1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9581
  • E-ISSN: 2665-959X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Research states that when deciding what target lexical items to focus in their syllabi, textbook designers tend to use their intuition and establish their framework for vocabulary teaching accordingly rather than using a systematic method. With the advent of computational methods for language analysis, contemporary EFL publishers also claim they have begun to design corpus-informed textbooks reflecting actual language use in their products as evidenced in a representative corpus. In an attempt to offer a more rational method to form corpus-oriented and pedagogically convenient target vocabulary lists, the present study, exploiting different association measures in a representative corpus, seeks to detect the collocational strength of 50 target word combinations presented in the two EFL textbooks as an initial step. Additionally, inspired by Ellis et al.’s (2008) research, the current study aims to investigate if/to what extent the association measures indicating collocational strength correlate with EFL instructors’ intuitions regarding collocational frequency. The results indicate that EFL instructors’ collocational frequency intuitions correlate strongly with an objective collocational frequency measure (t-score). The findings are likely to guide decision makers in tertiary level schools in constructing their vocabulary syllabi and designing materials for teaching collocations in particular.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20014.can
2021-03-02
2021-11-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson, J. C.
    (2007) Judging the frequency of English words. Applied Linguistics, 28, 383–409. 10.1093/applin/amm024
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm024 [Google Scholar]
  2. Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J.
    (2001) Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory and Cognition, 29, 639–647. 10.3758/BF03200465
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200465 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S.
    (2014) Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 28–41. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brezina, V.
    (2018) Statistics in Corpus Linguistic: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316410899
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brysbaert, M., & Cortese, M. J.
    (2011) Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 545–559. 10.1080/17470218.2010.503374
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.503374 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brzoza, B.
    (2018) Word frequency counts: Linking corpus data to user’s perception in linguistic research. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 41(2), 224–239. 10.1075/li.00021.brz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00021.brz [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cangır, H., Büyükkantarcıoğlu, S. N., & Durrant, P.
    (2017) Investigating Collocational Priming in Turkish. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(132), 465–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cangır, H.
    (2018) Investigating the Relationship between L1 and L2 Collocational Processing in the Bilingual Mental Lexicon (Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University). Retrieved fromwww.openaccess.hacettepe.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11655/4986
  10. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (1996) The Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf. Accessed1 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, X. & Dong, Y.
    (2019) Evaluating objective and subjective frequency measures in L2 lexical processing. Lingua, 230, 102738. 10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102738
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102738 [Google Scholar]
  12. Church, K., Hanks, P., & Moon, R.
    (1990) Word Association norms, mutual information and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. de Groot, A. M. B.
    (1992) Bilingual Lexical Representation: A Closer Look at Conceptual Representations. Advances in Psychology, 94, 389–412. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(08)62805‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62805-8 [Google Scholar]
  14. Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N.
    (2009) To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?IRAL, 47, 157–177. 10.1515/iral.2009.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.007 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, N. C.
    (2006) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27: 1–24. 10.1093/applin/ami038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami038 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C.
    (2008) Formulaic Language in Native and Second Language Speakers: Psycholinguistics, Corpus Linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00137.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Erickson, L. C., & Thiessen, E. D.
    (2015) Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review, 37, 66–108. 10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Evert, S.
    (2008) Corpora and collocations. InA. Lüdeling and M. Kytö (eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, article 58, pages1212–1248. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2017) Collocations in Corpus-Based Language Learning Research: Identifying, Comparing, and Interpreting the Evidence. Language Learning. 67(1), 155–179. 10.1111/lang.12225
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225 [Google Scholar]
  20. Granger, S., & Meunier, F.
    (2008) Phraseology in language learning and teaching. Where to from here?InS. Granger and F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp.247–252). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.138.19gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.138.19gra [Google Scholar]
  21. Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C.
    (2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65: 228–55. 10.1111/lang.12119
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119 [Google Scholar]
  22. Henriksen, B.
    (2013) Research on L2 learners’ collocational competence and development – a progress report. EUROSLA Monographs Series, 2, 29–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoey, M.
    (2000) A world beyond collocation: new perspectives on vocabulary teaching. InM. Lewis (Ed), Teaching Collocation (pp.224–243). Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoffmann, S., & Lehmann, H. M.
    (2000) Collocational Evidence from the British National Corpus. InJ. M. Kirk (Ed.), Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Howarth, P.
    (1998) Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19, 24–44. 10.1093/applin/19.1.24
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.24 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hunston, S.
    (2002) Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jones, M., & Durrant, P.
    (2010) What can a corpus tell us about vocabulary teaching materials?InM. McCarthy and A. O’Keeffe (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics: London: Routledge: 387–400. 10.4324/9780203856949‑28
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-28 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, S. H., & Kim, J. H.
    (2012) Frequency effects in L2 multi-word unit processing: Evidence from self-paced reading. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 831–841. 10.1002/tesq.66
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.66 [Google Scholar]
  29. Koprowski, M.
    (2005) Investigating the usefulness of lexical phrases in contemporary coursebooks. ELT Journal, 59(4): 322–332. 10.1093/elt/cci061
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci061 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kurtes, S., & Saville, N.
    (2008) The English Profile Programme – An overview. Research Notes, 33: 2–4. Cambridge: Cambridge ESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P.
    (2012) Vocabulary. InS. M. Gass and A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.163–176). London, England: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lewis, M.
    (1993) The Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McCrostie, J.
    (2007) Investigating the accuracy of teachers’ word frequency intuitions. RELC Journal, 38(1), 53–66. 10.1177/0033688206076158
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206076158 [Google Scholar]
  34. McGee, I.
    (2009) Adjective-noun collocations in elicited and corpus data: Similarities, differences and the whys and wherefores. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5, 79–103. 10.1515/CLLT.2009.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2009.004 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nation, P.
    (2001) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nesselhauf, N.
    (2003) The Use of Collocations by Advanced Learners of English and Some Implications for Teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223–242. 10.1093/applin/24.2.223
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.223 [Google Scholar]
  37. Okamoto, M.
    (2015) Is corpus word frequency a good yardstick for selecting words to teach? Threshold levels for vocabulary selection. System, 51, 1–10. 10.1016/j.system.2015.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Richards, J. C.
    (1974) ‘Word Lists: Problems and Prospects’, RELC Journal, 5: 69–84. 10.1177/003368827400500207
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368827400500207 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schmitt, N., & Dunham, B.
    (1999) Exploring native and non-native intuitions of word frequency. Second Language Research, 15, 389–411. 10.1191/026765899669633186
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765899669633186 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmitt, N.
    (2008) Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363. 10.1177/1362168808089921
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2010) Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. Palgrave Press. 10.1057/9780230293977
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977 [Google Scholar]
  42. Scott, T.
    (2019) Learning language in chunks. Part of the Cambridge Papers in ELT series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sinclair, J.
    (1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Siyanova, A., & Schmitt, N.
    (2008) L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 429–458. 10.3138/cmlr.64.3.429
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.3.429 [Google Scholar]
  45. Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Spina, S.
    (2015) Investigation of Native Speaker and Second Language Learner Intuition of Collocation Frequency. Language Learning, 65(3), 533–562. 10.1111/lang.12125
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12125 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tanaka-Ishii, K., & Terada, H.
    (2011) Word familiarity and frequency. Studia Linguistica, 65, 96–116. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2010.01176.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2010.01176.x [Google Scholar]
  47. The British National Corpus version 3 (BNC XML Edition)
    The British National Corpus version 3 (BNC XML Edition) (2007) Distributed by Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford, on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/
  48. The jamovi project
    The jamovi project (2019) jamovi. (Version 1.1) [Computer Software]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.jamovi.org
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tomlinson, B.
    (2011) Introduction: Principles and procedures of materials development. InB. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp.1–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tremblay, A., Baayen, H., Derwing, B., & Libben, G.
    (2008) Lexical bundles and working memory: An ERP study. Presentation given at the(FLaRN) Formulaic Language Research Network Conference. University of Nottingham, June 19–20, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang, M., & Koda, K.
    (2005) Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 55(1), 71–98. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00290.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00290.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Wolter, B.
    (2001) COMPARING THE L1 AND L2 MENTAL LEXICON A Depth of Individual Word Knowledge Model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(1), 41–69. 10.1017/S0272263101001024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101001024 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H.
    (2013) FREQUENCY OF INPUT AND L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING A Comparison of Congruent and Incongruent Collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 451–482. 10.1017/S0272263113000107
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000107 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J.
    (2014) Processing collocations in a second language: A case of first language activation?Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(29), 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wray, A.
    (2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  57. Yamashita, J.
    (2018) Possibility of semantic involvement in the L1-L2 congruency effect in the processing of L2 collocations. Journal of Second Language Studies, 1, 60–78. 10.1075/jsls.17024.yam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.17024.yam [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20014.can
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.20014.can
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): association measures; collocation; frequency; intuition; teaching vocabulary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error