1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2665-9581
  • E-ISSN: 2665-959X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In the present article I investigated whether data obtained from 7-year-old German L1 and German-Turkish eL2 children by means of an elicited imitation task including grammatical and ungrammatical sentences mirrored current findings in acquisition research concerning case marking, adjective inflection, V2 position and finiteness. The results show that L1 children have full mastery of all four phenomena, as they revealed a greater tendency to correct ungrammatical sentences than to introduce errors into grammatical sentences. On the other hand, eL2 children differed from L1 children in terms of how they dealt with the noun-related phenomena, as they did not reveal a clear preference for either changing grammatical items or correcting ungrammatical items. In the discussion, I propose how to minimise the likelihood that participants simply repeat ungrammatical items verbatim in further imitation studies and be thus able to collect more reliable data on their grammatical knowledge. The article ends with a proposal for a primary school exercise on case marking that involves correcting errors on case marking. The suggestion is that ungrammatical sentences can be used in grammar teaching to assess pupils’ linguistic knowledge and also to guide their attention to specific regularities of the language, thus stimulating language reflection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20001.cri
2020-06-03
2020-11-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, J. R.
    (1974) Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(2), 149–162. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(74)80039‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80039-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H.
    (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R/ Harald Baayen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
    (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bewer, F.
    (2013) Der Erwerb des Artikels als Genus-Anzeiger im deutschen Erstspracherwerb: Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Binanzer, A.
    (2017) Genus-Kongruenz und Klassifikation: Evidenzen aus dem Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110548549
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110548549 [Google Scholar]
  7. Biran, M., & Ruigendijk, E.
    (2015) Do case and gender information assist sentence comprehension and repetition for German- and Hebrew-speaking children?Lingua, 164, 215–238. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.012 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bittner, D.
    (1997) Entfaltung grammatischer Relationen im NP-Erwerb: Referenz. Folia Linguistica, 31(3–4), 255–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bley-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C.
    (1994) Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. Research Methodology in Second-Language Acquisition, 245–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blom, E., Polišenská, D., & Weerman, F.
    (2008) Articles, adjectives and age of onset: the acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research, 24(3), 297–331. 10.1177/0267658308090183
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308090183 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bock, J. K., & Brewer, W. F.
    (1974) Reconstructive recall in sentences with alternative surface structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(5), 837. 10.1037/h0037391
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037391 [Google Scholar]
  12. Boyle, W., Lindell, A. K., & Kidd, E.
    (2013) Investigating the role of verbal working memory in young children’s sentence comprehension. Language Learning, 63(2), 211–242. 10.1111/lang.12003
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T.
    (2015) Production of definite and indefinite articles in typically developing English-speaking children and children with SLI. Lingua, 155, 9–28. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clahsen, H.
    (1984) Der Erwerb von Kasusmarkierungen in der deutschen Kindersprache. Linguistische Berichte, 89, 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1982) Spracherwerb in der Kindheit. Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax. Universität Tübingen.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1986) Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics, 24(1), 79–122. 10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.79 [Google Scholar]
  17. Clahsen, H., & Penke, M.
    (1992) The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-Corpus. InJ. Meisel (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2-Phenomena in Langauge Development (pp.181–223). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑2803‑2_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_7 [Google Scholar]
  18. Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiß, S., & Vainikka, A.
    (1994) The seeds of structure. A syntactic analysis of the acquisition of case marking. InT. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp.85–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lald.8.07cla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.8.07cla [Google Scholar]
  19. Cristante, V.
    (2016) The Processing of Non-Canonical Sentences in Children with German as a First or Second Language and German Adults- Evidence from an Eye-tracking Study (PhD Thesis). Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität, Münster. Retrieved fromnbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-11269715348
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cristante, V., & Schimke, S.
    (2017) Verarbeitung von Passiv- und OVS-Sätzen bei Kindern mit Deutsch als früher L2. InS. Schimke & H. Hopp (Eds.), DaZ-Forschung [DaZ-For]: Vol. 13. Sprachverarbeitung im Zweitspracherwerb. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
    (2008a) German Childrens Comprehension of Word Order and Case Marking in Causative Sentences. Child Development, 79(4), 1152–1167. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2008.01181.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x [Google Scholar]
  22. (2008b) Young German children’s early syntactic competence: A preferential looking study. Developmental Science, 11(4), 575–582. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00703.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00703.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Duden, K.
    (2009) Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch. Mannheim, Zürich: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Eisenbeiß, S.
    (1994) Kasus und Wortstellungsvariation im deutschen Mittelfeld. Theoretische Überlegungen und Untersuchungen zum Erstspracherwerb. InB. Haftka (Hrsg.), Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation? Studien zu einem Interaktionsfeld von Grammatik, Pragmatik und Sprachtypologie (pp.277–298). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑90875‑9_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90875-9_17 [Google Scholar]
  25. Eisenbeiss, S.
    (2002) Merkmalsgesteuerter Grammatikerwerb (PhD Thesis). University of Düsseldorf.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Eisenberg, P.
    (2013) Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Band 2: Der Satz. 4., aktualisierte und überarb. Aufl. Stuttgart: Metzler.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ellis, N., & Collins, L.
    (2009) Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 329–335. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00893.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Ellis, N. C.
    (2005a) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352. 10.1017/S027226310505014X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X [Google Scholar]
  29. Ellis, R.
    (2005b) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. 10.1017/S0272263105050096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
  30. Erlam, R.
    (2006) Elicited Imitation as a Measure of L2 Implicit Knowledge: An Empirical Validation Study. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 464–491. 10.1093/applin/aml001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fattal, I., Friedmann, N., & Fattal-Valevski, A.
    (2011) The crucial role of thiamine in the development of syntax and lexical retrieval: a study of infantile thiamine deficiency. Brain, 134(6), 1720–1739. 10.1093/brain/awr068
    https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr068 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. G.
    (1981) The interpretation of elicited sentence imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning, 31(2), 369–392. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1981.tb01390.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01390.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Gamper, J.
    (2016) Satzinterpretationsstrategien mehr- und einsprachiger Kinder im Deutschen. Language development: Band 37. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gathercole, V., & Hoff, E.
    (2007) Input and the Acquisition of Language: Three Questions. InE. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology. Blackwell handbook of language development (pp.107–127). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757833.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757833.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  35. Granzow-Emden, M.
    (2013) Deutsche Grammatik verstehen und unterrichten. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Grimm, A., & Schulz, P.
    (2014) Sprachfähigkeiten von Kindern mit DaZ bei Schuleintritt. InB. Lütke & I. Petersen (Eds.), Deutsch als Zweitsprache: erwerben, lernen und lehren. Beiträge zum 9. Workshop Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund (pp.35–50). Stuttgart: Fillibach bei Klett.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2016) Warum man bei mehrsprachigen Kindern dreimal nach dem Alter fragen sollte: Sprachfähigkeiten simultan-bilingualer Lerner im Vergleich mitmonolingualen und frühen Zweitsprachlernern. Diskurs Kindheits- Und Jugendforschung, 11(1), 27–42. doi:  10.3224/diskurs.v11i1.22247
    https://doi.org/10.3224/diskurs.v11i1.22247 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hamann, C.
    (2012) Bilingual Development and Language Assessment. InA. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston Conference on Language Development (BUCLD), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hamayan, E., Saegert, J., & Larudee, P.
    (1977) Elicited imitation in second language learners. Language and Speech, 20(1), 86–97. 10.1177/002383097702000109
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000109 [Google Scholar]
  40. Jaeger, T. F.
    (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  41. Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., & Tomita, Y.
    (2007) Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 215–238. 10.3138/cmlr.64.1.215
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.1.215 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kaltenbacher, E., & Klages, H.
    (2006) Sprachprofil und Sprachförderung bei Vorschulkindern mit Migrationshintergrund. InB. Ahrenholz (Ed.), Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund (pp.80–97). Freiburg im Breisgau: Fillibach bei Klett.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Köpcke, K. M.
    (2003) Grammatische Komplexität und die Beherrschung der Kasusmorphologie durch Grundschulkinder. Didaktik Deutsch, 14, 55–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Köpcke, K. M., & Zubin, D.
    (2009) Genus. InE. Hentschel & P. M. Vogel (Eds.), Deutsche Morphologie (pp.132–154). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kuczaj, S. A., & Maratsos, M. P.
    (1975) What children can say before they will. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lemke, V.
    (2009) Der Erwerb der DP: Variation im fruhen Zweitspracherwerb (PhD Thesis). University of Mannheim.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lindner, K.
    (2003) The development of sentence-interpretation strategies in monolingual German-learning children with and without specific langauge impairment. Linguistics, 41(2), 213–254. 10.1515/ling.2003.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.008 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lust, B., Flynn, S., & Foley, C.
    (1996) What children know about what they say: Elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children’s syntax. Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax, 55–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Marinis, T., & Armon-Lotem, S.
    (2015) Sentence repetitionInS. Armon-Lotem, J. de Jong & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing Multilingual Children. Disentangling Bilingualism from Language Impairment (pp.95–124). Bristol/ Buffalo/ Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Marouani, Z.
    (2006) Der Erwerb des Deutschen durch arabischsprachige Kinder – Eine Studie zur Nominalflexion (Phd Thesis). University of Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mathieu, J., Lindner, K., Lomako, J., & Gagarina, N.
    (2016) „Wo bist du kleiner Monster?” Sprachspezifische nonword repetiton Tests zur Differenzierung von bilingual typisch entwickelten Kindern und entsprechenden Risikokindern mit USES. Forschung Sprache1, 5–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. McDade, H., Simpson, M., & Lamb, D.
    (1982) The use of elicited imitation as a measure ofexpressive grammar: A question of validity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 19–24. 10.1044/jshd.4701.19
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4701.19 [Google Scholar]
  53. Meisel, J.
    (1992) The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑2803‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2 [Google Scholar]
  54. Meisel, J. M.
    (1986) Word order and case marking in early child language. Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German. Linguistics, 24(1), 123–184. 10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.123
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.123 [Google Scholar]
  55. Mills, A. E.
    (1977) Parallel Studies in first and second language acquisition. Ludwigsburg: R. O. U. Strauch Ludwigsburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. (1985) The Acquisition of German. InD. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp.141–254). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Montanari, E.
    (2010) Kindliche Mehrsprachigkeit: Determination und Genus. Münster: Waxmann.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Müller, N.
    (2000) Gender and Number in Acquisition. InB. Unterbeck & M. Rissanen (Eds.): Gender in Grammar and Cognition (p.351–400). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802603.351
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802603.351 [Google Scholar]
  59. Munnich, E., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G.
    (1994) Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition, 227–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K.
    (1993) The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 1–33. 10.2307/416414
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416414 [Google Scholar]
  61. Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L.
    (1990) Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(6), 633–654. 10.1016/0749‑596X(90)90042‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90042-X [Google Scholar]
  62. Prévost, P.
    (2003) Truncation and missing Inflection in initial child L2 German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 65–97. 10.1017/S0272263103000032
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000032 [Google Scholar]
  63. Rödel, M.
    (2011) Der Sprachvergleich und die Didaktik des Sprachwandels. InB. Rothstein (Ed.), Thema Sprache – Wissenschaft für den Unterricht: Vol. 1. Sprachvergleich in der Schule (pp.27–48). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verl. Hohengehren.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Roesch, A. D., & Chondrogianni, V.
    (2014) Morphological cues in the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children. BUCLD 38: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 380–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Rothstein, B.
    (2010) Sprachintegrativer Grammatikunterricht: Zum Zusammenspiel von Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachdidaktik im Mutter- und Fremdsprachenunterricht (Univ., Habil.-Schr). Tübingen: Stauffeburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. (2011) Sprachvergleich in der Schule. InB. Rothstein (Ed.), Thema Sprache – Wissenschaft für den Unterricht: Vol. 1. Sprachvergleich in der Schule (pp.1–7). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verl. Hohengehren.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Rothweiler, M.
    (2006) The acquisition of V2 and subordinate clauses in early successive acquisition of German. Interfaces in Multilingualism: Acquisition and Representation, Ed. C. Lleó (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 91–113. 10.1075/hsm.4.05rot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.4.05rot [Google Scholar]
  68. Rothweiler, M., Schönenberger, M., & Sterner, F.
    (2017) Subject-verb agreement in German in bilingual children with and without SLI. Zeitschrift Für Sprachwissenschaft, 36(1). 10.1515/zfs‑2017‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2017-0005 [Google Scholar]
  69. Ruberg, T.
    (2013) Der Genuserwerb ein- und mehrsprachiger Kinder. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sachs, J. S.
    (1974) Memory in reading and listening to discourse. Memory & Cognition, 2(1), 95–100. 10.3758/BF03197498
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197498 [Google Scholar]
  71. (1967) Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2(9), 437–442. 10.3758/BF03208784
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208784 [Google Scholar]
  72. Schimke, S.
    (2011) Variable verb placement in second-language German and French: Evidence from production and elicited imitation of finite and nonfinite negated sentences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(04), 635–685. 10.1017/S0142716411000014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000014 [Google Scholar]
  73. Schimke, S., & Dimroth, C.
    (2018) The influence of finiteness and lightness on verb placement in L2 German: Comparing child and adult learners. Second Language Research, 34(2), 229–256. 10.1177/0267658317723071
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317723071 [Google Scholar]
  74. Schipke, C. S., Knoll, L. J., Friederici, A. D., & Oberecker, R.
    (2012) Preschool children’s interpretation of object-initial sentences: neural correlates of their behavioral performance. Developmental Science, 15(6), 762–774. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2012.01167.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01167.x [Google Scholar]
  75. Schönenberger, M., Rothweiler, M., & Sterner, F.
    (2012) Case marking in child L1 and early child L2 German. Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies. (3–22). 10.1075/hsm.13.03sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.13.03sch [Google Scholar]
  76. Schulz, P.
    (2007) Erstspracherwerb Deutsch: Sprachliche Fähigkeiten von Eins bis Zehn. InU. Graf & E. Moser Opitz (Eds.), Diagnostik und Förderung im Elementarbereich und Grundschulunterricht. Entwicklungslinien der Grundschulpädagogik. (pp.67–86). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Schwarze, R.
    (2018) Sprachentwicklungsstorungen bei fruhen Zweitsprachlernern – Der Erwerb von Kasus, Finitheit und Verbstellung (PhD Thesis). Goethe University Frankfurt.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Slobin, D. I., & Welsh, C. A.
    (1973) Elicited Imitation as a Research Tool in Developmental Psycholinguistics. InC. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith, C. S.
    (1970) An experimental approach to children’s linguistic competence. Cognition and the Development of Language. New York: Wiley, 109–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Thoma, D., & Tracy, R.
    (2006) Deutsch als frühe Zeitsprache: zweite Erstsprache?InB. Ahrenholz (Ed.), Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund (pp.58–79). Freiburg im Breisgau: Fillibach bei Klett.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Tracy, R.
    (1986) The acquisition of case morphology in German. Linguistics, 24(1), 47–78. 10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.47
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  82. (1991) Sprachliche Strukturentwicklung: Linguistische und kognitionspsychologische Aspekte einer Theorie des Erstspracherwerbs. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Tracy, R., & Lemke, V.
    (2012) Young L2 and Young L2 and L1 Learners: more alike than different. InT. Watorek, S. Benazzo & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Second Language Acquisition: Comparative Perspectives on Language: A Tribute to Clive Perdue (pp.303–323). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847696045‑018
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847696045-018 [Google Scholar]
  84. Tracy, R., & Thoma, D.
    (2009) Convergence on finite V2 clauses in L1, bilingual L1 and early L2 acquisition. InP. Jordens & C. Dimroth (Eds.), Functional categories in learner language (pp.1–43). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110216172.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216172.1 [Google Scholar]
  85. Tsimpli, I. M.
    (2014) Early, late or very late?: Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(3), 283–313. 10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi [Google Scholar]
  86. Turgay, K.
    (2010) Der Zweitspracherwerb der deutschen Präpositionalphrase: Eine Studie zum Sprachentwicklungsstand von Kindern mit Migrationshintergrund. Trier: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Verhagen, J.
    (2005) The role of the auxiliary hebben in Dutch as a second language. Zeitschrift Für Literaturwissenschaft Und Linguistik, 35(4), 99–127. 10.1007/BF03379455
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379455 [Google Scholar]
  88. Zifonun, G., Hoffmann, L., Strecker, B., & Ballweg, J.
    (1997) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache: Bd. 7. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20001.cri
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20001.cri
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): early second language learners , errors , grammar teaching , implicit knowledge and sentence imitation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error