1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pedagogical Linguistics
  4. Volume 3, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9581
  • E-ISSN: 2665-959X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The question of how to teach toward social, cultural and linguistic L2 pragmatic competence has raised serious challenges (Kasper, 1997). This is more the case for spoken rather than written discourse. As can be expected, the underlying pragmatic implications of spontaneous face-to-face communication naturally constrains the interactional scope and its potential pedagogical application. To address this issue, this naturalistic study explores two key potential contributors to the development of oral pragmatic competence: meta-pragmatic classroom conversational discourse and the course framework supporting that kind of relatively spontaneous interaction. An English for Academic Purposes (EAP) course provided fluency practice protocols, instruction in pragmatic categories, analysis of conversational data and “live” in-class intervention, focusing on meaning and alternate expressions and forms. Those interventions were designed to enhance learners’ ability to self-assess, monitor and expand their interactional repertoires. Part of a larger research project examining principles of pragmatics applied in EAP instruction, this study focuses on data from spontaneous classroom interactions situated within the integrated instructional framework of the course. Results present a range of strategies employed by the instructor consistent with current theoretical models of factors or pedagogical interventions that facilitate development of pragmatic competence.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20011.van
2021-04-16
2023-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pl.20011.van
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acton, W. R. & Cope, C.
    (1999) Cooperative Attending Skills Training, inKluge, D., McGuire, S., Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (Eds). Co-operative Learning. JALT Applied Materials, Tokyo: JALT, 50–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alcón-Soler, E.
    (2005) Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?System, 33(3), 417–435. 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Dörnyei, Z.
    (1998) Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 3(2), 233–262. 10.2307/3587583
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2013) Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63(1), 68–86. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00738.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00738.x [Google Scholar]
  5. (2015) Operationalizing conversation in studies of instructional effect in L2 pragmatics. System, 48, 21–34. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bazzanella, C.
    (2019) The complex process of mis/understanding spatial deixis in face-to-face interaction, Sociocultural Pragmatics, 7(1), 1–18. 10.1515/soprag‑2019‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/soprag-2019-0004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beltrán-Planques, V. & Querol-Julián, M.
    (2018) English language learners’spoken interaction: What a multimodal perspective reveals about pragmatic competence. System (Linköping), 77, 80–90. 10.1016/j.system.2018.01.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Belz, J. A.
    (2007) The role of computer mediation in the instruction and development of L2 pragmatic competence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 45–75. 10.1017/S0267190508070037
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070037 [Google Scholar]
  9. Borg, S.
    (2003) Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109. 10.1017/S0261444803001903
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.
    (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carpenter, H., Jeon, K. S., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A.
    (2006) Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 209–236. 10.1017/S0272263106060104
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060104 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clennel, C.
    (1999) Promoting pragmatic awareness and spoken discourse skills with EAP classes. ELT Journal, 53(2), 83–91. 10.1093/elt/53.2.83
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/53.2.83 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen, A. D.
    (2008) Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners?Language Teaching, 41(2), 213–235. 10.1017/S0261444807004880
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004880 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2017) Teaching and learning second language pragmatics. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 6th ed., New York: Routledge. 3, 428–452.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cross, J.
    (2010) Raising L2 listeners’ metacognitive awareness: a sociocultural theory perspective. Language Awareness, 19(4), 281–297. 10.1080/09658416.2010.519033
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.519033 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cruz, M. P.
    (2013) Metapsychological awareness of comprehension and epistemic vigilance of L2 communication in interlanguage pragmatic development. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 117–135. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2015) Fostering EF/SL learns’ meta-pragmatic awareness of complaints and their interactive effects. Language Awareness, 24(2), 123–137. 10.1080/09658416.2014.996159
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2014.996159 [Google Scholar]
  18. Crystal, D.
    (2015) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Drew, P.
    (2013) Turn design. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 131–149.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellis, R. & Sheen, Y.
    (2006) Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 575–600. 10.1017/S027226310606027X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310606027X [Google Scholar]
  21. Fraser, B.
    (2010) Pragmatic competence: the case of hedging. In: Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W. & S. Schneider (Eds.), New Approaches to Hedging. Bingley: Emerald, 15–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Frith, C. & Frith, U.
    (2005) Theory of mind. Current Biology, 15(17), 644–645. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.041
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.041 [Google Scholar]
  23. García Mayo, M. D. P. & Pica, T.
    (2000) Interaction among proficient learners: Are input, feedback and output needs addressed in a foreign language context?Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 272–279. 10.1111/1467‑9582.00066
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00066 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gass, S. M., Svetics, I. & Lemelin, S.
    (2003) Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53(3), 495–543. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00233
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00233 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gatbonton, E.
    (1999) Investigating experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 35–50. 10.1111/0026‑7902.00004
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gironzetti, E. & Koike, D.
    (2016) Bridging the gap in Spanish instructional pragmatics: from theory to practice. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 3(2), 89–98. 10.1080/23247797.2016.1251781
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2016.1251781 [Google Scholar]
  27. Heron, M. & Webster, J.
    (2019) Scaffolding talk in EAP lessons: an examination of experienced teachers’ practices. Innovation in Language Learning, 13(4), 358–370. 10.1080/17501229.2018.1466892
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1466892 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hiver, P.
    (2019) Language teacher metacognition: beyond the mirror. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(3), 201–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang, Alan
    (2020) The dialogical nature of language use in interactive listening: revisiting meaning in context. Language Awareness, 29(1), 21–40. 10.1080/09658416.2019.1686509
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1686509 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hunter, J.
    (2012) ‘Small Talk’: developing fluency, accuracy, and complexity in speaking. ELT Journal, 66(1), 30–41. 10.1093/elt/ccq093
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq093 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ifantidou, E.
    (2013) Pragmatic competence and explicit instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 93–116. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ishihara, N. & Cohen, A. D.
    (2010) Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ivey, A.
    (1971) Microcounseling: Innovations in interviewing training. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kasper, G.
    (1997) Can pragmatic competence be taught?NetWork, 6, 105–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. (2001) Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. InRose, K. R., Kasper, G. (Eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–60. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.006 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kasper, G. & Rose, K.
    (1999) Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81–104. 10.1017/S0267190599190056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190056 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2002) Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kasper, G. & Roever, C.
    (2005) Pragmatics in second language learning. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.317–334). Mahwah: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kasper, G.
    (2006) Speech acts in interaction: Towards discursive pragmatics. In: K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Félix-Brasdefer, & A. Omar (Eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, (Volume3, 11, pp.281–314). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. (2009) Locating cognition in second language interaction and learning: Inside the skull or in public view?International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, IRAL, 47(1), 11–36. 10.1515/iral.2009.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.002 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kecskes, I.
    (2014) Intercultural Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kecskes, I. & Zhang, F.
    (2009) Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Cognition, 17(2), 331–335. 10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec [Google Scholar]
  43. Kubanyiova, M.
    (2015) The role of teachers’ future self guides in creating L2 development opportunities in teacher-led classroom discourse: reclaiming the relevance of language teacher cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 565–584. 10.1111/modl.12244
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12244 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lam, P., McNaught, C. & Cheng, K.
    (2008) Pragmatic meta-analytic studies: learning the lessons from naturalistic evaluations of multiple cases. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 16(2), 61–79. 10.3402/rlt.v16i2.10886
     https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v16i2.10886 [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, C. & Gao, X.
    (2017) Bridging ‘what I said’ and ‘why I said it’: the role of Metapragmatic awareness in L2 request performance. Language Awareness, 26(3), 170–190. 10.1080/09658416.2017.1387135
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1387135 [Google Scholar]
  47. Liddicoat, A. J.
    (2014) Pragmatics and intercultural mediation in intercultural language learning. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(2), 259–277. 10.1515/ip‑2014‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0011 [Google Scholar]
  48. Long, M. H.
    (1981) Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. InH. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, (Volume379, pp.259–278). 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1981.tb42014.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Long, M.
    (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. InW. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.413–468). New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. (2007) Recasts in SLA: The story so far. InM. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA, (pp.75–116). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Mackey, A.
    (2007) Interaction as practice. InR. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practicing in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp.85–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.006 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2012) Introduction: The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. InA. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp.1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M.
    (2015) Second Language Research: Methodology and Design (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315750606
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750606 [Google Scholar]
  54. Mackey, A. & Philp, J.
    (1998) Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses and red herrings?Modern Language Journal, 82(82), 338–356. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01211.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x [Google Scholar]
  55. Martínez-Flor, A. & Usó-Juan, E.
    (2010) Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.26
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26 [Google Scholar]
  56. McConachy, T.
    (2019) L2 pragmatics as ‘intercultural pragmatics’: Probing sociopragmatic aspects of pragmatic awareness. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 167–176. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.014 [Google Scholar]
  57. Nguyen, M., Pham, T. & Pham, M.
    (2012) The relative effects of explicit and implicit form-focused instruction on the development of L2 pragmatic competence. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(4), 416–434. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  58. Nguyen, M., Pham, T., & Pham, M.
    (2017) The effects of input enhancement and recasts on the development of second language pragmatic competence. Innovation in Language learning and Teaching, 11(1), 45–67. 10.1080/17501229.2015.1026907
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1026907 [Google Scholar]
  59. Nguyen, M.
    (2017) Using conversation tasks and retrospective methodology to investigate L2 pragmatics development: the case of EFL criticisms and responses to criticisms. The Language Learning Journal, 45(3), 399–417. 10.1080/09571736.2014.908404
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.908404 [Google Scholar]
  60. Pang, W. & Burri, M.
    (2017) Teaching Dialogic Speaking Strategies in a Canadian EAP Program. InA. Burns & A. Seigel (Eds.), International Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills in ELT (pp.111–124). New York: Springer International Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Roever, C.
    (2009) Teaching and testing pragmatics. InLong, M. & Doughty, C. (Eds). The Handbook of Language Teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch29
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch29 [Google Scholar]
  62. Rogers, C. R. & Wood, J.
    (1974) Client-centered therapy. InA. Burton (Ed.), Operational theories of personality (pp.211–258). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Rose, K.
    (2005) On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System, 33, 385–399. 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  64. Ross, S.
    (2018) Listener response as a facet of interactional competence. Language Testing, 35(3), 357–375. 10.1177/0265532218758125
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758125 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rueda, Y.
    (2006) Developing pragmatic competence in a foreign language. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 8, 169–182.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Safont-Jordá, M.
    (2004) An analysis on EAP learners’ pragmatic production: a focus on request forms. Ibérica, 8, 23–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Sáez, N.
    (2015) Rethinking for Second Language Speaking. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 15(2), 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Sánchez-López, L.
    (2018) Cultural and pragmatic aspects of L2 Spanish for academic purposes: new data on the current state of the question. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 5(2), 102–114. 10.1080/23247797.2018.1538307
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2018.1538307 [Google Scholar]
  69. Silverstein, M.
    (1993) Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function. InA. Lucy, (Ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics (pp.33–58). Cambridge: Cambridge, University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
  70. Slobin, D.
    (1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. InJ. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp.70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Sotillo, S.
    (2005) Corrective feedback via instant messenger learning activities in NS-NNS and NNS-NNS dyads. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 467–496. 10.1558/cj.v22i3.467‑496
     https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v22i3.467-496 [Google Scholar]
  72. Sperti, S.
    (2019) Cross-cultural mediation in ELF migration contexts: Pedagogical implications on ELT multilingual settings. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 269–286. 10.32601/ejal.599253
     https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.599253 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sykes, J. & Cohen, A.
    (2018) Strategies and interlanguage pragmatics: Explicit and comprehensive. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 381–402. 10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.9
     https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.9 [Google Scholar]
  74. Taguchi, N.
    (2005) Comprehending implied meaning in EFL. The Modern Language Journal, 8(4), 43–562.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. (2007) Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in EFL. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 313–338. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00061.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00061.x [Google Scholar]
  76. (2008) The role of learning environment in the development of pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 423–452. 10.1017/S0272263108080716
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080716 [Google Scholar]
  77. (2011) Teaching pragmatics: trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. 10.1017/S0267190511000018
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000018 [Google Scholar]
  78. (2011) Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act production? Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49, 265–293. 10.1515/iral.2011.015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.015 [Google Scholar]
  79. (2012) Context, Individual Differences and Pragmatic Competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847696106
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847696106 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2014) Pragmatic socialization in an English-medium university in Japan. IRAL, 52(2), 157–181. 10.1515/iral‑2014‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0007 [Google Scholar]
  81. (2015) “Contextually” speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning abroad, in class, and online. System, 48, 3–20. 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  82. (2015) Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. 10.1017/S0261444814000263
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263 [Google Scholar]
  83. Taguchi, N. & Ishihara, N.
    (2018) The pragmatics of English as a Lingua Franca: Research and pedagogy in the era of globalization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 80–101. 10.1017/S0267190518000028
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190518000028 [Google Scholar]
  84. Taguchi, N.
    (2018) Advanced Second Language Pragmatic Competence. InThe Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition (pp.505–526). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119261650.ch26
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261650.ch26 [Google Scholar]
  85. Takahashi, S.
    (2001) The role of input enhancement in developing inter-language pragmatic competence. In: G. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp.171–199). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524797.014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524797.014 [Google Scholar]
  86. (2010a) Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. InA. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (Vol.7, pp.391–421). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. (2010b) The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. InF. Martinez-Flor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech Act Performance: Theoretical, Empirical and Methodological Issues (pp.127–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.26.08tak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.26.08tak [Google Scholar]
  88. Takimoto, M.
    (2006) The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 393–417. 10.1191/1362168806lr198oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr198oa [Google Scholar]
  89. (2009) The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 1–25. 10.1093/applin/amm049
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm049 [Google Scholar]
  90. (2010) Evaluating the effects of task repetition on learners’ recognition and production of second language pragmatic chunks. Paper presented at theInternational Conference of Malaysian English Language Teaching Association, Selangor, Malaysia. June.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. (2012) Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1240–1253. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  92. (2020) Investigating the effect of cognitive linguistic approach in developing EFL learners’ pragmatic proficiency. System, 89, 1–14. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102213
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102213 [Google Scholar]
  93. Timpe, V.
    (2013) “Assessing intercultural language learning. The dependence of receptive sociopragmatic competence and discourse competence on learning opportunities and input.” Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Timpe-Laughlin, V.
    (2015) Defining and Operationalizing the Construct of Pragmatic Competence: Review and recommendations. ETS Research Report.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Timpe-Laughlin, V.
    (2016) Learning and Development of Second and Foreign Language Pragmatics as a Higher-order Language Skill: A Brief Overview of Relevant Theories, ETS Research Report.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Verschueren, J.
    (2000) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language usage. Pragmatics, 10(4), 439–456. 10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.10.4.02ver [Google Scholar]
  97. Winke, P. & Gass, S. M.
    (2018) Individual Differences in Advanced Proficiency. InP. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition (pp.157–178). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119261650.ch9
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261650.ch9 [Google Scholar]
  98. Xiao, F.
    (2015) Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 557–581. 10.14746/sllt.2015.5.4.3
     https://doi.org/10.14746/sllt.2015.5.4.3 [Google Scholar]
  99. (2018) Advanced-Level Pragmatics in Instructed SLA. InP. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition (pp.463–483). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119261650.ch24
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261650.ch24 [Google Scholar]
  100. Young, R.
    (2013) Learning to talk the talk and walk the walk: Interactional competence in academic spoken English. Ibérica, 25, 15–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Ziegler, N. & Bryfonski, L.
    (2018) Interaction-Driven L2 Learning. InP. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition (pp.94–113). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119261650.ch6
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119261650.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhu, X., Liao, X. & Cheong, C.
    (2019) Strategy use in oral communication with competent synthesis and complex interaction. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(5), 116–118. 10.1007/s10936‑019‑09651‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09651-0 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20011.van
Loading
Spontaneous classroom engagement facilitating development of L2 pragmatic competence
Pedagogical Linguistics 3, 1 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.20011.van
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20011.van
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20011.van
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): inter-language pragmatics; interactional competence; meta-pragmatic discourse; pedagogic intervention; pragmatic competence

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error