1887
image of Russian nominative-accusative case distinction
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The learning of case paradigms is a well-documented challenge for learners of Russian, yet research on pedagogical approaches connecting evidence-based language acquisition theories with classroom practices of teaching case morphology is lacking. The current project addresses this gap by investigating the effects of usage-based language instruction for learning prototypical Russian nominative and accusative noun case endings to express subject and object information. This study analyzed the results of an assessment measure that followed a classroom intervention in immersion and non-immersion contexts with 48 English-speaking beginner learners of L2 Russian. Learners were introduced to accusative noun case endings through awareness raising activities, extensive task-based interpretation and production practice. The results show that systematically directing attention to form-meaning similarities and differences between L1 and L2 supported L2 grammar learning. Masculine and neuter accusative endings were found to pose greater challenges, as were nominative and accusative nouns in non-initial positions in the sentence (i.e., OV, OV, SV, SV). Beyond its instructional implications, the study offers insights into the underlying linguistic representations created in language immersion and non-immersion contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.24010.kis
2025-04-18
2025-05-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnett, C., & Lysinger, D.
    (2013) A cognitive grammar approach to teaching the Russian case system. Russian Language Journal, , –. 10.70163/0036‑0252.1143
    https://doi.org/10.70163/0036-0252.1143 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailyn, J.
    (1995) A configurational approach to Russian ‘free’ word order. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  3. Benati, A. G., & Lee, J. F. with McNulty, E. M.
    (2010) Exploring the effects of processing instruction on a discourse-level guided composition with the Spanish subjunctive after the adverb cuando. InA. G. Benati & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Processing instruction and discourse (pp.–). New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bivon, R.
    (1971) Element order. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherepovskaia, N., Slioussar, N., & Denissenko, A.
    (2022) Acquisition of the nominal case system in Russian as a second language. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658320988058
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320988058 [Google Scholar]
  6. Comer, W., & deBenedette, L.
    (2010) Processing instruction and Russian: Issues, materials, and preliminary experimental results. Slavic and East European Journal, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2011) Processing instruction in Russian: Further evidence is IN. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2011.01155.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01155.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Corbett, G.
    (1991) Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166119
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2007) Gender and noun classes. InT. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.004 [Google Scholar]
  10. DeBenedette, L., Comer, W., Smyslova, A., & Perkins, J.
    Mezhdu nami. AccessedMarch 20, 2024. https://mezhdunami.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DeKeyser, R., & Prieto Botana, G.
    (Eds.) (2019) Doing SLA research with implications for the classroom. Reconciling methodological demands and pedagogical applicability. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.52 [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N.
    (2006) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/aml015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R., & Shintani, N.
    (2014) Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fernández, C.
    (2008) Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263108080467
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080467 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gettys, S.
    (1998, December27–30). A model for applying lexical approach in teaching Russian grammar [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages (AATSEEL), San Francisco, CA, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gor, K.
    (2017) The mental lexicon of L2 Learners of Russian: Phonology and morphology in lexical storage and access. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, (), –. 10.1353/jsl.2017.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2017.0011 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gor, K., & Chernigovskaya, T. V.
    (2005) Formal instruction and the acquisition of verbal morphology. InA. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197372.1.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372.1.131 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., & Cook, S.
    (2017) Processing of native and nonnative inflected words: Beyond affix stripping. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.014 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2019) A case for agreement. Processing of case inflection by early and late learners. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, , –. 10.1075/lab.16017.gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16017.gor [Google Scholar]
  20. Henry, N., Culman, H., & VanPatten, B.
    (2009) More on the effects of explicit information in instructed SLA: A partial replication and a response to Fernández (2008). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263109990027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990027 [Google Scholar]
  21. Henry, N., Jackson, C. N., & Dimidio, J.
    (2017) The role of prosody and explicit instruction in processing instruction. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12397
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12397 [Google Scholar]
  22. I love Russian (2nd edition)
    I love Russian (2nd edition) (2017) Liden & Denz.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Janssen, B. E.
    (2016) The acquisition of gender and case in Polish and Russian: A study of monolingual and bilingual children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
  24. Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A.
    (2008) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203935927
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935927 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jessner, U.
    (2006) Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kallestinova, E.
    (2007) Aspects of word order in Russian. PhD dissertation. University of Iowa. 10.17077/etd.11qhthvg
    https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.11qhthvg
  27. Kasem, A.-H.
    (2005) The effect of focus on form in the written work of adult learners of Arabic. Languages and Linguistics, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B.
    (1998) The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263198004045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198004045 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kisselev, O.
    (2019) Word order patterns in the writing of heritage and second language learners of Russian. Russian Language Journal, , –. 10.70163/0036‑0252.1044
    https://doi.org/10.70163/0036-0252.1044 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kisselev, O., & Rubina, A.
    (2024) Mastering Russian case: Learning challenges, current textbook approaches, and new perspectives. Russian Language Journal, (), –. 10.70163/0036‑0252.1397
    https://doi.org/10.70163/0036-0252.1397 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kruschke, J. K., Kappenman, E. S., & Hetrick, W. P.
    (2005) Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and Cognition, (), .
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Langacker, R.
    (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, J. F., & Benati, A. G. with Aguilar-Sánchez, J. & McNulty, E. M.
    (2007) Comparing three models of delivering processing instruction on preterite/imperfect distinction and negative informal commands in Spanish. InJ. F. Lee & A. G. Benati (Eds.), Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and in virtual contexts: Research and practice (pp.–). Equinox. 10.3138/9781845535780‑006
    https://doi.org/10.3138/9781845535780-006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Leow, R. P.
    (2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315887074
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lucas, M.
    (2020) Cross-linguistic influence and plural marking: Enhancing error recognition and written accuracy among Japanese EFL learners through web-based awareness-raising. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2020.1737096
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1737096 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M.
    (2016) Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. MacWhinney, B.
    (2005) A unified model of language acquisition. InJ. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.–). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2008) A unified model. InP. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McManus, K.
    (2015) L1-L2 Differences in the Acquisition of Form-Meaning Pairings in a Second Language. Canadian Modern Language Review, (), –. 10.3138/cmlr.2070.51
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2070.51 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2019) Awareness of L1 form-meaning mappings can reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammatical learning. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2019.1620756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1620756 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2020) Examining the effectiveness of language-switching practice for reducing cross-language competition in L2 grammatical processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, –. 10.31219/osf.io/bv2yx
    https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bv2yx [Google Scholar]
  42. (2022) Crosslinguistic influence and second language learning. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (Ed.) (2024) Usage in second language acquisition. Critical reflections for theory and research. Routledge. 10.4324/9781032668475
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032668475 [Google Scholar]
  44. McManus, K., & Marsden, E.
    (2017) L1 explicit instruction can improve L2 online and offline performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S027226311600022X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311600022X [Google Scholar]
  45. (2019) Using explicit instruction about L1 to reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammar learning: Evidence from oral production in l2 French. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12567
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12567 [Google Scholar]
  46. Meir, N., Avramenko, M., & Verkhovtceva, T.
    (2021) Israeli Russian: Case morphology in a bilingual context. Russian Journal of Linguistics, (), –. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2021‑25‑4‑886‑907
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-4-886-907 [Google Scholar]
  47. Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nummikoski, M.
    (2011) Troika: A communicative approach to Russian language, life, and culture (2nd edition). Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Polinsky, M.
    (2007a) Acquisition of Russian: Uninterrupted and incomplete scenarios. Glossos, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2007b) Reaching the end point and stopping midway: Different scenarios in the acquisition of Russian. Russian Linguistics, , –. 10.1007/s11185‑007‑9011‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-007-9011-2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rubinstein, G.
    (1995) On case errors made in oral speech by American learners of Russian. The Slavic and East European Journal, , –. 10.2307/308241
    https://doi.org/10.2307/308241 [Google Scholar]
  52. Saito, M., & Wu, X.
    (2014) Communicative focus on form and second language suprasegmental learning: Teaching Cantonese learners to perceive Mandarin tones. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263114000114
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000114 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sato, M., & Loewen, S.
    (2019) Do teachers care about research? The research — pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/ccy048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy048 [Google Scholar]
  54. Shin, J. Y., Dixon, l. Q., & Choi, Y.
    (2020) An updated review on use of L1 in foreign language classrooms. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/01434632.2019.1684928
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1684928 [Google Scholar]
  55. Shintani, N.
    (2015) The incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for young beginner learners. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.166
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.166 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sirotinina, O. B.
    (1965) Porjadok slov v russkom jazyke. [‘Word order in Russian’]. Saratov State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & White, J.
    (2005) The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focused instruction. InA. Housen (Ed.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp.–). DeGruyter. 10.1515/9783110197372.2.199
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372.2.199 [Google Scholar]
  58. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
    (2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Tyler, A.
    (2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203876039
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876039 [Google Scholar]
  60. Tyler, A., & Ortega, L.
    (2018) Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. InA. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno & H. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.49.01tyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.01tyl [Google Scholar]
  61. VanPatten, B.
    (Ed.) (2005) Processing instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. VanPatten, B., Collopy, E., & Qualin, A.
    (2012) Explicit information and processing instruction with nominative and accusative case in Russian as a second language: Just how important is explanation?The Slavic and East European Journal, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wong, W.
    (2004) Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.24010.kis
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.24010.kis
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error