1887
image of More evidence that a usage-based, applied cognitive linguistics approach is effective for teaching the Spanish prepositions por and para
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

While applying cognitive linguistics (CL) to language teaching has been proven effective for teaching polysemous prepositions in English, it has demonstrated less success with the difficult-to-acquire Spanish prepositions and . This points to the need for more practical research investigating if and how CL might be effective for this particular target, especially given that conventional instruction has been found to be lacking. The current study compared three instructional conditions in intact intermediate Spanish classes. The first was a traditional approach to teaching and that presented learners with lists of disconnected uses in one lesson ( = 32). The second was an applied CL approach that presented Principled Polysemy Networks gradually over time ( = 34), an incremental approach that is usage-based and is a best practice for cognitively demanding instruction. The third was a traditional approach that presented lists of disconnected uses but incrementally over time ( = 26). The usage-based CL approach was found to confer the most advantage for learners on a multiple-choice test, but not a fill-in-the-blank test. The findings are discussed in relation to their pedagogical applications, future directions for applied CL research, and limitations of the study.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.22005.kis
2022-09-08
2023-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alonso Raya, R., Castañeda Castro, A., Martínez Gila, P., Miquel López, L., Ortega Olivares, J., & Ruiz Campillo, J. P.
    (2011) Gramática básica del estudiante de español. Edición revisada y ampliada. Barcelona: Difusión.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Achard, M., & Niemeier, S.
    (2004) Introduction: Cognitive linguistics, language acquisition, and pedagogy. InM. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 1–11). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199857.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, H.
    (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, H., Davidson, D., & Bates, D.
    (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory & Language, 59, 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using eigen and S4. R Package Version 1.1-9. Available online at: CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bielak, J.
    (2011) Cognitive linguistics and foreign language pedagogy: An overview of recent trends and developments. InM. Pawlak (Ed.), Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching (pp. 241–262). Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑20141‑7_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20141-7_19 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blanco, José A.
    (2015) Imagina: español sin barreras, 3rd edition. Boston: Vista Higher Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, H. D.
    (2014) Principles of language learning and teaching, 6th edition. White Plains, NY: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cadierno, T., & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2015) Usage-based perspectives on second language learning. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110378528
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cho, K.
    (2010) Fostering the acquisition of English prepositions by Japanese learners with networks and prototypes. InS. De Knop, F. Boers & A. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 259–92). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110245837.257
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245837.257 [Google Scholar]
  11. Comajoan Colomé, L.
    (2014) Tense and aspect in second language Spanish. InK. L. Geeslin (Ed.), The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 235–252). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Curry, K.
    (2010) ¿Pero Para? ¿Por Qué? The application of the principled polysemy model to por and para. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dolgova, N., & Tyler, A.
    (2019) Applications of usage-based approaches to language teaching. InX. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. New York: Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑02899‑2_49
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_49 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dornyëi, Z., & Ryan, S.
    (2015) The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315779553
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553 [Google Scholar]
  15. Drożdż, G., & Taraszka-Drożdż, B.
    (2020) Foreign language pedagogy in the light of cognitive linguistics research. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑58775‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58775-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, N. C.
    (2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352. 10.1017/S027226310505014X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X [Google Scholar]
  17. (2015) Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. InT. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–73). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110378528‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-005 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S.
    (2015) Second language acquisition. InE. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 409–431). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110292022‑020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022-020 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fox, F.
    (2003) Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27. www.jstatsoft.org/v08/i15/
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Guntermann, G.
    (1992) An analysis of interlanguage development over time: Part 1, por and para. Hispania, 75(1), 177–187. 10.2307/344777
    https://doi.org/10.2307/344777 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Llopis-García, R.
    (2019) Applied cognitive linguistics and foreign language learning. Introduction to the special issue. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language teaching, 57(1), 1–20. 10.1515/iral‑2018‑2004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-2004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kilimci, A.
    (2017) Integrating cognitive linguistics insights into data-driven learning: Teaching vertical prepositions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 681–719.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kissling, E. M., Negrete, L., Warren, L., & Tyler, A.
    (2018) Reexamining por and para in the Spanish foreign language intermediate classroom: A usage-based, cognitive linguistic approach. InA. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is Applied Cognitive Linguistics? Answers from Current SLA Research (pp. 229–256). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110572186‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572186-009 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lafford, B., & Ryan, J.
    (1995) The acquisition of lexical meaning in a study abroad context: The Spanish prepositions por and para. Hispania, 78(3), 528–547. 10.2307/345295
    https://doi.org/10.2307/345295 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lam, Y.
    (2009) Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching Spanish prepositions por and para. Language Awareness, 18(1), 2–18. 10.1080/09658410802147345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802147345 [Google Scholar]
  27. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2008) Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. InP. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 66–88). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I.
    (2015) The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65, 185–207. 10.1111/lang.12117
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12117 [Google Scholar]
  30. Littlemore, J.
    (2009) Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230245259
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245259 [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, D., & Tsai, T.
    (2021) Cognitive linguistics and language pedagogy. InH. Luo (Ed.), Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 543–555). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑36
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-36 [Google Scholar]
  32. Llopis-García, R.
    (2015) Las preposiciones y la metáfora del espacio: aportaciones y potencial de la lingüística cognitiva para su enseñanza. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 2(1), 51–68. 10.1080/23247797.2015.1042214
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2015.1042214 [Google Scholar]
  33. Long, M. H.
    (2007) Problems in SLA. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Luo, H.
    (2021) Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. InH. Luo (Ed.), Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 556–567). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑37
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-37 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mendo Murillo, S.
    (2019) El significado de las preposiciones en la enseñanza del español LE/L2. InI. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, T. Cadierno & A. Castañeda Castro (Eds.), Lingüística cognitiva y español LE/L2 (pp. 220–234). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315622842‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622842-10 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ortega, L., Tyler, A., Park, H., & Uno, M.
    (2016) The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Queller, K.
    (2001) A usage-based approach to modeling and teaching the phrasal lexicon. InM. Pütz, S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp. 55–83). Berlin: Mouton de Grutyer. 10.1515/9783110866254.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866254.55 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pinto, D., & Rex, S.
    (2006) The acquisition of the Spanish prepositions por and para in a classroom setting. Hispania, 89(3), 611–622. 10.2307/20063366
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20063366 [Google Scholar]
  39. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at: www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C.
    (2008) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203938560
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938560 [Google Scholar]
  41. Suzuki, Y. & DeKeyser, R.
    (2017) The interface of explicit and implicite knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790. 10.1111/lang.12241
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tyler, A.
    (2008) Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. InP. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456–488). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203876039
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876039 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
    (2001) Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. Language, 77(4), 724–765. 10.1353/lan.2001.0250
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0250 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tyler, A., & Huang, L.
    (2018) What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110572186
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572186 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tyler, A., Mueller, C., & Ho, V.
    (2010) Applying cognitive linguistics to learning the semantics of English to, for, and at: An experimental investigation. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 181–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Vázquez, G.
    (1991) Análisis de errores y aprendizaje de español/lengua extranjera. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Verspoor, M. H., & Hong, N. T. P.
    (2013) A dynamic usage-based approach to communicative language teaching. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 22–54. 10.1515/eujal‑2013‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pl.22005.kis
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.22005.kis
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error