1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pedagogical Linguistics
  4. Volume 2, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2665-9581
  • E-ISSN: 2665-959X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This overview paper discusses two major dimensions of professional teacher competencies: content knowledge and beliefs about linguistics (or grammar, respectively). Research has found that teacher trainees as well as practicing teachers often have gaps in their knowledge about grammar. Since a lack of content knowledge has negative implications for teachers’ actions in the classroom, we need to think of ways to make teacher education in the field of linguistics more successful and sustainable. In the article, several approaches targeting the explanation of low grammatical content knowledge are assessed; however, an emphasis is put on the idea that epistemological beliefs play a major role for students’ learning success suggesting that there is a relationship between content knowledge and beliefs which should be further explored in future research.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.21003.els
2021-04-23
2024-12-03

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pl.21003.els
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson, J. C., & Hudson, R.
    (2013) The metalinguistic knowledge of undergraduate students of English language or linguistics. Language Awareness, 22(4), 320–337. 10.1080/09658416.2012.722644
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.722644 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alghanmi, B., & Shukri, N.
    (2016) The Relationship between Teachers’ Beliefs of Grammar Instruction and Classroom Practices in the Saudi Context. English Language Teaching, 9(7), 70–86. 10.5539/elt.v9n7p70
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n7p70 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, S.
    (1994) The grammatical knowledge/awareness of native-speaker EFL teachers: What the trainers say. InM. Bygate, A. Tonkyn, & E. Williams (Eds.), Grammar and the language teacher (pp.69–89). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. (1997) Metalinguistic knowledge and teacher explanation. Language Awareness, 6(2–3), 147–161. 10.1080/09658416.1997.9959924
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1997.9959924 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1999) ‘All These Like Little Name Things’: A Comparative Study of Language Teachers’ Explicit Knowledge Of Grammar and Grammatical Terminology. Language Awareness, 8(3–4), 143–159. 10.1080/09658419908667125
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419908667125 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bachmann, M., Geyer, S., & A. Müller
    (2020) „Und darum geht es ja auch… zu wissen, wie Sprache funktioniert.“ Fachwissen und Überzeugungen von Grundschullehrkräften zu Grammatik und Grammatikunterricht. InM. Langlotz (Ed.), Grammatikdidaktik: Theoretische und empirische Zugänge zu sprachlicher Heterogenität (pp.187–211). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M.
    (2006) Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 469–520. 10.1007/s11618‑006‑0165‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2011) Das Kompetenzmodell von COACTIV. InM. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV (pp.29–54). Münster: Waxmann.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Baumert, J., Köller, O., & Neubrand, J.
    (2000) Epistemologische Überzeugungen und Fachverständnis im Mathematik- und Physikunterricht. InJ. Baumert, W. Bos, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), TIMSS/III. Dritte internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn. Band II: Mathematische und physikalische Kompetenzen am Ende der gymnasialen Oberstufe (pp.229–269). Opladen: Leske + Budrich. 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑83411‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83411-9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bell, H.
    (2016) Teacher knowledge and beliefs about grammar: a case study of an English primary school. English in Education, 50(2), 148–163. 10.1111/eie.12100
     https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12100 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bigelow, M., & Ranney, S.
    (2010) Knowledge about Language for Teachers is More than Knowing Grammar Rules. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3(1), 217–228. 10.1515/shll‑2010‑1070
     https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2010-1070 [Google Scholar]
  12. BMBWF
    BMBWF (1984) Verordnung des Bundesministers für Unterricht und Kunst vom 14. November 1984 über die Lehrpläne der allgemeinbildenden höheren Schulen; Bekanntmachung der Lehrpläne für den Religionsunterricht an diesen Schulen. https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10008568
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Boettcher, W.
    (1994) Grammatikunterricht in Schule und Lehrerausbildung. Der Deutschunterricht, 46(5), 8–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. (1999) Der Kampf mit dem Präpositionalobjekt. InA. Bremerich-Vos (Ed.), Zur Praxis des Grammatikunterrichts. Mit Materialien für Lehrer und Schüler (pp.193–252). Freiburg im Breisgau: Filibach.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Borg, S.
    (2001) Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 55(1), 21–29. 10.1093/elt/55.1.21
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2003) Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. 10.1017/S0261444803001903
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bredel, U.
    (2013) Sprachbetrachtung und Grammatikunterricht (2nd ed.). Paderborn: Schöningh.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bremerich-Vos, A.
    (1999) „Farbiger“ Grammatikunterricht. Studierende und ihre „Grammatikbiographien“. InP. Klotz, & A. Peyer (Eds.), Wege und Irrwege sprachlich-grammatischer Sozialisation. Bestandsaufnahme – Reflexionen – Impulse (pp.25–52). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bremerich-Vos, A., & Dämmer, J.
    (2013) Professionelles Wissen im Studienverlauf: Lehramt Deutsch. InS. Blömeke, A. Bremerich-Vos, G. Kaiser, G. Nold, H. Haudeck, J.-U. Keßler, & K. Schwippert (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenzen im Studienverlauf. Weitere Ergebnisse zur Deutsch-, Englisch-, und Mathematiklehrerausbildung aus TEDS-LT (pp.47–76). Münster: Waxmann.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cajkler, W., & Hislam, J.
    (2002) Trainee Teachers’ Grammatical Knowledge: The Tension Between Public Expectation and Individual Competence. Language Awareness, 11(3), 161–177. 10.1080/09658410208667054
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667054 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng Teik, O.
    (2011) Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about the teaching and learning of grammar. The English Teacher, 40, 27–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Chia, S. C. C.
    (2003) Singapore primary teachers’ beliefs in grammar teaching and learning. InD. Deterding, E. L. Low, & A. Brown (Eds.), English in Singapore: Research on grammar (pp.117–127). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Dämmer, J.
    (2020) Entwicklung von Professionswissen im Studienverlauf – Grammatisches Fachwissen von Lehramtsstudierenden des Faches Deutsch. InN. Masanek, & J. Kilian (Eds.), Professionalisierung im Lehramtsstudium Deutsch. Überzeugungen, Wissen, Defragmentierung (pp.153–183). Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. DfE
    DfE (2014) National curriculum in England: English programmes of study. Updated 16 July 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-english-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-english-programmes-of-study
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Duffy, G., & Anderson, L.
    (1984) Teachers’ theoretical orientation and the real classroom. Reading Psychology, 5(1–2), 97–104. 10.1080/0270271840050112
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271840050112 [Google Scholar]
  26. Eisenberg, P.
    (2004) Wieviel Grammatik braucht die Schule?Didaktik Deutsch, 17, 4–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Elsner, D.
    (2020a) Grammar Is Irrelevant – The Role of Epistemological Beliefs in Students’ Learning Success. InA. Trotzke, & T. Kupisch (Eds.), Formal Linguistics and Language Education, Educational Linguistics 43 (pp.69–90). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑39257‑4_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39257-4_5 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2020b) Zur fachspezifischen Modellierung und zum Zusammenspiel von epistemischen Überzeugungen und Fachwissen – eine Annäherung auf theoretischer Ebene. InN. Masanek, & J. Kilian (Eds.), Professionalisierung im Lehramtsstudium Deutsch. Überzeugungen, Wissen, Defragmentierung (pp.93–120). Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Elsner, D., & Döring, S.
    (submitted). Basisartikel Grammatik für die Schule.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Elsner, D., & Opitz, A.
    (in prep.). Epistemische Überzeugungen von Studierenden im Bereich Grammatik. Kommentar zum Basisartikel Grammatik für die Schule.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Fang, Z.
    (1996) A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65. 10.1080/0013188960380104
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104 [Google Scholar]
  32. Farrell, T. S. C.
    (1999) The reflective assignment: unlocking pre-service English teachers’ beliefs on grammar teaching. RELC Journal, 30(2), 1–17. 10.1177/003368829903000201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829903000201 [Google Scholar]
  33. Farrell, T. S. C., & Lim, P. C. P.
    (2005) Conceptions of grammar teaching: A case study of teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gordon, E.
    (2005) Grammar in New Zealand schools: two case studies. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 48–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Granzow-Emden, M.
    (2019) Deutsche Grammatik verstehen und unterrichten (3rd ed.). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. (1999) Grammatik ist, wenn man trotzdem fragt. Vom „Elend der Grammatiker-Fragen“ bei der Kasus-Ermittlung. InP. Klotz, & A. Peyer (Eds.), Wege und Irrwege sprachlich-grammatischer Sozialisation. Bestandsaufnahme – Reflexionen – Impulse (pp.169–183). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Graus, J., & Coppen, P.-A.
    (2016) Student teacher beliefs on grammar instruction. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 571–599. 10.1177/1362168815603237
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815603237 [Google Scholar]
  38. Harper, H., & Rennie, J.
    (2009) ‘I Had to Go out and Get Myself a Book on Grammar’: A Study of Pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge about Language. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 32(1), 22–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hennig, M.
    (2011) Satzglieder in Schulgrammatik und Linguistik. InK.-M. Köpcke, & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Grammatik – Lehren, Lernen, Verstehen (pp.127–152). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110263183.127
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110263183.127 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hofer, B. K.
    (2004) Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55. 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2000) Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378–405. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
     https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1026 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R.
    (1997) The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. 10.3102/00346543067001088
     https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088 [Google Scholar]
  43. Horwitz, E. K.
    (1988) The Beliefs about Language Learning of Beginning University Foreign Language Students. The Modern Language Journal, 72(3), 283–294. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1988.tb04190.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04190.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Hos, R., & Kekec, M.
    (2014) The Mismatch between Non-native English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Teachers’ Grammar Beliefs and Classroom Practices. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 80–87. 10.4304/jltr.5.1.80‑87
     https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.1.80-87 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hudson, R.
    (2004) Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics, 40(1), 105–130. 10.1017/S0022226703002342
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226703002342 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2020) Towards a pedagogical linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(1), 8–33. 10.1075/pl.19011.hud
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19011.hud [Google Scholar]
  47. Ilosvay, K. K.
    (2012) A Qualitative Study of Language Beliefs and Linguistic Knowledge in Preservice Teachers using the Intercultural Communicative Competence Framework. Dissertation Portland State University, USA. Paper 233. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/233
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Jeurissen, M.
    (2012) “Perhaps I didn’t really have as good a knowledge as I thought I had.” What do primary school teachers know and believe about grammar and grammar teaching?Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(3), 301–316.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Johnson, K. E.
    (1994) The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10(4), 439–452. 10.1016/0742‑051X(94)90024‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)90024-8 [Google Scholar]
  50. Jones, P., & Chen, H.
    (2012) Teachers’ knowledge about language: Issues of pedagogy and expertise. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 147–168.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Kratz, I.
    (2019) Goethe, Schiller, Chomsky!? Generative Grammatik im Deutschunterricht der gymnasialen Oberstufe am Beispiel des Themas Spracherwerb. InB. Rothstein, & A. Firstein (Eds.), Schülerinnen und Schülern Linguistik näherbringen: Perspektiven einer linguistischen Wissenschaftspropädeutik (pp.148–170). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Krettenauer, T.
    (2005) Die Erfassung des Entwicklungsniveaus epistemologischer Überzeugungen und das Problem der Übertragbarkeit von Interviewverfahren in standardisierte Fragebogenmethoden. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 37, 69–79. 10.1026/0049‑8637.37.2.69
     https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.37.2.69 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kuhn, D.
    (1991) The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kühn, P.
    (2015) Leistungsaufgaben zu grammatischem Wissen. InH. Gornik (Ed.), Sprachreflexion und Grammatikunterricht (2nd ed.) (pp.473–495). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Leech, G. N.
    (1994) Students‘ grammar – teachers‘ grammar – learners’ grammar. InM. Bygate, A. Tonkyn, & E. Williams (Eds.), Grammar and the language teacher (pp.17–30). New York: Prentice Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Louden, W., Rohl, M., Gore, J., Greaves, D., McIntosh, A., Wright, R., Siemon, D., & House, H.
    (2005) Prepared to teach: an investigation into the preparation of teachers to teach literacy and numeracy. Perth: Edith Cowan University. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/7135
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Mandl, H., Friedrich, H. F., & Hron, A.
    (1993) Psychologie des Wissenserwerbs. InB. Weidenmann, G. L. Huber, A. Krapp, H. Mandl, & M. Hofer (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie (2nd ed.) (pp.143–218). Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Mesch, B., & Dammert, Y.
    (2015) Verbwissen in der Primarstufe. InB. Rothstein, & B. Mesch (Eds.), Was tun mit dem Verb? Über Möglichkeit und Notwendigkeit einer didaktischen Neuerschließung des Verbs (pp.1–43). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110376630
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110376630 [Google Scholar]
  59. Morrison, J. W.
    (1979) A Good Servant, But… Linguistics in Teacher Training. ELT Journal, 34(1), 11–18. 10.1093/elt/34.1.11
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/34.1.11 [Google Scholar]
  60. Müller, A., & Geyer, S.
    (2020) Gut vorbereitet auf den Grammatikunterricht in der Schule? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum schulgrammatischen Wissen angehender Deutschlehrkräfte. InN. Masanek, & J. Kilian (Eds.), Professionalisierung im Lehramtsstudium Deutsch. Überzeugungen, Wissen, Defragmentierung (pp.121–151). Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Murdick, W.
    (1996) What English Teachers Need to Know about Grammar. The English Journal, 85(7), 38–45. 10.2307/820505
     https://doi.org/10.2307/820505 [Google Scholar]
  62. Myhill, D.
    (2005) Ways of knowing: Writing with grammar in mind. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 77–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Myhill, D., Jones, S., & Watson, A.
    (2013) Grammar matters: How teachers’ grammatical knowledge impacts on the teaching of writing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 77–91. 10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  64. Nishimuro, M., & Borg, S.
    (2013) Teacher cognition and grammar teaching in a Japanese high school. JALT Journal, 35(1), 29–50. 10.37546/JALTJJ35.1‑2
     https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ35.1-2 [Google Scholar]
  65. Numrich, C.
    (1996) On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 131–153. 10.2307/3587610
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587610 [Google Scholar]
  66. Op’t Eynde, P., de Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L.
    (2002) Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs. A quest for conceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. InG. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp.13–37). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/0‑306‑47958‑3_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_2 [Google Scholar]
  67. Pajares, M. F.
    (1992) Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. 10.3102/00346543062003307
     https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307 [Google Scholar]
  68. Peter, J., Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Leichner, N., & Krampen, N.
    (2016) Assessing epistemic sophistication by considering domain-specific absolute and multiplistic beliefs separately. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 204–221. 10.1111/bjep.12098
     https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12098 [Google Scholar]
  69. Phipps, S., & Borg, S.
    (2009) Exploring tensions between teachers‘ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37, 380–390. 10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  70. Pissarek, M., & Schilcher, A.
    (2017) FALKO-D: Die Untersuchung des Professionswissens von Deutschlehrenden. Entwicklung eines Messinstruments zur fachspezifischen Lehrerkompetenz und Ergebnisse zu dessen Validierung. InS. Krauss, A. Lindl, A. Schilcher, M. Fricke, A. Göhring, B. Hofmann, P. Kirchhoff, & R. H. Mulder (Eds.), FALKO: Fachspezifische Lehrerkompetenzen. Konzeption von Professionswissen in den Fächern Deutsch, Englisch, Latein, Physik, Musik, Evangelische Religion und Pädagogik (pp.76–111). Münster/New York: Waxmann.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Primus, B.
    (2015) Semantische Rollen und Satzgliedanalyse im Grammatikunterricht. InB. Rothstein, & B. Mesch (Eds.), Was tun mit dem Verb? Über Möglichkeit und Notwendigkeit einer didaktischen Neuerschließung des Verbs (pp.79–106). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110376630‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110376630-004 [Google Scholar]
  72. Rankin, T., & Whong, M.
    (2020) Grammar. A Linguists’ Guide for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108623360
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108623360 [Google Scholar]
  73. Rauh, G.
    (2000) Wi(e)der die Wortarten! Zum Problem linguistischer Kategorisierung. Linguistische Berichte, 184, 485–507.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Rödel, M.
    (Ed.) (2014) Deutschunterricht am Gymnasium – Was kann die Sprachwissenschaft leisten?Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Ryle, G.
    [1949] (2009) The concept of mind. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203875858
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875858 [Google Scholar]
  76. Sangster, P., Anderson, C., & O’Hara, P.
    (2013) Perceived and actual levels of knowledge about language amongst primary and secondary student teachers: do they know what they think they know?Language Awareness, 22(4), 293–319. 10.1080/09658416.2012.722643
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.722643 [Google Scholar]
  77. Schäfer, R., & Sayatz, U.
    (2017) Wie viel Grammatik braucht das Germanistikstudium?Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 45(2), 221–255. 10.1515/zgl‑2017‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2017-0012 [Google Scholar]
  78. (2019) Die germanistische Linguistik als Fachwissenschaft in der Lehramtsausbildung. Didaktik Deutsch, 46, 19–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Schlipphack, I.
    (2012) Generative Grammatik für die Schule. Marburg: Tectum Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Schulministerium NRW
    Schulministerium NRW (2019) Kernlehrplan für die Sekundarstufe I Gymnasium in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Deutsch. https://www.schulentwicklung.nrw.de/lehrplaene/lehrplan/196/g9_d_klp_%203409_2019_06_23.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Shulman, L. S.
    (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
     https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar]
  82. Štěpáník, S.
    (2019) Pupil preconception as a source of solutions to lingering problems of grammar teaching?L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature (Special Issue What is Grammar in L1 Education Today?), 19, 1–24. 10.17239/L1ESLL‑2019.19.02.05
     https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2019.19.02.05 [Google Scholar]
  83. Struckmeier, V.
    (2020) Why are there growing divisions between traditional grammars and theoretical and experimental linguistic works (and how can they be overcome)?Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(2), 211–233. 10.1075/pl.20002.str
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.20002.str [Google Scholar]
  84. Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O.
    (2008) Die Erfassung wissenschaftsbezogener Überzeugungen in der gymnasialen Oberstufe und im Studium. Validierung des Fragebogens zur Erfassung des Entwicklungsniveaus epistemologischer Überzeugungen (FREE). Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22, 277–291. 10.1024/1010‑0652.22.34.277
     https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.277 [Google Scholar]
  85. Urhahne, D.
    (2006) Die Bedeutung domänenspezifischer epistemologischer Überzeugungen für Motivation, Selbstkonzept und Lernstrategien von Studierenden. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 189–198. 10.1024/1010‑0652.20.3.189
     https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.20.3.189 [Google Scholar]
  86. Van Rijt, J., Wijnands, A., & Coppen, P.-A.
    (2019) Dutch teachers’ beliefs on linguistic concepts and reflective judgement in grammar teaching. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature (Special Issue What is Grammar in L1 Education Today?), 19, 1–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Van Vooren, V., Casteleyn, J., & Mottart, A.
    (2012) The impact of teachers’ beliefs on grammar instruction and students’ grammar competences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 641–648. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.456
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.456 [Google Scholar]
  88. Vavra, E.
    (1996) On Not Teaching Grammar. The English Journal, 85(7), 32–37. 10.2307/820504
     https://doi.org/10.2307/820504 [Google Scholar]
  89. Watson, A.
    (2012) Navigating ‘the pit of doom’: Affective responses to teaching ‘grammar’. English in Education, 46(1), 22–37. 10.1111/j.1754‑8845.2011.01113.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2011.01113.x [Google Scholar]
  90. (2015) The problem of grammar teaching: a case study of the relationship between a teacher’s beliefs and pedagogical practice. Language and Education, 29(4), 332–346. 10.1080/09500782.2015.1016955
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1016955 [Google Scholar]
  91. Weschenfelder, E.
    (2014) Professionelle Kompetenz von Politiklehrkräften. Eine Studie zu Wissen und Überzeugungen. Wiesbaden: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑04193‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04193-9 [Google Scholar]
  92. Williamson, J., & Hardman, F.
    (1995) Time for Refilling the Bath? A Study of Primary Student-Teachers’ Grammatical Knowledge. Language and Education, 9(2), 117–134. 10.1080/09500789509541407
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789509541407 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.21003.els
Loading
Knowledge about grammar and the role of epistemological beliefs
Pedagogical Linguistics 2, 107 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.21003.els
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.21003.els
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.21003.els
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): epistemological beliefs; grammar knowledge; grammar teaching; teacher education

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error