1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pedagogical Linguistics
  4. Volume 1, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9581
  • E-ISSN: 2665-959X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Pedagogical linguistics is a two-way bridge between linguistics and education, carrying information not only from linguistics to education, but also in the other direction, where linguistics needs to explore the impact of education on language. The paper reviews the history of this bridge, and especially in the 19th and 20th centuries, arguing that the bridge worked well in the 19th but that it disintegrated in the 20th with the rise of linguistics and education as distinct research fields. The challenge for the 21st century is to rebuild it in a sustainable way.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.19011.hud
2020-02-17
2021-10-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pl.19011.hud
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, J. G.
    (Ed.) (1912) Modern language teaching: The official organ of the Modern Language Association8. https://archive.org/details/modernlanguagete08modeuoft
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold, T.
    (1848) An English grammar for classical schools, with questions, and a course of exercises; being a practical introduction to English prose composition (4th ed.). London: Rivington. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89089195291;view=1up;seq=11
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkins, H. G., & Hutton, H. L.
    (1920) The teaching of modern foreign languages: In school and university. Edward Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker, K. F.
    (1829) Deutsche Sprachlehre (Vol2). Frankfurt am Main: Hermann.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Billroth, J.
    (1832) Lateinische Syntax für die obern Klassen gelehrter Schulen. Leipzig: Weidmann.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Board of Education
    Board of Education (1921) The teaching of English in England (The Newbolt Report). London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brassai, S.
    (1873) Paraleipomena kai diorthoumena. A mit nem mondtak s a mit roszul mondtak a commentatorok Virg. Aeneise II. könyvére [What the commentators did not say or wrongly said about Book II of Virgil’s Aeneid]. Budapest: MTA.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brittain, R. C.
    (1973) A critical history of systems of sentence diagramming in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
  9. Bullock, S. A.
    (1975) Language for life. London: Dept for Education and Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chambaud, L.
    (1750) A grammar of the French tongue: With a prefatory discourse, containing an essay on the proper method for teaching and learning that language. London: Printed for A. Miller.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chomsky, N.
    (1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Clark, S. W.
    (1847) A Practical grammar: In which words, phrases, and sentences are classified according to their offices and their various relations to one another (Sixth edition 1851). https://ia800304.us.archive.org/10/items/apracticalgramm04clargoog/apracticalgramm04clargoog.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Daniélou, A.
    (1993) Virtue, success, pleasure and liberation: The four aims of life in the tradition of ancient India. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dmitrievskij, A.
    (1877) Praktičeskie zametki o russkom sintaksise, I : Opredelenie predloženija [Practical remarks on Russian syntax: Definition of the proposition]. Filologičeskie zapiski (Voronež), 3, 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gleason, H.
    (1965) Linguistics and English grammar. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gragg, G. B.
    (2006) Babylonian grammatical texts. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp.639–642). Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01341‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01341-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gwosdek, H.
    (2013) William Lily’s grammar of Latin in English: An introduction of the Eyght Partes of Speche, and the construction of the same. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hefty, M., Ortiz, S., & Nelson, S.
    (2008) Sentence diagramming: A step-by-step approach to learning grammar through diagramming. Harlow: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Honey, J.
    (1997) Language is power: The story of standard English and its enemies. London: Faber and Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.
    (2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hudson, R.
    (2004) Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics, 40, 105–130. 10.1017/S0022226703002342
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226703002342 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hult, F.
    (2008) The history and development of educational linguistics. InB. Spolsky & F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp.10–24). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470694138.ch2
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Imrényi, A., & Vladár, Z.
    (forthcoming). Sámuel Brassai in the history of dependency grammar. InA. Imrényi & N. Mazziotta Eds. Chapters of dependency grammar: A historical survey from antiquity to Tesnière. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.212.06imr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.06imr [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson, K., Johnson, H.
    (1998) Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kahane, S.
    (forthcoming). How dependency syntax appeared in the French Encyclopedia: From Buffier (1709) to Beauzée (1765). InA. Imrényi & N. Mazziotta Eds. Chapters of dependency grammar: A historical survey from antiquity to Tesnière. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.212.04kah
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.04kah [Google Scholar]
  26. Kern, F.
    (1884) Grundriss der Deutschen Satzlehre. Berlin: Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Krashen, S.
    (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Law, V.
    (2003) The history of linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316036464
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316036464 [Google Scholar]
  29. Linn, A.
    (2006) English grammar writing. InB. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp.72–92). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  30. Luhtala, A.
    (1994) Grammar, early mediaeval. InR. Asher (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp.1460–1468). Oxford: Pergamon.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lyons, J.
    (1968) Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165570
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
  32. Macaro, E.
    (2014) Grammar: The never-ending debate. InP. Driscoll, E. Macaro & A. Swarbrick (Eds.), Debates in modern languages education (pp.108–120). London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mazziotta, N.
    (2016) Drawing syntax before syntactic trees: Stephen Watkins Clark’s sentence diagrams (1847). Historiographia Linguistica, 43(3), 301–342. doi:  10.1075/hl.43.3.03maz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.43.3.03maz [Google Scholar]
  34. Mclelland, N.
    (2017) Teaching and learning foreign languages: A history of language education, assessment and policy in Britain. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315624853
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624853 [Google Scholar]
  35. Morell, J. D.
    (1855) The analysis of sentences explained and systematised, after Beckers’ German grammar (5th ed.). London: Robert Theobald.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Nesfield, J. C.
    (1898) Outline of English grammar: In five parts. London: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Olson, G., Faigley, L., & Chomsky, N.
    (1991) Language, politics and composition: A conversation with Noam Chomsky. Journal of Advanced Composition, 11, 1–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Owens, J.
    (1988) The foundations of grammar: An introduction to mediaeval Arabic grammatical theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.45
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.45 [Google Scholar]
  39. Page, B.
    (1996) The Association for Language Learning (ALL). InE. Hawkins (Ed.), 30 Years of Language Teaching (pp.294–296). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Percival, K.
    (1976) On the historical source of immediate constituent analysis. InJ. McCawley (Ed.), Notes from the linguistic underground (pp.229–242). London: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368859_015
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368859_015 [Google Scholar]
  41. Perera, K.
    (1984) Children’s writing and reading: Analysing classroom language (Language Library). Oxford: B. Blackwell in association with A. Deutsch.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Quirk, R.
    (1964) The English language problem. English in Education, 1, 7–12. doi:  10.1111/j.1754‑8845.1964.tb01203.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1964.tb01203.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1972) A Grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Reed, A., & Kellogg, B.
    (1877) Higher lessons in English. A work on English grammar and composition, in which the science of the language is made tributary to the art of expression. A course of practical lessons carefully graded, and adapted to every day use in the school-room. (1890 edition). New York, NY: Clark and Maynard.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Robins, R.
    (1967) A short history of linguistics. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Seriot, P.
    (2004) L’affaire du petit drame: Filiation franco-russe ou communauté de pensée? (Tesnière et Dmitrievskij). Slavica Occitania, Toulouse, 17, 93–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Spolsky, B.
    (1978) Educational linguistics: An introduction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Swan, M.
    (1995) Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Sweet, H.
    (1891) A new English grammar logical and historical (2vols). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Taylor, D.
    (1991) Latin declensions and conjugations: From Varro to Priscian. Histoire Epistémologie Language, 13, 85. 10.3406/hel.1991.2334
     https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.1991.2334 [Google Scholar]
  51. Tesnière, L.
    (1959) Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pl.19011.hud
Loading
Towards a pedagogical linguistics
Pedagogical Linguistics 1, 8 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19011.hud
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.19011.hud
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.19011.hud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): communicative teaching; education; grammar-translation; linguistics; parsing; sentence diagram

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error