Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy

References

1. Aijmer, K.
   (Ed.) (2009) Corpora and language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.33
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33 [Google Scholar]
2. Arnett, C., & Suñer, F.
   (2019) Leveraging cognitive linguistic approaches to grammar teaching with multimedia animations. Journal of Cognitive Science, 20(3), 365–399. 10.17791/jcs.2019.20.3.365
   https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2019.20.3.365 [Google Scholar]
3. Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A.
   (2010) Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5(1), 1–27. 10.3366/cor.2010.0001
   https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Barlow, M.
   (2011) Corpus linguistics and theoretical linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(1), 3–44. 10.1075/ijcl.16.1.02bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.1.02bar [Google Scholar]
5. BNC Consortium
   BNC Consortium (2007) The British National Corpus, XML edition. Oxford: Oxford Text Archive.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boas, H. C.
   (Ed.) (2022) Directions for pedagogical construction grammar: Learning and teaching (with) constructions. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110746723
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723 [Google Scholar]
7. Boas, H. C., Dux, R., & Ziem, A.
   (2016) Frames and constructions in an online learner’s dictionary of German. InS. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp.303–326). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110458268‑012
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268-012 [Google Scholar]
8. Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., He, L., Deconinck, J., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J.
   (2017) Typographic enhancement of multiword units in second language text. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 448–469. 10.1111/ijal.12141
   https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12141 [Google Scholar]
9. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H.
   (2006) Means of motivating multiword units: Rationale, mnemonic benefits and cognitive-style variables. InS. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Medved Krajnovic, & J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 6 (pp.169–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/eurosla.6.11boe
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.6.11boe [Google Scholar]
10. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
    (2005) Finding ways to make phrase-learning feasible: The mnemonic effect of alliteration. System, 33(2), 225–238. 10.1016/j.system.2004.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.007 [Google Scholar]
11. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
    (2006) Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals, and evaluation. InG. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp.305–355). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
    (Eds.) (2008a) Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161 [Google Scholar]
13. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
    (2008b) How cognitive linguistics can foster effective vocabulary teaching. InF. Boers, & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp.1–61). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199161.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161.1.1 [Google Scholar]
14. Boulton, A.
    (2009) Data-driven learning: Reasonable fears and rational reassurance. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 81–106.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Boulton, A.
    (2010) Consultation de corpus et styles d’apprentissage. Recherche et pratiques pédagogiques en langues de spécialité – Cahiers de l’Apliut, 29(1), 98–115. 10.4000/apliut.967
    https://doi.org/10.4000/apliut.967 [Google Scholar]
16. Boulton, A., & Cobb, T.
    (2017) Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348–393. 10.1111/lang.12224
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224 [Google Scholar]
17. Bybee, J.
    (2008) Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. InP. Robinson, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.216–236). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
19. Campoy, M. C., Bellés-Fortuño, B., & Gea-Valor, M. L.
    (2010) Corpus-based approaches to English language teaching. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chambers, A.
    (2019) Towards the corpus revolution? Bridging the research–practice gap. Language Teaching, 52(4), 460–475. 10.1017/S0261444819000089
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000089 [Google Scholar]
21. Cheng, W.
    (2010) What can a corpus tell us about language teaching?InA. O’Keeffe, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp.319–332). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949‑23
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-23 [Google Scholar]
22. Collins, L., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M.
    (2009) Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 336–353. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00894.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00894.x [Google Scholar]
23. Condon, N., & Kelly, P.
    (2002) Does cognitive linguistics have anything to offer English language learners in their efforts to master phrasal verbs?ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 137/138, 205–231. 10.1075/itl.137‑138.03con
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.137-138.03con [Google Scholar]
24. Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
25. Csábi, S.
    (2008) A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching. InM. Achard, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp.233–256). Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dąbrowska, E.
    (2012) Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(3), 219–253. 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab [Google Scholar]
27. Davies, M.
    (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available athttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
    [Google Scholar]
28. De Knop, S., Boers, F., & De Rycker, T.
    (Eds.) (2010) Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110245837
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245837 [Google Scholar]
29. De Knop, S., & De Rycker, T.
    (Eds.) (2008) Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110205381
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205381 [Google Scholar]
30. De Knop, S., & Gilquin, G.
    (Eds.) (2016) Applied construction grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110458268
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268 [Google Scholar]
31. De Knop, S., & Meunier, F.
    (Eds.) (2015a) Learner corpus research, cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Special issue ofCorpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1). 10.1515/cllt‑2014‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0004 [Google Scholar]
32. De Knop, S., & Meunier, F.
    (2015b) The ‘learner corpus research, cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition’ nexus: A SWOT analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 1–18. 10.1515/cllt‑2014‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0004 [Google Scholar]
33. Dolgova, N., & Tyler, A.
    (2019) Applications of usage-based approaches to language teaching. InX. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp.939–961). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑02899‑2_49
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_49 [Google Scholar]
34. Ellis, N. C.
    (2012) What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use?InS. Th. Gries, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Frequency effects in language learning and processing (pp.7–33). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110274059.7
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110274059.7 [Google Scholar]
35. Ellis, N. C.
    (2013) Construction grammar and second language acquisition. InTh. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.365–378). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gabrielatos, C.
    (2005) Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells?TESL-EJ, 8(4), 1–35.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Geeraerts, D.
    (2006) A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics. InD. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp.1–28). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199901.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.1 [Google Scholar]
38. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Gilquin, G.
    (2006) The verb slot in causative constructions. Finding the best fit. ConstructionsSV1-3/2006. Available fromhttps://www.constructions.uni-osnabrueck.de/
    [Google Scholar]
40. Gilquin, G.
    (2008) Taking a new look at lexical networks. Lexis, 1: 23–39. Available fromhttps://journals.openedition.org/lexis/757. 10.4000/lexis.757
    https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.757 [Google Scholar]
41. Gilquin, G.
    (2010) Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.39 [Google Scholar]
42. Gilquin, G.
    (2021) Using corpora to foster L2 construction learning: A data-driven learning experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 229–247. 10.1111/ijal.12317
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12317 [Google Scholar]
43. Gilquin, G.
    (2022) Constructing learner speech: On the use of spoken data in applied construction grammar. InH. C. Boas (Ed.), Directions for pedagogical construction grammar: Learning and teaching (with) constructions (pp.73–96). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110746723‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723-003 [Google Scholar]
44. Gilquin, G., & Granger, S.
    (2011) From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. InJ. Mukherjee, & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp.55–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.44.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.04gra [Google Scholar]
45. Gilquin, G., & Granger, S.
    (2022) Using data-driven learning in language teaching. InA. O’Keeffe, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. Second edition (pp.430–442). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780367076399‑30
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367076399-30 [Google Scholar]
46. Gilquin, G., & Paquot, M.
    (2008) Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction, 1(1), 41–61. 10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.05gil [Google Scholar]
47. Godfrey, J. J., Holliman, E. C., & McDaniel, J.
    (1992) Switchboard: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. InProceedings of ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Volume 1 (pp.517–520). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 10.1109/ICASSP.1992.225858
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1992.225858 [Google Scholar]
48. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Goldberg, A. E.
    (1996) Making one’s way through the data. InM. Shibatani, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp.29–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Götz, S., & Mukherjee, J.
    (Eds.) (2019) Learner corpora and language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.92
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.92 [Google Scholar]
52. Granger, S.
    (1993) The International Corpus of Learner English. InJ. Aarts, P. de Haan, & N. Oostdijk (Eds.), English language corpora: Design, analysis and exploitation (pp.57–69). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Granger, S.
    (1996) From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. InK. Aijmer, B. Altenberg, & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in contrast: Papers from a symposium on text-based cross-linguistic studies (pp.37–51). Lund: Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Granger, S.
    (2009) The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation. InK. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp.13–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.33.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.04gra [Google Scholar]
55. Granger, S., Dupont, M., Meunier, F., Naets, H., & Paquot, M.
    (2020) The International Corpus of Learner English. Version 3. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Granger, S., Hung, J., & Petch-Tyson, S.
    (Eds.) (2000) Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Gries, S. Th.
    (2003) Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 1–27. 10.1075/arcl.1.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.1.02gri [Google Scholar]
58. Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2004) Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
59. Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2006) Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197709
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197709 [Google Scholar]
60. Gullberg, M.
    (2008) Gestures and second language acquisition. InP. Robinson, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.276–305). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Herbst, Th., & Hoffmann, Th.
    (2018) Construction Grammar for students: A Constructionist Approach to Syntactic Analysis (CASA). Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 6(1), 197–218. 10.1515/gcla‑2018‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2018-0010 [Google Scholar]
62. Hoffmann, Th.
    (2021) Multimodal Construction Grammar: From multimodal constructs to multimodal constructions. InX. Wen, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.78–92). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-6 [Google Scholar]
63. Holme, R.
    (2009) Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230233676
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233676 [Google Scholar]
64. Hundt, M., Sand, A., & Skandera, P.
    (1999) Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English (FROWN). Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Hunston, S.
    (2002) Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
66. Johansson, S.
    (2007) Seeing through multilingual corpora: On the use of corpora in contrastive studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.26
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.26 [Google Scholar]
67. Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T.
    (2010) Corpus-assisted creative writing: Introducing intermediate Italian learners to a corpus as a reference resource. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 28–44. Available fromhttps://www.lltjournal.org/item/2709
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lakoff, G.
    (1990) The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39 [Google Scholar]
69. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Lapaire, J.-R.
    (2006) La grammaire anglaise en mouvement. Paris: Hachette.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Laviosa, S.
    (2002) Corpus-based translation studies: Theory, findings, applications. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004485907
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004485907 [Google Scholar]
73. Leech, G.
    (1997) Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. InA. Wichmann, S. Fligelstone, T. McEnery, & G. Knowles (Eds.), Teaching and language corpora (pp.1–23). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Leech, G.
    (2011) Frequency, corpora and language learning. InF. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora. In Honour of Sylviane Granger (pp.7–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.45.05lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.45.05lee [Google Scholar]
75. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Dziwirek, K.
    (Eds.) (2009) Studies in cognitive corpus linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Lindstromberg, S.
    (2010) English prepositions explained. Revised edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.157
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.157 [Google Scholar]
77. Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F.
    (2008) Teaching chunks of language: From noticing to remembering. Helbling Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Littlemore, J.
    (2009) Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230245259
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245259 [Google Scholar]
79. Littlemore, J., & Juchem-Grundmann, C.
    (2010) Introduction to the interplay between cognitive linguistics and second language learning and teaching. AILA Review, 23, 1–6. 10.1075/aila.23.01lit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.01lit [Google Scholar]
80. Loenheim, L., Lyngfelt, B., Olofsson, J., Prentice, J., & Tingsell, S.
    (2016) Constructicography meets (second) language education: On constructions in teaching aids and the usefulness of a Swedish constructicon. InS. De Knop, & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied construction grammar (pp.327–355). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110458268‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268-013 [Google Scholar]
81. McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H.
    (2004–2006) Touchstone (four levels). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
82. McEnery, T., & Wilson, A.
    (1997) Teaching and language corpora (TALC). ReCALL, 9(1), 5–14. 10.1017/S0958344000004572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344000004572 [Google Scholar]
83. Meunier, F.
    (2002) The pedagogical value of native and learner corpora in EFL grammar teaching. InS. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp.119–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.6.10meu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6.10meu [Google Scholar]
84. Meunier, F.
    (2008) Corpora, cognition and pedagogical grammars: An account of convergences and divergences. InS. De Knop, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp.91–117). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Nikiforidou, K., & Fischer, K.
    (2015) On the interaction of constructions with register and genre. Constructions and Frames, 7(2), 137–147. 10.1075/cf.7.2.001int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.7.2.001int [Google Scholar]
86. Norvig, P., & Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Taking: A study in lexical network theory. InJ. Aske, N. Beery, L. A. Michaelis, & H. Filip (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 14–16, 1987. General session and parasession on grammar and cognition (pp.195–206). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v13i0.1820
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v13i0.1820 [Google Scholar]
87. O’Sullivan, Í.
    (2007) Enhancing a process-oriented approach to literacy and language learning: The role of corpus consultation literacy. ReCALL, 19(3), 269–286. 10.1017/S095834400700033X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400700033X [Google Scholar]
88. Pütz, M., Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R.
    (2001) Applied cognitive linguistics II: Language pedagogy. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Rudzka-Ostyn, B.
    (2003) Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197235
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197235 [Google Scholar]
90. Sandra, D., & Rice, S.
    (1995) Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind – the linguist’s or the language user’s?Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 89–130. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.1.89
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.1.89 [Google Scholar]
91. Schönefeld, D.
    (1999) Corpus linguistics and cognitivism. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 4(1), 137–171. 10.1075/ijcl.4.1.07sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.1.07sch [Google Scholar]
92. Seidlhofer, B.
    (2002) Pedagogy and local learner corpora: Working with learning-driven data. InS. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp.213–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.6.14sei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.6.14sei [Google Scholar]
93. Sinclair, J. McH.
    (Ed.) (2004) How to use corpora in language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.12 [Google Scholar]
94. Stubbs, M.
    (2004) Language corpora. InA. Davies, & C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of applied linguistics (pp.106–132). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757000.ch4
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch4 [Google Scholar]
95. Szmrecsanyi, B.
    (2017) Variationist sociolinguistics and corpus-based variationist linguistics: Overlap and cross-pollination potential. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 62(4), 685–701. 10.1017/cnj.2017.34
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.34 [Google Scholar]
96. Talmy, L.
    (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. InT. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp.57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Taylor, C.
    (2008) What is corpus linguistics? What the data says. ICAME Journal, 32, 179–200.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Taylor, J. R.
    (2006) Cognitive semantics. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, volume 2. Second edition (pp.569–582). Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01087‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01087-7 [Google Scholar]
99. Teubert, W.
    (2008) Some notes on the concept of cognitive linguistics. InA. Gerbig, & O. Mason (Eds.), Language, people, numbers (pp.61–84). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Thompson, G., & Hunston, S.
     (2006) System and corpus: Two traditions with a common ground. InG. Thompson, & S. Hunston (Eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections (pp.1–14). London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Tiedemann, J.
     (2012) Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. InProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2012) (pp.2214–2218). European Language Resources Association.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Tognini-Bonelli, E.
     (2001) Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
103. Tomasello, M.
     (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
     (2011) Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. InB. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (pp.95–160). Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Tyler, A., & Huang, L.
     (2018) Introduction. InA. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research (pp.1–33). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110572186‑001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572186-001 [Google Scholar]
106. Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L.
     (2018) Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. InA. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy (pp.3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.49.01tyl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.01tyl [Google Scholar]
107. Wichmann, A., Fligelstone, S., McEnery, T., & Knowles, G.
     (Eds.) (1997) Teaching and language corpora. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Wong, M. H. I., Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B.
     (2018) A cognitive linguistics application for second language pedagogy: The English Preposition Tutor. Language Learning, 68(2), 438–468. 10.1111/lang.12278
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12278 [Google Scholar]
109. Wulff, S.
     (2021) Krashen’s claims through a usage-based lens. Foreign Language Annals, 54(2), 306–310. 10.1111/flan.12555
     https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12555 [Google Scholar]
110. Yoon, J., & Gries, S. Th.
     (2016) Corpus-based approaches to construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.19
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.19 [Google Scholar]