1887
image of Concept-based instruction for applied L2 acquisition
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study’s objective is to present an overview of experimental applications of Concept-Based Instruction (CBI) for Second Language Acquisition. CBI aims to describe complex grammatical notions in a thorough manner in order to facilitate their acquisition. Even though CBI is still considered as a recent domain in language teaching, the growing body of research makes it timely to present a systematic review, which is currently lacking. In the present paper, we will first describe the theoretical background upon which CBI is grounded. Then, we will carry out an analysis of 29 CBI studies in which a classroom experiment was performed, with the objective of considering the strengths and limits of this teaching method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.21006.zak
2021-07-27
2021-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. *Aguiló-Mora, F., & Negueruela, E. (2015) Motion-for-the-other through motion-for-the-self: The complexities of giving directions for advanced second language learners of Spanish and English. InMasuda, K. & (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory: Applications for second and foreign language teaching, 8 (pp.73–100). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. Gruyter, Mouton. 10.1515/9781614514442‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-006 [Google Scholar]
  2. Borghi, A. M., & Cimatti, F.
    (2010) Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 763–773. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.029 [Google Scholar]
  3. *Buescher, K., & Strauss, S. (2015) A cognitive linguistic analysis of French prepositions à, dans, and en and a sociocultural theoretical approach to teaching them. InMasuda, K. & (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory: Applications for second and foreign language teaching, 8 (pp.155–181). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. Gruyter, Mouton. 10.1515/9781614514442‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carpay, J.ȂA.ȂM.
    (1974) Foreign-Language Teaching and Meaningful Learning: A Soviet Russian Point of View. ITL Review of Applied linguistics, 25–26, 162–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Crain, W.
    (2010) Theories of development: Concepts and applications, 6th ed.Upper Saddle River, Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Damasio, A.
    (1999) The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Edelman, G. M.
    (2004) Wider than the sky: The phenomenal gift of consciousness. Yale University Press.: New Haven, Connecticut.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. *Fazilatfar, A., Jabbari, A. & Harsij, R. (2017) Concept-based Instruction and Teaching English Tense and Aspect to Iranian School Learners. Issues in Language Teaching, 6(1), 145–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. *Fehrmann, I. (2016) Teaching the form-function mapping of German ‘prefield’ elements using Concept-Based Instruction. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 4(1), 153–170. 10.1515/gcla‑2016‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2016-0011 [Google Scholar]
  10. *Ferreira, M. (2005) An application of the concept-based approach to academic writing instruction. Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. *Fogal, G. G. (2016) Pedagogical Stylistics and Concept-Based Instruction: An Investigation into the Development of Voice in the Academic Writing of Japanese University Students of English. Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto (Canada).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. *Frazier, E.ȂG.ȂG. (2013) Concept-based teaching and Spanish modality in heritage language learners: A Vygotskyan approach. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gal’perin, P. I.
    (1989) Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology27 (3): 65–82. 10.2753/RPO1061‑0405270365
    https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405270365 [Google Scholar]
  14. (1992) Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology30 (July/August): 60–80. 10.2753/RPO1061‑0405300460
    https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300460 [Google Scholar]
  15. *Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. & Harun, H. (2011) Verbalisation as a mediational tool for understanding tense-aspect marking in English: an application of Concept-Based Instruction. Language Awareness. 20 (2), 99–119. 10.1080/09658416.2010.551125
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.551125 [Google Scholar]
  16. *Garcia, P. N. (2012) Verbalizing in the second language classroom: The development of the grammatical concept of aspect. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. García, P. N.
    (2017) Implementing concept-based instruction in the heritage language classroom: A pedagogical proposal. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 4(1), 1–19. 10.21283/2376905X.6.86
    https://doi.org/10.21283/2376905X.6.86 [Google Scholar]
  18. Harley, B., Cummins, J., Swain, M., & Allen, P.
    (1990) The nature of language proficiency. InB. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp.7–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524568.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524568.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. *Harun, H., Massari, N., & Behak, F. P. (2014) Use of L1 as a mediational tool for understanding tense/aspect marking in English: An application of Concept-Based Instruction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 134–139. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.231
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.231 [Google Scholar]
  20. Karpova, S. N.
    (1977) The realization of the verbal composition of speech by preschool children. With a forew. for the Engl.ed. byLuria, A. R.The Hague, Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. *Kim, J. (2013) Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in a second language through concept-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S.
    (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. *Lai, W. (2012) Concept-based foreign language pedagogy: Teaching the Chinese temporal system. Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lantolf, J. P.
    (2011) Integrating sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics in the second language classroom. InHinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 2 (pp.303–318). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lantolf, J. P., Thorne, S. L., & Poehner, M. E.
    (2015) Sociocultural theory and second language development. InVan Patten, B. & (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (pp.207–226). Taylor and Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. *Lee, H. (2012) Concept-based approach to second language teaching and learning: Cognitive linguistics-inspired instruction of English phrasal verbs. Unpublished PhD. dissertation. Pennsylvania State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2016) Concept-Based Instruction: Imagistic and Metaphorical Understanding of Phrasal Verbs. English Teaching, 71(4), 167–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lindstromberg, S.
    (2016) Inferential statistics in Language Teaching Research: A review and ways forward. Language Teaching Research, 20 (6), 741–768. 10.1177/1362168816649979
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816649979 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lyster, R.
    (1999) Immersion. InB. Spolsky (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of educational Linguistics (pp.626–632). Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (2004) Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classroom: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of French language studies. 14(3), 321–341. 10.1017/S0959269504001826
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269504001826 [Google Scholar]
  31. *Masuda, K., & Labarca, A. (2015) Schematic diagram use and languaging quality in learning Japanese polysemous particles ni and de. InMasuda, K. & (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory: Applications for second and foreign language teaching, 8 (pp.203–232). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. 10.1515/9781614514442‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-011 [Google Scholar]
  32. *Negueruela, E. (2003) Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 development: A sociocultural approach to teaching-learning and researching L2 learning. Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Negueruela, E., & Lantolf, J. P.
    (2006) Concept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish. InSalaberry, R., & Lafford, B. A. (Eds.), The Art of Teaching Spanish: Second Language Acquisition from Research to Praxis (pp.79–102). Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Negueruela, E.
    (2013) Metalinguistic knowledge becoming intrapsychological tools. Concepts as tools for second language development. InRoehr, K., & Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A. (Eds.), The metalinguistic dimension in instructed second language learning (pp.221–242). A&C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. *Ohta, A. S., & Tsujihara, R. (2017) Teaching addressee honorifics in Japanese using concept-based instruction (CBI): A qualitative, intact classroom study. InConference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (pp.18–21), Portland, Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. *Ord, C. A. (2014) The marking of aspect in the past tense in French: The role of languaging abstract grammatical concepts. Ph.D. diss., School of Languages and Comp Cultural Studies, University of Queensland.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pavlenko, A.
    (1999) New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 209–230. 10.1017/S1366728999000322
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728999000322 [Google Scholar]
  38. *Polizzi, M. C. (2013) The development of Spanish aspect in the second language classroom: Concept-based pedagogy and dynamic assessment. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. *Renoud, L. (2016) Vers une approche par concepts pour l’apprentissage des temps du passé en français langue étrangère dans le contexte de l’université au Japon. Ph.D. diss., Université de Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Richards, J. C.
    (2006) Communicative language teaching today. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. *Serrano-Lopez, M. & Poehner, M. E. (2008) Materializing linguistic concepts through 3-D clay modeling: A tool-and-result approach to mediating L2 Spanish development. InJ. P. Lantolf, & M. E. Poehner (Eds.). Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages (pp.321–346). London, U.K.: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. *Suñer, F. & Roche, J. (2019) Embodiment in concept-based L2 grammar teaching: The case of German light verb constructions. Journal of Cognitive Science20(3): 365–399
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Swain, M.
    (1997) French immersion programs in Canada. InJ. Cummins & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, vol. 5: bilingual education. (pp.260–299) Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4531‑2_26
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4531-2_26 [Google Scholar]
  44. *Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L. (2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 5–29. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00825.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00825.x [Google Scholar]
  45. *Thorne, S., J. Reinhardt, & P. Golombek (2008) Mediation as objectification in the development of professional academic discourse: A corpus-informed curricular innovation. InJ. P. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages (pp.256–284). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. *Twyman, T., Ketterlin-Geller, L., McCoy, J. D., & Tindal, G. (2003) Effects of concept-based instruction on an English language learner in a rural school: A descriptive case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(2), 259–274. 10.1080/15235882.2003.10162806
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2003.10162806 [Google Scholar]
  47. *Van Compernolle, R. A. (2012) Developing sociopragmatic capacity in a second language through concept-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1987) Thinking and Speech. InR. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1), Problems of General Psychology (pp.39–285). New York: Plenum Press. (Original Work Published 1934)
    [Google Scholar]
  49. *White, B. J. (2012) A conceptual approach to the instruction of phrasal verbs. The Modern Language Journal, 96(3), 419–438. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01365.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01365.x [Google Scholar]
  50. *Williams, L., Abraham, L. B., & Negueruela, E. (2013) Using concept-based instruction in the L2 classroom: Perspectives from current and future language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 363–381. 10.1177/1362168813482950
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482950 [Google Scholar]
  51. Williams, L.
    (2016) Authenticity and Pedagogical Grammar: A Concept-based Approach to Teaching French Auxiliary Verbs. InVan Compernolle, R. A., & McGregor, J. (Eds.), Authenticity, language, and interaction in second language contexts (pp.35–60), Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783095315‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095315-004 [Google Scholar]
  52. *Yanez-Prieto, M.ȂD.ȂC. (2008) On literature and the secret art of (im)possible worlds: Teaching literature-through-language. Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. *Zhang, X. (2014) The teachability hypothesis and concept-based instruction: Topicalization in Chinese as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pl.21006.zak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.21006.zak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error