f Towards a pedagogical linguistics

References

1. Anderson, J. G.
   (Ed.) (1912) Modern language teaching: The official organ of the Modern Language Association8. https://archive.org/details/modernlanguagete08modeuoft
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arnold, T.
   (1848) An English grammar for classical schools, with questions, and a course of exercises; being a practical introduction to English prose composition (4th ed.). London: Rivington. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89089195291;view=1up;seq=11
   [Google Scholar]
3. Atkins, H. G., & Hutton, H. L.
   (1920) The teaching of modern foreign languages: In school and university. Edward Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Becker, K. F.
   (1829) Deutsche Sprachlehre (Vol2). Frankfurt am Main: Hermann.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Billroth, J.
   (1832) Lateinische Syntax für die obern Klassen gelehrter Schulen. Leipzig: Weidmann.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Board of Education
   Board of Education (1921) The teaching of English in England (The Newbolt Report). London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brassai, S.
   (1873) Paraleipomena kai diorthoumena. A mit nem mondtak s a mit roszul mondtak a commentatorok Virg. Aeneise II. könyvére [What the commentators did not say or wrongly said about Book II of Virgil’s Aeneid]. Budapest: MTA.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brittain, R. C.
   (1973) A critical history of systems of sentence diagramming in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
9. Bullock, S. A.
   (1975) Language for life. London: Dept for Education and Science.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chambaud, L.
    (1750) A grammar of the French tongue: With a prefatory discourse, containing an essay on the proper method for teaching and learning that language. London: Printed for A. Miller.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chomsky, N.
    (1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Clark, S. W.
    (1847) A Practical grammar: In which words, phrases, and sentences are classified according to their offices and their various relations to one another (Sixth edition 1851). https://ia800304.us.archive.org/10/items/apracticalgramm04clargoog/apracticalgramm04clargoog.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
13. Daniélou, A.
    (1993) Virtue, success, pleasure and liberation: The four aims of life in the tradition of ancient India. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dmitrievskij, A.
    (1877) Praktičeskie zametki o russkom sintaksise, I : Opredelenie predloženija [Practical remarks on Russian syntax: Definition of the proposition]. Filologičeskie zapiski (Voronež), 3, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gleason, H.
    (1965) Linguistics and English grammar. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gragg, G. B.
    (2006) Babylonian grammatical texts. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp.639–642). Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01341‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01341-9 [Google Scholar]
17. Gwosdek, H.
    (2013) William Lily’s grammar of Latin in English: An introduction of the Eyght Partes of Speche, and the construction of the same. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hefty, M., Ortiz, S., & Nelson, S.
    (2008) Sentence diagramming: A step-by-step approach to learning grammar through diagramming. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Honey, J.
    (1997) Language is power: The story of standard English and its enemies. London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.
    (2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
21. Hudson, R.
    (2004) Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics, 40, 105–130. 10.1017/S0022226703002342
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226703002342 [Google Scholar]
22. Hult, F.
    (2008) The history and development of educational linguistics. InB. Spolsky & F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp.10–24). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470694138.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch2 [Google Scholar]
23. Imrényi, A., & Vladár, Z.
    (forthcoming). Sámuel Brassai in the history of dependency grammar. InA. Imrényi & N. Mazziotta Eds. Chapters of dependency grammar: A historical survey from antiquity to Tesnière. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.212.06imr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.06imr [Google Scholar]
24. Johnson, K., Johnson, H.
    (1998) Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kahane, S.
    (forthcoming). How dependency syntax appeared in the French Encyclopedia: From Buffier (1709) to Beauzée (1765). InA. Imrényi & N. Mazziotta Eds. Chapters of dependency grammar: A historical survey from antiquity to Tesnière. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.212.04kah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.212.04kah [Google Scholar]
26. Kern, F.
    (1884) Grundriss der Deutschen Satzlehre. Berlin: Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Krashen, S.
    (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Law, V.
    (2003) The history of linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316036464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316036464 [Google Scholar]
29. Linn, A.
    (2006) English grammar writing. InB. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp.72–92). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch4 [Google Scholar]
30. Luhtala, A.
    (1994) Grammar, early mediaeval. InR. Asher (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp.1460–1468). Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lyons, J.
    (1968) Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165570
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
32. Macaro, E.
    (2014) Grammar: The never-ending debate. InP. Driscoll, E. Macaro & A. Swarbrick (Eds.), Debates in modern languages education (pp.108–120). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mazziotta, N.
    (2016) Drawing syntax before syntactic trees: Stephen Watkins Clark’s sentence diagrams (1847). Historiographia Linguistica, 43(3), 301–342. doi:  10.1075/hl.43.3.03maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.43.3.03maz [Google Scholar]
34. Mclelland, N.
    (2017) Teaching and learning foreign languages: A history of language education, assessment and policy in Britain. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315624853
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624853 [Google Scholar]
35. Morell, J. D.
    (1855) The analysis of sentences explained and systematised, after Beckers’ German grammar (5th ed.). London: Robert Theobald.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nesfield, J. C.
    (1898) Outline of English grammar: In five parts. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Olson, G., Faigley, L., & Chomsky, N.
    (1991) Language, politics and composition: A conversation with Noam Chomsky. Journal of Advanced Composition, 11, 1–35.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Owens, J.
    (1988) The foundations of grammar: An introduction to mediaeval Arabic grammatical theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sihols.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.45 [Google Scholar]
39. Page, B.
    (1996) The Association for Language Learning (ALL). InE. Hawkins (Ed.), 30 Years of Language Teaching (pp.294–296). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Percival, K.
    (1976) On the historical source of immediate constituent analysis. InJ. McCawley (Ed.), Notes from the linguistic underground (pp.229–242). London: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368859_015
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368859_015 [Google Scholar]
41. Perera, K.
    (1984) Children’s writing and reading: Analysing classroom language (Language Library). Oxford: B. Blackwell in association with A. Deutsch.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Quirk, R.
    (1964) The English language problem. English in Education, 1, 7–12. doi:  10.1111/j.1754‑8845.1964.tb01203.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1964.tb01203.x [Google Scholar]
43. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1972) A Grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Reed, A., & Kellogg, B.
    (1877) Higher lessons in English. A work on English grammar and composition, in which the science of the language is made tributary to the art of expression. A course of practical lessons carefully graded, and adapted to every day use in the school-room. (1890 edition). New York, NY: Clark and Maynard.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Robins, R.
    (1967) A short history of linguistics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Seriot, P.
    (2004) L’affaire du petit drame: Filiation franco-russe ou communauté de pensée? (Tesnière et Dmitrievskij). Slavica Occitania, Toulouse, 17, 93–118.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Spolsky, B.
    (1978) Educational linguistics: An introduction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Swan, M.
    (1995) Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sweet, H.
    (1891) A new English grammar logical and historical (2vols). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Taylor, D.
    (1991) Latin declensions and conjugations: From Varro to Priscian. Histoire Epistémologie Language, 13, 85. 10.3406/hel.1991.2334
    https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.1991.2334 [Google Scholar]
51. Tesnière, L.
    (1959) Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]