Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


This article reports on the findings of a discourse analysis study whose purpose was to provide answers to the following research question:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bachman, L.
    (1988) Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10: 149–174. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007282
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007282 [Google Scholar]
  2. (1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachman, L. , & S. Savignon
    (1986) The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: A critique of the ACTFL oral interview. Modern Language Journal70.4: 380–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05294.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05294.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, G. , & G. Yule
    (1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, J.L.D.
    (1972) Foreign language testing: Theory and practice. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, J.L.D. , & R. Clifford
    (1988) The FSI/ILR/ACTFL proficiency scales and testing techniques: Development, current status, and needed research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10: 129–147. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007270
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007270 [Google Scholar]
  7. Educational Testing Service
    (1989) Oral proficiency testing manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hughes, A.
    (1989) Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson, M.
    (1997) What kind of speech event is the Oral Proficiency Interview: Problems of construct validity. UnpublishedGeorgetown University Dissertation.
  10. (1997) Interaction in the Oral Proficiency Interview. Paper presented atthe American Association for Applied Linguistics, Annual Conference, Orlando1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson, M. , & A. Tyler
    (1998) Re-analyzing the OPI: How much does it look like natural conversation?In R. Young & A.W. He (eds), Taking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sibil.14.04joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.04joh [Google Scholar]
  12. Tyler, A. , & M. Johnson
    (1998) Natural context?: Collaboration, conversational involvement and the OPI . Paper presented atthe American Association for Applied Linguistics, Seattle1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones, E.E. , & H.B. Gerard
    (1967) Foundation of social psychology. New York: Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lantolf, J. , & W. Frawley
    (1985) Oral-proficiency testing: A critical analysis. Modern Language Journal69.40: 337–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1985.tb04801.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1985.tb04801.x [Google Scholar]
  15. (1988) Proficiency: Understanding the construct. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10: 181–195. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007300
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007300 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lazaraton, A.
    (1992) The structural organization of a language interview: A conversation analytic perspective. System20: 373–386. doi: 10.1016/0346‑251X(92)90047‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(92)90047-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Levinson, S.
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Liskin-Gasparro, J.
    (1984) The ACTFL proficiency guidelines: Gateway to testing and curriculum. Foreign Language Annals17: 475–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1984.tb01736.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01736.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Lowe, P.
    (1983) The ILR interview: Origins, applications, pitfalls, and implications. Die Unterrichts Praxis2: 230–240. doi: 10.2307/3530138
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3530138 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1986) Proficiency: Panacea, framework, process? A reply to Kramsh, Schultz, and in particular, to Bachman and Savignon. Modern Language Journal70.4: 391–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05295.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05295.x [Google Scholar]
  21. (1988) ILR handbook on oral interview testing. Washington, DC: DLI/LS Oral Interview.
  22. McNamara, T.
    (1996) Measuring second language performance. London: Addisson Wesley Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1996) Interaction in second language performance assessment. Plenary address. American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Conference. Chicago IL, 26 March 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Messick, S.
    (1989) Validity. In R.L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement. New York: Macmillan, pp.13–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mishler, E.
    (1986) Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ross, S.
    (1992) Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interview. Language Testing9: 173–186. doi: 10.1177/026553229200900205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900205 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ross, S. , & R. Berwick
    (1992) The discourse of accommodation in oral proficiency examinations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition14: 159–176. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100010809
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010809 [Google Scholar]
  28. Sacks, H. , E. Schegloff , & G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Language50.4: 696–735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  29. Savignon, S.
    (1985) Evaluation of communicative competence: The ACTFL provisional proficiency guidelines. Modern Language Journal69: 129–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1985.tb01928.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1985.tb01928.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Schegloff, E. , & H. Sacks
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotics8: 287–327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schegloff, E. , G. Jefferson , & H. Sacks
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53: 361–82. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schiffrin, D.
    (1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1990) Conversational analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics11: 3–16. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500001926
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001926 [Google Scholar]
  34. (1994) Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Shohamy, E.
    (1982) Affective considerations in language testing. Modern Language Journal66: 13–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1982.tb01015.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb01015.x [Google Scholar]
  36. (1983) The stability of oral proficiency assessment on the oral interview testing procedures. Language Learning33: 527–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1983.tb00947.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00947.x [Google Scholar]
  37. (1988) A proposed framework for testing the oral language of second/foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10: 165–179. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007294
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007294 [Google Scholar]
  38. Valdman, A.
    (1988) Introduction to the assessment of foreign language oral proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition10.2: 121–128. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100007269
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007269 [Google Scholar]
  39. Van Lier, L.
    (1989) Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching, and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly23: 489–508. doi: 10.2307/3586922
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586922 [Google Scholar]
  40. (1988) The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (1996) Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman. doi: 10.1007/BF00641606
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00641606 [Google Scholar]
  42. Young, R. , & Milanovic
    (1992) Discourse variation in Oral Proficiency Interviews. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Young, R.
    (1995a) Conversational styles in language proficiency interviews. Language Learning45.1: 3–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00961.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x [Google Scholar]
  44. (1995b) Discontinuous interlanguage development and its implications for oral proficiency rating scales. Applied Language Learning6: 13–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Conversation; Oral proficiency interview; Speech event
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error