oa Caution and consensus in American business meetings

References

1. Agha, Asif
   (1994) Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology23: 277–302. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.001425
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.001425 [Google Scholar]
2. Balholm, Field and Associates
   (1992) High commitment high performance team training.
3. Boden, Deirdre
   (1994) The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bourdieu, Pierre
   (1990) The scholastic point of view. Cultural Anthropology5.4: 380–391. doi: 10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00030
   https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
5. Briggs, Charles L.
   (1997a) Introduction: From the ideal, the ordinary, and the orderly to conflict and violence in pragmatic research. Pragmatics7.4: 451–459.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Briggs, Charles L.
   (ed.) (1997b) Special issue on conflict and violence in pragmatic research. Pragmatics7.4.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, Penelope , and Stephen C. Levinson
   (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Button, Graham
   (ed.) (1992) Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa , and Malcolm Coulthard
   (eds.) (1996) Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dalton, Melville
    (1959) Men who manage. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Davidson, Judy
    (1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Drew, Paul , and John Heritage
    (1992a) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Drew, Paul , and John Heritage
    (eds.) (1992b) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Duranti, Alessandro
    (1992) Intentions, self and responsibility: An essay in Samoan ethnopragmatics. In J.H. Hill and J.T. Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eelen, Gino
    (1999) Politeness and ideology: A critical review. Pragmatics9.1: 163–173.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ehlich, Konrad , and Johannes Wagner
    (eds.) (1995) The discourse of business negotiation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110881516
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110881516 [Google Scholar]
17. Engeström, Yrjö , and David Middleton
    (eds.) (1996) Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174077
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077 [Google Scholar]
18. Fairclough, Norman
    (1989) Language and power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Firth, Alan
    (1991) Discourse at work: Negotiating by telex, fax, and phone. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Language and Intercultural Studies, Aalborg University, Denmark.
20. Firth, Alan
    (ed.) (1995) The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Foucault, Michel
    (1977) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan . New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Foucault, Michel
    (1980) Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Translated by Colin Gordon , Leo Marshall , John Mepham , Kate Sopher . Edited by C. Gordon . New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Francis, David
    (1995) Negotiation, decision-making and formalism: The problem of form and substance in negotiation analysis. In K. Ehlich and J. Wagner (eds.), The discourse of business negotiation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gal, Susan
    (1989) Language and political economy. Annual Review of Anthropology18: 345–367. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.18.100189.002021
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.18.100189.002021 [Google Scholar]
25. Gal, Susan , and Kathryn Woolard
    (eds.) (1995) Special issue on constructing languages and publics. Pragmatics5.2.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goffman, Erving
    (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Goodwin, Charles
    (1986) Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies9: 205–217. doi: 10.1007/BF00148127
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148127 [Google Scholar]
28. Goodwin, Charles , and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
    (1992) Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    (1982) Processes of dispute management among urban black children. American Ethnologist9: 76–96. doi: 10.1525/ae.1982.9.1.02a00050
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1982.9.1.02a00050 [Google Scholar]
30. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    (1983) Aggravated correction and disagreement in children’s conversations. Journal of Pragmatics7: 657–677. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90089‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90089-9 [Google Scholar]
31. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    (1990) He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hill, Jane H. , and Judith T. Irvine
    (1992) Introduction. In J.H. Hill and J.T. Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jackall, Robert
    (1988) Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Jefferson, Gail , Harvey Sacks , and Emanuel A. Schegloff
    (1987) Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kangasharju, Helena
    (1996) Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation. Journal of Pragmatics26: 291–319. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00051‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00051-8 [Google Scholar]
36. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss
    (1977) Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kienpointner, Manfred
    (ed.) (1999) Special issue on ideologies of politeness. Pragmatics9.1.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kroskrity, Paul , Bambi Schieffelin , and Kathryn Woolard
    (eds.) (1992) Special issue on language ideologies. Pragmatics 2.3.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kunda, Gideon
    (1992) Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lerner, Gene H.
    (1993) Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text13.2: 213–245.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Mao, Lu Ming Robert
    (1994) Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics21: 451–486. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90025‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6 [Google Scholar]
42. Maynard, Douglas W.
    (1984) Inside plea bargaining: The language of negotiation. New York: Plenum Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑0372‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0372-3 [Google Scholar]
43. Miller, Laura
    (1989) The Japanese language and honorific speech: Is there a Nihongo without keigo?Penn Linguistics Review13: 38–46.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mills, C. Wright
    (1951) White collar. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Okamoto, Shigeko
    (1999) Situated politeness: Coordinating honorific and non-honorific expressions in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics9.1: 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ourousoff, Alexandra
    (1993) Illusions of rationality: False premises of the liberal tradition. Man28: 281–298. doi: 10.2307/2803414
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2803414 [Google Scholar]
47. Pomerantz, Anita
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Riesman, David
    (1950) The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Rosenbaum, James E.
    (1984) Career mobility in a corporate hierarchy. Orlando: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sacks, Harvey
    (1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
52. Sarangi, Srikant , and Celia Roberts
    (1999a) The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. In S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208375
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375 [Google Scholar]
53. Sarangi, Srikant , and Celia Roberts
    (eds.) (1999b) Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208375
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375 [Google Scholar]
54. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1995) Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction. In P. Ten Have and G. Psathas (eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , Gail Jefferson , and Harvey Sacks
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53: 361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
56. Schieffelin, Bambi , Kathryn A. Woolard , and Paul Kroskrity
    (eds.) (1998) Language ideologies: Practice and theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1984) Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society13: 311–335. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500010526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010526 [Google Scholar]
58. Schwartzman, Helen
    (1989) The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Plenum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Silverstein, Michael
    (1998) Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology27: 401–426. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.401
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.401 [Google Scholar]
60. Wasson, Christina
    (1996) “Your candor would be appreciated”: Performing contradictory identities in business meetings. Paper read atDiscourse as Mosaic: Linguistic Re/Production of Identities and Ideologies, at Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wasson, Christina
    (1998) “Feeding the gorilla”: Meetings, work and hierarchy in corporate America. Paper read atAmerican Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, December 4, Philadelphia.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Wasson, Christina
    (2000) “Feeding the gorilla”: Talk and surveillance in business meetings. Paper read at4th International Conference on Organizational Discourse, July 28, London.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Watts, Richard J.
    (1992) Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behavior: Reconsidering claims for universality. In R.J. Watts , S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory, and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Watts, Richard J.
    (1999) Language and politeness in early eighteenth century Britain. Pragmatics9.1: 5–20.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Watts, Richard J. , Sachiko Ide , and Konrad Ehlich
    (eds.) (1992) Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory, and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Whyte, William H.
    (1956) The organization man. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Wodak, Ruth
    (ed.) (1989) Language, power, and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ct.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.7 [Google Scholar]
68. Woolard, Kathryn , and Bambi Schieffelin
    (1994) Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology23: 55–82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415 [Google Scholar]