1887
Volume 11, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Discourse and communication approaches to culture have traditionally been concerned with the role of language in (mis)representing cultures. But how text and talk reproduce and transform cultures is just beginning to be understood. Proceeding from the view that cultural creation, development and transformation are constituted in and through situated discursive practice, this study explores the interconnections between argumentative discourse and cultural reproduction. The research is based on multinational and multilingual data of journalistic communication on Hong Kong’s historic transition. It is shown that the causes of Hong Kong’s economic success, as an important cultural feature, are used as arguments to undermine contrary claims. It is also revealed that the future development of Hong Kong is being constrained by the argument ad baculum. In addition, it is observed that Hong Kong’s identities are used as bases for prescribing desired course of action. Finally, these argumentative strategies are re-examined in their broader historical and cultural context in order to show how Hong Kong’s past, present and future are cultural realities bound up with Western desire and power.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.11.3.03shi
2001-01-01
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antaki, C
    (1994) Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Antaki, C. , & S. Widdicombe
    (eds.) (1998) Identities in Talk. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, J.L
    (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin, M.M
    (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four essays. (Ed. M. Holquist ; trans. C. Emerson , & M. Holquist .). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (Trans. V.W. McGee ). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauman, R. , & J. Sherzer
    (eds.) (1996) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhabha H.K
    (1992) Postcolonial authority and postmodern guilt. In L. Grossberg , C. Nelson & P. Treichler (eds.), Cultural Studies. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 56-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Billig, M
    (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourdieu, P
    (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, J
    (1992) Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of 'postmodernism'. In J. Butler , & J.W. Scott (eds.), Feminists Theorize the Politica.l New York: Routledge, pp. 3-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Buttny, R
    (1993) Social Accountability in Communication. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carbaugh, D.A
    (1988) Talking American: Cultural Discourses on Donahue. London: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (ed.) (1990) Cultural Communication and Intercultural Contact. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clifford, J
    (1988) The Predicament of Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cole, M
    (1996) Cultural Psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Deleuze, G
    (1988) Foucault. London: The Athlone Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Edwards, D
    (1991) Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory and Psychology. 1: 515-42. doi: 10.1177/0959354391014007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354391014007 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fabian, J
    (1983) Time and the Other: How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Foucault, M
    (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings1972-1977. Ed. Colin Gordon . New York: Pentheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Garssen, B
    (1997) Argumentatieschema's in pragma-dialektisch perspektief. Amsterdam: IFOTT.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Giddens, A
    (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Govier, T
    (1987) Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gramsci, A
    (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. and trans. Q. Hoare & G.N. Smith . London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Grennan, W
    (1997) Informal Logic. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Grice, H.P
    (1975) Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Grodin, D. , & T.R. Lindlof
    (eds.) (1996) Constructing the Self in a Mediated World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781483327488
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327488 [Google Scholar]
  28. Habermas, J
    (1972) Knowledge and Human Interests. (Trans. & Intro. by T. McCarthy ). Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hall, S
    (1996a) Cultural studies: Two paradigms. In J. Storey (ed.), What is Cultural Studies: A reader. London: Arnold, pp. 31-48. (Also 1980, Media, Culture and Society, 2)
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kienpointner, M
    (1983) Argumentations analyse. Innsbruck: Inst. für Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1992) Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann /Holzboog.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (1993) The empirical relevance of Perelman's new rhetoric. In Argumentation. 7.4: 419-437. doi: 10.1007/BF00711059
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711059 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1996) Vernünftig argumentieren. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kienpointner, M. , & W. Kindt
    (1997) On the problem of bias in political argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics. 27: 555-85. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00035‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00035-5 [Google Scholar]
  35. Knight, A. , & Y. Nakano
    (eds.) (1999) Reporting Hong Kong: Foreign media and the handover. London: Curzon.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Marcus, G
    (1986) Afterword: Ethnographic writing and anthropological careers. In J. Clifford & G.E. Marcus (eds.), Writing Culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography, pp. 262-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McHoul, A. , & W. Grace
    (1993) A Foucault Primer. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Perelman, Ch. , & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca
    (1971) The New Rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pratt, M.L
    (1992Imperial Eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Quintilianus
    (1953) Institutio oratoria. London: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rabinow, P
    (1986) Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In J. Clifford & G.E. Marcus (eds.), Writing Culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography, pp. 234-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sadock, J.M
    (1978) On testing for conversational implicature. In P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 281-297.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Said, E.W
    (1993) Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schellens, P.J
    (1985Redelijke argumenten. Dordrecht: ICG Printing.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Scott, M.B. , & S. Lyman
    (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review. 33: 46-62. doi: 10.2307/2092239
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239 [Google Scholar]
  46. Shi-xu
    (1994) Ideology: Strategies of reason and functions of control in accounts of the non-Western Other. Journal of Pragmatics21.6: 645-69. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90102‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90102-3 [Google Scholar]
  47. (1995b) Cultural perceptions: Exploiting the unexpected of the Other. Culture and Psychology. 1.3: 315-42. doi: 10.1177/1354067X9513001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9513001 [Google Scholar]
  48. (1996) Concepts of 'language' in discourse: An interactional resource in troubled intercultural contexts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 122: 47-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (1997) Cultural Representations: Analyzing the discourse of the Other. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (1999) Attributional explanation: Exploring structural and qualitative complexities.Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 18.4: 356-76. doi: 10.1177/0261927X99018004001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018004001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Shweder, R.A
    (1990) Cultural Psychology - what is it?In J.W. Stigler , R.A. Shweder & G. Herdt Cultral (Eds.), Psychology: Essays on comparative human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-43. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173728.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173728.002 [Google Scholar]
  52. Streeck, J
    (1994) Culture, meaning, and interpersonal communication. In M.L. Knapp & G.R. Miller (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 286-319.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Taylor, C
    (1999) Two theories of modernity. Public Culture. 11.1: 153-74. doi: 10.1215/08992363‑11‑1‑153
    https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-11-1-153 [Google Scholar]
  54. Thompson, J
    (1995) The Media and Modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Toulmin, S
    (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Eemeren, F.H. , & R. Grootendorst
    (1992) Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A pragma- dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Eemeren, F.H. , R. Grootendorst , & F. Snoeck Henkemans
    (1996) Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Voloshinov, V.N
    (1986) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Walton, D
    (1992) The Place of Emotion in Argument. Univ. Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (1996) Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Williams, R
    (1976) Keywords. London: Fontana. (2nd ed. 1983).
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wittgenstein, L
    (1968) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.11.3.03shi
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Argumentation , Culture , Discourse , Politics , Power and Social constructionism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error