1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pedagogical Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of From spatial to abstract
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This contribution focuses on how abstract relations are expressed using the German preposition in the pattern NP1 + + NP2 (e.g. ) and compares these expressions with their equivalents in English, Polish and Ukrainian. The qualitative analysis of the dictionary and corpus data identified 71 abstract nouns governing the preposition and their cross-linguistic equivalents, which revealed both convergence and divergence in the metaphorical extension of spatial prepositions to abstract domains. About 22% of the data revealed common patterns across the four languages in semantic domains such as aggression, cognition/communication, control and shopping behaviour. These shared expressions imply a shared reliance on common image schemas.

However, significant variability emerges in prepositional usage, with Polish and Ukrainian often omitting prepositions in favor of genitive case marking, which reflects alternative morphosyntactic strategies. The findings support Langacker’s (1984, 2008) view that meaning is conceptualization shaped by linguistic convention.

By highlighting cross-linguistic similarities and differences in prepositional usage, the study offers theoretical implications for language pedagogy, particularly in teaching spatial and abstract prepositional meanings across languages.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25005.fok
2025-11-14
2025-12-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pl.25005.fok
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/pl.25005.fok/pl.25005.fok.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25005.fok&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Almuoseb, A.
    (2016) A lexical-semantic analysis of the English prepositions at, on, and in and their conceptual mapping onto Arabic. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, (), –. 10.1515/gcla‑2016‑0014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2016-0014 [Google Scholar]
  2. Boieblan, M.
    (2022) Enhancing English spatial prepositions acquisition among Spanish learners of English as L2 through an embodied approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2021‑0151
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0151 [Google Scholar]
  3. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (1999) The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cienki, A. J.
    (1989) Spatial cognition and the semantics of prepositions in English, Polish, and Russian. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang. 10.3726/b12805
     https://doi.org/10.3726/b12805 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cho, K.
    (2010) Fostering the acquisition of English prepositions by Japanese learners with networks and prototypes. In: De Knop, Sabine / Boers, Frank/ De Rycker, Antoon (eds.): Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, –. 10.1515/9783110245837.257
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245837.257 [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, W.
    (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dąbrowska, E.
    (2012) Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab [Google Scholar]
  8. Deane, P. D.
    (1993) At, by, to, and past: An essay in multimodal image theory. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, , –. 10.3765/bls.v19i1.1500
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v19i1.1500 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dixon, R. M. W.
    (2021) English Prepositions: Their Meanings and Uses. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Faulhaber, S.
    (2011) Verb valency patterns: A challenge for semantics-based accounts. Berlin, Germany, & New York, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110240788
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240788 [Google Scholar]
  11. Golonka, J.
    (2002) Ihre Meinung dazu, oder: Wie denken Sie darüber? Zur Vererbung verbaler Valenzmerkmale in Nominalphrasen des Deutschen und des Polnischen. Institut für Deutsche Sprache. Mannheim
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Haspelmath, M.
    (2010) Framework-free grammatical theory. Theoretical Linguistics, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Helbig, G., & Buscha, J.
    (1996) Deutsche Grammatik. Langenscheidt.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lam, Y.
    (2018) The Acquisition of Prepositional Meanings in L2 Spanish. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, (), –. 10.7202/1050808ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/1050808ar [Google Scholar]
  18. Lindstromberg, S.
    (2010) English Prepositions Explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/z.157
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.157 [Google Scholar]
  19. Langacker, R. W.
    (1984) Active zones. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, , –. 10.3765/bls.v10i0.3175
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v10i0.3175 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive application (Vol. 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2010) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0017 [Google Scholar]
  24. Littlemore, J., & Low, G.
    (2006) Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Mandler, J. M.
    (2004) The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mkhitaryan, Y.
    (2019) A cross-linguistic study of some space prepositions in English and their counterparts in Armenian. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, (), –. https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt/article/view/496
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Nacey, S., & Graedler, A.-L.
    (2015) Prepositions in Norwegian English learners’ writing: Patterns and challenges. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Niemeier, S.
    (2017) Task-based grammar teaching of English. Where cognitive grammar and task-based language teaching meet. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Oczko, A.
    (2023) Linguistic conceptualization of spatial prepositions: Romanian ’în’ and Polish ’w’ — A comparative approach. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai. Philologia, , –. 10.24193/subbphilo.2023.1.05
     https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2023.1.05 [Google Scholar]
  30. Orlenko, O.
    (2014) Conceptualization of spatial relations: Over vs над, через. Linguistic Studies, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Pan, M. X., & Hu, G.
    (2022) Effectiveness of a CL-informed approach to English preposition acquisition by young Chinese learners. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, (), –. 10.1075/cogls.20017.pan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.20017.pan [Google Scholar]
  32. Sáez, C.
    (2022) Cross-linguistic interference in preposition use among Spanish learners of English. Applied Linguistics Review.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Schmitz, R.
    (1964) Formale Ausdrücke und ihre Funktionen. München: Max Hueber Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Seilhamer, M.
    (2011) The prepositions verbs associate with: a corpus-based investigation of collocation in prepositional verbs. NUCB Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Talmy, L.
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Tyler, A.
    (2012) Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. 10.4324/9780203876039
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876039 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tyler, A., & Evans, V.
    (2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486517
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517 [Google Scholar]
  39. Vandeloise, C.
    (1985) Au-delà des Descriptions Géométriques et Logiques de l’Espace: Une Description Fonctionnelle. Lingvisticae Investigationes, –. 10.1075/li.9.1.07van
     https://doi.org/10.1075/li.9.1.07van [Google Scholar]
  40. (2017) Spatial prepositions: A cognitive linguistic perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Zeschel, A.
    (2019) Zum Bedeutungsgehalt von Präpositionalobjekten: Eine musterbasierte Analyse verbaler Argumentstrukturen mit der Präposition vor. InD. Czicza, V. Dekalo, & G. Diewald (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik VI: Varianz in der konstruktionalen Schematizität (pp.–). Tübingen, Germany: Stauffenburg.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmitz, J.
    (1964) Der Gebrauch der deutschen Präpositionen. Hueber.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Bańko, Mirosław
    (2000) Inny słownik języka polskiego. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press. German-English dictionary. Retrieved [November-December 2023], fromhttps://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/german-english/
  45. Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (DWDS)
    Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (DWDS). Retrieved [November-December 2023], fromhttps://www.dwds.de/d/woerterbuecher
  46. Langenscheidt
    Langenscheidt (2019) Langenscheidt Großwörterbuch Deutsch als Fremdsprache (3rd ed.) Langenscheidt.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Langenscheidt. Deutsch-Englisch Wörterbuch
    Langenscheidt. Deutsch-Englisch Wörterbuch. Retrieved [November-December 2023], fromhttps://de.langenscheidt.com/deutsch-englisch/
  48. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary
    Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Retrieved [November-December 2023], fromhttps://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com
  49. PONS. Deutsch-Polnisch Übersetzung
    PONS. Deutsch-Polnisch Übersetzung. Retrieved [November-December 2023], fromhttps://de.pons.com/%C3%BCbersetzung/deutsch-polnisch
  50. Куньч, З.
    (2005) Універсальний словник української мови. Навчальна книга — Богдан.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. British National Corpus (BNC)
    British National Corpus (BNC). https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/
  52. Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)
    Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
  53. Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (DWDS)
    Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (DWDS). https://www.dwds.de/d/korpora
  54. MOVA.info
    MOVA.info. www.mova.info/corpus.aspx?l1=209
  55. Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego (NKJP)
    Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego (NKJP). nkjp.pl/
  56. Sketch Engine
    Sketch Engine. www.sketchengine.eu
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25005.fok
Loading
From spatial to abstract
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.25005.fok
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25005.fok
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25005.fok
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: governed prepositions ; spatial and abstract relations ; cognitive linguistics ; cross-linguistic variation ; conceptual metaphor ; image schemas

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error