1887
Volume 11, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The speeches delivered by Al Gore and George W. Bush at the conclusion of the contested 2000 U.S. presidential campaign are of especial interest because they represent a type of political speech that is virtually unique and, because the speakers and their staffs had no previous models to fall back upon, as spontaneous as political utterance currently gets. This paper analyzes those speeches, focusing on the relationships between their forms and what their speakers feel they have to do, and finds interesting similarities as well as differences, in style and content, between them.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.11.3.04lak
2001-01-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bronner, Ethan
    (2001) Posner vs. Dershowitz. The New York Times Book Review, July15 2001: 11-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Duranti, Alessandro
    (1994) From Grammar to Politics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fairclough, Norman
    (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fiske, John
    (1996) Media Matters: Race and gender in U.S. politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ivins, Molly
    (2000) Shrub. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lakoff, Robin , & Deborah Tannen
    (1984) Communicative strategy and metastrategy in pragmatic theory: The case of Scenes from a Marriage . Semiotica49.3/4: 323-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nader, Laura
    (1995) Civilization and its negotiators. Understanding Disputes: The Politics of Law, ed. Pat Kaplan . Oxford: Berg, pp. 39-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1997) Controlling processes: Tracing the dynamic components of power. Mintz Lecture. Current Anthropology38.5 (Dec.): 711-737. doi: 10.1086/204663
    https://doi.org/10.1086/204663 [Google Scholar]
  9. Posner, Richard
    (2001) Breaking the Deadlock. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781400824281
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400824281 [Google Scholar]
  10. Verschueren, Jef
    (2001) Predicaments of criticism. Critique of Anthropology21.1: 59-81 (March 2001) DOI: 10.1177/0308275X0102100104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X0102100104 [Google Scholar]
  11. Watzlawick, Paul , Janet H. Beavin , & Don D. Jackson
    (1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.11.3.04lak
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Acceptance , Cencession and Political speech
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error