1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Pedagogical Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Pedagogical construction grammar — the fashion of the day?
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This paper provides a short introduction to Construction Grammar (CxG). It first very briefly outlines how linguistic theory has developed over time. Then it describes similarities and differences between the usage-based approach of CxG and Chomsky’s generative approach to the study of language. After that different types of constructions are described in order to explain the concept of constructions as ‘conventionalized form-meaning pairings’. Next, eight different reasons are discussed for why CxG may last and not share the fate of other linguistic models that only ‘survived’ for a more or less short period of time. In this context, important characteristics of different approaches to the description and analysis of language are described that can all be subsumed under the umbrella term ‘Construction Grammar’. Finally. this paper explains why CxG provides an ideal framework for foreign language teaching and learning and it provides a few concrete examples showing how a constructionist approach to language pedagogy could be used in the classroom to deal with different lexicogrammatical phenomena.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25020.her
2025-12-05
2026-02-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/pl.25020.her
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/pl.25020.her/pl.25020.her.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25020.her&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Altenberg, B.
    (1998) On the phraseology of Spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. InA. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications (pp.–). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L. & Gildea, S.
    (2015) Diachronic Construction Grammar.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.18
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
  3. Behrens, H.
    (2011) Grammatik und Lexikon im Spracherwerb: Konstruktionsprozesse. InS. Engelberg, A. Holler & K. Proost (Eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik (pp.–). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110262339.375
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110262339.375 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boas, H. C.
    (2022) From Construction Grammar(s) to Pedagogical Construction Grammar. InH. C. Boas (Ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar. Learning and Teaching (with) Constructions (pp.–). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110746723‑001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723-001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, J.
    (2010) Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cadierno, T. & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (Eds.) (2015) Usage-Based Perspectives on Second-Language Learning.Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110378528
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, N.
    (1973) The utility of linguistic theory to the language teacher. InJ. P. B. Allen & S. Pit Corder (Eds.), The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics. Volume 1. Readings for Applied Linguistics (pp.–). London: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge/Mass: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (1986) Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Croft, W.
    (2022) Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World's Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316145289
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145289 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dąbrowska, E.
    (2014) ‘Words that go together’: Measuring individual differences in native speakers’ knowledge of collocations. Mental Lexicon, , –. 10.1075/ml.9.3.02dab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.3.02dab [Google Scholar]
  12. De Knop, S. & Gilquin, G.
    (2016) Applied Construction Grammar. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458268
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, N. C.
    (2003) Constructions, chunking & connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. InC. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp.–). Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  14. Erfurt, J. & De Knop, S.
    (Eds.) (2019) Konstruktionsgrammatik und Mehrsprachigkeit. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
    (1996) Blending as a central process of grammar. InA. E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp.–). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. (2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Faulhaber, S., Herbst, T. & Uhrig, P.
    (2013) Funktionswortklassen im Englischen: linguistische und lexikografische Perspektiven. InE. Breindl & A. Klosa (Eds.), Funktionswörter|buch|forschung: Zur lexikographischen Darstellung von Partikeln, Konnektoren, Präpositionen und anderen Funktionswörtern (pp.–). Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1968) The case for case. InE. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp.–). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P. & O’Connor, M. C.
    (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case oflet alone. Language, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gisborne, N.
    (2008) Dependencies are constructions. A case study in predicative complementation. InG. Trousdale & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional Approaches to English Grammar (pp.–). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199178.3.219
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199178.3.219 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2019) Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Goschler, J. & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2024) Constructional Transfer in L2 Learning: The Role of Entrenchment. Zeitschrift Für Anglistik Und Amerikanistik, (), –. 10.1515/zaa‑2024‑2028
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2024-2028 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gries, S. Th. & Wulff, S.
    (2005) Do foreign learners have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1075/arcl.3.10gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.10gri [Google Scholar]
  25. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hausmann, F. J.
    (1985) Kollokationen im deutschen Wörterbuch: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des lexikographischen Beispiels. InH. Bergenholtz & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Lexikographie und Grammatik (pp.–). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111635637‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111635637-004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Herbst, T.
    (2014) Idiosyncrasies and generalizations: Argument structure, semantic roles and the valency realization principle. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, , –. 10.1515/gcla‑2014‑0015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2014-0015 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2016) Foreign language learning is construction learning: Principles of Pedagogical Construction Grammar. InS. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar (pp.–). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110458268‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110458268-003 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2020) Constructions, generalizations, and the unpredictability of language. Constructions and Frames(), –. [reprinted inT. Timponi Torrent, E. Edison da Silva Matos & N. Sathler Sigiliano (Eds.) (2022) Construction Grammar across Borders (–). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/cf.00035.her
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00035.her [Google Scholar]
  30. Herbst, T. & Hoffmann, T.
    (2024) A Construction Grammar of the English Language. CASA — A Constructionist Approach to Syntactic Analysis.Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/clip.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clip.5 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hilpert, M.
    (2019) Construction Grammar and its Application to English (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474433624
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474433624 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2020) Constructional Approaches. InB. Aarts, J. Bowie & G. Popova (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar (pp.–). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.13
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.13 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hoffmann, T.
    (2017) Multimodal constructs — multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard, (). 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑0042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0042 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2018) Creativity and construction grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik,(), –. 10.1515/zaa‑2018‑0024
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0024 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2022a) Constructionist approaches to creativity. Yearbook of the German Linguistics Association, , –. 10.1515/gcla‑2022‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2022-0012 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2022b) Construction Grammar: The Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139004213
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139004213 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G
    (Eds.) (2013) The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hudson, R.
    (2008) Word Grammar and Construction Grammar. InG. Trousdale & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional Approaches to English Grammar (pp.–). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199178.3.257
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199178.3.257 [Google Scholar]
  39. Langacker, R. W.
    (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Leino, J.
    (2013) Information structure. InT. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Schmid, H. -J.
    (2020) The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Siepmann, D.
    (2005) Collocation, colligation and encoding dictionaries. Part I: Lexicological aspects. International Journal of Lexicography, (), –. 10.1093/ijl/eci042
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/eci042 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2006) Collocation, colligation and encoding dictionaries. Part II: Lexicographical aspects. International Journal of Lexicography, (), –. 10.1093/ijl/eci051
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/eci051 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2007) Wortschatz und Grammatik: Zusammenbringen, was zusammengehört. Beiträge zur Fremdsprachenvermittlung, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sinclair, J. McH.
    (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (2008) The phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the phrase. InS. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp.–). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.33sin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.33sin [Google Scholar]
  47. Sommerer, L. & Smirnova, E.
    (Eds.) (2020) Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cal.27
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.27
  48. Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2011) Keine Grammatik ohne Konstruktionen: Ein logisch-ökonomisches Argument für die Konstruktionsgrammatik. InS. Engelberg, A. Holler & K. Proost (Eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik (pp.–). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110262339.181
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110262339.181 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a Language. Cambridge/MA/London: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Uhrig, P.
    (2020) Multimodal research in linguistics. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, (), –. 10.1515/zaa‑2020‑2019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2020-2019 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2021) Large-Scale Multimodal Corpus Linguistics — The Big Data Turn. Habilitationsschrift Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (unpublished ms.).
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Uhrig, P., Faulhaber, S., Dąbrowska, E. & Herbst, T.
    (2022) L2-words that go together — more on collocation and learner language. InH. C. Boas (Ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar (pp.–). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110746723‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746723-004 [Google Scholar]
  53. Welke, K.
    (2019) Konstruktionsgrammatik des Deutschen: Ein sprachgebrauchsbezogener Ansatz. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110614077
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110614077 [Google Scholar]
  54. CASA|Con.
    CASA|Con.The CASA-ConstruCtiCon of the English Language. Thomas Herbst, Thomas Hoffmann, Peter Uhrig & Armine Garibyan. www.constructicon.de
     [Google Scholar]
  55. FrameNet
    FrameNet. https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu
  56. VALBU. Schumacher, H., Kubczak, J., Schmidt, R. & de Ruiter, V.
    (2004) VALBU –Valenzwörterbuch deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. VDE Herbst, T., Heath, D., Roe, I. F. & Götz, D.
    (2004) A Valency Dictionary of English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. BNC British National Corpus
    BNC British National Corpus. Distributed byOxford University Computing Service on behalf of the BNC Consortium.
  59. TV TV corpus
    TV TV corpus (over 325 million words) https://www.english-corpora.org
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25020.her
Loading
Pedagogical construction grammar — the fashion of the day?
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.25020.her
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25020.her
/content/journals/10.1075/pl.25020.her
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: constructions ; grammar ; Pedagogical Construction Grammar ; lexis ; linguistic theory ; constructicon

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error