Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


This study examines the effects of utterance form and appropriateness on how children report conversations. Children between 7 and 9 years were asked to narrate filmed dialogues that contained two types of target utterances: (a) declaratives, interrogatives, or imperatives that were used appropriately as directives; (b) declaratives and interrogatives that were inappropriate from the point of view of information exchange, i.e., that should not have been used by the interlocutors as means of giving or requesting information, given background knowledge conditions. When reporting the appropriate directive targets, the 7/8-year-olds frequently transformed declaratives into more explicit imperatives, while the 9-year-olds' reports did not vary systematically with directive types. With respect to the inappropriate targets, omissions were more frequent at 7/8 years, transformations at 9 years. Transformations consisted most often of changing the mood or modality of inappropriate declaratives to make them appropriate. Some role reversals also occurred with inappropriate interrogatives. Finally, children of all ages omitted or transformed other events preceding or following the target utterances, so as to make the dialogues coherent more globally. These findings show children's sensitivity to the forms and functions of utterances in conversations, but they also suggest developmental changes in their reporting strategies. The younger children prefer functionally transparent reports and they omit utterances in cases of inadequate conditions of use. With increasing age, children use more complex strategies to adapt some inappropriate utterances locally by transforming systematically their form, their conditions of use, and/or their functional value.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aksu-Koç, A
    (1988) The acquisition of aspect and modality: The case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554353
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554353 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aller, W. K. , Aller, S. K. , Saad, L. M
    (1977) The acquisition of ‘ask’, ‘tell’, ‘promise’, and ‘show’ structures by arabic-speaking children. Paper presented atthe 6th Annual Linguistics Symposium, University of Wisconssin, Milwaukee.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen, E. S
    (1990) Learning to speak with style: a study of the sociolinguistic skills of children. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bamberg, M
    (1987) The acquisition of narratives: learning to use language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110854190
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854190 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bassano, D. , Champaud, C. , Hickmann, M
    (1988) Epistemic modality in French children’s reported speech. Paper presented atthe Third European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Budapest, Hungary.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, E
    (1976) Language and context: the acquisition of praqmatics. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bock, J. K. , Hornsby, M. E
    (1981) The development of directives: how children ask and tell. Journal of child language, 8, 151-163. doi: 10.1017/S030500090000307X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000307X [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowerman, M
    (1979) The acquisition of complex sentences. In P. Fletcher and M. Garman (Eds.), Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1983) How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar in the absence of feedback about what is not a sentence. Papers and Reports onChild Language Development, Stanford University, Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruner, J. S
    (1983) Child’s talk: learning to use language. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Champaud, C. , Bassano, D. , Hickmann, M
    . (in press) Modalité épistémique et discours rapporté chez l’enfant français. To appear in N. Dittmar and A. Reich (Eds.) The acquisition of modality. Berlin: Springer Verlaq.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, C
    (1969) The acquisition of syntax in children from five to ten. Cambridae, MA: M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1982) ‘Ask’ and ‘tell’ revisited: a reply to Warden. Journal of Child Language9, 667-78. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900004979
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004979 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark, E. V
    (1973) What’s in a word? on the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In: T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark, E.V
    (1980) Awareness of language: some evidence from what children say and do. In A. Sinclair , R.J. Jarvella , and W.J.W. Levelt (eds.), The child’s conception of language. Berlin, Heidelberq: Springer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ervin-Tripp, S
    (1976) Is Sybil there?: the structure of some American English directives. Language in Society5, 25-66. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500006849
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006849 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ervin-Tripp, S. , Mitchell-Kernan. C
    (Eds.) (1977) Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gombert, J. E
    (1990) Le développement métalinguistique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Harris, R. J
    (1975) Children’s comprehension of complex sentences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 420-433. doi: 10.1016/0022‑0965(75)90071‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(75)90071-5 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hickmann, M
    (1985) Metapragmatics in child language. In: E. Mertz and R. Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation: psychological and sociocultural perspectives. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (Ed.) (1987) Social and functional approaches to language and thought. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1991) Le discours rapporté: aspects métapragmatiques du langage et de son développement. Bulletin de Psychologie. Tome XLIII, No. 399, to appear.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. . (in press) The boundaries of reported speech in narrative discourse: some developmental aspects. To appear in: J. Lucy (Ed.) Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hickmann, M. , Bassano, D. , Champaud, C
    . (in preparation) Pragmatics and metapragmatics in the development of epistemic modality. To appear in C. de Lemos and C. Sinha (Eds) Discourse in the construction of language and self. Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Maratsos, M
    (1974) How preschool children understand missing complement sentences. Child Development, 45, 700-6. doi: 10.2307/1127836
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1127836 [Google Scholar]
  26. Karmiloff-Smith, A
    (1979) A functional approach to child language: a study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ochs, E. , Schieffelin, B. B
    (Eds.) (1989) Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tanz, C
    (1983) Asking children to ask: and experimental investigation of the pragmatics of relayed questions. Journal of Child Language10, 187-94. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900005225
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900005225 [Google Scholar]
  29. Tunmer, W.E. , Pratt, C. , Herriman, M.L
    (eds.) (1984) Metalinguistic awareness in children. Berlin, Springer Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑69113‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69113-3 [Google Scholar]
  30. Warden, D
    (1981) Children’s understanding of ‘ask’ and ‘tell’. Journal of Child Language8, 139-49. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900003068
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900003068 [Google Scholar]
  31. (1986) How to tell if children can ask. Journal of Child Language13, 421-428. doi: 10.1017/S030500090000814X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090000814X [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error