Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2665-9581
  • E-ISSN: 2665-959X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper first considers what is meant by good reading comprehension and makes a distinction between the product of reading comprehension and the processes that are required to attain that product. It goes on to consider how less-skilled comprehenders can be identified and provides a summary of the research into how less-skilled and skilled comprehenders differ in terms of the skills and processes that they apply during text comprehension. Finally, the implications of these research findings for instruction are considered, and generalizable research-based recommendations for teaching reading comprehension strategies are considered.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Barzillai, M., Morris, R., Lovett, M. & Wolf, M.
    (2010) Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Studies in Reading.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L.
    (2005) Choosing words to teach. InA. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp.209–222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck, I., Perfetti, C., & McKeown, M.
    (1982) Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 741, 506–521. 10.1037/0022‑0663.74.4.506
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.506 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biemiller, A.
    (2005) Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. InA. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp.223–242). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biemiller, A., & Boote, C.
    (2006) An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 44–62. 10.1037/0022‑0663.98.1.44
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R.
    (2010) Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 515–537. 10.1007/s11145‑009‑9172‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H.
    (2010) The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. 10.3102/0034654309359353
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J.
    (1971) Abstraction of Linguistic Ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 331–350.   10.1016/0010‑0285(71)90019‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(71)90019-3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K.
    (1972) Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(72)80006‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cain, K.
    (1999) Ways of reading: how knowledge and use of strategies are related to reading comprehension. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(2), 293–309.   10.1348/026151099165285
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151099165285 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2003) Text comprehension and its relation to coherence and cohesion in children’s fictional narratives. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 335–351. 10.1348/026151003322277739
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003322277739 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V.
    (1999) Inference making and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(5–6), 489–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2011) Matthew effects in young readers reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431–443. 10.1177/0022219411410042
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410042 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2014) Reading comprehension and vocabulary: Is vocabulary more important for some aspects of comprehension?L’Année Psychologique/ Topics in Cognitive Psychology. 10.4074/S0003503314004035
    https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503314004035 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E.
    (2001) Comprehension skill, inference making ability and their relation to knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. 10.3758/BF03196414
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196414 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. E.
    (2004) Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 671–681. 10.1037/0022‑0663.96.4.671
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671 [Google Scholar]
  17. Carney, J. J., Anderson, D., Blackburn, C., & Blessing, D.
    (1984) Preteaching vocabulary and the comprehension of social studies materials by elementary school children. Social Education, 48(3), 195–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Carroll, J. B.
    (1993) Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511571312
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571312 [Google Scholar]
  19. Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S.
    (2012) Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 104(1), 166–181. 10.1037/a0025323
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025323 [Google Scholar]
  20. Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., & Kapp, S.
    (2007) Vocabulary intervention for kindergarten students: Comparing extended instruction to embedded instruction and incidental exposure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(2), 74–88. 10.2307/30035543
    https://doi.org/10.2307/30035543 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cunningham, A. E.
    (2005) Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. InE. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamhi (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp.45–68). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Davis, F. B.
    (1944) Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 9(3), 185–197. 10.1007/BF02288722
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288722 [Google Scholar]
  23. (1968) Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3(4), 499–545. 10.2307/747153
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747153 [Google Scholar]
  24. de Sousa, I., & Oakhill, J. V.
    (1996) Do levels of interest have an effect on children’s comprehension monitoring performance?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(4), 471–482. 10.1111/j.2044‑8279.1996.tb01213.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01213.x [Google Scholar]
  25. de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A.
    (2002) Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(1), 51–77. 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D.
    (1992) British Picture Vocabulary Scale. London: NFER-Nelson.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I.
    (2013) Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435–452. 10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005 [Google Scholar]
  28. Englert, C. S., & Thomas, C. C.
    (1987) Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison between learning-disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(2), 93–105. 10.2307/1510216
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1510216 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gambrell, L. B., & Bales, R. J.
    (1986) Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth- and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 454–464. 10.2307/747616
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747616 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E.
    (1986) Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. 10.1177/074193258600700104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104 [Google Scholar]
  31. Johnson-Laird, P. N.
    (1983) Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kintsch, W.
    (1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Markman, E. M.
    (1979) Realizing that you don’t understand: Elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 501, 643–655. 10.2307/1128929
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128929 [Google Scholar]
  34. McMaster, K. L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., Bohn Gettler, C. M., & Carlson, S.
    (2012) Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 100–111. 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  35. Medo, M. A., & Ryder, R. J.
    (1993) The effects of vocabulary instruction on readers’ ability to make causal connections. Literacy Research and Instruction, 33(2), 119–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C.
    (2013) Is working memory training effective?A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 491, 270–291. 10.1037/a0028228
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228 [Google Scholar]
  37. Meyer, B. J., & Freedle, R. O.
    (1984) Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121–143. 10.3102/00028312021001121
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021001121 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J.
    (2000) Vocabulary processes. InM. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. Vol. III (pp.269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. National Reading Panel
    National Reading Panel (2000) Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm).
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Oakhill, J. V.
    (1984) Inferential and memory skills in children’s comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 541, 31–39. 10.1111/j.2044‑8279.1984.tb00842.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb00842.x [Google Scholar]
  41. (2020) Four Decades of Research into Children’s Reading Comprehension: A Personal Review, Discourse Processes.   10.1080/0163853X.2020.1740875
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1740875 [Google Scholar]
  42. Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K.
    (2012) The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. 10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219 [Google Scholar]
  43. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E.
    (2003) The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. 10.1080/01690960344000008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008 [Google Scholar]
  44. Oakhill, J. V., Hartt, J., & Samols, D.
    (2005) Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 181, 657–686. 10.1007/s11145‑005‑3355‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z [Google Scholar]
  45. Oakhill, J. V. and Patel, S.
    (1991) Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems?Journal of Research in Reading, 141, 106–115. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.1991.tb00012.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1991.tb00012.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K. E. and Elbro, C.
    (2014) Understanding Reading Comprehension: A Handbook. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315756042
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315756042 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ouellette, G. P.
    (2006) What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. 10.1037/0022‑0663.98.3.554
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554 [Google Scholar]
  48. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L.
    (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 [Google Scholar]
  49. Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G.
    (2003) Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 36–76. 10.1598/RRQ.38.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  50. Perfetti, C. A.
    (2007) Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 111, 357–383. 10.1080/10888430701530730
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730 [Google Scholar]
  51. Perfetti, C. A., Yang, C.-L., & Schmalhofer, F.
    (2008) Comprehension skill and word-to-text integration processes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 221, 303–318.   10.1002/acp.1419
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1419 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pressley, G. M.
    (1976) Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 355–359. 10.1037/0022‑0663.68.3.355
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.68.3.355 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A.
    (1977) The representation of knowledge in memory. InR. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp.99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M. F.
    (2005) Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7–9), 617–656. 10.1007/s11145‑005‑2038‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0 [Google Scholar]
  55. Shapiro, B. K., & Hudson, J. A.
    (1997) Coherence and cohesion in children’s stories. InJ. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships: studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp.23–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M.
    (1986) The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110. 10.3102/00346543056001072
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056001072 [Google Scholar]
  57. Stanovich, K. E.
    (1993) Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the Development of Verbal Intelligence Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 241, 133–180. 10.1016/S0065‑2407(08)60302‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60302-X [Google Scholar]
  58. (1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 [Google Scholar]
  59. Stetter, M. E., & Hughes, M. T.
    (2010) Using story grammar to assist students with learning disabilities and reading difficulties improve their comprehension. Education & Treatment of Children, 33(1), 115–151.   10.1353/etc.0.0087
    https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0087 [Google Scholar]
  60. Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K.
    (2006) Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398. 10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3 [Google Scholar]
  61. Thorndike, R. L.
    (1973) Reading as reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly, 9(2), 135–147. 10.2307/747131
    https://doi.org/10.2307/747131 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tomesen, M., & Aarnoutse, C.
    (1998) Effects of an Instructional Programme for Deriving Word Meanings 1. Educational Studies, 24(1), 107–128. 10.1080/0305569980240108
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569980240108 [Google Scholar]
  63. van den Broek, P. W.
    (1997) Discovering the cement of the universe: The development of event comprehension from childhood to adulthood. InP. W. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental Spans in Event Comprehension and Representation (pp.321–342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. van den Broek, P. W., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M.
    (2001) The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for text. Memory and Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087. 10.3758/BF03206376
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206376 [Google Scholar]
  65. Weekes, B. S., Hamilton, S., Oakhill, J. V., & Holliday, R. E.
    (2008) False recollection in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Cognition, 106(1), 222–233. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  66. Williams, J. P., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Pollini, S., Stafford, K. B., Garcia, A., & Snyder, A. E.
    (2007) Teaching cause–effect text structure through social studies content to at-risk second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(2), 111–120. 10.1177/00222194070400020201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400020201 [Google Scholar]
  67. Williams, J. P., Stafford, K. B., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., & Pollini, S.
    (2009) Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 1–20. 10.1037/a0013152
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013152 [Google Scholar]
  68. Yuill, N. M., & Oakhill, J. V.
    (1988) Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2(1), 33–45. 10.1002/acp.2350020105
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350020105 [Google Scholar]
  69. (1991) Children’s problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error