oa Communicated and non-communicated acts in relevance theory

References

1. Andersen, G. , and T. Fretheim
   (in press) (eds.) Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.79
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.79 [Google Scholar]
2. Arundale, R.B.
   (1999) An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory. Pragmatics9: 119–153.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blakemore, D.
   (1991) Performatives and parentheticals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society91: 197–213.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carston, R. , and S. Uchida
   (1998) (eds.)Relevance theory: Applications and implications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.37
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.37 [Google Scholar]
5. Cosmides, L. , and J. Tooby
   (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow , L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dominicy, M. , and N. Franken
   (forthcoming) Speech acts and relevance theory. To appear in D. Vanderveken and S. Kubo (eds.) Essays in speech act theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.77.16dom
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.77.16dom [Google Scholar]
7. Escandell-Vidal, V.
   (1996) Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. In K. Jaszczolt and K. Turner (eds.), Contrastive semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp.629–650.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Franken, N.
   (1997) Les performatifs dans la théorie de la pertinence. Paper presented atthe 3ème Rencontre des Jeunes Linguistes, Université du Littoral, Dunkerque, 16–17 May 1997.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Jary, M.
   (1998a) Relevance theory and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics30: 1–19. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)80005‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)80005-2 [Google Scholar]
10. Jary, M.
    (1998b) Is relevance theory asocial?Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses11: 157–169.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Humphrey, N.
    (1976) The social function of the intellect. In P.P.G. Bateson and R.A. Hinde (eds.), Growing points in ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Myers-Scotton, C.
    (1993) Common and uncommon ground: Social and structural factors in codeswitching. Language in Society22: 475–503. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500017449
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017449 [Google Scholar]
13. Myers-Scotton, C.
    (1995) What do speakers want? Codeswitching as evidence of intentionality in linguistic choices. In P. Silberman and J. Loftin (eds.), SALSA 2 (Papers from the Symposium about Language and Society at Austin). Austin: University of Texas, Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Nicolle, S.
    (1999) On the translation of implicit information: Experimental evidence and further considerations. Notes on Translation13.3: 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Nicolle, S.
    (in press)Markers of general interpretive use in Amharic and Swahili. In G. Andersen and T. Fretheim (eds.) Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.174–188. doi: 10.1075/pbns.79.08nic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.79.08nic [Google Scholar]
16. Okamoto, S.
    (1999) Situated politeness: Manipulating honorific and non-honorific expressions in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics9: 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
17. O’Neill, J.
    (1988-89) Relevance and pragmatic inference. Theoretical Linguistics15: 241–261.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Recanati, F.
    (1987) Meaning and force. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Rouchota, V. , and A. Jucker
    (1998) (eds.)Current issues in relevance theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.58
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.58 [Google Scholar]
20. Sperber, D.
    (1994) The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L.A. Hirschfeld and S.A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.39–67. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511752902.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752902.003 [Google Scholar]
21. Sperber, D. , and D. Wilson
    (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Terkourafi, M.
    (1999) Frames for politeness: A case study. Pragmatics9: 97–117.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tooby, J. and L. Cosmides
    (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow , L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Wilson, D. and D. Sperber
    (1993) Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua90: 1–25. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90058‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90058-5 [Google Scholar]