1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2665-9581
  • E-ISSN: 2665-959X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This exploratory study examines the role of project-based learning (PBL) in an Eigogaku (English linguistics) course for preservice English teachers studying at an English medium college in Japan. Three projects were designed to connect the course modules on phonetics/phonology, morphology, and syntax with language teaching applications. At the start and conclusion of the course, students completed a survey that included an open-ended question about the role of linguistics in language teaching and 29 Likert-scale response items targeting their understanding of linguistic concepts, pedagogical applications of linguistics, their beliefs and values about language teaching and learning, and learner autonomy. Responses to the open-ended question showed an increase in explanations of how linguistics can inform pedagogical practices and increase teacher agency. Responses to the Likert-scale items indicated greater understanding of linguistic concepts, pedagogical practices, and learner autonomy, but minimal change regarding beliefs about language learning and teaching. Implications for these findings and recommendations for future research on linguistics education for language teachers are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.23005.ric
2023-09-12
2024-07-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, C.
    (2018) Essentials of linguistics. Pressbooks.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Backley, P.
    (2016) Varieties of English: Teaching Englishes, not English. English Language & Literature, 1011, 87–96. https://www.tohoku-gakuin.ac.jp/research/journal/bk2017/pdf/no01_04.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2020) Pedagogical linguistics: A view from L2 pragmatics. Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(1), 44–65. 10.1075/pl.19013.bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19013.bar [Google Scholar]
  4. Bateman, N.
    (2019) Linguistics in middle school: Incorporating linguistics into project-based learning. Language, 95(2), 300–326. 10.1353/lan.2019.0044
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0044 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumgartner, E., & Zabin, C.
    (2008) A Case Study of Project-Based Instruction in the Ninth Grade: A Semester Long Study of Intertidal Biodiversity. Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 97–114. 10.1080/13504620801951640
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620801951640 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, J. D.
    (2011) Likert items and scales of measurement?Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15(1), 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, N.
    (1966) Linguistic theory. InR. G. Mead (Ed.), Language teaching: Broader contexts. Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Modern Languages: Reports of the working committees. New York, NY: MLA Materials Center
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies, M.
    (2004) BRITISH NATIONAL CORPUS. Oxford University Press. https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dawson, H., & Phelan, M.
    (Eds.) (2016) The language files: Materials for an introduction to language and linguistics. (12th ed.). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press. 10.26818/9780814252703
    https://doi.org/10.26818/9780814252703 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D.
    (2003) Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. 10.1016/S0959‑4752(02)00025‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7 [Google Scholar]
  11. Filimonova, V.
    (2020) Problem-based learning in introductory linguistics. Langauge, 961, e1–e21. 10.1353/lan.2020.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0012 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L.
    (2011) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 611 (Special issue), 189–220. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00646.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00646.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, M.
    (1982) Linguistics in teacher education. InR. Carter (Ed.), Linguistics and the teacher (pp.10–15). London: The Gresham Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Holm, M.
    (2011) Project-based instruction: A review of the literature on the effectiveness in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade classrooms. InSight: Rivier Academic Journal, 7(2), 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hudson, R.
    (2020) Towards a pedagogical linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(1), 8–13. 10.1075/pl.19011.hud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19011.hud [Google Scholar]
  16. Ikeuchi, M., Kubozono, H., & Kosuge, K.
    (Eds.) (2018) Eigogaku wo eigo jugyou ni ikasu [English linguistics in the English language classroom]. Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E.
    (2010) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Köylü, Y.
    (2021) Teaching linguistics through language construction: A project-based approach. Pedagogical Linguistics, e1–e41. 10.1075/pl.21013.koy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.21013.koy [Google Scholar]
  19. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Celce-Murcia, M.
    (2015) The grammar book: Form, meaning, and use for English language teachers (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning/Cengage Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S.
    (2015) Setting the standard for project based learning. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N.
    (2013) How languages are learned. (4th ed.) Oxford. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
    (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. 10.1017/S0272263197001034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lyster, R., & Saito, K.
    (2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(Special Issue 2), 265–302. 10.1017/S0272263109990520
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520 [Google Scholar]
  24. MEXT
    MEXT (2019) Gaikokugo no core curriculum ni tsuite [Regarding the foreign language core curriculum]. https://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/04/04/1415122_3.pdf
  25. Park-Johnson, S. K., & Shin, S. J.
    (2020) Linguistics for language teachers: Lessons for classroom practice. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315545462
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545462 [Google Scholar]
  26. Riddle, M.
    (1982) Linguistics for education. InR. Carter (Ed.), Linguistics and the teacher (pp.31–51). London: The Gresham Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rogerson-Revell, P.
    (2011) English phonology and pronunciation teaching. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 10.5040/9781350934177
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934177 [Google Scholar]
  28. Sanders, N.
    (2016) Constructed languages in the classroom. Language, 92(3), 192–204. 10.1353/lan.2016.0055
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0055 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sawada, O.
    (2008) Two types of adverbial polarity items in Japanese: Absolute and relative. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Pragmatics Society of Japan, 31, 263–270. pragmatics.gr.jp/content/files/proceedings/Proceedings_03_2008.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sinclair, J.
    (1966) Linguistics and the teaching of English. Study Group Paper, 81,1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Thomas, J. W.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/pl.23005.ric
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.23005.ric
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error