1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pedagogical Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Prosody for teaching French as a foreign language
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Prosody, with its core elements the melody and timing of speech, is one of the aspects learners often struggle with when learning foreign languages in its spoken form. The teaching of prosody is however still largely overlooked — even though prosodic knowledge would help to improve learners’ comprehensibility. The present contribution concentrates on prosody teaching of French as a foreign language in Germany. We present the results of semi-structured interviews conducted with five experienced teachers of different regions in Germany. Our aim is to explore the needs among the foreign-language teachers. The teachers reported a rather marginal treatment of prosody, focusing instead on lexis and morpho-syntax in their teaching practice. Concurrently, all of them considered the relevance of prosodic topics as medium to high. We discuss several reasons for this discrepancy including issues of university education as well as quality of textbooks. The teachers also expressed the need to receive input on how to apply prosodic content in the classroom. This includes (a) comprehensible and didactically reduced teaching materials, (b) criteria for grading prosodic skills, (c) authentic audio material, and (d) in-service training. Finally, we present several ideas on how to make linguistic findings on prosody accessible for the foreign-language classroom.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.24015.fel
2025-04-22
2025-05-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pl.24015.fel
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abel, C.
    (2018) Ausspracheschulung. Erhebung der Kompetenzen, Überzeugungen und Praktiken von Französischlehrkräften. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Akker, E., & Cutler, A.
    (2003) Prosodic cues to semantic structure in native and nonnative listening. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728903001056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001056 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Koehler, K.
    (1988) The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1988.tb00167.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00167.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Arvaniti, A.
    (2022) The autosegmental-metrical model of intonational phonology. InJ. Barnes & S. Shattuck-Hufnagel (Eds.), Prosodic theory and practice (pp.–). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10413.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10413.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baills, F., Alazard-Guiu, C., & Prieto, P.
    (2022) Embodied prosodic training helps improve accentedness and suprasegmental accuracy. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amac010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac010 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, A. A.
    (2011) Pronunciation pedagogy: Second language teacher cognition and practice. Dissertation, Georgia State University. 10.57709/1949560
     https://doi.org/10.57709/1949560
  7. Ballier, N., Méli, A., Arnold, T., & Henserson, A.
    (2022) Revisiting paratone prosodic features with the EIIDA corpus. Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody 2022, –. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022‑92
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-92 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beckman, M. E., & Hirschberg, J.
    (1994) The ToBI annotation conventions. Ohio State University. www.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/files/conv.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Benazzo, S., Dimroth, C., & Santiago, F.
    (2021) Additive linking in L2 French discourse by German learners. Languages, , (). 10.3390/languages6010020
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6010020 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, J. D.
    (2009) Foreign and second language needs analysis. InM. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp.–). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch16
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch16 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bürgel, C., & Siepmann, D.
    (2025) Digitalisierung als Wunderwaffe. FAZ, Januray 02, 2025. https://zeitung.faz.net/faz/politik/2025-01-02/83ec617e38be4952991af84b5d3e55a5/?GEPC=s1
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cantone, K.
    (2020) Immigrant minority language maintenance in Europe. International Multilingual Research Journal, (), –. 10.1080/19313152.2020.1715541
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2020.1715541 [Google Scholar]
  13. CEFR
    CEFR (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. RetrievedOctober 22, 2024, fromwww.coe.int/lang-cefr
     [Google Scholar]
  14. CEFR
    CEFR (2020) Common European framework of reference for languages. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. RetrievedOctober 22, 2024, fromwww.coe.int/lang-cefr
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Christophe, A., Gout, A., Peperkamp, S., & Morgan, J.
    (2003) Discovering words in the continuous speech stream: The role of prosody. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(03)00040‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00040-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Christophe, A., Peperkamp, S., Pallier, C., Block, E., & Mehler, J.
    (2004) Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chun, D. M.
    (1988) The neglected role of intonation in communicative competence and proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1988.tb04192.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04192.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Chun, D., & Levis, J. M.
    (2020) Prosody in L2 teaching: Methodologies and effectiveness. InC. Gussenhoven & A. Chen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832232.013.41
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832232.013.41 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cutler, A.
    (1982) Prosody and sentence perception in English. InJ. Mehler, E. C. Walker, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Perspectives on mental representation: Experimental and theoretical studies of cognitive processes and capacities (pp.–). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum. https://www.mpi.nl/publications/item_69892
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cutler, A., & Norris, D.
    (1988) The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, (), –. 10.1037/0096‑1523.14.1.113
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113 [Google Scholar]
  21. Delais-Roussarie, E., Post, B., Avanzi, M., C. Buthke, Di Cristo, A., Feldhausen, I., Jun, S.-A., Martin, P., Meisenburg, T., Rialland, A., Sichel-Bazin, R., & Yoo, H.
    (2015) Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French. InS. Frota & P. Prieto (Eds.), Intonation in Romance (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, J. M.
    (2005) Second language accent and pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quartely, (), –. 10.2307/3588486
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486 [Google Scholar]
  23. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastian, N., & Mehler, J.
    (1997) A destressing ‘deafness’ in French?Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1996.2500
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2500 [Google Scholar]
  25. Elvira-García, W.
    (2016) La entonación en el aula de ELE. InN. Baulenas & B. Montmany (Eds.), Dossier del XXV encuentro práctico de profesores de ELE (pp.–). Barcelona: Difusión Publishing Company and International House.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Feldhausen, I.
    (2021) Sprachatlanten in Forschung und Lehre — Zum Gewinn interaktiver Intonationsatlanten für Sprachwissenschaft und fremdsprachlichen (Spanisch- und Französisch-)Unterricht. Zeitschrift für Romanische Sprachen und ihre Didaktik, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. (2022) Pedagogical linguistics in Romance. Isogloss - Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, (), –. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.231
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.231 [Google Scholar]
  28. Feldhausen, I., & Garcia Sánchez, I.
    (2023) La enseñanza de la estructura informativa en el español como lengua de herencia. InMarta Garcia (Ed.), El español como lengua de herencia (pp.–). Peter Lang Publishing. 10.3726/b20727
     https://doi.org/10.3726/b20727 [Google Scholar]
  29. Feldhausen, I., Elsig, M., Krieger, S., Kupisch, T., & Pešková, A.
    (forthcoming). Grammar. InE. Pustka & D. Reimann Eds. Manual of pedagogical linguistics [Manuals of Romance linguistics]. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A.
    (1995) Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, (), –. 10.1016/0167‑6393(94)00044‑B
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(94)00044-B [Google Scholar]
  31. Foote, J. A., Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., & Soler, U. F.
    (2016) Pronunciation teaching practices in communicative second language classes. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2013.784345
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.784345 [Google Scholar]
  32. Frota, S., & Prieto, P.
    (Eds.) (2015) Intonation in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gabriel, C., & Thiele, S.
    (2017) Learning and teaching of foreign language pronunciation in multilingual settings. InC. Schlaak & S. Thiele (Eds.), Migration, Mehrsprachigkeit und Inklusion (pp.–). Stuttgart: ibidem.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gabriel, C., Grünke, J., & Schlaak, C.
    (2022) Unterstützt die Herkunftssprache Türkisch den Erwerb der französischen Prosodie? Eine Pilotstudie zur Förderung mit digitalen Aussprachetools. InF. Schöpp & A. Willems (Eds.), Unterricht der romanischen Sprachen und Inklusion: Rekonstruktion oder Erneuerung? (pp.–). Stuttgart: ibidem.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gilbert, J. B.
    (2008) Teaching pronunciation. Using the prosody pyramid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Gluhareva, D., & Prieto, P.
    (2017) Training with rhythmic beat gestures favors L2 pronunciation in discourse- demanding situations. Language Teaching Research(), –. 10.1177/1362168816651463
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816651463 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gordon, J., & Darcy, I.
    (2016) The development of comprehensible speech in L2 learners: A classroom study on the effects of short-term pronunciation instruction. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, –. 10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor [Google Scholar]
  38. Gordon, J., Darcy, I., & Ewert, D.
    (2013) Pronunciation teaching and learning: Effects of explicit phonetic instruction in the L2 classroom. InJ. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp.–). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Grice, M., Baumann, S., & Benzmüller, R.
    (2005) German intonation in autosegmental-metrical phonology. InS.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  40. Herment, S., Tortel, A., Bigi, B., Hirst, D., & Loukina, A.
    (2014) AixOx, A multi-layered learners’ corpus: Automatic annotation. InA. Díaz-Negrillo & F. Javier (Eds.), Specialisation and variation in language corpora (pp.–). Bern: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Horwitz, E. K., & Young, D. J.
    (1991) Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hudson, R.
    (2020) Towards a pedagogical linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics, , –. 10.1075/pl.19011.hud
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19011.hud [Google Scholar]
  43. Hyman, L. M.
    (1977) On the nature of linguistic stress. InL. M. Hyman (Ed.), Studies in stress and accent (pp.–). Los Angeles: USC Linguistics Department.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. (2006) Word-prosodic typology. Phonology, (), –. 10.1017/S0952675706000893
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000893 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2014) Do all languages have word accent?InH. van der Hulst (Ed.), Word stress: Theoretical and typological issues (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139600408.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600408.004 [Google Scholar]
  46. Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L.
    (2021) Enseñanza de la estructura informativa en ELE. Arco Libros.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Jun, S.-A.
    (2005) Prosodic typology. InS.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp.–). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0016
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0016 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2014) Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. InS.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic Typology II (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kamoun, C., & Ripaud, D.
    (2007) Phonétique essentielle du français. Paris: Didier.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Kennedy, S., Blanchet, J., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2014) Learner pronunciation, awareness, and instruction in French as a second language. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/flan.12066
     https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12066 [Google Scholar]
  51. Krifka, M., Błaszczak, J., Leßmöllmann, A., Meinunger, A., Stiebels, B., Tracy, R., & Truckenbrodt, H.
    (Eds.) (2014) Das mehrsprachige Klassenzimmer. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑34315‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34315-5 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S.
    (2022) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung: Grundlagentexte Methoden. Weinheim Basel: Beltz Juventa.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ladd, D. R.
    (2008) Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511808814
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814 [Google Scholar]
  54. Larrouy-Maestri, P., Poeppel, D., & Pell, M. D.
    (2024) The sound of emotional prosody: Nearly 3 decades of research and future directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10.1177/17456916231217722
     https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231217722 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lehiste, Ilse
    (1970) Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Levis, J. M.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, , –. 10.2307/3588485
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
  57. Levis, J. M., Derwing, T. M., & Sonsaat-Hegelheimer, S.
    (Eds.) (2022) Second language pronunciation: Bridging the gap between research and teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781394259663
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394259663 [Google Scholar]
  58. Long, M. H.
    (2005) Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. InM. H. Long (Ed.), Second Language Needs Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667299.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299.002 [Google Scholar]
  59. MacDonald, S.
    (2002) Pronunciation — views and practices of reluctant teachers. Prospect, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. MacIntyre, P., & Gregersen, T.
    (2012) Affect: The role of language anxiety and other emotions in language learning. InS. Mercer, S. Ryan & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning (pp.–). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9781137032829_8
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_8 [Google Scholar]
  61. McNerney, M., & Mendelsohn, D.
    (1993) Suprasegmentals in the pronunciation class: Setting priorities. InP. Avery & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Teaching American English pronunciation (pp.–). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Mennen, I.
    (2015) Beyond segments: Towards an L2 intonation learning theory. InE. Delais-Roussarie, M. Avanzi & S. Herment (Eds.), Prosody and language in contact (pp.–). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑45168‑7_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_9 [Google Scholar]
  63. Missaglia, F.
    (2007) Prosodic training for adult Italian learners of German. InJ. Trouvain & U. Gut (Eds.), Non-native prosody (pp.–). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198751.2.237
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751.2.237 [Google Scholar]
  64. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation(): –. 10.1075/jslp.1.1.01mun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.1.1.01mun [Google Scholar]
  65. Niebuhr, O., Alm, M. H., Schümchen, N., & Fischer, K.
    (2017) Comparing visualization techniques for learning second language prosody: First results. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.07nie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.07nie [Google Scholar]
  66. Pešková, A.
    (2023) L2 Spanish and Italian intonation: Accounting for the different patterns displayed by L1 Czech and German learners. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.15460/repohh/sub.2024200001
     https://doi.org/10.15460/repohh/sub.2024200001 [Google Scholar]
  67. Pešková, A., & Feldhausen, I.
    (forthcoming). Suprasegmentals. InE. Pustka & D. Reimann Eds. Manual of pedagogical linguistics [Manuals of Romance linguistics]. Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Prieto, P., Borràs-Comes, J., & Roseano, P.
    (2010–2014) Interactive atlas of Romance intonation. prosodia.upf.edu/iari/
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Prieto, P., & Cabré, T.
    (2007–2012) Atles interactiu de l’entonació del català. prosodia.upf.edu/atlesentonacio/
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Prieto, P., & Roseano, P.
    (2009–2013) Atlas interactivo de la entonación del español. prosodia.upf.edu/atlasentonacion/
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Pronina, M., Feldhausen, I., & Prieto, P.
    (forthcoming). Expressivity and prosody. InD. Gutzmann & K. Turgay Eds. The Oxford handbook of expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Racine, I., Detey, S., Zay, F., Kawaguchi, Y., Kamber, A., & Skupien Dekens, C.
    (2012) Des atouts d’un corpus multitâches pour l’étude de la phonologie en L2. InA. Kamber & C. Skupien Dekens (Eds.), Recherches récentes en FLE (pp.–). Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Radatz, H.-I.
    (2016) Von der Zusammenarbeit zwischen Linguistik und Fachdidaktik: Plädoyer für eine phänomenologische Linguistik mit didaktischem Aha-Effekt. InF. Robles i Sabater, D. Reimann & R. Sánchez Prieto (Eds.), Sprachdidaktik Spanisch-Deutsch (pp.–). Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Reimann, D., Cantone, K., Venus, T., Haller, P., & Di Venanzio, L.
    (2018) Angehende Fremdsprachenlehrkräfte und sprachlich heterogene Lerngruppen. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Reinhardt, J.
    (2019) Regularity and Variation in French Direct Interrogatives. Dissertation, University of Konstanz. Konstanz: KOPS.
  76. Rothstein, B.
    (2010) Sprachintegrativer Grammatikunterricht. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Saito, Y., & Saito, K.
    (2017) Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168816643111
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816643111 [Google Scholar]
  78. Santiago, F., & Delais-Roussarie, E.
    (2015) The acquisition of question intonation by Mexican Spanish learners of French. InE. Delais-Roussarie, M. Avanzi & S. Herment (Eds.), Prosody and language in contact (pp.–). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑45168‑7_12
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_12 [Google Scholar]
  79. Sheehan, M., Havinga, A., Kasstan, J., Stollhans, S., Corr, A., & Gillman, P.
    (2024) Teacher perspectives on the introduction of linguistics in the languages classroom. Evidence from a co-creation project on French, German and Spanish. British Educational Research Journal, , -. 10.1002/berj.4009
     https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4009 [Google Scholar]
  80. Siepmann, D., & Bürgel, C.
    (2016) Französisch mangelhaft — trotz Kompetenzorientierung. FAZ, p., December 29.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Sonsaat-Hegelheimer, S., & Levis, J.
    (2025) Is intonation learnable in the classroom? Evidence from Turkish learners of English. Language Teaching Research (online first, Feb. 2025). 10.1177/13621688241312502
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241312502 [Google Scholar]
  82. Tremblay, A., Broersma, M., & Coughlin, C. E.
    (2017) The functional weight of a prosodic cue in the native language predicts the learning of speech segmentation in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S136672891700030X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891700030X [Google Scholar]
  83. Trotzke, A., & Rankin, T.
    (2020) Editorial: Introduction to Pedagogical Linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/pl.19015.tro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.19015.tro [Google Scholar]
  84. Trouvain, J.
    (2021) Phonetische Lernerkorpora und ihr Potenzial im FLE-Unterricht. InE. Pustka (Ed.), La prononciation du français langue étrangère (pp.–). Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Trouvain, J., & Braun, B.
    (2020) Sentence prosody in a second language. InC. Gussenhoven & A. Chen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832232.013.40
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832232.013.40 [Google Scholar]
  86. Trouvain, J., & Gut, U.
    (Eds.) (2007) Non-native prosody: Phonetic description and teaching practice. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110198751
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198751 [Google Scholar]
  87. Turco, G., & Delais-Roussarie, E.
    (2014) A crosslinguistic and acquisitional perspective on intonational rises in French. Proceedings of Interspeech, –. Singapore. 10.21437/Interspeech.2014‑547
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2014-547 [Google Scholar]
  88. van Rijt, J., & Coppen, P.-A.
    (2017) Bridging the gap between linguistic theory and L1 grammar education: Experts’ views on essential linguistic concepts. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2017.1410552
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1410552 [Google Scholar]
  89. Zahner-Ritter, K., Elsässer, N., Feldhausen, I., & Trouvain, J.
    (2024) Prosodic marking of contrastive focus in French learners of German. Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody 2024, –. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2024‑49
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2024-49 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.24015.fel
Loading
Prosody for teaching French as a foreign language
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.24015.fel
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.24015.fel
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.24015.fel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: German ; Needs analysis ; L2 Prosody ; Teaching ; French ; Interviews

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error