1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.1.1.04boi
1991-01-01
2023-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage
    (eds.) (1984) Transcript notation. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ix-xvi.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Catron, Louis E
    (1984) Writing, producing, and selling your play. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, Wallace L
    (1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 21-52. doi: 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha [Google Scholar]
  4. Crystal, David
    (1969) Prosodie systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Disraeli, Benjamin
    (1904) Sybil; or, The two nations. London: M. Walter Dunne.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Du Bois, John W
    (1985) Competing motivations. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Typological studies in language, vol. 6. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 343-65. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.17dub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.17dub [Google Scholar]
  7. (1986) The pragmatics of marginality: Illocutionless language in cartoon semiotics. Paper delivered to theConference on Sound Symbolism, UC Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. . (forthcoming) Typology of discourse information. MS, UC Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Du Bois, John W. and Stephan Schuetze-Coburn
    (forthcoming) Representing hierarchy: Constituent structure for discourse databases. In Edwards and Lampert (forthcoming).Talking data: Transcription and coding of spoken discourse,
  10. Du Bois, John W. , Stephan Schuetze-Coburn , Danae Paolino , and Susanna Cumming
    (forthcoming a) Discourse transcription. MS, UC Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (forthcoming b) Outline of discourse transcription. In Edwards and Lampert (forthcoming).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Edwards, Jane A
    (1989) Transcription and the new functionalism: A counterproposal to CHILDES’ CHAT conventions. Berkeley Cognitive Science Report No. 58, March 1989. Institute of Cognitive Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. . (forthcoming) Transcription in discourse. In William Bright (ed.) Oxford International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards, Jane A. and Martin D. Lampert
    (eds.) (forthcoming) Talking data: Transcription and coding of spoken discourse. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ehlich, Konrad
    (forthcoming) HIAT–A transcription system for discourse data. In Edwards and Lampert (forthcoming).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hillerman, Tony
    (1990) Coyote waits. Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. International Phonetic Association
    (1989) Report on the 1989 Kiel Convention. Journal of the International Phonetic Association19: 67-80. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300003868
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300003868 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ladefoged, Peter
    (1990) Some reflections on the new IPA. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics74: 61-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lodge, David
    (1984) Small World. New York: Warner.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ochs, Elinor
    (1979) Transcription as theory. In Elinor Ochs and Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds.), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 43-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Shakespeare, William
    (1623 [1928]) The tempest. A facsimile of the first folio text. London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wilde, Oscar
    (1982) The importance of being earnest. The annotated Oscar Wilde. New York: Clarkson Potter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams, Tennessee
    (1971) The glass menagerie. The theatre of Tennessee Williams, vol. 1. New York: New Directions.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Svartvik, Jan and Randolph Quirk
    (eds.) (1980) A corpus of English conversation. Lund Studies in English 56. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.1.1.04boi
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error