1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2665-9581
  • E-ISSN: 2665-959X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Comment

This is a commentary article in response to the following content:
Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.22008.str
2022-07-13
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2015) Designing instructional effect studies for L2 pragmatics: A guide for teachers and researchers. InS. Gesuato, F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds.) Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices (pp.135–164). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Su, Y.
    (2017) The effect of corpus-based instruction on pragmatic routines. Language Learning & Technology21(3): 76–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Stringer, D.
    (2017) Unconventional expressions: Productive syntax in the L2 acquisition of formulaic language. Second Language Research, 33(1): 61–90. 10.1177/0267658316641725
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316641725 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
    (2006) Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals, and evaluation. InG. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp.305–355). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll, S. E.
    (2010) Explaining how learners extract ‘formulae’ from L2 input. Language, Interaction and Acquisition1: 229–50. 10.1075/lia.1.2.05car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.1.2.05car [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunningham, A. E.
    (2005) Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. InE. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp.45–68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Knop, S.
    & Meunier, F. (2015) The ‘learner corpus research, cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition’ nexus: A SWOT analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1): 1–18. 10.1515/cllt‑2014‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S.
    (2015) The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315779553
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, N.C.
    (2003) Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. InC. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.33–68). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gabrielatos, C.
    (2005) Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells?TESLEJ, 8(4), 1–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gilquin, G.
    (2021) Using corpora to foster L2 construction learning: A data-driven learning experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 229–247. 10.1111/ijal.12317
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12317 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2022) Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy: From rationale to applications. Pedagogical Linguistics, VOL: pages. 10.1075/pl.22014.gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.22014.gil [Google Scholar]
  14. Gradman, H.
    (1971) The limitations of contrastive analysis predictions. Proceedings of the Pacific Conference on Contrastive Linguistics and Language Universals (PCCLLU): University of Hawai’i Working Papers in Linguistics3/4: 11–16. University of Hawai’i.radman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y.
    (2021) A psycholinguistically motivated methodology for task-based language teaching. InM. Ahmadian & M. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp.305–325). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108868327.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868327.018 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D.
    (1981) Introduction. InN. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition (pp.9–31). New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jusczyk, P. W.
    (1997) The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lightbown, P. & Spada, N.
    (2013, 4th ed.). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lindstromberg, S. & Boers, F.
    (2008) Teaching chunks of language: From noticing to remembering. Innsbruck: Helbling Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Long, M.
    (2015) Experimental perspectives on classroom interaction. InN. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp.60–73). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118531242.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118531242.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nash, H., & Snowling, M.
    (2006) Teaching new words to children with poor existing vocabulary knowledge: A controlled evaluation of the definition and context methods. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(3), 335–354. 10.1080/13682820600602295
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820600602295 [Google Scholar]
  23. Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  24. Rudzka-Ostyn, B.
    (2003) Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197235
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197235 [Google Scholar]
  25. Saito, K., & Plonsky, L.
    (2019) Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69, 652–708. 10.1111/lang.12345
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schachter, J.
    (1974) An error in error analysis. Language Learning24(2): 205–214. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00502.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00502.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R.
    (2013) Generative approaches and the poverty of the stimulus. InJ. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.137–158). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139051729.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051729.010 [Google Scholar]
  28. Seuss, Dr
    (1957) The cat in the hat. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R.
    (2013) Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63(2), 296–329. 10.1111/lang.12001
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Slabakova, R.
    (2008) Meaning in the second language. New York/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211511
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211511 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2016) Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Stahl, S.
    (2005) Four problems with teaching word meanings (and what to do to make vocabulary an integral part of instruction). InE. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp.95–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Stringer, D.
    (2019) Lexical semantics: Relativity and transfer. InErdogan, N. & Wei, M. (Eds.), Applied linguistics for teachers of culturally and linguistically diverse learners (pp.180–203). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑5225‑8467‑4.ch007
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8467-4.ch007 [Google Scholar]
  34. Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
    (2011) Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks. Language Learning61(2): 569–613. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00622.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00622.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Tyler, A., Huang, L., & Jan, H.
    (2018) (Eds.). What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110572186
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572186 [Google Scholar]
  36. VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S.
    (Eds.) (2020) Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429503986
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pl.22008.str
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error