1887
image of The types of cues that help you learn

Abstract

Abstract

Despite a considerable amount of research conducted on the development of tense/aspect (TA) usage in English by second language (L2) learners, nuances in uses of TAs remain elusive to many L2 learners of English: the grammatical accounts proposed appear difficult to apply as they are either too general or too specific and fail to provide learners with a conceptual understanding of the system. Merging insights from psychological models of learning, corpus-based, and cognitive linguistics approaches to second language acquisition we use the results of computational simulations of learning of the TA system conducted by and propose an approach to TA teaching that focuses on the cues that have been identified as crucial for accurate TA use. Our pedagogical approach draws learners’ attention not so much to the cues themselves but to the type of cues that are the most reliable in the choice of different TA combinations. This approach allows teachers to equip learners with a long-term learning strategy that will help them focus on the most useful type of information, and thus gradually build up a bank of knowledge specific to each TA combination.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.23003.rom
2024-01-11
2024-10-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/pl.23003.rom/pl.23003.rom.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pl.23003.rom&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexander, L. G.
    (2005) Longman English Grammar. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y.
    (1996) The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. InW. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.–). San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2000) Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Comajoan-Colomé, L.
    (2022) The relation of second language acquisition, instructed second language acquisition, and language teaching from the lens of second language tense-aspect. Language Teaching, , –. 10.1017/S026144482200009X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482200009X [Google Scholar]
  5. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. W.
    (1995) The role of lexcial aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587807
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587807 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (2021) Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.232
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M.
    (2011) Teaching English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, (), –. 10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.3.4
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.3.4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E.
    (2009) Input effects within a constructionist framework. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00899.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00899.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Casalosa, M.
    (2005) When less is more: How infants learn to form an abstract categorical representation of support. Child Development, , –. 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2005.00844.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00844.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Comajoan-Colomé, L., & Llop Naya, A.
    (2021) An SLA-informed and cognitive linguistic approach to the teaching of L2 Catalan tense-aspect. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, , –. 10.5209/clac.76714
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.76714 [Google Scholar]
  11. Divjak, D.
    (2017) The role of lexical frequency in the acceptability of syntactic variants: Evidence from that-clauses in Polish. Cognitive Science, , –. 10.1111/cogs.12335
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12335 [Google Scholar]
  12. Divjak, D., Testini, I., & Milin, P.
    (Under revision). On the nature and organistion of morphological categories: verbal aspect through the lens of associative learning. Morphology.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, N. C.
    (2006a) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/ami038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami038 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2006b) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/aml015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
    (2009) Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00896.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Ez-Zizi, A., Divjak, D., & Milin, P.
    (2023) Error-correction mechanisms in language learning: Modeling individuals. Language Learning, Ahead of print. 10.1111/lang.12569
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12569 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuchs, R., Götz, S., & Werner, V.
    (2016) The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. InV. Werner, E. Seoane, & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Re-assessing the Present Perfect. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110443530‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443530-013 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gilquin, G.
    (2022) Cognitive linguistics and pedagogy: From rationale to applications. Pedagogical Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/pl.22014.gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.22014.gil [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N.
    (2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.2004.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.011 [Google Scholar]
  20. Götz, S., Werner, V., & Fuchs, R.
    (2019) Temporal adverbials in the acquisition of past-time reference: A cross-sectional study of L1 German and Cantonese learners of English. InA. Abel, A. Glaznieks, V. Lyding, & L. Nicolas (Eds.), Widening the scope of Learner Corpus Research. Selected papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference (pp.–). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2004) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
  22. Infante, P., & Poehner, M. E.
    (2021) Alex, the toolmaker: Tool-and-result activity in the L2 learning context. Linguistics and Education, (). 10.1016/j.linged.2020.100862
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100862 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jacobsen, N. D.
    (2018) The best of both worlds: Combining cognitive linguistics and pedagogic tasks to teach ENglish conditionals. Applied linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kermer, F.
    (2016) A Cognitive Grammar Approach to Teaching Tense and Aspect in the L2 Context. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Celce-Murcia, M.
    (2016) The Grammar Book: Form, meaning, and use for English language teachers (3rd Ed.). Boston: Heinle Cengage.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Leech, G.
    (1992) 100 million words of English: The British National Corpus (BNC). Second Language Research, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, P., & Shirai, Y.
    (2000) The acquisition of lexcial and grammatical aspect. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110800715
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800715 [Google Scholar]
  28. MacWhinney, B.
    (1987) The Competition Model. InB. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp.–). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Niemeier, S., & Reif, M.
    (2008) Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching in the German EFL classroom. InS. D. Knop & T. D. Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar (pp.–). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110205381.3.325
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205381.3.325 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ninio, A.
    (1999) Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, , –. 10.1017/S0305000999003931
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000999003931 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pavlov, I.
    (1927) Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Reichenbach, H.
    (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Reif, M.
    (2012) Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Romain, L., Ez-Zizi, A., Milin, P., & Divjak, D.
    (2022) What makes the past perfect and the future progressive? Experiential coordinates for a learnable, context-based model of tense and aspect. Cognitive Linguistics, (). 10.1515/cog‑2021‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0006 [Google Scholar]
  35. Salaberry, R. M.
    (2008) Marking past tense in Second Language Acquisition. A theoretical model. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W.
    (1995) The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, (), –. 10.2307/415743
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415743 [Google Scholar]
  37. Skinner, B. F.
    (1957) Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. 10.1037/11256‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11256-000 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  39. Svalberg, A. M.-L.
    (2007) Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444807004491
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004491 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2019) Mapping tense form and meaning for L2 learning – from theory to practice. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑0105
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0105 [Google Scholar]
  41. Weist, R. M., Pawlak, A., & Carapella, J.
    (2004) Syntactic-semantic interface in the acquisition of verb morphology. Journal of Child Language, , –. 10.1017/S0305000903005920
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005920 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wonnacott, E., Boyd, J. K., Thomson, J., & Goldberg, A. E.
    (2012) Input effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction in 5 year olds. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Leblanc, C. J.
    (2009) The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00895.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Year, J.
    (2009) Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of input frequency and distribution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University, New York.
  45. Year, J., & Gordon, P.
    (2009) Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00898.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00898.x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.23003.rom
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.23003.rom
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: tense/aspect ; associative learning ; EFL/ESL ; usage-based theories ; cognitive linguistics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error