science(). –. 10.1111/1467‑8721.00004
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00004 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zwaan, Rolf A. & Lawrence J. Taylor
    2006 Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General(). –. 10.1037/0096‑3445.135.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.25009.ruy
Loading
Worse than bad, better than good
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.25009.ruy
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.25009.ruy
/content/journals/10.1075/pc.25009.ruy
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: complaints ; compliments ; Twitter ; emotional contagion

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error