Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Atlas, Jay David
    (1981) Is not logical?In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposion on multi-valued logic. New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society Press, 124-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1989) Philosophy without ambiguity: A logico-linguistic essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brugman, Claudia
    (1986) Sisterhood is more powerful than you thought: Scopal adverb placement and illocutionary force. In: CLS 22, Part 2, 40-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burton-Roberts, Noel
    (1989) The limits to debate: A revised theory of semantic presupposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carston, Robyn
    (1985) A reanalysis of some ‘quantity imlicatures’. University College, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1988) Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In: Ruth Kempson (ed.)Mental representations: The interface between language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155-181.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Donnellan, K
    (1966) Reference and definite descriptions. Philosphical Review75, 281-304. doi: 10.2307/2183143
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2183143 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ducrot, Oswald
    (197) Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grice, H. Paul
    (1967) Logic and conversation. Unpublished. William James Lectures ad Harvard.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Horn, Laurence R
    (1985) Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language61:1, 121-174. doi: 10.2307/413423
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413423 [Google Scholar]
  11. (1989) A natural history of negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacobs, Joachim
    (to appear) Negation. In: A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.) Handbuch der Semantik.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Karttunen, L. & S. Peters
    (1979) Conventional implicature. In: C.-K. Oh & D. Dinneen (eds.)Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 1-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kempson, R
    (1986) Ambiguity and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. In: C. Travis (ed.)Meaning and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell, 77-103.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kratzer, Angelika
    (1977) What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy1, 337-355. doi: 10.1007/BF00353453
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353453 [Google Scholar]
  16. Récanati, François
    (1989) The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language4:4, 295-329. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.1989.tb00258.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00258.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Russell, Bertrand
    (1905) On denoting. Mind14, 479-493. doi: 10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479 [Google Scholar]
  18. Seuren, P.A.M
    (1976) Echo: Een studie in negatie. In: G. Koefoed & A. Evers (eds.)Lijnen van taaltheoretisch onderzoek. Groningen: Tjeenk Willink, 160-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1985) Discourse semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1988) Presupposition and negation. In: Journal of Semantics6: 3/4, 175-226. doi: 10.1093/jos/6.1.175
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/6.1.175 [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith, Neil
    (1989) The twitter machine: Reflections on language. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sweetser, Eve
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  24. Van der Sandt, Rob
    (to appear) Denial and negation. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wertheimer, R
    (1972) The significance of sense: Meaning, modality, and morality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error